Subject to the jurisdiction of another country. Well, sir, the bilateral Security Agreement is in mind for the interests of both countries. We understand that the issue of immunity is of very specific importance for the United States. As was, for us, the issue of sovereignty and detentions and the continued presence of International Forces in afghan villages and the very conduct of the war itself. With those issues resolved, as we did today, part of it, the rest was done earlier, i can go to the Afghan People and argue for immunity for u. S. Troops in afghanistan in a way that afghan sovereignty would not be compromised, in a way that afghan law would not be compromised, in a way that the provisions that we arrive at through talks will give the United States the satisfaction of what it seeks and will also provide the Afghan People the benefits that they are seeking through this partnership and the subsequent agreement. [ inaudible ] thats not for us to decide. It is an issue for the Un
For u. S. Troops in afghanistan in a way that afghan sovereignty will not be compromised, in a way that afghan law will not be compromised, in a way that the provisions that we arrive at through our talks will give the United States the satisfaction of what it seeks, and will also provide the Afghan People the benefit that they are seeking through this partnership and the subsequent agreement. [indiscernible] that is not for us to decide. It is an issue for the United States. Numbers are not going to make a difference to the situation in afghanistan. It is the broader relationship that will make a difference to afghanistan and beyond in the region. The specifics of numbers are issues that the military will decide and afghanistan will have no particular concern and we are talking of numbers and how they are deployed. [indiscernible] i direct my question in my own language. Mr. President , the mission of the United States, after 2014 how this mission will be, will it be resembling the sa
Afghan interests. Translator the government of afghanistan i would like to ask the question in my own language. Mr. President , combative Mission United states after 2014, how this mission will be, how will it be resembling, resembling the same mission as it was during 11 years . Or is there a difference . Different kind of mission. Those who are in pakistan, particularly the safe havens that are in pakistan, what kind of policy will you have. Thank you. The mission will be fundamentally different. Just to repeat. Our main reason, should we have troops in afghanistan post 2014 at the invitation of the Afghan Government will be to make sure that we are training, assisting and Afghan Security forces who have now taken the lead for and are responsible for security throughout afghanistan. And of interest to the United States, the very reason we went to afghanistan in the first place to make sure that al qaeda and its affiliates cannot launch an attack against the United States or other cou
Auditor-DC-UGA22 01 - Uganda reliefweb.int - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from reliefweb.int Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.