aim at his likely democratic rival for the white house, accusing president biden with no evidence of weapon sizing the justice department for political purposes. every time radical left democrats, marxists, communists, and fascists indict me, i consider it a great badge of honor. i m being indicted for you. these are not indictments in the traditional sense. these are biden indictments. this is just against a political opponent. again, there is zero evidence that the white house has anything to do with the indictments against the former president. despite his complaints, though, that he s being unfairly victimized, trump sounded like he is out for revenge, suggesting he would use a second presidential term to go after biden. he s opened up a pandora s box that may never let our country be the same. i only can say to joe is be very careful what you wish for because what you ve done is a terrible thing. let s bring in former republican congressman adam kinzinger. he ser
the campaign they are talking about what people are actually feeling out there. i think that is going to be very helpful. you can get people statistics and all sorts of stuff, but we have to have real conversations about how are these things affecting you at home? a lot of surprises for me. a lot of fun in one hallway, running into two of my old friends. we will do this all over again. he might get some sleep, my friend. we have a surprise from the supreme court. a ruling in favor of common sense. all the justices except clarence thomas joined in favor of the common sense decision in the case of preventing domestic abusers from having guns. chief justice roberts, in the majority opinion, said the laws confirm what common sense suggests one one when individual poses a clear threat to another, the threatening individual may be disarmed. end quote. that threatening individual may be disarmed. that is a good concept. does it apply to this individual? those j6 warriors,
i m ana cabrera reporting from new york. andrea mitchell picks up our coverage right now. right now on andrea mitchell reports family matters, the first lady shows up in court as the jury selection begins for hunter biden s trial, a trial that the prosecution says will include testimony from his late wife and laid brother s widow. the white house is pushing back on bibi netanyahu s saying that he did make the proposal. former president trump railing against his conviction and raising a ton of money and supporters since his verdict. next up, his meeting with propace officer and sentencing next month, just days before the republican convention. i m okay with it. i think at a certain point there s a breaking point. good day, everyone. jury selection has begun in wilmington, delaware, for the first criminal trial of a sitting president s son. first lady jill bide is not in the courtroom along with hunter s wife, his sister ashley and her husband, the president s son
Potentially it could be big. I mean, looking at Michael Cohen, what this means is the same tactic that we have seen happening in this investigation out of the Southern District of new york, is happening, that we see happen in the Mueller Investigation. They go after other witnesses, encourage them to cooperate, and in this case you have this Business Partner who is cooperating, being offered significant being offered a potential sentence that is much smaller than what he could be facing. He could be facing 25 years for each count, owing millions of dollars in back taxes. All of that is being reduced, which says to me that he has some information that prosecutors would be interested in regarding Michael Cohen. That subsequently puts more pressure on Michael Cohen to cooperate to reduce his potential legal exposure and talk about whatever he knows that could aid the Mueller Investigation. It also, since this is outside of the jurisdiction of the Mueller Investigation, it really could tak
Lawyer, william burke. However, the lawyer then says but they were okay with giving this information over. This administration isnt. Make some sense of this for me. Well, i think the thing to think about is this, im not sure at the end of the day how much difference its going to make. Partly this is a matter of arithmetic. The republicans simply have the votes. But secondly while this will be, and you can count on it, that the democrats will be following joe bidens advice, theyll be saying how can we vote on this guy until we know every possible thing about him. The crucial question will be how will he vote as a judge, what can we learn from his time on the Court Of Appeals here in the district of columbia. I think thats where the bulk of the questions will be. Whats going to be new and different about this Confirmation Hearing is questions about how far you can go in subpoenaing or possibly indicting or other Legal Process against a sitting president. That becomes important obviously