exactness and sameness in law should be the same as nebulous undefined principles. i got news for the president. absolutists do exists, words do have meaning in language and law. it is the basis of all civilization. it is why all the laws are written down, so the letter of the law carries the force of the law. that is why our bill of rights was written into law, to ensure that fundamental freedoms of a minority could never be denied by a majority. those are the principles we call unalienable rights. without these absolutes, protections, democracy decays
we oppose legislation that is intended to restrict our second amendment rights by limiting the capacity of clips or magazines. why do they want to have unlimited clips? this is really and supporting the right of state-issued concealed issue carry limits to cross state lines. they want unlimited gun use. remember that a lot of voters, throughout the midwest, are single-issue i shouldn t say a lot. there are single-issue gun rights voters in many midwestern battleground states, and they are also trying to appeal to them. but they re absolutists, these people. they are. when you don t put the more strident voices on the stage and let them say what the base wants to hear, then you let them write the platform. and you let the gun rights folks whatever they want. the immigration stance is hard-core. the abortion, no exceptions. and you just basically turn it over to the extremists. and you hope that those independent voters out there only see the pictures.
unlimited clips in magazines in your guns? not just certain kind of firearms let me get erin in here. we oppose legislation that is intended to restrict our second amendment rights by limiting the capacity of clips or magazines. why do they want to have unlimited clips? this is really and supporting the right of state-issued concealed issue carry limits to cross state lines. they want unlimited gun use. remember that a lot of voters, throughout the midwest, are single-issue i shouldn t say a lot. there are single-issue gun rights voters in many midwestern battleground states, and they are also trying to appeal to them. but they re absolutists, these people. they are. when you don t put the more strident voices on the stage and let them say what the base wants to hear, then you let them write the platform. and you let the gun rights folks whatever they want. the immigration stance is hard-core. the abortion, no exceptions. and you just basically turn it
they want unlimited clips why would you make an issue of unlimited clips in magazines in your guns? not just certain kind of firearms let me get erin in here. we oppose legislation that is intended to restrict our second amendment rights by limiting the capacity of clips or magazines. why do they want to have unlimited clips? this is really and supporting the right of state-issued concealed issue carry limits to cross state lines. they want unlimited gun use. remember that a lot of voters, throughout the midwest, are single-issue i shouldn t say a lot. there are single-issue gun rights voters in many midwestern battleground states, and they are also trying to appeal to them. but they re absolutists, these people. they are. when you don t put the more strident voices on the stage and let them say what the base wants to hear, then you let them write the platform. and you let the gun rights folks whatever they want. the immigration stance is hard-core. the abortion, no exc
rates of 36% will not automatically lead to the doom and gloom republicans worried about back then and are once again warning about today. very good. that s what i got. professor steve. we talk about how republicans have moved so far to the right. to your point, is this kind of disproving that notion a bit? it is just taxes are the history of this is in 1990 george bush sr. raised taxes. i m talking about the deficits coming down at the end of the 90s. the other guy that should get credit is george bush sr. made the deal to raise tax necessary 1990. what that did was set off a civil war in the republican party. in the anti-tax absolutists they were led by newt gingrich back then and guys like this. they emerged victorious from that. bush lost his re-election race in 1992. lesson every republican took out of that 1990 tax hike was never, ever vote for another tax hike again. they never grappled with what happened in 90s. informs all of our debate and all of our discussio