him? we re probably going to hearing? along the lines of we know we have some issues. we have some work to do, but we re still doing great and we re watching 99.999% of everything. this is clearly not the case. we poked around little. we found these ads very, very easily. if we re easy to find them, a trillion company facebook with that resources they should be able to find them. this is not just posting the picture of free speech. this is an ad that facebook is actually profiting from. this is an ad. one ad they had run they only spent $400 or $500 and were able to reach up to half a million people. and we saw some states targeted with some specific ads, florida, texas, a lot of states where there are the major covid issues or we saw v seen the spikes throughout the year. appreciate it. perspective now from former facebook executive frances haugen in her first interview since testifying before the house committee. frances, this reporting from
we don t have anything on the schedule for tomorrow, as of right now, and so, it is probably going to slide into next week, sean. sean: you try and get answers from jen psaki, and she s talking about they are placed on a path toward removal proceedings, and you got her to admit it it doesn t actually men anything, and they are not even requiring people to show up in court, they are requesting. a request that you show up but not mandate that you show up. k, 99.999%, they are not going to honor the request. the other thing that came up today is that all these people that are getting on these buses from del rio to el paso and laredo and being flown to tucson, no covid testing. you ask a pretty important question. how is that helping anybody stop the spread? and her answer was, well, again, we have protocol. the protocol for we, the american people, is we have vaccine mandates. or testing mandates that are coming into place.
i don t want to drop names. but you were there. i m of that generation. of that generation. a problem with this studio. what are you hitting me about? a being problem. seriously, guys. can t you see it? joe has to wear pants now. that s not a problem. does he? yep. all of you do. yeah. i think i agree with alex. i don t know that that s a problem. you have to fully dress head to toe. let s talk about other things right now. studio s beautiful by the way. gorgeous. great. new studio. you remember the last time the studio opened up here we had michael bloomberg. eric adams will be here today. with a 50/50 chance of being slight favorite. 50.1. the new york times meter probably has him at, you know, like 99.999.
i don t know that s a problem. you ll have to fully dress, head to toe. let s just talk about other things right now. the studio is beautiful by the way. remember the last time we had studio here, we had michael bloomberg come. that s right. eric adams is going to be here today. guy who has a 50/50 chance of being slight favorite. 50.1. yup. the new york times meter has him at, you know, what, 99.999%. yeah, what s that? okay. carol meryl or something is walking out of that door. oh, t.j., you re showing the studio. it is certainly vibrant. let s get back. 5:00 a.m., i did a walkaround. oh. i did hits from a variety of the studio, showing it off, getting my steps in. that s really good. you re versatile.
thought it s important to note that he doesn t speak on behalf of the organisation. we have another council that is called concil of scholars, so they will soon decide. we are muslims. people in afghanistan, 99.999% are muslims, and they believe in islam. when you believe in a law, definitely, you should apply that law. so, islam is a law. let s take a look a closer look at what sharia law means. sharia law is islam s legal system, based on the koran and the rulings of islamic scholars. it acts as a code of conduct for muslims and can impact every aspect of daily life depending on how strictly it is followed. sharia law divides offences into two broad categories: hadd offences, which are serious crimes with set penalties, and tazir crimes, where the punishment is left to the discretion of a judge.