saying, you know, the more people who were in their questioning what sort of pandemics we might have, the better. i think his suggestion about having a sort of red team to do micro whatever architecture you build, its only as good as a people within the building and the decisions they make. his idea of having a red team to challenge the thinking, i think, having a red team to challenge the thinking, ithink, is having a red team to challenge the thinking, i think, is an excellent one because there is always a danger of groupthink, and perhaps that what was happening here. we were so focused, or the system was so focused, or the system was so focused on pandemic influenza because of the well risks of it, that the system had got itself into a belief that that was the most likely pandemic and that s the one we needed to prepare for. i think oliver s statement is powerful. so oliver s statement is powerful. 50 cu oliver s statement is powerful. so you don t think that he let yo
more time had been spent on a high infectious asymptomatic pandemic, different recommendations would have been made about what was necessary to prepare for it. that s what i think is my focus. in to prepare for it. that s what i think is my focus. think is my focus. in terms of focusin: think is my focus. in terms of focusing on think is my focus. in terms of focusing on a think is my focus. in terms of focusing on a pandemic - think is my focus. in terms of focusing on a pandemic otherj think is my focus. in terms of - focusing on a pandemic other than influenza, focusing on a pandemic other than influenza, it is right that the strategy influenza, it is right that the strategy in 2011 states as follows, ptans strategy in 2011 states as follows, plans for strategy in 2011 states as follows, plans for responding to a future pandemic plans for responding to a future pandemic should therefore be flexible pandemic should therefore be flexible and adaptable for a wide ra