Transcripts For SFGTV LIVE BOS Budget And Finance Committee 20160525

Budget and finance committee occurring on may 25, 2016 will begin shortly. Good morning and welcome to San Francisco board of supervises budget and finance Committee Meeting for may 25, 2016. Im mark farrell and clar and joined by supervisor katy tang as well as jane kim. We will be joined by norman yee and scott wiener. Want to thank lichbda wong and jessie [inaudible] Charles Kremenak from sfgtv. Silence cell phones and leck trainic devices. Documents should be submit today the clerk. Items will appear on june 7, board of supervises agenda unless otherwise stated. Colleagues we have a lengthy ajendsa. Item 1, resolution approving agreement between state and city combined city project including pedestrian safety, transit impruchbments andue fillty upgrades. Shannon karen from San Francisco public works. Im here to seek approval for public works to intr into agreement can caltrans to 19th avenue. This project features pedestrian and transit curb extensions as well as water and sewer infrastructure improvements. The project extends along 19th avenue which is state route 1 from [inaudible] to lincoln way. The agreement is prerequisite for caltrans. The agreement specifies the responsibility of the city and caltrans in executing the project. The city is the implementing agency fraall phases of the project. Caltrans is responsible for providing Quality Assurance and permit after accepting the plans, specifications and estimate package, the right of way certification, fundsing certification. No funds are exchanged. Public works order march 21, 2015 dweckter of public work recommends approve the agreement to sign the agreement on behalf of the city. Happy to answer any questions. Thank you very much. Any questions. Moouv to pub lic comment. Anybody wish to comment on item 1 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed like to send iletm 1 to full board with positive recommendation motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor kim without objection. Item 2 resolution approving the one permanent easement to mu deso for 35 thousand paid by jwgmic heny to bide nl a portion of mchenry avenue. Thank you very much. Good morning. My name is tony borto the assistant real estate director of San Francisco Public Utilities commission. The action before you have is a resolution a easement to modesto paid by jwg mchenry. In addition the resolution also reflects adoption of several funings include ceqa findings, a findsing the conveyance and respect to code 23. 3 the find thofg sale of ineasement through a Competitive Bidding prauls is impractical. The resolution authorizes the director of property or general manager to execute and modify agreements in furtherance of this resolution. I want to justthere isqul i have a drawing that shows what we are talking about. This is mchenry avenue in modesto. These lines here mark the pucs right of way boundaries. Under subservice the puc has 3 High Pressure water lines and under ground voltage lines. The area is in question is the squiggling box. It is the area the developer needs to expand and widen mchenry avenue. When the city of modesto approved this development which is here and here, they required the developer to widen mchenry avenue. They need a little of our right of way to widen the highway. Sfpuc staff and caltrans and modesto reviewed and approved the plan for street improvements includes a subsurface bridge to protect the pipeline. July 14, 2015 the San Francisco Public Utilities commission authorize said agreement for the sale of the easement. Modesto city manager executed this agroument and the city of mu odesto accepted the improvements and an agreement with caltrans. Jwg mchenry provided an appraisal dated in 2014 and updated june 4, 2016 fair market value at 35 thousand. The appraisal was approved by the cities director of real propertyment we ask the board to adopt this resolution and the related findings. Thank you very much. Colleagues, any questions for the puc . Okay, seeing none move to Public Comment. Anyone wish to comment on item 2 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Entertain a motion . Move with positive recommendation to full board. Motion by supervisor yee and second by supervisor tang and take that without objection. Item 3 resolution [inaudible] authorizing the director of Mayors Office of housing [inaudible] Allocation Committee to permit the revenue baunz in a principle amount not to exceed 50 million 455 fell street. Item 4, [inaudible] no cost for aumgz of 6 months until december 31, 20s 17. Thank you don lusty, senior project manager. Before you today are two resolution related to financing and ground lease for new 100 percent affordable fomly Housing Development located at 455 fell street also known as central freeway parcel o in hayes valley. The first resolution is bonds [inaudible] authorizing the city to submit a application for bond financing not to exceed 56 million used for construction financing. The second resolution authorizes the city to enter into ground lease where the project is built. Provides the terms for ground lease that includes 75 year lease term with extension option for additional 24 years annual rent of 10 percent of fair market value determined by a Third Party Appraisal with annual base rent payments structured as 15 thousand annually and the balance payable to the extent proceeds a available from project cash flows. Approval of both resolutions is required for the [inaudible] bond application [inaudible] june 14, it is important to note the baunz are financing obligations which dont require the city to place any money to repay the bond. Briefly, the project will be located at 455 fell as i mentioned earlier. Will be a new 100 percent affordal rental Housing Development in San Francisco hayes valley neighborhood to be financed with tax ex. Bonds 4 percent tax credits and [inaudible] state department of housing and Community Development and [inaudible] funds from the federal home loan bank, a permanent mortjudge and funding from the city. The development will consist of 180 family units earning betwoot 40 and scith percent of ami included a 30 percent set aside for formally homeless families. To be built on the largest remaining freeway parcel, the project is owned by mercy housing and San Francisco Housing Development corporation and include 1200 square feet of retail space on the ground floor, a large central landsscape court yard, roof top open space, community garden, office space for Supportive Service and on site daycare. Provide housing for low income families and formally homeless. We are available to answer questions. Thank you very much. Any questions on 3 or 4 . We move to Public Comment. Anybody wish to comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Like to make a motion to send item 3 and 4 for positive recommendation we take that without objection. Item 5, resolution declaring intent the city to [inaudible] directorf Mayors Office of housing and Community Development to Submit Application to Allocation Committee to permit issuance of moorejudge revenue bond not to exseat 140 million for 2070 folsom street. Item 7, [inaudible] locate td at 2070 folsom street thank you very much. Mayors office of housing and Community Development is back. Good morning supervisors. I am ann romarrow project manager. I will present resolutions related to financing and option to ground lease of family Housing Development in the mission located near 17th and folsom street. The first is tax exempt bond which authorizes the silty to submit for bond finances in a amount not to exceed 140 million. The second resolution authorizes the city to enter into ground lease with city owned parcel where the project will be built. Mission Economic Development agency and chinatown Community Development were selected to develop the city and it is ideal for housing, it faces south to a park under construction on 17th and folsom. The project includes up to 139 units of Affordable Housing over ground floor using facing the park and include 20 percent set aside for homeless or at risk transitional age use. Also includes a hub on the ground floor that include license childcare and youth after School Programs and services, Leadership Programs and ground floor cafe with public restrooms. We request approval to authorize the skity to apply for the bond allocation and will return to the board to requestissue the bonds in late 2017 when the project is ready for construction. The bonds a conduit finances only. Apply to the the bond allocation the developer must demonstrate site control which is achieved by a option to ground lease the site. The option leads to the ground lease with Standard City terms. That is the term of 75 years with extension option for additional 24 years and annual rent of 10 percent of fair market value with base rent in the amount of 15,000 a year. The project will provide needed Affordable Housing for families and homeless transitional age youth in the mission with ground floor uses and recommend approval. We have representatives from the sponsor here if and center questions for them. Thank you. Colleagues, any questions . Okay. Seeing none open up to Public Comment. Public comment is closed. Motion to send the item forward . Motion to pass to full board. Motion by supervisor yee and second by supervisor tang. Item 7, resolution declaring intent of the city to expenditures from proceeds of future bond indetedness and Mayors Office of housing and Community Development to submit a application to california debt limit Allocation Committee to permit the issuance of rez sidential bond not to exceed 225 million. Item 8, declaring intent of the city to [inaudible] submit a application to the california debt limit allocation city to permit the issuance of residential bond in amount not to exceed 240 million for 1601 mariposa street. Thank you very much. Good morning, my name is adam cray and Bond Program Manager for housing and Community Development. Here to present resolutions for two Affordable Housing projects. These resolutions authorize the city submit a application to california debt limit Allocation Committee. When bonds are authorized they will be issued as conduit debt and nolt require the city to pledge funds to repay of the bonds. The first project 5th and howard consist of 263 below market rate units and 100 percent affordable and mixed income building located at 921 howard street. The below market rates units serve those not earning more than 50 percent ami. The second project, will be 299 one unit mixed Income Project located at 1601 mariposa. 60 units serve very low income house holds and a portion will be reserved for houses earning no more than 40 percent of ami and the balance is reserved for those earning no more than 50 percent ami. Both of the projects the sponsors plan to submit an application to the california debt limit allocation within 4 weeks. Here is representatives fraup tenderloin development and [inaudible] on behalf of the sponsors like to thank you for the consideration and look forward to your support for the very important projects. Thank you very much. Any question for staff on 7 or 8 . We move to Public Comment . Anybody wish to comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Motion to move forward item 7 and 8 to full board with positive recommendation. Motion by supervisor tang and take that without objection. Is there a second . Second by supervisor yee without objection. With that, call item number 9 please. Hearing on the cities financial position and requesting the mayors budget director and budget and legislative analyst and controller to report. Okay, thank you very much. This is a item colleagues we have as a standing item and dont have anything to work on this week so we will continue this. Continue to the call of the chair but will take Public Comment. Anyone wish to comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor yee without objection. We will do a few out of order, calls item 1214. Item 12, ordinance appropriating 207 million to mta for transportation projects and equipment. 13, resolution authorizing the sale issuance and execution of one or more series mta Revenue Bonds in amount not to exceed 207 million. Item number 14, ordinance appropriating approximately 6 million oo support Planning Design and outreach for Capital Improvement projethwith Golden State Warrior [inaudible] thank you very much. We have [inaudible] good morning, thank you for hearing these 3 items. Item 12 and 13 are related to the next sear as of Revenue Bonds which we are seeking approval of the ordinance and resolution. We propose to seek approval of 190 million fund, lightrail vehicle procurement and [inaudible] mission bay Capital Improvement. The fund is 190 million and 1070 mill ynl for lightrail, 48 million for van ness bart and [inaudible] Capital Improvements. The lightrail vehicle is one of our largest projects and we vavariety of Funding Sources to help fund the new lightrail vehicles. The Revenue Bonds are a portion of the Funding Sources and same is true of van nessbert projth. I want to thank you debia newman from budget analyst, did a great job summarizing the bonds. Dont want to bore you details s, so if you have questions happy to answer them. Any questions right now . Okay, mr. Rose can we go to your reports, please . Yes, mr. Chairman and members. On page 7 of our report we report that the estimated total debt service over 30 years is approximatelyim on item 12the Debt Services is 385. 4 million of which 178. 4 is interest and 207 million principle. The bonds will add between 11 million to 16 million in debt service. On page 8, we note that the sfmta will repay the bonds from gross annual revenues which total 626 million312 thousand in 1516 and that is table 7 on page 8 of the report. We recommend you approve the proposed resolution and ordinance. Regarding item 14 , on page 13 of our report we note that according to the Controllers Office when the warriors purchased the 11 acres from sales force in 2015 the sales transaction generated 3, that results in 3 million 50 thousand to mission bay fund. 350 thousand for sfmta increased base line for total 3. 4 million so that one time transfer provides the source of revenues, 3. 4 million for appropriation for arena Capital Improvement for fy 1516 and that is shown on table 1 of page 5 the report. Sales tax and gross receipts tax totaling approximately 2, 310 thousand are projected to be generated for construction the warriors areney in fy 1718. 270 thousand is base line allocation from the sales and gross receipts tax revenues. Provide a total source of revenues [inaudible] and again that is shown on table 1. All of the revenues in the supplemental if they are not generated by warriors sale tax and gross receipts tax is the city general fund would fund a difference so want to note that is a possibility. On page 14 of our report, over 5 year period as shown in table 2 on that page 14, even with the anticipatedgeneral funds contributions to transfer taxes and construction gross receipts taxes and sales taxes, the sfmta will face a revenue shortfall of 34, 508, 573. Sfmta anticipates funding the sort fall through Revenue Bonds and that was the prior item that we just reviewed. As shown in file 6604 and 160465. Request approval not to exceed [inaudible] which includes 35 million of mission Bay Transportation Capital Improvement. The 35 million in the prior item would funds this 34. 5 million projected shortfall. We note according to the the report from the direct of transportation, sfmta will be able to deliver Transit Service to the the warriors project, sfmta can not guarantee future finding for the Transit Service to the warriors project. Accord toog the director of transportation, sfmta supports the warrior project understanding the city, Golden State Warriors and sfmta dont expect adverse impact associated with implementing the Transit Service plan and Capital Investment to support the warriors project and recommend you approve the ord nnss. Thank you. Any questions on items 1214. Seeing none we will open to Public Comment. Anybody wish to comment on items 1214 . Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Any questions or comments at this time . Like to the make a motion to send forth 1214 to full board with positive recommendation. Motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor kim and take that without objection. Item 10 and 11. Item 10, budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimates received and estimates expenditures for departments as och may 2, 2016. Item 11, annual salary ordinance proposed budget and appropriation ordinance for selected department as of may 2, 2016 for fy 201617 and 2017 to 18. Colleagues these are departmental budgets we started to hear. We will go through a number of them now and start with department of environment. We will not do that. We will move on. Is retirement here . Jake huish . Come on up. Mr. Rose, we want to go to your report . Why dont you let the department go first and well comment. Good morning. Pleasure to be back here. We have reached agreement with the Budget Analyst Office related to adjustments they are recommending to this committee on Department Budget and would like to take the opportunity to thank the committee as well as Budget Analyst Office and mayors Budget Office for supporting the budget for us to fulfill or mission and with that, happy to answer question. Thank you very much. Mr. Chairman and members, now im referring to the separate budget analysis report on the budget. On page 42 of the report we note that our recommended reduction to the budget total 616, 503. Still low a increase of of 6. 5 percent in fy 1617 budget. The budget total 576, 097 in 1718. The reduction uzalone increase of 161, 335 or 6 10 of a percent. The department concurs with our reductions which is shown on pages 43 and 44 of our report. Glad to answer any questions. Thank you mr. Rose. Colleagues any questions for mr. Rose or huish . Thank you very much. Colleagues can i entertain a motion to assessment these budget Analyst Recommendations pending Public Comment . So moved. Motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor yee. We take that without objection. I want to make sure as we start budget season this is the first one we do this appropriately or is there another method . John gibbener, today we take comment on item 10 and 11 and recommend the committee take the motions but not vote on them until after Public Comment and when Public Comment is done adopt. Okay. Fair enough. Madam clerk motion to resend the previous motion to resend. Motion by sfr visor tang and second by supervisor yee without objection and entertain a motion to accept the recommendations afterPublic Comment. Thank you very much. Department of the environment here yet by chance . No problem. My apologies for the timing error. Debbie rafael department of environment and are pleased to say we are in agreement with budget analyst recommendation and accept their changes. Thank you very much. Mr. Rose why dont we go to your report. On page 2 of the report the recommended reductionspage 18 of the report, sorry. Our recommended reductions to the budget total 102, 633. 1617. 92, 918 are on going savings and 9, 750 are 1 time. Allow increase of [inaudible] or 6. 9 percent in the department 1617 budget. [inaudible] all those monies are on pm going savings and as i understand the department concurs with our recommendation, and any further questions or comments . Thank you for coming to agreement. We will entertain that after Public Comment. Next we have bbi. Am hui. Good morning supervisors. Tom hui director of Department Building inspection. We are in agreement with budget analyst. Thank you for them to work with us closely on this budget. If you center any question we can answer it. Thank you very much mr. Hui. Mr. Chairman, members on page 11 of our report our recommended reductions to the budget total 4, 393, 815 in 1617. Of that amount 4, 324, 815 are on going savings and 69,000 are 1 time. Total [inaudible] all of which are on going savings and as i understand it the department concurwise recommended reductions and details are shown on pages 12squaen 16 of the report. Any questions or comments for dbi or budget analyst . Okay, thank you very much for being here. Good morning Megan Wallace from port of San Francisco and we are in full agreement with the budget and legislative analyst recommendation. This is going smooth. Mr. Rose can we get a report, please . Yes. On page 21 of our report our recommended reductions to the budget total 505, 208 in 1617 all are ongoing savings and allow increase of [inaudible] to 23 percent of the 1617 budget. The bulk of that are Capital Improvements that is quhie you see a huge increase in the budget. In addition we recommend closing out prior year unexpending incumbences of 95, 185. Those are on page 23 of the report. Regarding fiscal year 1718 the recommended reductions to the budget total 528, 504 all are on going savings and department concurs with the reductions shown on pages 22 and 23. Colleagues any questions . Thank you for being here. Up next we have our library. Madam clerk, would you call item 22 out of order . Item 22 ordinance appropriating 7. 6 million for general reserve for Public Library and [inaudible] fiscal 1516. Good mornling supervisors regarding the fy 17 and 18 budget we reached agreement with budget analyst and want to thank [inaudible] mr. Rose. We agreed with the reductions proposed. Thank you very much. Mr. Rose can we go to your report, please . Mr. Chairman and members, on page 25 of our report our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 680, 277 in fy 1617. 664, 527 are on going, 15, 750 are one time. The reductions allow increase of 6, 421 [inaudible] 5. 1 percent in the budget. We also recommend that 1, 772, 592 for Property Leasing on Budget Finance Committee reserve pending submission of a proposed lease it come back to the board of supervisors to budget and finance committee. For 1718 the recommended reductions total 664, 527. Of that amount all are ongoing saichbings and reductions allow increase of 4, 339, 085 or 3. 5 percent in departments 1718 budget. As i understand it the depermanent concur with the recommended reductions. Thank you very much. Supervisor tang. Just a quick question, curious what is the facility near 805 bryant . The purpose is [inaudible] operation jz moving some of the items and collections we have at books hall to a space that is much more adequate and will house our mobile outreach. It will bethe idea it is long term . Yes. We are looking at long term lease. Thank you very much. Item 22 we will consider. Mr. Her era i want to speak separately. Can we approve that now . You can. Thank you very much supervisors. The next item the Library Commission unanimously approved a resolution asking we request to appropriate 7. 5 million from fy 16 general reserve that go thooz payment of our debts associated with the issuance of lease Revenue Bonds. Some of those we use to partially support the completion of Library Improvement program. The supplemental appropriation will reduce the debt at 28 million from the original bond amount of 34 million. We work closely with Controllers Office of Public Finance and indicated the library can refinance our current debt by reducing the prisple and estimate Interest Rates to 2. 6 to 3. 7 percent to the original sale which was 5. 6 percent. It is all good fiscal management to reduce that debt and the long term savings approximate from 14 to 16. 7 million. The bond term is for 25 years and end in 2034 but this will reduce the timeframe so ask for your support approving that appropriation and refunding. We also have jamie curuben from the Controllers Office of Public Financing to answer any questions. Why don we go to the report from mr. Rose. We totally agree this is the best interest of it city to refund the future refunding of these lease Revenue Bonds. On page 40 in table 1 the department on the Controllers Office of Public Finance anticipate savings as the director mentioned. [inaudible] we recommend that you approve this ordinance. Okay. Thank you mr. Rose. Colleagues, any questions. We move to Public Comment for item 22 only. Anyone wish to comment on item 22 . Good afternoon. Peter war field. This was presenteds a prepayment of debt service to save money and there was no mention about brooks hall moving or mention of another facility as i recall. One the issues with the library is distrunkz of the entire west wing of the 5th floor where the bound magazines about half the collection was housed and the removal to brooks hall so there can be a lurbing and Literacy Center placed there which we said could be placed in any store front or Office Building and not as a core function of the library housing the libraries collections so im completely taken aback that now those materials are going to be moved even further away then brooks hall which is basically the underground area in the civic center. I think the lack of public process here is very problematic. It is something that will have something to say about on the overall budget issue, but the idea that collections will be moving further and further away when the literacy and Learning Center functions be in any location in the area of the library or not is very very problematic. It is real dismantling of the library as a library. Thank you. Thank you very much. Anybody else wish to comment on item 22 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Motion on item 22 please only . Like to move to full board with positive recommendation. Motion by supervisor yee and second by pr visor tang without objection. Thank you very much and thank you to had city library for being here on their budget. We move up next to the airport. Good morning. Cathy wagner with San Francisco airport. The airport is in agreement with budget Analysts Recommendations and we would like to thank mr. Rose and our analyst mr. Low for their work on the airports budget this year. I am happy to answer questions and joined by the airports budget drether if you have specific questions. Thank you very much. Any questions . Mr. Rose can we get a report. Page 2 of the prort the recommended reductions to the budget total 3, 142, 122 in 1617. These reduction allow increase of 38, 589, 602 or 4. 2 percent in the 1617 budget. 1718 total [inaudible] of that amont 1, 501, 726 are ongoing savings and [inaudible] these reductions would still allow increase of 31, 664, 116 or 3 percent the budget and understand the department concurs with the reductions and shown on pages 39 of the report. Any questions . Okay, thank you very much to the airport for being here and up next we have Public Utilities commission. I see mr. Kelly here and team. Good morning. Harlan caly general manager of San Francisco Public Utilities commission and we too are in agreement with the budget analyst and just want to thank them for coming and listening to our stories and working out a win win for everybody. Want to thank them. Okay. Mr. Rose, go to your report, please. We can hear about the stories too if you want on page 29 of our report, i will go over each Division Within the puc, the first is bureau remed reduction to the proposed puc budget 541, 884 in 1617. 419, 884 are on going savings and 122,000 122,000 are 1 time. Hetch hetchy reduction toletal 1, 189, 381 and of that amount 1, 125, 597 are ongoing, 63, 734 are one time. Regarding the water enterprise the reduction to the 1617 budget total 908, 930. 712, 811 are ongoing. Regarding the waste water enterprise recommended reductions to the proposed 1617 budget total 1, 273, 673. Of that amount 1, 225, 805 are on going savings and [inaudible] overall for 1617 the reductions total 3, 913, 818 which allow increase of [inaudible] 1. 6 percent in the 1617 budget. On page 30 of our report for fiscal year 17 hrf 18 the reduction for puc bureaus total 410, 685. Of that are amount all are on going savings. Hetch hetchy and power, recommended reduction total 991, 139 and of that amount 745, 180 are ongoing savings and [inaudible] one time. Regarding the water enterprise our recommended reductions total 959, 632. Of that amount 825, 610 are ongoing savings and [inaudible] water enterprise reduction total 965, 384 all ongoing savings. Recommended reductions total [inaudible] 60, 600, 821 or 6 percent in the budget and understand the department concurs with our recommended reductions which are shown on pages 3140 of our report. Okay. Thank you mr. Rose. Colleagues any questions for the budget analyst or our department . Okay. That is all we have for our item 10 and 11 budgets so we will open up 10 and 11 to Public Comment now. Anybody that wishes to comment on 10 or 11 in our departmental budgets . Parter warfield exectesk director of libraries users. I sent the supervisors last night and delivered a letter concerning the libraries testimony at the last budget and finance Committee Meeting last wednesday. The library has proposed changes only in the pucklic forum you provided, there was nothing at the Libraries Commission or no discussion what so ever as part the budget or any other fashion and that is something that we are very sensitive to. We ask you to ask questions at the very least and perhaps reserve that amount until a proper process can be done at the library can with regard to hours. In general i have to say we are always in favor of more hours, more access student the public, but hours are not potatoes, there are hours the citizens said they wanted consistently to the library through all the surveys and testimony and that is evening and weekends. The library made no clarity to your committee orally or in the presentation materials as to whichwhat the hours will be that are changed nor what existing hours are and there was no process what so ever. I would say also proposition d which made the library rich requires a specific process and have a copy of proposition d which i can give to you and that has not been fallowed either. That is because the library has consistently chinched library hours. The last time they ignoreed what the public said and tried to cut every evening from 9 to 8 oclock and saturday mornings. We fought that and they had to retreat. This should not be imposed unless there is a proper process. Thank you. Any other members of the public who wish to comment on items 10 or 11 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Colleagues we have departmental budgets for 10 and 11. Unless the City Attorney corrects me bhaut we like to do is take a motion accepting the budget analyst rmd recommendations cuts. All departments in agreement and forward 10 and 11 to the Board Meeting for july 12 of this year 2016. Through the chair like to make a motion to that effect so 10 and 11 adopt the budget analyst recommendation and send to full board with positive recommendation. Motion by supervisor yang and seconded by supervisor yee. July 12. We take that without objection. Would you call 15 and 17 together . [inaudible] the hetchy [inaudible] authorizing the issuance and sales of tax exempt power Revenue Bonds in principle amounts not to exceed 32 million. Item 17, ordinance appropriating approximately 158 million of hetch hetchy revenue and water Revenue Bonds for Capital Improvement program for fy 1617 at 65 million and 2017 to 18 at 93 million. Thank you, the puc is here 250 speak. The next 7 itemsitems 1520 relate to capital funding. All the proposals were vetted in the Public Meetings with the commission as well as Public Meeting with Capital Planning committee. Item 15, 16 and 17 relate to hetch hetchy water and power. Item 16 and 17 relate to 2 year capital appropriation and funding authorization for the next 2 fiscal years for hetch hetchy water and power totaling 158, 125, 130. Happy to answer any question. Thank you. Colleagues, any questions or comments . I think well go to Public Comment for those items then. We wanted to harvey. Mr. Rose. Madam chair, members of the committee, on page 19 of our report for these items, we note the descriptions of the projects are included in the attachment on 23 of the report. On page 21 as you know supervisors the power bonds are repaid from the sfpuc hetch hetchy power enterprise revenues generated largely from the sale of electricity. Sfpuc charges different rates to customers, the airport and sfpuc pay rets set by pg e. Others play different rates shown on table 4 of page 21 of the report. The sfpuc adopted new rates for other city departments increasing the rates by 50 cents per kilo watt hour shown in table 4. On page 22 i will revise our first recommendation. Instead of aminding file 160473 to specify that the sfpuc submit future legislation to the board of supervisors we recommend that you amend file 160473 to require the sfpuc submit report to budget and finance committee on sale of the bonds and recommend you approve file 160473 as amended and 160470 and 160475. Thank you very much. Colleagues, any questions . Comments . May i just make a comment that the increase to power rates was a half cent, not 50 cents. Okay. We will move to Public Comment. Anybody wish to comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. We have a bla recommendation for the legislation. Any comments or questions from the puc on the recommendation . No we are in agreement with the recommendation. Colleagues, unless any questions or comments or objections we entertain a motion to accept the budget analyst recommendation and move forward. Make a motion to item 15 to amind the puc submit future legislation for future sale bonds and approve 16 and 17 all with positive recommendation. Motion by supervisor tang i believe item 15 is hearing. Okay. Could we then motion to file item 15. [inaudible] whats that . Would you like to release the reserved funds . Let me triple check here what we are doing. On 15 is release reserves. That is part of the legislation supervisor and recommend you release those monies. Those are mitigation revenues. I resend my motion. Item 15, lets go first with motion to release 2. 7 million reserve. Motion by supervise rb tang, veckd by supervisor yee and take without objection. Number 15 be filed . A motion to file 15. Take without objection. Item 16 and 17 and apologize i forget the budget analyst recommendation applies to but to amend so the puc comes back before us with legislation to approve future sale of bonds. That is item 16, correct . Just clarify that supervisor tang, it is file 160473 and instead of requiring separate legislation to report back to budget and finance committee is our recommendation. Okay. Great. So, what harvey said for item 16 and move forward item 16 and 17 with amendment with positive recommendsation to full board. Amend items 16 and move forward 16 and 17 with positive recommendation . Correct. Thank you everybody. Motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor kim without objection. Call items 18 and 19. Item 18 ordinance appropriating approximately 2 272 millions from bonds water revenue and [inaudible] Public Utilities commission [inaudible] 150 million and 201718 122 million. [inaudible] other form of indetness by Public Utilities not to exceed 265 million to finance the cost of various capital Water Project benefiting the water enterprise. Thank you very much. Items 18 and 19 are similar to what you just heard item 16 and 17. They relate to 2 year capital appropriation and funding authorization for water enterprise totedling 272, 233, 620. The items were vetted in 5 Public Meetings and Public Meeting of Capital Planning committee and happy to answer questions. Any questions . Mr. Rose can we go to your report . Yes. On page 27 of the report we note that the descriptions of the proposed projects are included on page 29 of our report. On page 28 of the report we note according to the 1617 Financial Plan plans a 10 percent increase in water rates in 201617 and 7 percent increase in water rates in fy 201718 to cover the water enterprise operating capital costs. The sfpuc estimates the average rate water bill will increase brie 4 in 1617. Again by another 3 in 1718 from 44 to 47 in fy 1718. Again, we have the same recommendation that we made on the first item. We revice to report to budget and finance committee instead of separate legislation and recommend you approve the files as amended. Thank you mr. Rose. Any questions . Any comments on the recommendation . We agrie with the budget analyst. Move to Public Comment. Anybody wish to comment on item 18 or 19 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. We have recommendation by there budget analyst. Comments, questions, motions . Motion to send forth to full board with positive recommendations. Item 18 and 19. With budget analyst recommendation. Motion accepted budget analyst recommendation. Motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor yee without objection. Item 20 and 21. Item 20. [inaudible] control board [inaudible] waste water revenue [inaudible] item 21, ordinance authorizing issuance and sales of tax exempt or taxable waet waster revenue bond in [inaudible] Public Utilities commission in principle amounts not to exceed 1. 1 billion to finance the cost of various capital waste Water Project benefiting the waste water enterprise. Thank you very much. Eric sandsler, 20 and 21 are similar to the legislation you heard with respest to waste water enterprise. Two year capital appropriation for the next 2 fiscal years and funding authorization for those capital appropriation and total 1, 112, 601. That concludes the presentation. Assume you are okay with the budget analyst recommendation . Any comments . On the bottom page of 34 of the report we note that the proposed projects are included on page 37 of the report. Page 35 the sfpuc bills for water and sewer bill. The average is 86, 40 is water and 46 is sewer. According to the 1617 to 2526 Financial Plan the puc plans 7 percent increase in sewer rates in fy 1617 and 11 percent increase in sewer rates in 1718 to cover the waste water enterprise operating and capital cost. The puc estimates that the average monthly residential sewer bill increases by 4 in 1617 and by 7 in fy 1718. We have there same recommendation thatd you amind file 60471 to require the sfpuc to submit report on budget and finance committee on the sale of the bond. We recommend you approve. Seeing nobody for Public Comment, it is closed. Like to make a motion to approve item 20 and 21 to amend with budget analyst recommendation and send both to full boret with positive recommendation. Take those without objection. Colleagues, we arewe blew through 21 items in a hour in 20 minutes. We are going to go into recess until 4 30 p. M. Where we will have a joint meeting with youth commissioners so with that, we are in recess. [budget and finance committee in recess in recess until 4 30] tick. Severe droughts. Tick. Tick. Tick. Tick. Tick. Tick. Devastating. Devastating hurricanes. Tick. Tick. Tick. Tick. Tick tick tick tick tick tick our future. Tick tick is up. To you. Tick. Go to fightglobalwarming. Com while theres still time. 2, 1 you innovation on or was on over 200 years they went through extensive innovations to the existing green new metal gates were installed our the perimeter 9 project is funded inform there are no 9 Community Opportunity and our Capital Improvement plan to the 2008 clean and safe neighborhood it allows the residents and park advocates like san franciscans to make the matching of the few minutes through the philanthropic dungeons and finished and finally able to pull on play on the number one green a celebration on october 7, 1901, a skoovlt for the st. Anthonys formed a club and john then the superintendent the Golden Gate Park laid out the Bowling Green are here sharing meditates a permanent green now and then was opened in 1902 during the course the 1906 San Francisco earthquake that citywide much the city the greens were left that with an ellen surface and not readers necessarily 1911 it had the blowing e bowling that was formed in 1912 the Parks Commission paid laying down down green number 2 the San Francisco lawn club was the first opened in the United States and the oldest on the west their registered as San Francisco lark one 101 and ti it is not all fierce competition food and good ole friend of mine drive it members les lecturely challenge the stories some may be true some not memories of past winners is reversed presbyterian on the wall of champions. Make sure you see the one in to the corner thats me and. No . Not bingo or scrabble but the pare of todays competition two doreen and christen and beginninger against robert and others easing our opponents for the stair down is a pregame strategy even in lawn bowling. Play ball. Yes. Almost. clapping . The size of tennis ball the object of the game our control to so when the players on both sides are bold at any rate the complete ends you do do scoring it is youll get within point lead for this bonus first of all, a jack can be moved and a or picked up to some other point or move the jack with i have a goal behind the just a second a lot of elements to the game. Were about a yard long. Aim a were not player ill play any weighed see on the inside in the goal is a minimum the latter side will make that arc in im righthand side i play my for hand and to my left if i wanted to acre my respect i extend so it is arced to the right have to be able to pray both hands. clapping. who one. Nice try and hi, im been play lawn bowling affair 10 years after he retired i needed something to do so i picked up this paper and in this paper i see in there play lawn bowling in San Francisco Golden Gate Park ever since then ive been trying to bowl i enjoy bowling a very good support and good experience most of you have of of all love the peoples and have a lot of have a lot of few minutes in mr. Mayor the San Francisco play lawn bowling is in Golden Gate Park were sharing meadow for more information about the club including free lessons log patrick. Welcome to another episode of stay safe i saw us prepare our crawl space on this episode well saw the sheer wall youll see the finished product hi, im patrick and welcome to another episode of stay safe . The second part were retrofitting the triple wall as you can see weve installed one of the sheer ply wall on the First Episode we provided blocking to secure the ply wed and bolted and provided the connection with the floor im joined by thor madison. Thor Structural Engineers and thor knows more about sheer walls than anybody ive met in my life. It provides the stable ability that would rock before and after during around earthquake the nails along the edge of the plywood will reduce the chance of the building falling down. What else should we consider in getting ready. One thing about plywood a natural material that absorbs moisture and the panels can swell depending on the moisture if they swell theyll bulk out it is important probation officer leave a gap between the panels so before we install the next panel well drive in a couple of nails used to as temporary spares. What are the nails. 16 penny singers a good saying that and we dont need to be concerned with the exact nail size only the gap the next panel will be held with the existing panel well pull those down. We have peter from the construction why not go outside and cut our second panel so, now weve got the plywood lets go ahead and get it put up see if we can get it in place. By looking at that a perfect fit why not get peter in here to nail it down. So peter did a great job with the nailing but important to know this work requires a permit in the department of building inspection whether youre doing the work or a left hand contractor make sure you have the proper permit and additional to the nailing anything you want to talk about thinking about the plywood. The more plywood to install the better and make sure that the nails along each edge of each panel so you cant forget and hedge and had it perform the same thing. Another example of little money you can substantially rusz reduce the good afternoon and w im [inaudible] public address anounssment for you 3 time World Championship [inaudible] [applause] the team must always be introduced. It is my honor to welcome you to this very special celebrationment we gather to celebrate the birthday of the greatest player to ever play the game of baseball. Right San Francisco treasure and Living Legend the hall of famer number 24, give it up to mr. Willie mays. [applause]. Before we begin i like to mometd to recognize our dignities. He is on his way, mayor willie brown. He heard that a few times. Chairman tom nolan. Mta board member malcon hine iky. [inaudible] ceo mr. Larry bear and his wife pam. Mr. Peter megalen is on his way. He here yet . He will be here, yes, sir, you know he wont miss this mr. Mays. Supervisor mark farrell. Also we are expecting fire chief joan hayeswhite. And director of the mta ed riscon. Let me tell you about our honored guest today. Born in west field alabama in 19thry 1 willie mays junior was introduced to baseball. His professional career began in 1947 still in high cool. Ofew short years later the new york ginets signed willie a Minor League Deal and made his major league debay in 1941. The next year the army drafted willie removing him from it game befr about a year and a half and returned to baseball in 1954 with a bang winning the mrp award and selected to the a l star team. In 1958 the giants franchise relocated to beautiful San Francisco where willie spends most of his