as the decision was issued that people were giving their opinions? you know they did not read it. you know nancy pelosi did not read this. yet she came out and made a poisonous statement filled with lies intended to provoke because the democratic party has had an entire plan of e-mails, get out the vote, grassroots operations, protest, many on commercials. you see that play out in anticipation of this decision that was leaked from a liberal clerk on the supreme court that i would argue. and incredibly important decision. why? because it is a constitutional decision that recognizes a court and accepts the fact it is not all-powerful. one of the great things about press washington lies he decided he would not be king. he could have been. he said no. i will follow the constitution. the activist on the court who lobby the court to basically turn the supreme court into a super left-wing legislature as a backstop to congress and the president and the bureaucracy. even if the left l
Welcome back to the weekend, everyone. Donald trumps 2016 Election Interference Trial resumes tomorrow morning with a very key witness. Multiple sources have confirmed to nbc news that Michael Cohen will take the stand. His testimony over the hush money payment made to Stormy Daniels is expected to last several days. The Prosecution Plans to call one more witness before resting its case. Who exactly that other witness is remains a mystery. Joining us to discuss it all is a former member of the probe, andrew weisman, who hosts the Podcast Prosecuting donald trump. And Lockland Cart right is here, he doesnt have a webby but he has the ticket. So andrew, you have for the duration of this offered up a master class for anyone who has been following the numerous trials here. I sit at your knee for a lot of this stuff because you bring a lot of the elements of insight and understanding to make it clear for us what we are looking at. I want to play for you Michael Cohen. He is the guy starting
handed future presidents a, quote, loaded weapon, in the words of a dissenting justice, aimed straight at the rule of law in the country. the conservative 6-3 majority of the court, half of them appointed by ex-president donald trump, two others have been faced calls for their recusal in this very case, a potentially fatal blow to council jack smith s effort to hold the president accountable for crimes committed on january 6th in the insurrection and the plot to overturn the 2020 election he lost. they ruled that donald trump and all future presidents are entitled to immunity for official acts, that they take during their presidency. now there is a question of whether a president can order a seal team 6 or assassinate a political rival, the united states supreme court said in effect, yeah, maybe. regarding jack smith s prosecution of donald trump, the court is sending that case back to judge tonya chutkan to parse out what is an official act in which trump is entitled to comp
Everyone has gotten more rights. Everyone, that is, except for cops and Christians. That is why our evangelical leaders chose to sell Donald Trump to their followers.
What Is The Proper Role of the Courts? heritage.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from heritage.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.