He falsely claimed that mexico was sending drugs and rapists and this type of rhetoric moved from the fringe right to the mainstream talk points with the socalled invasion of the Sojourner Border and now with trump vying for another bid at the white house, this rhetoric has only gotten worse in recent months as he promised the largest deportation and to scare voters is the spread of the rhetoric, but the data shows us something different. It shows that trumps claims against the migrants are baseless including with the comments of the should crime wave. The nbc news review of crime data in blue cities where migrants are bussed and flown with Texas Governor abbott shows crime dropping, in fact, immigrant Crime Research over the past 20 years have shown that immigrants commit fewer crimes than nativeborn americans, but despite the facts, antiimmigrant and racist rhetoric is foundation and Fear Mongering for many of the policies like in arizona where a bill passed up the statehouse that al
Kind of a preview of how shell run her court and this case. And in deciding whether to grant Special Counsel jack smiths request for protective order limiting what the disgraced expresident can and cannot say publicly about the case, judge chutkan cuts through Talking Points like a hot knife through butter. On the First Amendment protections, they are so fond of citing, mr. Trump, like every american, has a First Amendment right to free speech. But that right is not absolute. Adding that without a protective order, the disclosure of discovery materials could lead to witnesses being harassed or otherwise interfering with a fair trial. What about the fact that trump is running for president. And chutkan did not mince words on that eithe saying, this is a criminal trial and i will not take into consideration the impact will have for have for a political came on either side. He will have all of the rights hesen tieptled to. The existence is not going to have any bearing on my decision. I i
On this new our of ayman, politics and rhetoric go hand inhand. These days, so does the truth and misinformation. Tonight we clear out the lies being told about immigration and crime. Plus, the powerful payoff of loyalty. We read Between The Lines of the new position. Us says children dying from starvation in gaza is a warning like no other. The president and ceo joins us. Lets get started. We know that immigration has become one of the top issues of this years president ial race. According to a recent poll, it has emerged as the most important issue for the First Time Since 2019. More than half of those surveyed said quote large numbers of immigrants entering the United States illegally is a critical threat to us interests. In other words, theres a general sense of fear around immigrants right now. Polls like these show us there is a massive gap between perception and reality. Yes, you may feel unsafe, but the truth is very different. That gap is in great part due to decades of gop Fe
Three hours of breaking stories, and checking out the truth behind them. We start in brazil and a Landmark Summit to protect the amazon rainforest. The leaders of eight South American countries that share the amazon, have gathered in the city of belem. Scientists are concerned that, deforestation in the amazon may be approaching an irreversible Tipping Point. Brazils president Lula Da Silva is hoping for a co ordinated regional approach, to tackle illegal mining and logging as well as other environmental crimes. Our reporter Azadeh Moshiri looks at whats at stake in the summit. The amazon is, of course, beautiful, but its also hugely important in the fight against climate change. And thats because it stores so much carbon dioxide, which drives the Climate Crisis were currently facing. And yet the forest is under threat of deforestation. Now, 60 of it is located in brazil, which is why the country is taking the lead in hosting eight other countries in south america who share the amazon.
Odd system, it is odd because it rewards them for keeping their money outside the uk, which we think is the opposite of what we should do. What has changed with that . What has changed with that . What has changed is that any weird concept of domicile has been abolished, there will be a simple definition based on how many years you have been resident in the uk, which is sensible, and a complete exemption from tax on the foreign assets of someone who has recently arrived in the uk, which is simpler, and i think federer. It will only last forfour years. For a last for four years. For a professional person arriving to the uk from abroad gives the four years in which they can sort their Foreign Affairs and learn to live in the uk, but it is much less useful for the very wealthy. We have got jake here who has written and, as a young person, soon to on slightly above average income, what are the longer term effects of the budget, will i be better off . I will come to the longer term peace in