startling details. the devil is in the details. donald trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mar-a-lago. there could be numerous others that are charged, not just donald trump, as well as additional crimes that could be charged. is she kidding me? now, she might be getting that idea from one of the small parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted. like on page 30 where it referred to president trump and those around him as, quote, criminal parties. but still didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that releasing the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee or destroy evidence stored electronically or otherwise. flee? really? trump s plane has his name on it. and destroy electronic evidence. do they mean something like doing, i don t know, deleting 33,000 e-mails? we re going to get into that more in moments with our legal panel. but if anyone thinks that the doj is an impartial
over half is redacted. and you may remember, i was on the show the day of the raid and i said this is an incredible act by the doj, and one would fully expect transparency. i expected a statement immediately, some sort of communication to the american people. of course, it took three days of us demanding that for there to be a statement, and even then, when they released the search warrant, it told us nothing. and so you, you remarked on a very good point. there was a letter by the trump attorneys that said, this is our basis for saying, you know, there s nothing to see here. we have done nothing wrong. make sure you include this letter if you do anything with the court, by motion or application. they attached that to the affidavit and then they redact any sort of explanation that would explain why they needed to go in. and so i think, again, we have another act, another revelation, another document released, and we still have no answers that would assure the american people that thi
the huawei cfo. her extradition order we learned from fox business last night. it was an independent act by the d.o.j. questions whether or not the president knew about it beforehand or not. we continue to learn more there. it is fueling a lot of uncertainty about the u.s./china relationship and an actual trade deal getting done. what is the latest there, maria? one of the issues here is espionage. the president may not have known that they were arresting her when they arrested her. he was at dinner with president xi in argentina. maybe he didn t know the specifics that they were about to arrest her but the president understands the situation around huawei and zte two major telecom companies out of china. the issue here is that the chinese government has used these chinese companies as tools to spy on foreigners,