one way or the other. governor evers is a pro-abortion activists and the attorney general and they will file suit in dane county wisconsin. that s the most liberal county in the state. they will find a sympathetic judge and they will be successful in that local dane county court, but this will then be appealing go to the wisconsin supreme court and they ll make a decision. but it was interesting, joey, this law was passed in 1849 banning abortion and criminalizing the abortionist but not the mom. democrat say that s an old law and it should be off the books. what s interesting about politics is, if you don t like a law, every legislature has the right to repeal, but it is still good law. the republicans assembly in wisconsin, the politics looks so good that it might be a vetoproof majority even if tony
abortion reporting law in our nation. fair. i m just talking about how you were citing that it was dangerous to take the abortion pill. it s far more dangerous to carry a child and to birth a child. we don t know that. we can t say it s far more dangerous because we don t have any comparable statistics because we have no national abortion reporting law. okay, let s move on. let s talk about the women who will cross state lines to get an abortion. so i know that you re talking to, i think, some legislators in missouri about what to do about that. i think you were quoted in the washington post as saying if you travel out of state for an abortion, the abortionist can be held liable. how do you imagine policing that? how will you know if a woman is going from missouri to illinois for an abortion or to visit a relative? there s a lot of different strategies being thrown around, questions about how to best protect women from these predatory abortionists who really profit, financial
the abortionist s names. but both refused to reveal them. they were too terrified, my mother always said. abortionists to use the term of that era typically extracted three promises from women who sought them out, they must keep the procedure a secret, they must never reveal the abortionist s name, and no matter what happened to them afterward, they must never contact him or her again. flanagan also writes the first time i saw one of the new 3d ultrasounds of a fetus in utero, i wasn t entirely sure what i was looking at. it wasn t anything like the black and white images i was used to seeing. it looked other worldly like we had finally made contact with a planet we had always wanted to reach. for a long time these images made me anxious, they are proof that grows within a pregnant woman s body is a human being,
profit off of the despair of women, as we heard in the earlier clip. these are tragic circumstances, for sure. i know there s been conversations about ensuring that if an abortionist is committing abortions against one state, the state may be able to say, look, we have an interest in protecting the pre-born human beings in our state who are citizens, as well as their mothers. and that is what the supreme court said on friday, that states do have a legitimate interest in protecting pre-born life, just like how we have an interest in protecting children from opioid abuse and things like that. i understand. but how will you police it? how will you know if a woman is crossing the border to get an abortion? there s been talk about using civil suits, similar to the texas the landmark texas heartbeat law, where if a family member or a spouse knows of an abortionist who is preying upon a vulnerable woman who is