Xiaomi files appeal against ED's seizure of Rs 5,551.27 crore

The counsel for the company argued that the seizure was unnecessary and under Section 37A of FEMA even the necessity of suspicion is not required. Even the qualification of the "authorised officer" to take action was not prescribed.

Related Keywords

China ,Xiaomi ,Fujian ,India ,Karnataka ,United States ,Justicem Nagaprasanna ,Justice Prasannab Varale ,High Court ,Competent Authority ,Enforcement Directorate ,Chief Justice Prasannab Varale ,Justice Mgs Kamal ,Xiaomi India ,Xiaomi Tax Case ,Xiaomi Ed Case ,Karnataka High Court ,