composition be? brand new. and i fundamentally agree that he does have the power under 8usc is 1182f, okay? that s what gives him the power. but the problem here is the text of it does not make clear whether or not it applies for lawful residents. and that was, that was the crux of the ninth circuit s decision. arthel: that s why you re saying he should come up with a brand new order. he should redraf it, and redraft it, and be i think that s going to happen on monday. arthel: okay. maybe you ll be back to analyze that. i want to move to this proposal i first started talking about. in anticipation of a likely increase of deportation of people from mexico living here in the u.s. illegally, mexico s former foreign minister had this to say, pop this up for me, guys. w .n!+ k24z4.sb7yx5ñ /v@+h
they never even cited, sandra, once the provision of the immigration and nasht fact congress gave the president this power. he doesn t have to go back through a legislative process to issue a new executive order. they don t even site 1182 f which is where congress delegated in 1952 to the president this power to determine who can and can t enter our country when it s related to national security. sandra: jordan, when you say that. look more findly on it than the ninth circuit. sandra: talk to me about the justices that might be on his side and i also want to talk to you about the ninth circuit because there is some interesting stat that you can bring us there but the justices first? yeah. so first this would go to if let s decide right now that the white house decides we may issue a new order that doesn t moot out the existing order because we want to continue to fight on this one. it would first go to justice kennedy. he is the circuit justice here. he can make the decision on h
the means here. they look at this as an interim decision applied to the temp rer restraining order on the action and they continue to have the mind set. they are right and the law is on their side and the president is the commander in chief of the united states and they look specifically and repeatedly refer to u.s. code 1182 in which the president if he sees aliens coming into this country that are detrimental to the interest of the united states, the president can by proclamation suspend the entry of them into the country. they will use that, but based on the ruling from the judges tonight, they need to provide more evidence as to why there is a threat to the country why and why these seven countries. they will go back to the drawing board and sharpen their pencils and give more explanations to the argument. it was a unanimous decision against the president. he is saying see you in court. the roll out of this order
unanimous 3-0 decision by the ninth circuit court. your take. where should the administration go to here? they could take it to the supreme court or should the president rewrite it? ultimately the easiest thing to do is rewrite it. if you look at the law i believe it s subsection f of 1182 u.s. code, it essentially says the president may do what the president chooses to do. 1965 an additional law was added that doesn t just make that the only law that applies. we can assume these three federal judges knew the code and the law when they made their decision. i think the green cardholders, et cetera, is what caused the hangup. would you advise the president trump, mr. trump rewrite it and make it more narrow and try to win. here is why. it s not about doinwinning. it s about doing what s right for the united states.
determine who comes into this country. all this talk about constitutional rights, if you were from somalia, i got news flash, you do not have constitutional rights in this country. and, congress agreed with the plenary power authority of the president in terms of national security and immigration with, what is it, 8 usc, what is it, 1182-f. when they said the president at anytime can make a decision to block an alien from coming into this country. so it is not about people with green cards. it is about joe schmo muhammad, doesn t have any vetting from another country where they promised to send in individuals and jihadists to kill us. brian: scmmo you muhammad the iii. that is little bit different. here is what trump responded. security of our nation is at stake. got so many other fights to v he has an attorney general to do this. let it go because front and