statute 1182 gives the president sweeping authority on immigration which id does. the problem with the first one, you can t discriminate where someone is coming from or the religious minority part. that s out now. you ve got six instead of seven, yes, they re muslim majority countries. how much harder is this court fight for you guys this time around, green cardholders aren t included. to be clear on dan s point, he s wrong about the statutory authority. the president can designate certain individuals as having a terrorist threat. he s designating all individuals from six muslim countries as effectively terrorist threats. that s something he can t do and has never been done. we re out of time. thank you both very much. following a lot of news as you can see this morning. let s get right to it. if he s making that up, it s a real problem. if it s true, it s an even
the order tells them to do. so hopefully they will do their job to the best of their ability. also, there is a little bit of a gap between because the new order is supposed to apply retroactively so there might be some terrorists who raced to get visas in this gap. period into them i say, too bad. yosi 1182 gives the president the right to do this and those are the few people that might make the most noise initially. jon: go ahead, philip quickly. there is no guarantee they re going to be issuing any new visas of the next ten days anyway, so that right there might make the whole thing moot. jon: that could be issue, thank you both. jenna: some labor leaders cautiously warming up to the prospect of working with president trump as he continues to make decisions that seem to benefit unions. a closer look at the future of labor under the trump administration ahead. like what? like a second bee helmet with protective netting.
period put forward. that was in violation. so hold on. let me answer the question. there s also a strong reading when you read 1182, u.s. code, that it is very clear that the president does have the authority. so they are very much apples and oranges issues. one it s very clear that the president is told by congress in u.s. code that he has the authority to do what is necessary to protect the american people. that is there s no way that anybody above a fifth grade reading level could interpret that different. there s a difference between looking at a statute in 1972 and saying something was complicated back then. not only that it s a multifaceted thing. you look at how the guidance was issued. there was a zero comment peered yo. nobody was able to weigh-in on that situation back then. so when you re talking about forcing schools to make a huge accommodation from the federal level and schools, parents, teachers, kids were not able to have any input in that decision from washington, i
comment period put forward on this guidance and how it was executed. there s also a strong reading when you read 1182 u.s. code that it is very clear the president does have the a authority, one it s very clear that the president is told by congress in u.s. code he has the authority to do what s necessary to protect the american people and there s no way that anybody above a fifth grade reading level could interpret that any different. there is a difference from something back in 1972, there was a zero comment period, nobody was able to weigh in back then so talking about schools to make a huge accommodation and parents, teachers kids, did not
this guidance, which is in violation of how it was executed. so, there s a big hold on. let me answer the question. there is also a strong reading when you read 1182 u.s. code that it is very clear that the president does have the authority. so, they are very much apples and oranges issues. one, it s very clear that the president is told by congress in u.s. code he has the authority to do what s necessary to protect the american people. that s and there s no way anybody above a fifth grade reading level could interpret that difference. there is a difference looking at a statute from 1972 again, it s a multifaceted thing. when you look at how the guidance was issued, there was a zero comment period. nobody was able to weigh in on that situation back then. and so when you re talking about forcing schools to make a huge accommodation from the federal level, schools, parents, teachers, kids, were not able to have any input in that decision from washington, i think it s a