Our office does certify the funding though. Thats where we do work with the department of Public Health. Good, and certifying the funding means . We review the d. P. H. Says these are the costs and this is what we spent and we review it. Is this generating what the mayor would want to see, does that happen . I do not think so, but i can confirm that for you. Okay, cool. There was a fair look at mhsa last year indiscernible . System review. And were audited by the state so our quality review and our annual reviews have items related to mhsa outcomes. I know that theres a lot in here. One of the things that was in here that i was interested in that i did not know about but seems relevant to some of our current discussions around access is the behavioral access center. What is that, and what does that do . So is it a place . Yes, its 1380 howard. We are located were at the very right at the entrance lobby on the first floor there towards the left. I have heard of this. Yes. So it serves as an entry access point for Health Services. A center and thats an access point for Mental Health . Yes. They help them with applications for medical. And they also provide information for the various providers and all of that information is provided to any community or San Francisco resident who is interested in becoming part of the Behavioral Health services. Supervisor mandelman i believe that the hours are monday to friday and 9 00 to 5 00 and not open on the weekends and into the evening hours. But with there being a place in San Francisco where anyone with Behavioral Health needs is supposed to go or could go and drop in at least if its between 9 00 and 5 00, and receive a referral, get connected to clinicians, connected with whatever else one might need, that place exists correct. Supervisor mandelman it may not be we may think of the hours, whether it might need some more hours but thats an existing current yeah, i had heard about this. I didnt connect that this is what that was. But im glad that we have it and maybe that we need to expand it. Right. Supervisor mandelman thank you. Supervisor fewer okay, theres no report on this so lets open up for Public Comment. Any members of the public that would like to comment on item number 7 . All my demonstrations that i put before you, when i showed you the two towers, 144unit Apartment Building complex was bought at the Bargain Basement price of 56 million and then another Apartment Unit complex, 87 units and thats a threestory building as well for the mere price of 57 million. And then you talk about theres no place like home . The best treatment to give the people who all of you want to help is to give them a home. Now youve already on the right track in the Mission District where youre talking about building building for people who have mental disabilities. But is that 100 for people that have mental disabilities . Or is that just a big large Apartment Building complex and you are only putting two or three people in the building thats got a mental disability . All of this money that you spend and you give to trent royal and all of the money to the Behavioral Health money, all of this money that youre giving to the Overall Department of Public Health should be spent on building those type of Apartment Building complexes and get that 8,011 people thats homeless out on the street who you claim thaw want to help. Youre not going to be help all of those people with a program and an office and a headquarter spread out through the city. How you going to provide all of these services that you put up there on the viewer, which is a good track youre on the right track but how you going to help them when you dont even know where theyre at . All you know is they in the city and county of san damned francisco. And if you house them first, understand me, then you can provide the services for the people thaw want to help because they have a place to live. You are doing it tailend, ass backwards. You have been doing this for well over several generations and thats why you have so many people homeless out on streets right now. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. Next speaker, please. Well, i feel certain that you have the best of intentions but i ask, nonetheless, how is it that now while we are presently suing a number of important pharmaceuticals, manufacturers and their regional distributors for a significant sum of billions of dollars owing to their illegal conduct in the mass promotion of highly addictive substances and by we, i mean cities and counties and states throughout the county as plaintiffs in multiple lawsuits. Im glad that San Francisco has come around to join the litigation. How can it seem like a good idea for taxpayers, with the bill, for example, for Mental Health care, for all possibly opening the door to future potential abuse on a significant scale. Again, to the benefit the financial benefit of our industry, possibly to the detriment of society and the individuals within it. Present Mental Health programs are already funded and they have a source of revenue and the budget has expanded by 1 billion yearoveryear at the expense of the local economy. Can you Work Together with your colleagues to better organize the budget, potentially and hopefully for the benefit of the Small Businesses just beyond your doors. Thank you. Supervisor fewer thank you very much, any other Public Comment, seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. Supervisor, would you like to make a motion . I move that we forward this to the full board with a positive recommendation. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. Madam clerk. Call item number 8. Clerk item number 8, ordinance delegating the authority to the general manager of the Public Utilities commission, for revenue from such an agreement is 1 million or more and amending the administrative code to establish a low carbon fuel standard credits sales fund to receive funds from the credits sales for use in connection with projects that will reduce San Franciscos Carbon Footprint and or advance its sustainability goals. Supervisor fewer thank you very much and so before we start the presentation id like to say that i would like to continue this item and hear the presentation next week. In the meantim meantime id likk the b. L. A. To do a report on this, and do you think that could be ready by the next budget meeting . Yes, we will have a report for the next budget. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. So i will take Public Comment on this item now and well hear the presentation next week along with the b. L. A. Report. Thank you very much for coming today. Lets open this up for Public Comment. Are there any members of the public that would like to comment on item number 8 . The part here where youre talking about the Public Utilities commission and the fuel standards, the only thing that i could see as far as the Public Comment that relates which makes me think about is the way that preferential treatment is being given to pg e for starting all of these fires and then having the problem further compounded by means of gathering with the taxpayer money to help pg e to pay for the damages they delivered to their customers is outrageous. How you going to help the victims of a lawsuit who win a lawsuit and youre going to help to defend it and pay for a lawsuit and you are supposed to be the government . Thats a contradiction. How you going to go and help a defendant pay for his violation of personal injury law and the destruction of property if premises Liability Law and then turn around and go help the difficult . Defendant . Thats a conflict of interest and a waste of the taxpayers money and you have 8,011 people homeless in San Francisco, not including the hundreds and thousands of people thats homeless lined up in tents leading up to the state Capital Building where Gavin Newsome works. Thats disgusting. So i object to him doing that and hes setting us up for a lawsuit because youre not helping other people in lawsuits who lose and helping the defendants to pay the fees. Sincerely. Supervisor fewer thank you. Any other Public Comments . Public comment is now closed. So id like to make a motion to continue this to the next meeting of the budget and finance committee. And we can take that without objection. Thank you very much. Madam clerk, read item number 9. Cloik item 9, approving amendment 42 agreement cs991, preliminary design and Environmental Services for the transmission and the distribution project and authorizing the proper Utilities Commission to execute the amendment increasing the agreement apound by 4 million for a total not to exceed the amount of 11 million for a term of august 1, 2010, to august 31, 2022. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. And i thablg we have mr mr. Ramonabu. Yes. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. So, good morning, chair fewer and supervisor mandelman. And im the Deputy Assistant general manager for power enterprise. Today we are requesting your approval of amendment number 4 to cs991 with for the continued work on the big corridor transmission and distribution projects. And just a background information, with what is the big corridor transmission distribution project . Known as bctdp. And it will be constructed along the bayside of San Francisco. And well have some independence from pg e and control of our own Distribution System and a capacity of 75 megawatts. And we will still be interconnecting at 230,000 volts or 230 k. B. And well be distributing the voltage to our customers at about 12,000 volts. And so the substation basically will convert the high voltage to 12 k. V. So just to give you additional background, what happened with this contract and the reason for the extension is that when this project was initiated it was initiated back in 2006, with the closure of pg es power plant that was shutdown in 2007. In 2008 well, during that period there was a major concern about the reliability of the electric service in San Francisco. And so in 2008, the mayor and the board of supervisors directe sfpuc to have a transmission project, that means that well build a transmission line between watersville and to enter the city. And a new youer substation in order to bring the power directly into the city to replace what was then the potrero plant substation. And then in 2010, this contract was initiated and the project went on to 2012, and at that time a preliminary report was prepared by dnrus, addressing the issues or the challenges that well be facing in building the transmission line from warnerville into San Francisco. And so but at the same time there was some changes happening with our relationship with pg e and the Interconnection Agreement was expiring. And so its redefining the use of the transmission line. And so theres some Business Decisions that needed to be made. So at that time the project was actually stalled. So from about march 2012 to january 2016, there was no work that was done on the project until we can address those business concerns. So why are we doing this, were investing in our own distribution to serve our local communities. This is going to be the beginning of it. And we will have control to provide safe timely and Reliable Service to customers and i want to emphasize safety and reliability. This will be a brandnew system that we will control ourselves. And theres a lot of development along the corridor, that is why we selected this project, this location, to build this transmission system. And at the bottom of the diagrams you can see thats where the substation is going to be and towards the middle you will see where the potrero substation is. So at the end of the connection from potrerch ro substation well be building distribution substation next to the plant on 398 queen street. And the idea for this bctd is to be able to make it scalable and to be able to grow it based on the needs that we have and other customers that wed pick up from pg e and we are exploring other construction so that we can build up and integrate a fully distributed system in the city of San Francisco. Potential Customer Base shown here, theres development at the seawall at 337, through 370 and were doing their projects so we can support the need for the southeast plan to meet the regulatory requirements to have a reliable backup service into the plant for the sewer treatment. Just to show you what 75 m. V. A. Or megawatts is, this is the load that we anticipate from the customers that were going to be serving, effective in the spring of 2021. 75 m. B. A. , well build up through at least 60 megawatts so well have a lot of capacity, redundancy and reliability to keep light the lights on. So there has been three amendments today and the contribute is dated back to june 2010, to review the transmission interconnection or the transmission system. And then the project was stalled and so the First Amendment was to extend the contract so that we can continue with the work and then number two in may, we defined the project better and there was an amendment for additional funding and also an extension. And then amendment number 3 happened recently when we have identified the location for the substation. We needed time to prepare the budget and the request to come here today before you today for approval and we needed the five months. The contract was going to expire before we could prepare so we only asked for an extension to give us time to prepare for this meeting. Or to prepare the report. So the total project is going to be 11,500,000. And the total is 11 years and 8 months duration. And noting that we did have a time period where we didnt do any work for about three years and six months. So im here to request for you to adopt the amendments, the legislation, as proposed by sfpuc, with one minor correction the date of completion will be april 2022, not august 2022 as shown in the legislation, so well update that. We ask that you authorize to execute amendment number 4 for the bctd project and increasing the amount by 4 million, and about two years and eight months, and at the same time also to correct the name for you, u. S. Corporation america, to u. S. Corporation. Their name has recently changed. Thank you. And im open to questions. Supervisor fewer thank you, any questions . Seeing none can we hear from the b. L. A. , please. The board of supervisors is being asked to approve the Fourth Amendment to the contract between p. U. C. And u. R. S. Corporation and they provide engineering and dine services for the bay corridor and cust distribution project. This is the first time that its come before the board because it increases the contract amount by 4 million from 5. 7 million to 11. 5 million and extends the term to 2022, which is consistent with the extension of the project itself. And we recommend approval. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. Lets open this up for Public Comment now. Are there any members of the public that would like to comment on item number 9 . Pretty good idea, sir. But i think that my ideas and plus with my hands on demonstrated experience of being in the oil business as a kid during my younger years is that it will make things better. First of all, the transmission of electrical power thaw are genrthat you are generating fro, and to use power lines to bring that amount of voltage into the city. You should transmit that power in a conduit line which is like a pipeline thats under the ground surface, so you wont create all of these hazardous fires like pg e has already demonstrated and wiped out thousands of homes. And the loss of lives behind that poor maintenance and old obsolete transmission of power. And youre talking about being independent, and id like to see you further expand and get your own license and start up your own Solar Company and create jobs and make solar panels without going through a private contractor and be your own corporation and start using solar power along with your original idea, sir. That would cut back and free the city from being at the need of operating electricity with pg e. Pg e is disgusting. Come every time you turn around theyre getting preferential treatment for delivering damages and then when they get sued you turn around and you want to charge the Company Strike that you want to charge the customer to pay the fee on the violation and premises Liability Law damages that you delivered to the customer. Thats disgusting. Their executives is getting multibillion dollar bonuses and then you talk about they dont have any money to pay the customers of who they hurt, and the lives that are lost. And forget the nuisance supervisor fewer thank you, mr. Wright. Any other Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. And the City Attorney says that these amendments are not substantive so id like to make a motion to accept the amendments. Thank you very much, we can take that without objection. And then i would like to make a motion to move this to the board with a positive recommendation as amended. Thank you very much, madam clerk. Can you please call item 10. Cloik item number 10, authorizing agreement between the California Independent system operator for Reliability Coordinator Services for an initial term of 18 months from january 7,2019, through july 6,2020, with an automatic renewal of the Contract Term in excess of 10 years and a maximum cost of not to exceed their 3 million. Supervisor fewer thank you very much, and i believe that we have cheryl speary. The Administrative Services manager, with the Regional Water system. That is correct. Thank you, and good morning, chair fewer and supervisor mandelman. The sfuc is requesting an approval for an ordinance to authorize them to enter into an agreement with the California Independent system operator or ciso, for Coordinator Services from january 7th through july 6th, 2020, with automatic renewals. Its in anticipated to have a cost of 150,000 per year. It complies with the electrical reliability standards, mandated by the north American ElectricReliability Corporation or nerc. Under the authority of the regulatory commission. And the water and power is registered as a transmission operator under nerc. And nerc standards require that transmission operators have a reliability coordinator. Since 2014, these services have been provided by peak reliability. And the only reliability coordinator for our region. And in july of 2018, they announced theyd wind down their Coordinator Services operations by the end of 2019. In november 2018, ferc approved the caiso to provide Reliability Coordinator Services. And caiso provided the draft reliability coordinative Services Agreement on december 11, 2018. However, there was no ability to modify provisions of the agreement. And other than peak who was winding down there was no other reliability coordinator for our region. Caisa was requiring the execution of the Reliability Coordinator Services agreement by january 1, 2019, to participate in the confidential Training Data sharing with the caiso so we included in the customers transitions from peak to caiso. The manager signed the agreement on january 7, 2019, and caiso allowed water and power to participate in the confidential data sharing with the caiso so that we could be included in the first wave of customers transitioning. Had we not signed the agreement wed have to wait to december 2019. We would be out of compliance and subject to fines of up to 1. 27 million per day, per violation. San francisco administrative code section 21. 046 authorizes the general manager of the sfpuc to directly purchase ans Larry Services with Power Transmission for assuring Reliable Services perrent in with good utility practices. However, retro ak tiapproval of the retroactive approval is necessary for two reasons. The code states that the departments are prohibited from entering into contracts with automatic renewal provisions. And, two, since the Contract Term could potentially have a term of more than 10 years, the city charger section 9. 11 requires the board of supervisors approval. We respectfully request your approval. Thank you. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. Could we have a b. L. A. Report. It approves the agreement between p. U. C. And the California Independent system operator for Coordinator Services, Reliability Coordinator Services and the Network Application services. And this is retroactive to january of this year and the term is 18 months from january through the spring and summer of 2020. And there is an overlap with the current provider through november, our understanding is that the overlap has somewhat to do with the actual transition the software and the services during that period. This is a required Regulatory Service and there is a 20year annual automatic renewal, every 20 years and it would not come back to the board of supervisors, but we do recommend approval of the proposed agreement. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. This is retroactive, is this correct . Thats correct. Supervisor fewer and the reasons for it being retroactive . So had we not signed the agreement in january of 2019, we would not be included in the first wave of customers transitioning. And were required by law to have ar reliability coordinator but wed have to wait to december 2019 to be transitioned with the second wave of customers. So our current coordinator is phasing out in november. We would be left without any reliability coordinator from november, december, potentially going forward, given the transition thats required. Supervisor fewer thank you. Just a note for yourself that when this goes to the full board that there may be questions about it being retroactive so you might have to be prepared to answer those questions before the full board. Thank you very much. Lets take Public Comment now. Any members of the public that would like to comment on item 10 . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. Id like to make a motion to move this to the full board with a positive recommendation. I can take that without objection. Thank you very much. And now could you read item number 11. Clerk item number 11, resolution approving the Fourth Amendment to the contract between the Municipal Transportation Agency and the Transbay Joint Powers Authority for Transbay Transit CenterProgram Services to extend the term for a term of july 21, 2009, through december 31, 2019, and relocate funding within task budgets at no additional costs. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. We have the m. C. A. Good morning, chair fewer and supervisor mandelman. We this is just an item to continue the contract that we had and its nothing its not asking for additional funding at all and its just in response to the delays that happened as a result of the construction of the transbay terminal. And so if youd like another briefing or to go further into it we can answer any questions now and weve got my colleague here who can answer any technical questions. But if you want to meet further we would be happy to do that some time this week as well. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. Theres no b. L. A. Report on this. Supervisors, you have any questions . Maybe you can give us a quick overview of you are asking us to approve an extension, is that correct . Correct. Madam fewer and supervisor mandelman, im the project manager, and this admin is to extend the time only because of the shutdown, we couldnt do all of the work, especially m. D. A. Related work. And we need to do a few tests over there. Like, the system testings and the traffic signal testings, to make sure they are still function the way that theyre supposed to function. So the next few months we are going to do that. And the extension of this time will help us to accommodate all of that. And thats what we are asking for with your approval so that we can get it done. Supervisor fewer okay, thank you very much. And so this is open for Public Comment. Any members of the public to comment on item number 11 in seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. And id like to move this to the board with a positive recommendation. Okay. Good. Without objection. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Madam clerk, please call item 12. Clerk item 12, resolution approving amendment number 2 to the agreement between richmond area multiservices and the department of Public Health for Behavioral Health senses through the peertopeer programs to increase the contract amount to 9 million, for a total not to exceed 28 million, to extend the term by one year, from july 1, 2020, for a total Agreement Term of july 1, 2015. Supervisor fewer we have the manager here. Good morning. Today the department is presenting a proposed amendment to improve the existing contract by 9,345, 495 with the richmond area multiservices to extend the term to june 30, 2021 for a total not to exceed 28,388,060. And the board of supervisors approved the amendment 1 on january 9, 2018. But a term of july 1, 2015, through june 30,2020 and not to exceed their 19,400,065. And it provides services to continue to recruit and employ and train, place, support and supervise the peertopeer staff within d. H. S. And community settings. Some of those Services Include the peertopeer services, and a peer specialist Mental Health certificate program, a transitional leadership employ Employment Program and a support to outpatient program. And it defines peers as individuals with personally lived experiences of mental illness, who are consumers of Mental Health and or Substance Abuse treatments and former consumers of Mental Health and or Substance Abuse treatment services, or family members of significant others. And the fiscal year 20182019, the department processed a revision to the currently existing contract which expanded peertopeer services under two new r. F. Q. S. And the authorized solicitation for these two new r. F. Q. S allow for services to be extended up to december 2024, and its beyond the term of the original r. F. Q. Supporting the current contract which ends june 30, 2020. And the department did not need to return to the board of supervisors to have funding from the two new solicitations because the department had not exceeded the existing Contract Term, ending june 20, 2020, and nor did he services exceed the approved not to exceed value of 19 million approved in amendment one. Instead of creating separate agreements as a result of these two new r. F. Q. S, these new services were added to the current peertopeer contract previously approved by the board of supervisors in 2018, under amendment 1. And to link all peertopeer services under one contract. Further, as a result of this extension of services due to these two new r. F. Q. S, the current approved contract including contingency has insufficient funding to cover the costs of services beyond the current Contract Term of june 30, 2020. Approval of the days proposed amendments here will exercise the remaining option 5ed under the original r. F. Q. To extend the contract by one year through to june 30, 2021 and to allocate the full amount of funding to have services. And a new r. F. Q. Will replace the original r. F. Q. On or before january 1, 2021 to allow for the selection, negotiation and a new contract which will begin july 1, 2020 to continue to provide services. Its very possible that if the services from the original r. F. Q. Are reawarded to r. A. M. S. , in the new r. F. Q. , a new contract could be created, likely containing all of the services again. And its possible that the two new services sorry the services from the two new r. F. Q. S could also become a standalone contract. And the d. H. S. Behavioral staff are here to answer any questions. And your approval is requested for this proposed resolution today. Thank you. Supervisor fewer thank you very much, mr. Reynold. Could we have a b. L. A. Report, please. The proposed resolution approves the Second Amendment to the existing contract between d. P. H. And rams. And the board approved the First Amendment in 2017. And extended the contract through 2020. And then increased the contract amount to 19 million. And at that time this was based on the original competitive solicitation back in 2014. Its for peertopeer services at 3. 2 million a year. And as mr. Morano said, the additional solicitation for Additional Services in 2017 and 2018, those are being folded into this contract. So now that the contract under the Second Amendment would be extended through 20 to june 2021, and increased by 9. 3 million to cover all of the services to 28. 4 million that includes a 12 contingency over the remaining three fiscal years and we recommend approval. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. Any comments . Seeing none, lets open it up for Public Comment. Any members of the public that would like to comment on item number 12 . This is another example of your discrimination and your differential treatment. The richmond area . Isnt that the avenues, the area where i went to high school, George Washington and predominantly white . You come up here and you want these millions of dollars and talking about you have Rehabilitation Centers and peer counselling in an area thats predominantly white and everybody is living there is in high income brackets. You are giving us no statistics on the amount of people thats coming into your system and the amount of people thats coming out of your system, and the results that you are getting from the people that youre claiming that you are helping. From the beginning of the first goddamned day of that contract you have not had one demonstration on the type of results that youre getting but you keep coming in here and getting millions of dollars. Is that clear . That supervision and management and the tax dollars going to work that aint getting no goddamned results pertaining to helping people who are most vulnerable and homeless out in the goddamned street. You have 8,011 people thats homeless. In fact, it turns out that its 30 more because you wasnt counting the people who was in the mental hospitals, in jails, and in facilities that wasnt out on street, but technically theyre homeless because when they complete their location where theyre located they go back out in the goddamned street. Thats the type of people that need that money spent on them so they can get their lives straightened out. Who have you helped . What kind of results do you get . Not one goddamned person that you can show that you have helped. Is that clear . And until you see some results i dont want to have a goddamned penny further approved and granted to that goddamned program. What the hell are you doing . Who are you serving . You aint serving nothing thats out in the street. Supervisor fewer thank you, mr. Wright. Any other Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. Well make the motion to move this to the board with a positive recommendation. We take that without objection. Thank you very much. And madam clerk, can you please call item number 13. Clerk call 13 and 14 together . Whatever you want. Supervisor fewer im going to take those items separately. Clerk item 13, to retroactively approve a revenue agreement between the public works and j. C. Decaux San Francisco, for a Kiosk Program with anticipated revenue of over 12. 9 million and a term of 21. 5 years, commencing on july 1, 2019. Supervisor fewer okay. Thank you very much. Id like to let folks know that ill make a motion to continue this item to the next Board Meeting and well not hear a presentation today and well not hear the b. L. A. Report today but well hear it in its entirety when my other member is also here in attendance. However, im happy to take Public Comment on item number 13 now. Another example of poor supervision and management. And nonopportunities, ber taining pertaining to housing to the most Vulnerable People who were never included in the housing opportunities that come out of the Mayors Program on housing. The people that need the toilets that are discharging their human waste and human and feces and shit all over the city of San Francisco, if you include them in the housing opportunity and follow the rules and the regulations of the redevelopment, section 410, where 15 of each and every Apartment Building complex that comes out of the goddamned Mayors Office on housing is supposed to be for very low and lowincome bracket and moderate incomes you wouldnt have Homeless People out there in the street discharging their human waste on the street in the first goddamned place. You contradict yourselves. When you have a problem like this you wonder why. And then you further demonstrate the professional stupidity by creating the job paying people 184,000 goddamned a year and you call them the poop squad detail. Got every goddamned city in the United States making fun of us. Thats disgusting. You are talking about you leading the economy and cleaning up. You want to spend time on plastic bags. Talking about taking care of the ecosystem. Were the only goddamned city that got more piles of shit in the overall city pertaining to the overall United States of america and youre talking about you are the leader . If you ever dreamed youre the leader in the ecosystem and you better wake u and apologize. You got that . Los angeles got homeless situations like this and it is a thyroid breakout which is equal to the ebola disease in three continents that has been affected with that. Is that clear . Supervisor fewer thank you mr. Wright. Any other Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed and i make a motion to continue this item until the next meeting of the budget and finance committee. I take that without objection. Thank you very much. Madam clerk, call item 14. Clerk item 14, retroactively approving the sixth revenue to the revenue agreement between public works and j. C. Decaux San Francisco, for the automatic Public Toilet and Public ServiceKiosk Program extending the Contract Term by 90 days, changing the termination date from january 25,2019, to april 25,2019. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. We have the Deputy Director and administration from public works here. Thank you, chair fewer and members of the budget and finance committee. We have a requested change to this resolution to reflect an extension of this agreement through to june 30th. Supervisor fewer i believe that supervisor peskin has joined us. Are you offering an amendment . Supervisor peskin as miss dawson said this would relative to the last item, make these co determineus, so wide be in favor of having we extended this agreement a number of times by extending it to june 30, 2019, is the intent of this resolution. Supervisor fewer okay. Thank you very much. And so this is the amendment in hand, is that correct, supervisor peskin . Supervisor peskin that is correct. So the april 25, 2019, date should be stricken and changed to june 30, 2019, and the 90 days should be changed to 156 days due to the delays of this supervisor. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. And, mr. City attorney, that is not substantive . Thank you very much. So lets open this up for Public Comment. Any members of the public that would like to comment on item 14 . Automatic toilet . Going hightech . Call yourself helping the Homeless People out so you can use a Hightech System . Instead of providing permanent housing so that people can have their own house, their own apartment, their own permanent housing . And the own permanent bathroom like youve got . Hightech toilet . What do you do have a smartphone in order to use it . You spend more time creating programs and the use of facilities for people thats homeless out in the street, when that money should be invested and providing permanent housing to get the people off the streets so they wont have to use the goddamned toilet thats located in the street in the first goddamned place. When are you going to wake up and smell the goddamned coffee . When am i going to be able to get you to look further than the tip of your nose as far as investing multimillions of dollars and getting the topclass return on your investment and keeping that ceiling on the most Vulnerable People thats out on the streets, thats homeless. That need help. And they need permanent housing. And the services that you want to provide pertain to Mental Health services, Drug Rehabilitation Services and any other services they need, inhomecare services and psychiatric services. I have demonstrated statements from professional people that the best way to provide Mental Services is to have permanent housing so that you can serve the people because theyre stationed at a place where you can go locate them and give them the services. Not run around like a chicken with its head cut off and trying to find out where theyre located. Supervisor fewer thank you, mr. Wright. Any other Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. I make a motion to approve the amendment. We can take that without objection. Thank you very much. And i make a motion to move this to the board as amended with the positive recommendation. Well take that without objection. Thank you very much. Mad okay clerk, please call item 15. Clerk item 15, ordinance approving Health Service system plans and contribution rates for calendar year 2020. Supervisor fewer supervisor mandelman. Supervisor mandelman thank you, madam chair. This ordinance approves the health plans and dental and longterm plans and contribution rates for the calendar year 2020, and those those plans are with the United Health care, blue shield and kaiser. And there are i believe compelling reasons why we ought to get this before the board for action prior to the august recess. However, back in april, this board of supervisors unanimously passed a resolution calling on kaiser to settle a contract with its Mental Health clinicians and those workers, those kaiser workers are out on strike today and i believe in solidarity with those workers and in the view of our past expressed support for those workers we should continue this for one week to our next Budget Committee and i so move. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. I think that we will not have the presentation today then. Any members of the public like to comment on item number 15 . This type of treatment that people with mental disabilitie disabilities thats seen by kaiser hospital, though its not under your umbrella and jurisdiction, if you want to address that issue and because their hospital location is on the premises of the city and county of San Francisco, you can use premises Liability Law against them. And by the same response incorporate medical malpractice lawsuits against them because theyre not providing the services for the people with the mental disabilities who have insurance and who theyre being paid to help. Thats called medical malpractice. Is that clear . You want to come down on kaiser. Ill show you how to come down on kaiser. If i have to, ill do it myself. Ill put so much law beside kaiser law that a. L. Mike their head swim. Thats disgusting. Theyre paying for services they cant get and its the same type of situation that veterans have come they come back from the combat zone and the Veterans Hospital would not treat them and a lot of the veterans would die waiting on the goddamned appointment. The same situation there but they can go to Alameda County and build the goddamned skyscraper and have a grand opening with the people waiting to be seen by a goddamned doctor. Thats disgusting. Its not saying too much for that mayor over there either. The only thing that she want to over there for the homeless is a shed. Thats disgusting. So and thats why i got on the administrations case here, you will provide 24 Mental Health services to the people on the street, 8,011 of them and its 30 more how you going to do that when you have 17 openings for psychiatrists within your own damned jurisdiction. You contradicting yourself. And this behavior cant get no professional help. What are you going to do, teach people out on the street to behave differently than what theyre behaving while theyre homeless on the street . Thats disgusting. And you need to put money into the direct Housing Program too. That program thats directed by margo afternoon ntonetti supervisor fewer thank you mr. Wright, thank you, mr. Wright. Any other Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Theres a motion to continue this item and we can take that without objection. Thank you very much. And madam clerk, call item 16 and 17 together. Clerk item session, thursdaying the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development to acquire Real Property located at 1515 south van necessary avenue from l. M. C. San francisco holdings for a purchase of their 19 million inclusive of a disposit in the amount of 500,000, placing the property under the jurisdiction of the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development for the use in constructing Affordable Housing for San Francisco. And item 16, the Community Development to accept and expend a grant the amount of 5 million from the metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Affordable Housing jumpstart gran program for the term of july 1, 2019 through june 30, 2029. Supervisor fewer i believe that we have jonathan gagan here. Thank you very much. Good morning, i am a multifamily project manager. Item number 16 before you is a resolution to approve and to authorize the director of property to acquire the site located at 1515 south van necessarnessavenue. And the total Purchase Price is 19 million which is subjected by an appraisal and to develop the site as a 100 Affordable Housing. I am also here to present item number 17, which is approval of a resolution to accept and extend 5 million from the metropolitan Transportation Commission as part of their Affordable Housing jumpstart program. These funds will go towards the acquisition costs of 1515 south van ness. And m. T. C. Selected the city and county of San Francisco as a recipient for the jumpstart funding in 2017. The following requirements apply to the grant the jumpstart funds must be used to secure sites for Affordable Housing development or to bridge funding gaps. The funding must be used in a community where theres a high risk of displacement. With these requirements in mind, m. C. D. Opted to use it for site acquisition in the Mission District. The city staff has worked since then to identify a site in the mission that would meet these criteria, generate more than 100 Affordable Homes and was available on the market at a fair price. The Purchase Price of 19 million includes a 500,000 deposit. And aside from the jumpstart grant, the remaining 14 million will come from 20182019 eraf, which is the education Revenue Augmentation fund. And they expect to close onsite acquisition in Early September per the terms of the purchase and Sale Agreement which is in front of you for your approval today. The site is currently vacant aside from its use as a staging area for construction on a nearby 100 Affordable Housing project. Historically mcmillian electrical, an Electrical Contractor business occupied this building. Once they acquire the site they will select a developer through a request for qualification process. And they will work with the selected developer to construct 100 of Affordable Housing plus retail and or community space. The site is located in the Mission Street transit zoning district. And they will refine the programs once the site is required but we expect that it will accommodate up to 150 units of Affordable Housing for families. And the site is entitled for up to 157 units of housing and 1,074 square feet of retail. To work with the Planning Department to determine whether the site will need to be reentitled. At this point we expect to begin construction in physical year, 20202023. And we ask the committee to approve both item is. Im joined here by amy khan from o. C. D. And another person from the real estate department. Thank you. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. Can we hear from the b. L. A. , please. Yes, item 17 is a resolution to approve the acceptance of a 5 million grant from m. T. C. , and this 5 million grant is a source of funds for the purchase of 1515 south van ness which is the item number 16, and table one page 46 of our report shows that the Funding Sources for the purchase of this site, 5 million is the grant, 14 million is the surplus eraf fund for the site. At the time of the writing of our report we did not have the appraisal review and we received the appraisal on monday and we received the appraisal review last night. Weve had time to read both of them. And they do confirm the Purchase Price of 19 million. So we recommend approval. Supervisor fewer thank you very much. And lets put this out for Public Comment. Any members of the public that would like to comment on item 16 and 17 . I havent heard nothing about the a. M. I. Scale and how much youre charging. The tenants to pay rent and none of these buildings that youre talking about. Every time you say 100 Affordable Housing, you set the requirement at about 80 of the a. M. I. Which is about 96,000. So every income that is below that income per year is not included in the housing opportunity. Thats not equal opportunity housing and thats not no goddamned 100 Affordable Housing. Is that clear . And as far as you developers is concerned, if you dont have a nonprofit developer that is not charging 56 million per 144 Apartment Unit complexes, i want this board to tell that goddamned developer to get the hell out of the city and county of city of san goddamned francisco. You have people in it for property, over safety. Just like they built 100 nonprofit developer and toured Gavin Newsome to the building and to provide permanent housing for the most Vulnerable People thats homeless out on the street and people that are not working and vulnerable that cant find housing based on their income. Is that clear . Im putting a halt to this, because each time you toss that 100 Affordable Housing, my thesis is going to show how youre not including the most Vulnerable People. And section 410 which i put before you that says each and every building that comes out of the mayors goddamned program on housing is supposed to be 15 for the very low and lowincome bracket and mod rarat families of income and you never include it. Supervisor fewer thank you mr. Wright. Any other Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed and i think that the only reservation is that this is about the appraisal and you have received the appraisal, is that correct . Id like to make a motion to move this to the board i mean to the full board with a positive recommendation. If i can take that without objection. Thank you very much. And madam clerk, can you please call item 18. Clerk item number 18, for a motion ordering to the voters for an election to be held on november 5, 2019, and ordinance amending the business and tax regulations code and administrative code to impose an excise tax on the net rider fares for rides facilitated by Transportation Network companies and rides provided by Autonomous Vehicles and private Transit Services vehicles, to Fund Transportation operations and infrastructure for Traffic Congestion mitigation to the city and to increase the citys appropriations limit by the amount collected under the tax for four years from november 35, 2019. Thank you, chair fewer. Chair fewer, supervisor mandelman, the longawaited much discussed as my chief of staff said, id supposed to say what a long strange trip its been, pun intended. So thank you for giving me the opportunity to hear this longawaited measure that is commonplace in many other cities and states, but we would be the first in the state of california if the voters see fit to have a per ride fee or tax, if you will, on the Transportation Network companies commonly known as uber and lyft. And as we are painfully aware, state law preempts us from regulating this industry in any number of ways. please stand by