masks don t work. only the expensive m95 s work. two years into this you re saying that masks don t work, the back some needed mandates are unconstitutional and you can get covid while vaccinated and transmitted. the experts have been wrong about everything. they need to put their salary back into the treasury. just send their paycheck back, because we are paying them to be wrong. we can keep paying experts to be wrong. dana: care to grovel geraldo? he mistakes my position. i was at a lawyers dinner a few weeks ago including an attorney, the seminal 1905 case, the government have the absolute right to mandate vaccines. the supreme court s it said today yes.
of issues. roosevelt was a complicated person both in his motivations and consequences. james earl frazier was a complicated sculptor. reporter: the museum writing in 2020, in its initial removal request, the statue conveys a racial hierarchy and the museum and members of the public have long found disturbing. a city parks official calling the move incredibly rare but the right course of action. over time, the meanings of the statue really did start to change as we thought more about what our social landscape looked like. reporter: workers began dismantling it this week. roosevelt, who also served as new york s 33rd governor, was hailed as a driving force for antitrust and progressive policies and as a conservationist. but scholars says he was also an imperialist, and he said of immigrants in his 1905 message to congress, the laws now existing for the exclusion of undesirable immigrants should be strengthened. it s pretty clear that his personal opinions were quite frankly raci
that require agencies to mandate vaccines. the only thing you can t do is pass a regulation. regulation is different than a law. it doesn t have debate, two sides to the story, so i believe the supreme court was absolutely appropriate and in line with this president from 1905. that didn t sound like groveling. i feel about the whole situation with covid the and today, january 13th. the biden administration is losing. it is oozing with the highest court in the land. which is specifically said osha, congress has never put forth such a mandate. they knew it was a runaround, they knew they were trying to get around the fact that they couldn t get congress to vote on this law.
complicated person in his motivations and consequences. james earl frasier is a complicated sculptor and the museum is a complicated place. reporter: the museum in the initial removal request, the museum and members of the public found disturbing. a city parks official calling the move incredibly rare but the right course of action. over time, the meanings of the statute really did start to change as we thought more what our social landscape looked like. workers began disbamantling this week. roosevelt serving as new york s 33rd governor for anti trust and pro progressive policies but he said of ill grants in the 1905 message to congress, the laws existing for the exclusion of undesirable immigrants should be strengthened. it s pretty clear his personal opinions were racist to
talked about jacobson versus massachusetts. the supreme court held that there was a right to refuse medical treatment could be overrused if it was necessary to spread to stop the spread of a contagious disease. this is one question. is it essential to curbing the pandemic. the point made in the journal article is we don t have any evidence that the current vaccines would do anything to stop it. here s the more fundamental question. in a case involving massachusetts in 1905, it involved the ability of the government, the right of an individual to refuse treatment. there s a more fundamental question that we discussed last week which is does the government have the legal authority to do this. where in statute was the intention or authority granted to the federal government to take this kind of an action? there was clearly a lot of skepticism on behalf of most of the members of the supreme court