A former liberal government official, he saw little chance of full reconciliation with Palestinians in “the foreseeable future” but nevertheless sought to ease tensions.
Zoom study group on the Selections from Gramsci's Prison Notebooks edited by Hoare and Nowell-Smith, Thursdays 8pm from 18 August 2022 to 10 November 2022
, or, as it is also expressed, that is not felt to be true
, not given as an inwardly revealed eternal verity, as something sacred that is believed
. Experience is just this, that the content - which is Spirit - is in itself substance, and therefore an object of consciousness
. But this substance which is Spirit is the process in which Spirit becomes what it is in itself
; and it is only as this process of reflecting itself into itself that it is in itself truly Spirit .
It could make no sense, from the point of view of Hegel s dialectics, to invert this process of showing that all the everyday world is the self-development of Spirit, as reflected intuitively in religion and systematically in science - to invert it to show what? That Spirit, or Reason, or God are revealed by dialectical analysis to be, not rational, reconciling, and harmonising as Hegel wanted them to be, but awkward, variegated, and changeable as the at-first-sight world?
再谈《精神现象学》 (2021-02-15 11:01:05) 下一个
最近我又接到另一篇关于黑格尔思维现象学《The Phenomenology of Mind》或《Phenomenology of Spirit》的线上讨论的邀请。是一位专业黑学研究生的论文，有一位英国的专业黑学教授发表了评论。我发现他们仍然没有真正理解黑格尔的思维现象学到底在讲什么，就再次参与了讨论。我的评论并没有完全针对那篇原文（只针对其中一部分问题），因为我主要想指出最近我发现西方专业哲学界对于黑格尔的思维现象学所出现的最主要误解。这里是该讨论的链接：https://www.academia.edu/s/e4ca12cc2e?source=link， 对黑格尔的思维现象学感兴趣的朋友可以去参加讨论。下面是我的评论：
Dear Santo,
Thanks for the invitation. Here is some of my thought:
Before we get into the difficult readings of Hegel, we might need to first to ask ourselves why we w