friday revealed the president only paid 18.4% on an income of over $608,000. with us right now to weigh in, stuart varney. that is a very low tax rate. 18% is extremely low. however, he did this by giving a very large amount of money to charity. the president gave $150,000 to over 30 different charities, including 103,000 which went to fisher house foundation, which provides housing for seriously wounded vets. so he gets the rate down by giving heavily to charity. here s the problem: the president s budget proposes to cap those deductions, including the charitable deductions. so he s doing what he says he s going to restrict in the future. he s got his rate down by doing what he says he s going to cap and limit in the future. that s a contradiction. steve: it is, because, for instance, fisher house,
helen miron was the constant attention between the celebrity, between public emotions and forensic science. because the forensic science which i testified to and i was called in on day one and i was present and participated in the autopsy on lana clarkson. my wife came in about two or three years later well beyond my involvement in the case. geraldo: so your wife didn t bring you in, you were in? i was brought in on day one by the attorneys that the time. geraldo: so dose edward owe you an apology? he is wrong and sure, he owes me. i didn t get $103,000. but he makes up things i see from this. the first contact i have seen. excuse me, excuse me. may i interrupt. geraldo: let him finish. and what mammoth dose brilliantly in the film is to show the conflict that happened
helen miron was the constant attention between the celebrity, between public emotions and forensic science. because the forensic science which i testified to and i was called in on day one and i was present and participated in the autopsy on lana clarkson. my wife came in about two or three years later well beyond my involvement in the case. geraldo: so your wife didn t bring you in, you were in? i was brought in on day one by the attorneys that the time. geraldo: so dose edward owe you an apology? he is wrong and sure, he owes me. i didn t get $103,000. but he makes up things i see from this. the first contact i have seen. excuse me, excuse me. may i interrupt. geraldo: let him finish. and what mammoth dose brilliantly in the film is to show the conflict that happened
and a myth logical sort of a thing. they were forced to do that because of two years we have been fighting this film and what it is about. you can t say it as fiction when you are using real people s names. geraldo: what is your biggest beef edward? what is the biggest beef about it? the biggest beef is that it portrays lana clarkson as being responsible for are her own death. this trial was two years. two different trials. a jury convict #-d him. this movie takes away any kind of faith in the american jury system. all of the evidence that dr. baden and his wife which is still we don t understand the conflict of interest, how can a wife bring in a forensic expert who was paid $103,000 for his testimony which the brilliant district attorney allen jackson brought out in the trial, how can you even be part of this
and a myth logical sort of a thing. they were forced to do that because of two years we have been fighting this film and what it is about. you can t say it as fiction when you are using real people s names. geraldo: what is your biggest beef edward? what is the biggest beef about it? the biggest beef is that it portrays lana clarkson as being responsible for are her own death. this trial was two years. two different trials. a jury convict #-d him. this movie takes away any kind of faith in the american jury system. all of the evidence that dr. baden and his wife which is still we don t understand the conflict of interest, how can a wife bring in a forensic expert who was paid $103,000 for his testimony which the brilliant district attorney allen jackson brought out in the trial, how can you even be part of this