search warrant served on monday. that s right, victor. we didn t expect attorney general merrick garland to come out today but he is going to be making a statement from the justice department building in downtown washington. they haven t disclosed yet exactly what it is going to be about, but you re right, there has been pressure building in recent days since this search on monday, this unprecedented search of a former president s home, that we are watching to see whether garland may want to make a statement about this. now, this isn t something that the justice department typically would comment on. it is an ongoing investigation. we don t believe that there have been charges brought at this time. we haven t seen any emerge from this. it s also about national security issues. on top of that, garland is not the type of attorney general that makes a lot of public statements, does a lot of press conferences, even whenever there were charges for seditious conspiracy, another u
it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redact shawredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash p patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dpeum documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties think should be persecuted. if you ar contempt eighth a former president. there the president take the personal documents from the white house or did someone else pack the boxes? when did trump learn who was taken? did they knowingly withhold documents after being asked to return them, was there a good faith disagreement on what had to be legally returned. when is why did negotiations break down. w
it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redact shawredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash p patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dpeum documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties think should be persecuted. if you ar contempt eighth a former president. there the president take the personal documents from the white house or did someone else pack the boxes? when did trump learn who was taken? did they knowingly withhold documents after being asked to return them, was there a good faith disagreement on what had to be legally returned. when is why did negotiations break down. w
it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redactredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dp documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties think should be persecuted. if you a contempt eighth a former president. there the president take the personal documents from the white house or did someone else pack the boxes? when did trump learn who was taken? did they knowingly withhold documents after being asked to return them, was there a good faith disagreement on what had to be legally returned. when is why did negotiations break down. what classif