So i think the other thing we have to do is put the new trees in about wise in how it is set up we put the trees in on a drive we did them on another road many of the trees didnt survive the first time around they were not staked correctly when the winds came and i know that trees only need watering for a certain amount of time but they need it several years before they take root it will be efficient to have guys come bye bye by in a truck it is false economy you put the water supply in there and never worry about the trees getting enough water on the subject of the foliage i know its been brought up it isnt before us but the National Area program didnt make sense well pub u talk about that the national from pictures ive seen one of which you should in our presentation is San Francisco before the plantinging were done mostly sand it was not national and it didnt make sense to spend money on that this is great im going to move to initiate this and i believe we need a date i think were s
All right, so through the chair for the recommendation 3, which basically touches upon City Building code and the ports building code, a recommendation that it should be amended to include provisions that address impacts. The board of supervisors is stating that this will require further analysis because city departments are actively working with one another right now with city and regional agencies to evaluate and develop consistent guidance and policies to address sea level rise. Thats for recommendation 3. Moving on to recommendation 11 d, this is where the recommendation at the city should request an Insurance Premium estimate from fema and compare that against future flooding. The board of supervisors response would like to suggest that we say the recommendation will not be implemented because femas naksal Flood Insurance program does not offer it to private municipalities, only to private owners. And then for recommendation 12b the state said the city should create a local workin
These hearings, you dont get no information. Most of questions you asking, what do you get . Well get back to you. And does that ever get back . I dont think so. But if there was another concept, supervisors, that Community People like myself and other, media, be there involved with this so called working groups, what do you working on and who are you working for and who is working these groups . So the spin word now is working groups. Thank you mr. Washington. Are there any other members of the public whod like to provide Public Comment at this time . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. So at this time, president tang, there are a number of changes that i am going to propose to the board of supervisors responses to the civil grand jury for this particular purpose, starting with the recommendation 1a, the city should repair and adopt a Risk Assessment in preparation for developing its comprehensive plan regarding the sea level issue. This recommendation has been implemented with a s
11, 2014 on september 22, 2014, the Capital Planning committee adopted the guidance for incorporated Sea Level Rise into Capital Planning in San Francisco, assessing vulnerability to support adaptation so thats for item number 1a. And for 1b the city should assess costs of both implementation of adaptation, strategies and potential losses from failing to do so. And the possible the recommended response is the recommendation has been implemented an a summary of the implementation actions and our response today is as reported by mayoral staff at the government audit and Oversight Committee meeting on december 11. The Capital Planning committee adopted the guidance for incorporated Sea Level Rise into Capital Planning in San Francisco, assessing vulnerability and risk to adaptation. Item number 2a, the planning cold should be amened to include maps showing the areas in the city that are most at risk from the impacts of Sea Level Rise. The planning code should be amended to prohibit the de
Furthermore, ceqa provides Planning Department with sufficient authority for planning projects to be designed and mitigate po sensual hazards and thus an amend. M to the planning code is not recommended. Thank you. So item number 3b is planning code should include a provision that the amended sections of the code including the rising sea levels be reviewed and assessed every five years. The recommendation will not be implemented and ceqa, the board of supervisors agrees with the tenure of the recommendation and any supervisor can take an effort to amend the Building Code but cannot guarantee one of its members will choose to do so. For clarity, that was the response for recommendation three. 3b. The recommendation that was requires a response was 3. Which one . For rising sea levels. Okay. Madam chair, i believe it should just be recommendation. I need to take a five minute recess because i think i have some mix ups in my paperwork. You have the same thing that i have. Okay. So were no