and i think that across the board, the vast majority of the american people don t agree with a lot of the decisions the courts are making. president biden in an exclusive interview with my colleague, nicolle wallace, responding to today s very predictable supreme court decision on affirmative action. and that is where we begin tonight, with the united states supreme court once again turning the arc of justice away from equality and back to the early 20th century. striking down the use of affirmative action in college admissions. the roberts court, which wouldn t even look like the court it is today without affirmative action, decided that race conscious admissions programs at harvard university and the university of north carolina violate equal protection under the constitution. it is fitting then that it would be the court s first black woman justice, ketanji brown jackson, who clearly articulated the cost of this latest regression. writing in her dissent, with let them
admissions. it is a complete misnomer to suggest this is about color brined blind when in fact it is about being blind to history. tonight, the ruling, the powerful descent, and how clarence thomas finally won his long battle against affirmative action. n hi long did you give your degree back again? yale does not recognize me. [laughter] as the special counsel ramps up on the january 6th investigation that is what jack smith is going in for, absolutely, this is it, this is the big show. what we are learning today about new subpoenas in the documents case. i get everything right and they indicted me. when all in starts right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes. today in a landmark ruling that overturns decades of precedents, sweeping aside generations of arguments about racial justice and equality, the supreme court in a 6 to 3 decision, six conservatives to three liberals, effectively got rid of the use of race in college admissions a
tonight will you be holding a segregated party for white people in massachusetts? mayor welcome to primetime. i didn t want to shoot anybody. but i have to make a statement. jesse: granddaddy armed and dangerous. jesse: american muslim calls for jihad. plus we re the devil. the devil. [ugly sounds] jesse: if there is one thing the left is successful at it s destruction. they aren t that great at building things, but boy, kat they tear something down. the family unit, the english language, gender but physically as well. the left is a wrecking ball. in 2020 they for uppered cities and toppled statues, statues of the people who built the country. no one was safe. [chanting] [stand your ground] [screams] [ bleep ] [ bleep ] [ bleep ]. jesse: as for democrats in d.c. they said let the people do what they want. it s up to the communities to decide what statues they want to see. i don t care that much about statues. people will do what they do. jesse: h
following today s supreme court ruling on affirmative action, there are still two potentially momentous supreme court decisions expected tomorrow. one, whether president biden has the authority to erase more than 400 billion dollars and student loan debt. the other involves a colorado designer who objects providing services for same-sex marriages. she is challenging the states public on accommodations law, open to everyone from discrimination, including on the basis of sexual orientation. of course, we will break it all down for you tomorrow on the readout. that is tonight s read out. all in with chris say starts now. with chris say starts now. tonight on all in so out of the basic value system of american people. this is not your father s republican party. a supreme court and affirmative action in college
frustrating about this decision, i almost find it hard to put into words. you know, lawyers, we agree with decisions that courts make all the time. it doesn t mean that those decisions are wrong. it means that there are two sides and we were on the losing side. but this decision is in a different category. a category reserved for very few cases. it s a case where the decision is wrong on its face. it s wrong because it s made in ignorance of the law, deliberate ignorance, and it s wrong because factually, it s so inaccurate, it echoes from the shelby county case which chief justice roberts also wrote, and in shelby county, the voting rights case, he said we don t need to enforce these old criteria under the voting rights act anymore. there s no reason to believe that black people are still being discriminated against when they register, when they have low turnout numbers. and he was dead set wrong on that. here he is now saying, we no longer need to protect black