Both h s a and the other agency those are still heavily focused on conceptual compliance and we need what is more expensive conceptual comparison of outcomes u outcomes across buildings and vendors and the city s is currently engaged in our Main Findings and speaking to the concerns youve raised supervisor farrell we believe at this time master lease and nonprofit support housing are necessary components of the system because the master lease unit do make up 2 3rds of Supportive Housing portfolio and 3 thousand unit at this time it is less expensive and more available than the nonprofit housing theyre less desirable the buildings are older and although the city has created more 3 thousand unit since the adaptation of the plan in 2004 the Homeless Population has unchanged from 2005 to 2013 in general people that are being housed in addition while past analysis by the city and other government academic sources that provided the academics particularly compared to other expenditures and ot
Available unit in San Francisco versus nonprofit owned is a longer period to develop the unit but ultimately over time well use the public fund a. M. Intents over one hundred years and our market in San Francisco versus nonprofit that owned assuming we pay for it over a long period of time that the city might smooth out a little bit more; is that correct. The asset for the master less lease i think weve looked at the mart lease per unit 3 hundred to 350,000 per unit per average those will go up but the other thing i dont have the specific numbers but the master costs are increasing by quite a bit one was approved last year it is to 50 percent hive both of those will be gouch. If we think about the vision of the city over the next decades if we if you take the assumption our Real Estate Market is going to continue to go haywire then locking in the it is on a thirty year base it looks at more expensive than today walking in construction and purchase of land value purposes today for perma
Table for the first time. Theres much to talk about. Were going to talk about energy in a broader sense and what you think of where we are in terms of climate and other issues, but let me begin with nuclear talks. You have become famous forcing the two john kerry and often sitting next to foreign minister for reid who was at this table a week ago and is someone you knew at m. I. T. When you are students. Ernest we overlapped at m. I. T. And did meet subsequently in vienna when he was heading the iaea delegation for iran. As students, we did not know each other but i can assure you we did not have the substantive discussions that weve had for 30 or 40 hours one on one in switzerland. Charlie tell me what your role is. Ernest i would say more on the side of the iranian negotiators initially that i think to reach an agreement that involved significant limits on the Nuclear Program that he was running and he was the foreign minister himself before that they felt without having the team of
Welcome one and all. Great to see our witnesses. Great to be here with senator johnson, and well call this hearing to order. I appreciate the effort of all of you to get here today. Im glad were having the hearing today, and not tomorrow. If we were having it tomorrow we might not be having a hearing. Todays hearing, as you know, is focused on the costs of not being prepared for extreme weather events, and exploring the ways that our federal government can increase resiliency in our communities, and just to underbehind this, and save money. Save money in the long haul. We have deficits coming down, theyre still too much. Down from 1. 4 trillion, i think, four years ago, this year expected to be down to about 550 billion. Only 550 billion. Thats still way too much and we have to continue to look in every nook and cranny and figure out how do we save more money. Thats the focus of todays hearing. But, i will try to take about five minutes for my Opening Statement and yield to senator joh
The causes of ocean, this causes ocean waters to expand and in addition, mountain glaciers are rapidly retreating which adds water to the oceans. The Sleeping Giant however in the Sea Level Rise occasion has been ice in the main major ice sheets of greenland and ant antarctica. Both ice she is are losing mass. How quickly they melt over the coming decades will determine whether we have an additional one foot of Sea Level Rise or up to four feet and perhaps even more. Another major change in our climate brought by about humaninduced warm something the increase in heavy downpours. This is clearly an area in which recent observations have been born out, have borne out our previous projections. A warm atmosphere would hold more moisture. We measured that and indeed it is happening. We predicted increased in atmosphere of water vapor and more rain comes down in heavy events and now weve seen that happen. Some regions like the northeast and midwest have seen very large increases in the rainf