keeping a lot of this under wraps. the committee just announced a surprise hearing for tomorrow with very few details. it s set to begin at 1:00 and the committee is saying they will present what they re calling recently obtained evidence and saying they ll hear more witness testimony. no word yet on what the evidence is or who may be testifying, not even an indication on how many people will be testifying. but there has been this sense that the committee was getting inundated with new information and it was just last week that the committee remember jamie raskin talked after one of the hearings about this deluge of information that the committee had been receiving, including via the tip line they have, and even chairman benny thompson has been calling for more people to come forward. he s done it repeatedly after some of the hearings. we saw last week, that was hearing five, this would be hearing six, and last week showcased some compelling testimony. we saw three former top
abortion reporting law in our nation. fair. i m just talking about how you were citing that it was dangerous to take the abortion pill. it s far more dangerous to carry a child and to birth a child. we don t know that. we can t say it s far more dangerous because we don t have any comparable statistics because we have no national abortion reporting law. okay, let s move on. let s talk about the women who will cross state lines to get an abortion. so i know that you re talking to, i think, some legislators in missouri about what to do about that. i think you were quoted in the washington post as saying if you travel out of state for an abortion, the abortionist can be held liable. how do you imagine policing that? how will you know if a woman is going from missouri to illinois for an abortion or to visit a relative? there s a lot of different strategies being thrown around, questions about how to best protect women from these predatory abortionists who really profit, financial