president about this as i outlined this case has been won already in arbitration and there was no only in of payments from the president. he s denied all of these allegations. i simply asked sarah whether she was lying to us when she made that comment. here s what happened. whether you were in the dark, i think it s a fairly simple question. i think it s a fairly simple answer i have given you actually several times now. i gave you the best information they had. i will continue to do my best to do that every single day. now, of course, she didn t really answer the question as to whether or not she was left in the dark. but clearly she was left in the dark, anderson, if you want to believe that sarah sanders was not lying to us a month ago. but you know i talked to a source close to the white house earlier today, who is normally pretty defensive of sarah s performance in the briefing room. this person said look this was absolutely brutal. you don t need a source inside the white h
politics. according to time s rosenstein and officials suspect some lawmakers are using oversight authorities to gain information about the investigation and funneling it, that verb again, to the white house. joining me to talk about this is a member of the house intelligence committee. congressman, are you aware of house republicans sharing information they received from the department of justice regarding the russia probe with the white house? good evening, anderson. this is certainly something we have seen in the past. you know, the origin of it was when devon nunez went to to the white house, the diafter devon 91ness testified, they were asking for information to sign off on information about an ongoing investigation. the fisa warrant for carter page. the concern i had there was you were reading in individuals who were subject to an investigation and giving them the authority to sign off on what would be released.