saying, you know, the more people who were in their questioning what sort of pandemics we might have, the better. i think his suggestion about having a sort of red team to do micro whatever architecture you build, its only as good as a people within the building and the decisions they make. his idea of having a red team to challenge the thinking, i think, having a red team to challenge the thinking, ithink, is having a red team to challenge the thinking, i think, is an excellent one because there is always a danger of groupthink, and perhaps that what was happening here. we were so focused, or the system was so focused, or the system was so focused on pandemic influenza because of the well risks of it, that the system had got itself into a belief that that was the most likely pandemic and that s the one we needed to prepare for. i think oliver s statement is powerful. so oliver s statement is powerful. 50 cu oliver s statement is powerful. so you don t think that he let yo
happening now, new fears that russia s war against ukraine is about to get a very serious boost from china. i ll acquit white house national security official john kirby whether beijing is actively considering sending lethal aid to putin s forces. also tonight, a new assessment on the origins of the covid pandemic is stirring up major controversy. we ll tell you why the u.s. energy department now believes the virus likely emerged from a chinese lab. and breaking news, new legal filings in the dominion voting systems lawsuit against fox news. the fox chairman rupert murdoch admitting underoath that popular tv hosts endorsed false claims about the 2020 presidential election. welcome to our viewers here in the united states and around the world, i m wolf blitzer. you re in the situation room. we begin our coverage tonight with the war in ukraine. the deepening alliance between russia and china sending chills throughout the u.s. intelligence community. our senior national secur
saying, you know, the more people who were in their questioning what sort of pandemics we might have, the better. i think his suggestion about having a sort of red team to do micro whatever architecture you build, its only as good as a people within the building and the decisions they make. his idea of having a red team to challenge the thinking, i think, having a red team to challenge the thinking, ithink, is having a red team to challenge the thinking, i think, is an excellent one because there is always a danger of groupthink, and perhaps that what was happening here. we were so focused, or the system was so focused, or the system was so focused on pandemic influenza because of the well risks of it, that the system had got itself into a belief that that was the most likely pandemic and that s the one we needed to prepare for. i think oliver s statement is powerful. so oliver s statement is powerful. 50 cu oliver s statement is powerful. so you don t think that he let you down?
in which the tucker carlson s of the world conceded this was a problem. what s new today is that the top level executives also knew in realtime this was bad, and they did nothing to stop it. in fact, fox s chief legal and policy officer is quoted in the deposition basically saying that fox had a responsibility to stop these election lies from being peddled, and it still acted anyway. so oliver, button this up for us. where does this lawsuit go from here? this lawsuit looks like it s going to trial, wolf. next month it s supposed to start and, you know, fox i should note, too, is pushing back against what we re reading right now, and they re saying that dominion effectively has a very weak case. but legal experts i have spoken to have suggested complete otherwise in that they have said that this evidence that we re seeing presented now for the first time in these filings is really quite damning. is there a strong legal case here? wolf, i do think it is a
transparent with their viewers and readers and they own it. and i m wondering if abc would have actually owned this, had we not started asking questions. because initially they called it a clarification and then they wanted to call it went back and called it a correction. but would abc have owned this? there was not only a mistake made in the actual reporting, but how abc was transparent with their viewers in revealing that mistake to their audience. absolutely. meanwhile, the president s tweet about abc only one of ten tweets he s posted today. so oliver, thank you. after the break, we re going to talk about his relationship with twitter. and how it is now causing real danger. the market. but through good times and bad. .at t. rowe price. .we ve helped our investors stay confident for over 75 years. call us or your advisor. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. if yorheumatoid arthritisevere and you re talking to your rheumatologist about a medication,