and we re going to have to figure out a way to acknowledge it first. and then have a grown-up discussion with the rest of the american people on how we address climate change without destroying our economy because there s absolutists on the left but don t we as republicans have to acknowledge climate change is real and it s a very possible threat. if the communists in china are recognizing it against their own interest in studies isn t it time that republicans in america recognize it? good luck with that. the china argument in come par season is i ve heard from some folks, we re not walking around in washington, d.c. and new york and los angeles with masks on because the smog is so bad. so china argument is one that falls flat for at that lot of folks in terms of making the case since in their argument, their view china has tone nothing. we footed this bill and carried this argument.
this is to me not coincidence. a clear obvious connection. you can call it a connection. was rhetoric a part of his motivation? was it just seeing the videos? was it his anti-abortion views or was he a person who was allowed i would bring of those words in court. of course you would. i m sorry. i was going to make a further connection on the gun issue. we skip past. the gun issue is there. then we can get into rhetoric, for example. we can get into the position that second amendment absolutists would have, now that everybody ought to be armed and that s how you stop a guy with a gun, right? are they now going to argue abortionists should have guns? we have to keep guns out of the hands of deranged people. here are some of the
discussion and it is for political purposes. martha: negotiation with the iranians went well. so here we are. marjorie clifton, former consultant to the obama campaign and principle of clifton consulting. kevin mccullough talk show host of salem media group, author of, no he can t, and columnist for townhall.com. good morning. good morning. martha: marjorie, take this first. good move for her. it is an interesting move. what she is trying to do, analogies used by both sides of the aisle. they are very effective. that is why they keep using them. look at iran and communists they re seen as black and white. we have done well with the iranian negotiations, winning new audiences and those opposed to negotiating with iran, because they were absolutists it s a winning analogying. look they will not bend either way in light of another shooting. what she is also trying to plug
this is a choice she made to keep her family together. they didn t start out like this. one day she was faced with a choice do you make banning abortion and calling myself an abolitionist my life or split my family up? even toby was not this guy. right? what was the process of him becoming this person? he was a drug dealer. he called himself a partier. they were both partiers. he went to jail. this is a deeply religious movement. they are absolutists on abortion and they see everything as sort of redemption through christ. so he found christ in jail and decided that the number one evil in the world is abortion and that they all needed to devote themselves to it and started this organization. grew a long beard and off to the races on basing his entire life on to this abolitionist move. a lot of them have beards. a john brown look happening there. a lot of the guys we hung out with did have beards. i highly recommend people go and check out this documentary.
who sued in the case. while the health care litigation draws lots of litigation, the current supreme court docket includes several case that is could prove far more influential, testing limits on the government s power. before the senate reformed the filibuster to curb gop obstruction, president obama rolled republicans by using his recess appointment power to install some blocked labor nominees. so the court will decide if the president overstepped his authority. a case that could shift the balance of power between the white house and an increasingly do-nothing congress. and there s another key case about political rules that s already drawn warnings from the president. the latest case would oh go even further than citizens united. essentially, it would say anything goes. there are no rules in terms of how to finance campaigns. what it means is, ordinary americans are shut out of the process. many liberals argue, the court could hand down a sequel to citizens united in that case,