According to the Board of Appeals ruling, specific requirements not met included:
• The September meeting was plagued with technical difficulties such that Planning Board members and attendees couldn’t hear one another.
• Roll call votes, required by state law, weren’t taken.
• The Planning Board failed to address each of the nine standards included under Article 21, the commercial and industrial structures section of the Weld Building Ordinance.
• The Planning Board concluded incorrectly that the deed AT&T submitted showed sufficient proof of right title and interest.
Later that month the Planning Board took no action on a request to reconsider the AT&T cellphone tower application.