All right. Ladies and gentlemen, good morning the meeting will come to order this the regularly the Budget Finance Committee excuse me board of supervisors budget finance subcommittee im supervisor cohen chair of this committee and to my left is supervisor katie tang and to my right is supervisor yee and our clerk mr. John carol and linda wong thank you jesse larson and phil jackson from sfgovtv so for assisting us today madam clerk, any announcements . Devices. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the may 2 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you very much call the first item Revenue Bonds or commercial placing the total Principal Amount of San Francisco International Airport subordinate commercial paper notes for any lawful airport. Thank you id like at a call kathy from the airport to make a brief presentation on this item. Good morning chair cohen im kate hartley with the San Francisco International Airport if i might make a suggestion to call item 2 since the budget Analyst Report addresses both piece of legislation madam clerk, call item number. A aggregate Principal Amount of San Francisco International Airport second series Revenue Bonds to finance and refinance airport capital plan aggregate airport shrina sami vs. The department of building inspection at 555 33rd avenue. Thank you members of the board kathy with the San Francisco International Airport the items before you are requesting approval of the supplemental appropriation one for 4. 8 million consisting of 40. 6 billion in new airport Revenue Bonds bopped authorization and 4 hundred and 74 previously thooshsz capital bonds that request see the authorization to sell in the airport revenue bond and increase the commercial paper by one hundred Million Dollars for Capital Improvement projects sfo use the capital be airport bojdz to finance the capital plan and uses commercial paper a short term Financing Mechanism for cash flow requirement prior to the long term bonds the property resolution will authors the sale of bonds in the amount of 4. 6 billi 4. 6 billion and an additional 100 million in the paper in before you appropriates 4. 8 billion of the airplane capital plan bonds at sfo last fiscal year Airport Passenger levels hit projection for 5 years in the future to fiscal year 2021 led to a demand for public that concludes my remarks and Ground Transportation as well as an increase in security requirements and infrastructure urban designs the airport prepares a 5 year capital plan in order to priorries the essential projects the capital plan is reviewed by the finance staff and the committee and the Controllers Office and is approved by the citys Capital Plan Committee the airport capital plan project to be funds to the legislation before you are focused on projected air traffic and passenger demands Major Projects to be funded by the subject bond precedes are the air excuse me improvements Airport Support improvements and terminal improvements and utility improvements the budget analyst has one hundred reviewed these im joined by the finance director kevin and im available to answer any questions you might have. Thank you very much ms. Wagner appreciate our presentation no questions at that time i suggest go to Public Comment and what is the public has to say all right. I understand all right. Go to the budget Analyst Report but looks like no Public School lets see what hashs say. We note the airport capital plan is the requested 4. 3 billion in new bond authorizations that file and then an additional 4 hundred and 4,832,455,418 in prior airport capital bond which was authorized by the board of supervisors but not sold the sources and use of 4. 8 billion in table 2 on page 5 of the report on page six the major Capital Improvement projects to be opportunity by the subject bond preys are on pages 6 and 7 of the report and also an appendix provided by the airport that shows the budget details beginning on page 9 of the report on page 8 we note the airport estimates total debt service of 10 plus bloinld in principle and in interest annual debt service is three hundred plus Million Dollar a comment ill make as you may know under the airports break even policy the airlines that are required to pay the difference between the budget is whatever the operating expense the difference between the 9 Airline Revenues and the expenses in effect any increase expenditures will be absorbed by the airlines through fees and terminal charges we recommend you approve the proposed ordinance. Thank you well take that under advisement anyone wish to comment on item number two minutes youll hear a soft chime with 30 seconds left seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Make a motion. I make a positive recommendation to the full board. Motion and accepted well take that without objection. Mr. Clerk. Agenda item 3 commission to execute services with mott of the exceed 21,000,000 and with a time from august 1, 2009, through april 14, 2018, pursuant to charter, section 9. 118. Public utilities commission. Welcome. Morning supervisors dan wade the director of capita water projects and programs for the San Francisco public works and here this morning to talk about the amendment that were requesting for a contract with Mott Macdonald for the new irvington tunnel projectconstruction Management Services this project is part of a 4. 8 billion Improvement Program this program is driven by 4 overall goals schematic liability and Water Quality and delivery reliability as well as water supply and these the new irvington tunnel projectconstruction Management Services is a very important link in to water system to provide water to 2. 6 million customers in 2009 the board approved a contract between Mott Macdonald and the city to provide construction Management Services for in project we had 15 million term with a 5 year duration its been amended 4 times since then in october 2016 the board approved a Fourth Amendment actually, the puc for 200 and 50 thousand for 5 and a half months in duration to continue the negotiations with the contractor for some disputes on the contract we resolved all but two of those disputes but have two disputes remaining and so we need additional time and money for the construction manager to assist us with closing out the contract the two disputes are an issue we have harder rock in the tunnels than previously experienced during the design phase or previously anticipated and then we have two repairs in the tunnel that were needed weve mad Good Progress with the contractor on the disputes and anticipate we show be able to resolve that without further legal action but need further time to get this down or done to close out our request to approve easement 5 on the contract increasing that by 3 hundred and 50 thousand and is duration for one additional year. Thank you is there a budget Analyst Report on this item . Yes. Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee on the bottom of page 18 of our report the subject the current total for the construction and related costs for the tunnel is 345 million plus and that is shown in table 4 on page 19 of our report that budget includes the Mott Macdonald construction Management Services contract of 700 million and the proposed request for three hundred and 50 thousand amendment it is a cost of 21 million plus we recommend you approve that resolution. Thank you for your recommendation well go to Public Comment is there any Public Comment on item 3 come up seeing none, Public Comment is closed. All right. Lets take those recommendations from the budget analyst. All right. So ill make a motion to. Send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. Okay without objection. Agenda. Call item 5 and 6 together. I will item no. 4 ordinance amending the administrative and environment codes to require that any new Passenger Vehicles in the city fleet by zero Emission Vehicles by december 31, 2020, and to encourage selection of zero Emission Vehicles in other vehicles classes as technology improves. All right. Thank you. Supervisor tang thank you so today your city family celebrated earth day that is on saturday with our annual breakfast at the city hall and i want to thank the wonderful sf environmental staff we know Everyday Needs to be earth day and if we dont collectively take action to deliberately stop well not to have the earth to celebrate one of the most existing and meaningful issues ive been working on is around sustainability and the protection of our environment one the ways and San Francisco can do our part to evaluate the footprint and change our behavior for the negative declaration negative impact this seeks to change the types of vehicles are City Employees drive the legislation requires all late night will be zero Emission Vehicles unless a waiver or exemption like Public Safety or Emergency Response use requires well have an amendment for this by the year 2022 the light passenger fleets will transition to zero Emission Vehicle and 10 percent to address the range and challenging issues for the department that contemplates future technology and want to encourage the city departments to adopt Better Technology that is available we also hope that legislation will really cause a shift in the market and lead to the availability of additional zero Emission Vehicle like the light duty trucks and i see that legislation as a huge opportunity for office of Economic Workforce Development so we as a city develops more clean meblgz mechanics a huge program introduce city college that will be wonderful to learn the new skills and adopt to the environment outside of San Francisco and make them competitive with high sought after skill sets with that as is legislation, however, ill be proposing some amendments to address some of the concerns ive heard so number one, and members of the board a summer sheet im allowing for the existing usable fleet by the year 2022 ramp 2020 the reason that every year our city currently off roads one hundred passengers so the contribution of the municipal fleet to 20222022 and that assumes were not were reducing the vehicles we have in the city fleet and then to clarify the purpose of those new vehicles needs to be zero emission under section 40 is the depiction to clarify f we added a definition regarding the light duty Passenger Vehicles to clarify separate and apart in the ordinance which is the health air and transportation ordinance what we mean by this legislation and essentially meaning Passenger Vehicles no trucks are included as part of this analysis we clarify emergency vehicles and is there are existing exemptions for emergency vehicles but into the health air and transportation ordinance we clarify that unless your vehicle is equipped with lights and sirens vehicles use this for administrative function for passenger transplant shall not be considered a zero Emission Vehicle if youre trying not to purchase the zero Emission Vehicle we add existence for general passenger advances advancing and the hybrids and clarify the intent of the legislation only light duty Passenger Vehicles must be zero Emission Vehicle and with the plugin vehicles were allowing 10 percent of nonexempt fleet to be ev for the additional option and plugin vehicles require the level two plug ins so the waiver we clarified the department will submit one waiver requesting the Zoning Administrator to specify all vehicles needs a waiver exemption and the reason rather than forcing a department to submit a waiver for every single vehicle and lastly on page 6 line 10 we actually just clarified that moving forward the city could do recent options rather than pretty much we might want to consider leasing those are the amendments we can adopt or ill make a motion for later after discussion first, id like to turn to our Budget Analyst Office that will report on this after that ill call up jesse if sf environment to speak about the ordinance and some of the overall dream goals in San Francisco followed by admin from the Administration Officer and rogers. Yes. Yes. Madam chair, and members of the committee. Supervisor tang said there are various version and thats what ill recite you should as supervisor tang stated some of this has changed the proposed ordinance will necessitate the difference between seven hundred o. J. On page 24 and 5 hundred and 50 zero Emission Vehicles by december 2020 therefore the total estimated cost of respect procurement will range from 80 million plus to 72 million plus over the next 2 and a half years. On page 25 of our report we note that the total estimated cost purchase 759 between those two numbers new zero Emission Vehicles and install between 636 and 1427 will range from 23 million to 95 million those costs will be occurred through the proposed ordinance and thirty days after approval for december 20, 2020, a period of approximately 2. 5 years we note that the city currently purchases one hundred new Passenger Vehicles a year as it is written weve reviewed it will require the lease of seven hundred and 59 vehicles over the next 2. 5 years or three hundred and 4 vehicles per year on supervisor we have various other policy issues weve brought up our recommendation on page 27 this is a policy matter for the board of supervisors. Thank you, mr. Rose ill speak is about this after the Department Presentations i have questions and issues with the analysis i understand that was a large amount of analysis to be completed over a short period of time ill bring up jesse denver from sf environment that has been helping us lead the charge when it comes to protect ferguson our fleet. Good morning jesse Energy Program manager thank you to supervisor tang for her leadership of zero Emission Vehicle these the department of the environment supports the proposed ordinance and is available to support the Zoning Administrators office and is interdepartments as supervisor tang noted weve heard this morning 45 minutes ago at the mayors breakfast the city will deliver 50 percent of the citywide with Renewable Energy enabling the residents to power their businesses and vehicles with Renewable Energy it is important for the demonstrates of leadership id like to highlight the heather clean air and transportation ordinance and the lead of Zoning Administrator in implementing that and describe how the department of the environment supports the City Administration office it there 0 loading order the city transit first policy insuring that employees are utilizing Public Transportation and or sun power to get where they need to go on city business and reduces the size of vehicle fleet and insures the vehicles are right size for their appropriate case and finally that establishes a vehicle list that dictates the type ofs of vehicles the department can procure here is how we provide the assistance with the implementations of hacking to we work on the development of programs and the implementation of policies to achieve our transit first and retirement and purchasing requirements of this ordinance and annually the city Administrators Office provides a report with an annual review report of implementation of hacking to we help the singlestory for the Green House Gas emissions for the portion of the fleet that is subject to the hack to and changes to the ordinance as needed we fascinate the development of the facilities for alternative fulfills in the privately owned vehicles in the amount not to exceed for Hydrogen Transportation and necessary legislation at the board of supervisors the department of the environment also under hack to acts as guess clearly house for coordinating the applications grants the support zero Emission Vehicles and alternative fuel programs the difference is we assist the departments with grant applications upon requests in the last year that has been quite frequent as new opportunities for funding around zero Emission Vehicles need to spend themselves like the department of transportation were one of the finalist and the department of the environment is responsible for the looms of programs to encourage the private fleet operators to operate the vehicles that have zero Emission Vehicle or High Energy Efficient and the use of alternative fultz with low carbon with the you were recommendation to the board of supervisors a good t sf environment the source of the readiness ordinance that passed this week personally thank you youll for your support in closing as cochair as the mayor of the mayors Ev Working Group the department of the environment supported the city singlestory city administrator to discover that we have a deep interest and the subject experts ready to provide the support as we invest in the zero Emission Vehicles and their infrastructure. Thank you, very much. It was important to bring her up to remind everyone about the health air and ordinance were amending and adding to that for the for the most part so the departments need to refer back to the existing ordinance that is already on the book thank you for your overall so next ill bring up adam from the city administers office. Good morning, supervisors. Im adam finance and planning director for the city Administrators Office thank you supervisor tang the City Administrator Office oversee the Contract Administration both supports the implementation of this proposed change we first welcome friendly policies the two major challenges we would see related would be budget so there are significant budgetary considerations associated with that assuming we had the budget to implement happy to do so the other major considerations for lease Parking Spaces approximately 50 percent of the parking spots are leased we dont have direct authority to electrify or install chargers but perhaps addressed at the lavish the departments have additional concerns about the 10 percent they told her threshold and Zoning District through the Mayors Office there the budget the 10 percent vehicles may not be sufficient from the departments perspective to meet the daily operational needs and respond during disaster dbi for instance, has one hundred vehicles that need parking spots with a significant responsibility during the earthquake we need should the grid go down we may not have the grid to do to respond otherwise the amendments we prop a timeline and concerns. Thank you very much and im wondering i know that supervisor farrell has legislation in june i believe of 2015 regarding you know the vehicles to use data to track our fleet, you know, how many miles are driven by whom and when and ultimately analyzing how we have the city fleet by depended by department and annual reporting what we do im wondering where we are on the process that is important to the process number one, first, we encourage transit first or our own Kinetic Energy as stated do we have too many vehicles in the city fleet we should be down sizing and goat to vision zeros if you can talk about that. Ill be happy to we have thus far installed the devices in the required vehicles 4000 vehicles weve been, of course, taken a year and a half it takes time to do the installations weve been Golden State Warriors the data and observing the behaviors and use of vehicles f around idling and we found thus far with our initial data that there is some opportunity to either more efficiently manage and lifeless the fleet with full installation over the next basically most gather more information to identify vehicles that could be reassigned or toll vehicles to more efficiently have those vehicles used in reduce the size of fleet. How about for the reporting requirement. Weve issued a report if im not mistaken but we plan on doing additional annual reports. When will that be. Ill be happy to check with. So june 30th ill look forward to that report and to the Budget Analyst Office for the analysis for the cost it scary first of all, accounting but secondly, it also assumes were in the reducing our fleet so if we can all communicate about that the amended version of the report that is really important okay. I think your other issues youve spoken to about the lease parking spots well sort through with the departments individually and in terms of Emergency Response were trying to create a shift in the city you know, i know that everyone is here what do we do when we cant use a gallon car there are other solutions that rely on clean and green that can help in an Emergency Response again, we look forward to working with all the departments so alright nothing else to add. I have a question. Sorry supervisor yee. Thank you, supervisor supervisor tang first of all, thank you for championing this issue that is important so i fully am behind the intent of this but some questions i have are fiscally oriented and thank you for mentioning the protective foretelling aromatics last year the vehicles were pretty much seven hundred that are using purely gas and 6 hundred that is hybrid yeah 7 780 using gas so i guess the question i have is currently when our purchasing the vehicles like this year are they are any of these gas vehicles purely gas vehicles or all hybrids were purchasing at this moment. Supervisor thank you for your question typically we have Term Contracts that is available for vehicles a vehicle selector list we try to steer the departments towards the greenest vehicle generally one the fleet the majority are hybrid gallon and battery operated the percentage in the general fleet is very small it is dedicated to gallon some has to do with the fact that we are transitioning our vehicles over time as vehicles age the gasoline vehicles are being replaced with the plug in hybrids. The table im looking as the budget Analyst Report table one for Passenger Vehicles there is seven hundred and 80 gun and 6 hundred and 38 hybrid seems like of the Passenger Vehicles of the 15 hundred 86 approximately half of it are pure gasoline. If you look at the chart needs to be updated but under Police Department that there are 5 hundred and 9 gasoline vehicles and most will have to be exempted. My followup question in regards so lets is the hybrid vehicles whats the Life Expectancy for the purpose of city. We generally consider full life to be 8 years so we have not generally be able to have that our vehicles are replaced at the 10 or 12 year mark. And then in regards to replacing all the vehicles i guess the amended version will be 2000, 22 which is 5 years from now where would the additional funding come to replace the higher rate and weve defer to the board and the Mayors Office to identify the Funding Sources associated with that. Is the estimate correct. The estimate how much by how much it costs the city and since weve gone through the Budget Discussion how tough in the next 3 years wondering where the reserves are put aside for this. Through the chair supervisor yee one clarification im asking the budget Analyst Report to make in their cost analysis didnt take into consideration how much money from the offloading of one hundred or vehicles every year we sell so im speeding up by 50 more vehicles per year to 5 years and so again, no analysis as to how much we get out of it and then what kind of a model will be going upon in the future purchasing or leasing. And then is cost savings no longer using gas. 50 percent is a lot im wondering well and also another cost that the budget analyst mentioned and again, the infrastructure is the cost of creating are putting in the chargers is there any funding for that. That had been from the same sources. Oh, okay. Through the chair to supervisor tang have you thought about what the source of funding will be for this is a bigticket item. Absolutely there are some things well be asking the Budget Analyst Office to look at one thing for example not take into consideration the long term cost benefit analysis for example, if we have a usage of gas what does that mean and according to the legislation in june of 2015 it estimated that 5 percent reduction to a Light Vehicle fleet will result in salesforce of 2009 million over 4 years a 10 percent reduction in 5. 8 reduction over 5 years and fuel reduction will deal 3 had and 63 annual savings and a 10 percent reduction in fuel usage results in seven hundred plus those are not fooshthd into the costs as well as microscopes in terms of electrical vehicles little maintenance involved but as were giving the departments 5 year lease time to include in their capital budgets it is important and also the cost estimate in the report states that each charger costs 16,000 and folks that are here who are you know destroy experts to explain what the costs will actually be and allowing 10 percent of fleet level one chargers youll image the city the socket in our wall for example, there is a lot of fine tuning with the cost analysis and the range were presented the high range of 15 thousand vehicles in the fleet it is actually not we shouldnt be considering that because were not touching any of the light duty trucks again there needs took fine tuning with the cost analysis here well get for about the Board Meeting. Okay. I appreciate our explanation. All right. Thank you have you completed our presentation. I have. Thank you supervisor tang anyone else that. Lastly bring up Planning Department ann marie rogers. Thank you were here and applaud the moving of new Passenger Vehicles to the vision zero emissions and try this for other vehicles Visitacion Valley as well we would ask for one additional amendments that is reinforcing the comments if the department of the environment we suggest that be amended to more clearly require the right sizings the citys fleet in so many ways the city of San Francisco is in a leadership position on the Environmental Standards and new technology here two the city seeks to move employees to transit walking and biking where possible as we work to reduce the impacts of driving right sizings the fleet is the Ongoing Program that will change and reduce the fleet needs in the future the city has many programs were doing right now and should recognize this Initiative Analysis and changes in the infrastructure you mean the mta is involved in a lot of upgrades to the transit city the city has a major change to the bike infrastructure and working on pedestrian improvements and there are new avenues that can be explored like the vehicle pools between multiple departments so in light of these we do believe if we have increased investment in those Ongoing Programs and explored additional programs can be a greener investment in the city vehicle fleet we have specific language well suggest in the committee is open to it that concludes my presentation. Thank you, thank you very much. I guess to clarify i dont know if under hack to and the existing legislation i thought we have requirements of right sizings our fleet i fully agree with the intent not an amendment to this but look at perhaps all right. So may be open up for Public Comment and through that i really hope to better understand the cost for charging infrastructure i think the analysis can be improved here and i have one pshgd and nothing else that wants to speak sir, the floor is yours. Thank you hi, im spencer represent the charge point thank you for the opportunity to voice our support for this proposed legislation charge point is the Worlds Largest charging stations over theo thousand charger spots across the United States and canada we have experience including working with the city and county of San Francisco who is one of our first customers over 8 years ago and thank you for a Long Term Partnership all over the place for helping to advance the migration to electrification of this i dont have a lot of time but my concerns around the budget analysis we found the number of 160,000 per as an average per charger is high in our experience we hope to have a more 0 in depth conversation with the departments of city to lend our expertise to help refine and get to a more accurate number. Can do you suggest is an accurate number. Its complicated there are many factors in the effecting the installation price they fall into 3 buckets the first the construction planning and design we need to understand what the Electrical Capacity at any given site and how to best get the source of power to the station another bucket the hardware and total ownership of that station including the electrical costs and maintenance fees and the third is the financing of incentives the way to purchase those we have expertise across those to lower the costs substantially it is a situationsal base we hope to have a more in depth conversations and better estimate those costs thanks. Thank you under two minutes just one followup question i know the airport recently cherished to charge point for the infrastructure for passenger investigates as well as sorry for the passengers flying out of sfo and future for the employees in terms of 16,000 estimate for example, per my understanding that could mean one of those chargers that could charge up to 2 chargers two cars even the 16,000 costs that was cited in the report can be cut in half. Right. So to future explain we are working with the aircraft on a long term Parking Solution theyre our Current Customer has over one hundred chargers with of the report that mentioned it with the long term Parking Solution we leveraged the technology for less infrastructure to support more cars and the fabulous was lower i dont have the number off the top of my head but can provide that it is sitting less if that situation. Moving forward you know where it through charge points or other city approved vendors that is really important that we engage them to understand the complete cost analysis for charging infrastructure limits and ill say i know that the departments will have issues and challenges trying to abide by this legislation that is important to have this difficult conversation to shift the way that you know in terms of our transportation modes and our clean vehicles and so we are condominium to having our department of the environment to work with all departments to figure this out and changing technologies that improve and can make charging easier and faster using less infrastructure i want to make sure all the departments are aware of it well make sure that each of the departments feel that the ability to k078 apply with the legislation so ill say moving forward again ill share with the budget analyst review all the different aspects i feel we need to finetune the cost analysis for example, no analysis but the federal and tax credits available if we purchase the zero Emission Vehicle by the time this hits the board a more refined sense of cost for this legislation. Thank you, colleagues i dont know if have any other questions. You nailed it ill be looking for more information about the vendor and what the process and the costs associated with getting us to our goal commissioner tang my compliments to you for proposing such a good piece of legislation looks like weve got the the budget analyst has remarks. Come to the microphone please. Yes. Madam chair, and members of the committee. First of all, a clarification we do special projects for the board of supervisors and we manage and it takes considerable time this report a budget and finance committee we basically have a week to had about two more weeks to do this report and number one, and number 2, every single number in this report comes from respected departments the department of public works, the department of Administrative Services and the mta those are the 3 departments that manage the citys fleet and do the implementation of the technical aspects of this proposal thats why we spoke and went to those 3 departments if there are numbers that are wrong in the report it came from the 3 departments i dont on the numbers are wrong if you want us to do an additional work on this report it is going to take considerable time well be happy to do it but not for next tuesday that is superficial and basically impossible and a disservice to the board of supervisors to give you an amend report with some of the aspects that supervisor tang is requesting well be happy to do it but not for next thank you. Through the chair. Sorry supervisor tang i want to close Public Comment. So is there any Public Comment seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Supervisor tang thank you. I fully acknowledge the hard work you have a short turn around time first of all, it is not going to the board next tuesday the following tuesday that will be ill look at my calendar may second when wed like the additional analysis and happy to help to fascinate that information it is for the initial report should have contained that information in the first place. Thank you supervisor tang and supervisor yee has remarks additional to add. Im curious through the chair to supervisor tang of the considering that some of the vehicles hybrids were bought last year and potentially this year would that 10 percent youre talking about that is in i believe in your amendments will that account for those amendments their not the Life Expectancy by the turnover in 2022 with our amendments thats 5 years from now so this possibility those vehicles are in real good shape and can be still used im concurring when you think about the 10 percent was that factored in. The 10 percent for plug in hybrids we have 15 of so this is significantly lower than the 10 percent were allowing the reason why they extended the lead time for 2022 instead of 2020 to account for the vehicle Life Expectancy well be trerment some vehicles earlier than the 10 or 8 years of theyre expected life but extending it further than proposed i think that a great compromise. Okay. Given we supposedly offload one hundred vehicles yeah, well have that up to 50 vehicles every year. My mistake im looking at the hybrid the purchasing the 6 hundred and 38 figure. Yes. What is going to happen did you take into consideration the offloading relating new cars. Yes. I think that you know if you look at this chart for example, you cant tell which ones are exempted from the regulation first of all, knock off vehicles from the list and secondly, the same answer thats why im extending the lead time to comply to the city to 2022 and some cars will be terminated earlier but our goal to wean ourselves off of gasoline powered cars. I guess who what im looking at it i support weaning it all we can wean it off this year im looking at whether or not well be open to amendments for those newer vehicles that has been purchased you know either this year or last year give it at least a year were talking about those hybrids i dont have the analysis which ones are exempt so that is my question which if youre open to amending that piece which will be a small percentage i guess i assume. So i 3r0er7b8 wont consider that amendment today but followup with the city Administrators Office which are exempt that are hybrid and lets talk with the Board Meeting as we head into budget season look at each departments request in terms of how theyll comply with the legislation and a lot of discussion on both points in terms of what well see and they need and what we are able to provide. Right in passing the legislation you know it moved to the full board id like to consider at that point not when they not when they do the budget this way it is clearer in our legislation that we take these things in consideration. My previous answer holds im looking forward to look at the vehicles covered under our light duty passenger and exempted in the Public Safety emergency exemptions and consider it before the full board. All right. Thank you very much that robust discussion i think we are done with this item. Is there a motion or something youd like media to do with that. Ill make a motion to adopt all the amendments i stated on the record. Without objection it passes. Call items 5 and 6 together and would you like then ill multiple voices . To amend and. Send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. As amended. Without objection. 5 and 6 please. With the state department of health care services, in the amount of 128,849,925 for the term of april 15, 2017, through june sign said agreement and to approve amendments for less than 10 of the contracted amount. And drug administrator to sign said agreement and to approve amendments for less than 10 of the contracted amount. Sign said agreement and to approve amendments for less than 10 of the contracted amount. All right. Thank you welcome chair cohen and members of the board thank you for hearing those two items my name is judy martin the medical director for Substance Services for the city and county of San Francisco ive introduced two academies for the resolution have to do with dates the first one delays item 5 the 68 from april 15th to june 15th at the recommendation of our stat medical agency to allow time for the federal cms to review and fine item 5 at the onset of item 5 replaces item 6 item 6 is a multi year Substance Abuse services previous contract and, of course, every year has to be adjusted and amended the amendment for this year for 16, 17 is what you see there id like to really thank the analysis for a deep review of o items and at their suggestion obtained in writing from the department of health that specifics the end date of contract 267 that will be the red line copy will be available with Barbara Garcia signatures and director garcia tomorrow i wanted to also comment that the organized Delivery Service contracted that is number 6 5 on your agenda represents about 2 to 2 and a half years of very hard work by the Substance Abuse disorder my team in terms of some are here and also it represents a tremendous effort by the contracting partners that provide the services in the community to renovate, upgrade and change how theyre planning to deliver care this is to bring a beneficiaries more into line with medical care increases the professionalism a step parts parity a greater step than ive seen in any career aside from that introduction im here to answer any questions. Thank you, dr. Martin lets see supervisors i see your name in the cue. Take it off. Doctor martin well go to the budget Analyst Report hopefully answer questions. Yes. Madam chair, and members of the committee. On page 31 of the report dpw 2016 17 that includes additional reimbursement of 12 million in 16, 17 by the state under the proposed fifth amendment that is sharing shown in table one of page thirty in our report. Our recommendations on page 33 we recommend you amend the file to state that the agreement between dph and the state is effective as of june 2017 and 67 to state the existing contract between dph and the state terms in 2017 and the new agreement between dph and dhs becomes effective and recommend you approve the approved resolutions as amended. Thank you colleagues any other comments seeing none, all right. Well go to Public Comment at this time ladies and gentlemen, if you like to come and speak on items 5 or 6 all right. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Thank you, dr. Martin i i think were okay. Is there a motion . I make a motion to adopt the amendments as specified and to the item move forward welcomes to the board. Supervisors item 5 and 6. Items 5 and 6 and oh, item 5 and 6. Thank you all right. Without objection thank you all right. Mr. Clerk. Love for you to call item 7 item no. 7 resolution authorizing an application to the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee to permit the lowand firsttime homebuyers in San Francisco. All right. Thank you fostering with the mayor and amy changing on behalf of the Mayors Office of housing to speak on this item welcome. Amy from the Mayors Office of housing good morning chair cohen and commissioner tang and supervisor yee the item before you authorized the Mayors Office of housing to apply to the depth motion to Strike Committee occupy to 15 million just the low and moderate in case the first time homeowners the certifies allow the homeowners to claim 15 percent tax credits for 40 years and up to two hundred percent ami are eligible to apply and one more time. Households up to 175 to two hundred of ami are eligible to apply for the certificates and board of supervisors in 2010 to apply for 40 million and the last of those certifies were issued last year in october so, now were coming back to the allow to apply for another round of applications the deadline in may coming up soon and planning to submit the next request for 5. 5 million in mortgage considers it requires that we have board approval thats why were asking the committee to remedy the resolution today and my colleagues jena and others are here in case you have questions. Jan if the Mayors Office of housing; right . And sonya from where . Also from the Mayors Office of housing. All right. All right. Thank you very much. One question. Yes. Supervisor yee. So im curious for this type of program is that for people that they have to apply for this program when they first purchasing or how does that work. Correct and ill ask jenny to talk about the eligibility. Hi supervisor im jenny with the Mayors Office of housing and Community Development im the Program Manager this is for people first purchase their property to be eligible to get a tax credit. All right. Thank you so 33 they have to be a first time homeowner not owning a property for 14 years. So if someone purchased a year ago it was too late. Three years ago they own a property and come back 3 years later and dont own property for the last 3 years. Thank you all right. Thank you for your presentation go to Public Comment. No Public Comment Public Comment is closed. Thank you send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. As a Committee Report . All right. Well take that without objection. Item 8 item no. 8 appropriation sales proceeds of City Property for 122,000,000 and proceeds from certificates of participation for 321,765,000 to the General Service agency fy20162017. To fund the retirement the series certificates of participation and to fund the Development Costs of 1500 Mission Street Office Development in relayed San Francisco board of directors sf and places the total of 440 million open controllers reserve. I appreciate that and today weve got many naomi kelly city administrator to report. Today with me is claudia Deputy Director of the real estate and lopez from the department of public works first, i want to say im referring to the budget analyst to a approve the appropriations of one and 22 million in place on the reserve to continue the balance of the three hundred and 215 seven hundred plus from the occupations for 15 hundred mists when we return in may well have further discussion with the budget analyst with the costs and additionally come back and report on the existing stacking plan for 15 hundred mission that is in the finalized and talk about existing out of civic center lazy thought ill talk about 15 hundred mission the conceptual design versus today as a building as weve gotten more programming design over the last 3 years just a couple of things reduced the size of rentable space to 30,000 while at the same time increasing the density of employees going in there the head count if the 3 departments has increased by over 3 percent but in the rentalable area has increased by. 8 percent our permit center has increased since 2014 we wanted to add more departments into the onestop shop permit center as you may know and going to like the Small Business popularity if you opened up a restaurant in San Francisco it would take 20 permits to do so in various location and now we thought in addition to having dbi planning and public works we should add many more other departments into the permit center so it is trowel a onestop shop permit shop the actual fte dbi planning and public works has increased over the past 3 years our projected actives in 2014 with not meetings the active uses of today we are delivering more Service Needs to the san franciscans there is a chart i have that speaks to and shows basically the same information in the budget Analyst Report we anticipated in 2014 and where we are and not popping up sfgovtv. There we go. And we can pass it out to the board of supervisors you can see the increase or where we are in Square Footage and the difference from the different departments the department of public works as you can see the existing with what their existing today with the program on 15 hundred mission again not finalize and please forgive me we dont have a copy of that. Is this one . I dont have it. Thank you. We have it now and. So we are as you can see public works what was anticipated inform 2014 what is conceptually or potentially programmed for 15 hundred mission not finalize we have time to work on it an increase of gone from one and 82 to one 11 thousand Square Footage change planning has gone from 49 to 59 square feet it is a 10 thousand Square Footage change a 22 percent and dbi is 50 thousand or 51 thousand going up to 56 close to 57 an 11 increase and the permit center by 22 to 38 thousand a 76 percent increase i mentioned earlier we decided to increase the center to say a onestop shop there and areas where there is tenants to be determined and also see the weight increased the training and Childcare Centers in the common ear so there is Square Footage there again, we have time to work on this you can see the head counts in the table below what we projected in 2014 what is the active today and again, a lot of the head count more is more of policy called by the mayor and the board of supervisors and how many ftes we have going in there were doing the best we can with the fitting the number of employees and the program and getting out of a very important thing getting out of existing leases it is not something that ill be able to discuss further today and well have more to say in may but a lot of theres a lot of moving parts and valuables in getting out of various lease an example the department of public works is not on on thirty van ness and mission but major divisions at 1155 Mission Street with the management and their Accounting Division and moving out of those spaces into 15 hundred mission well backfill with it is a favorable lease term with other entities out of different areas before city hall or have on south van ness that allows the mta to get out of expensive leases and move to one thousand van ness it is kind of as we call it a project chest were moving multiple areas down stream you then eventually get out of leases it is a worthy conversation and goal we all share and more than willing to come back to you in may and further and continue the dialogue with the board of supervisors around that. Wow. Thank you. Supervisor yee. I think and supervisor tang excuse me thank you for this chart here i mean, i see the 76 percent in Square Footage for the permit center that is something ive been pushing all of the departments on because in terms of Customer Experience with the people getting permits it is challenging to go to different buildings and then they are different timelines and accuses and everything so i know that ohio ive been work with the office of Economic Workforce Development and the Planning Commission i think that is important to go to one place and get our Business Done in one shot i know you said youll come back in may with Additional Information about how it is were getting departments out of expensive leases can you elaborate what are your thoughts of and analysis of the shifting going around in the budget analyst comments last week this is a lot of talk about increasing the Square Footage on 15 hundred mission but reducing the Square Footage for the sub center leases. There was a lot of Different Things we need to look at ill not be able to accomplish in one week there is looking at the existing footprint here in this building that will it takes time and looking at the different leases in the civic center when they expire and the needs and Program Needs what are the different source of funding coming in were doing some analysis now to and have ideas that we would feel better coming back in may and having those conversations. I have a pretty technologies question mr. Rosenfeld if you give me a second can you mr. Rosenfeld can you remind me what was the difference between a controlled reserve and Budget Reserve i think that is simple question. No okay. Turn your mike on. Good morning Ben Rosenfield Controllers Office there are two different ways that the board can place reserves the Controllers Office reserve typically will not require the action to return to the board of supervisors if you want to place something on reserve your clear regarding the criteria to release the be reserve for example, funds on Controllers Office reserve until bones are sold this is a nice bright line to authors this spending but were other examples typically with the Controllers Office reserve is the board places fund on reserve the Controllers Office is authorized to release it using the criteria the board as articulated to us thats one approach and second that you pensions that Budget Finance Committee reserve the appropriation move forward forward but were not authorized to spend those until it returns to the board with a release those are two approaches for reserve. Thank you. I appreciate the clarification and supervisor yee. Thank you. Yes and madam chair. This is along the line of questioning of supervisor tang in regards to the projections of staffing and Square Footage and pretty much the same conversation we had since last week on the same item and it seems like there is hadnt been any further clarification because this will take more time to do a better analysis and even the moving juggling everything around like to see that in on paper it is kind of hard to follow when you talk about it there to there and Something Else will move there. The question i have then is in regards to the three hundred 21 thousand no 3 plus 65 precedes from to develop the new space i guess when is that necessary. I mean as it seems like youll not need that funding for awhile. Well need the funding at the time were in counteracting with the developer related we will need to ratify the 321 million at the same time the purchase of agreement now and when we come back in may that we dont need the entire amount i dont have the cash flows in front of me but need to ratified and this conversation in may if parts are put on reserve thats fine but have it fully rat fiduciary at the time of ratifying the purchase sale agreement. What it the ratification to purchase the Sales Agreement you in the middle of may we think working with the chair may 11 or the following week. I uncomfortable with projections and the hope that the Board Members hope in regards to reducing the lease space in the Civic Center Area and i dont know how much we can push it whether those numbers makes sense or their inflated in terms of the Square Footage that these 3 particular departments needs ill definitely support the permit center if theyre more comfortable in the Square Footage certainly support the childcare piece but what else is there i mean and see because the uncomfort level we are talking about two items that are related i dont know if my colleagues on the committee would be open to an amendment or id like to do is i dont want to hold up the one hundred and it 2 million it seems like that is necessary at this point the other piece is sill time sensitive but have time to give the departments a chance to finalize their numbers or tighten up their numbers so fully understand wherewith he can get to reduce some of the leases in the Civic Center Area so one way to maybe approach this is to duplicate the files, and then for the duplicated foil to amend out the 321 million seven hundred and 65 and go ahead and pass the other piece the other appropriation of one and 22 today and then if the chair can actually put this on the agenda for may 11 and the timing should be still okay give you more time to give us clarity on the space usage so can i just ask i dont have i know that jamie with behind me and ben it is the timing of may 11th we want to make sure that the Controllers Office has enough time to do the work on the certifies of appropriation and rather than to assure i have may 11 to some of the items have not been trod we suggest to the call of the chair to have scheduling on may 11th or 18 we want to make sure about that all the remaining legislation it in front of you were not sure that can happen by the 11. Im open to that. All right. Thank you. Supervisor tang any thoughts you want to share. I think ill submitted. Supervisor yee. Sounds like we have common thinking well go ahead and privet and go to Public Comment so see what the Public Comment has to say seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Thank you supervisor yee i want to make sure i heard you correctly the b l a made recommendations youre proposing to today that is to appropriate one and 22 million ; is that correct all the no, im actually proposing something slightly different. Okay. Which is. Hold that thought i want to that i have privet. Yes. Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee i have the city administrator i dont understand what remedies she didnt agree with. One comment when we return in may to reduce the k o ps my comment ill work with you. Great you basically agree with the recommendations yes. Madam chair, and members of the committee. There are two main concerns or issues in our report project you were told there would be a reduction in led space it turns out the department is recorded theyll windup with the city owned buildings we sold and windup with one and 54,000 Square Footage it seems reasonable a reduction in the spaces and some of the cost savings wed like to found out when it did not comes back, and, secondly, the furniture equipment, the computers and moving costs run up one and 39 percent from 12 millionmillion. Appreciate our willingness to respond to question. Supervisor yee. So i guess to continue the item can do we need to split the file did you want the foil. John gibner, deputy city attorney. So i think what supervisor yee is appropriately did you want the file that is a single supervisors privilege to that can happen without a vote and amend one version to one hundred and 22 million, the method. Send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. And then. Report. The second duplicated version to remove the 122 has the 321 and thats the right number and continue that item to the call of the chair. All right. Thank you for your clarification. Thank you for your clarification. So thats what you want to do. Yes. laughter all right. Supervisor tang how are you all right . . Okay to the clerk do we need to restate that can we accept. Id like to clarify if you want the first version the one and 22 million would you like to full board as a Committee Report. Yes. I would. Thank you. All right. Thank you okay. All right. So theres a theres a motion on the floor and for clarifying that and colleagues, can we take that without objection . All right. That item passes. Unanimously thank you. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, and im not sure if i closes Public Comment but Public Comment is closed. All right. All right. There any additional business to come before this body . Theres no further business. All right. My friends this meeting is adjourned we love our parks, but we love. And the community who is really the core of it all, came together and said what we need is a place for our teenager to play, not just play grounds for the kids and soccer fields but we need a skate park that will keep the kids home in the neighborhood so they can play where they live. The children in the neighborhood and it will be a major boone. And we have generations, the youth generations that will be able to use this park in different places. The best park in San Francisco right here. Creating place where people can be active and lead, active, healthy life styles that are going to just stay with them for life. The committee and shortly joined by supervisor yee the vice chair supervisor tang and supervisor sheehy are also meeting supervisor kim is excused from this meeting id like to entertain a motion to excuse supervisor kim so moved. Thank you very much well take that without objection. Without objection. Our clerk is linda wong id like to thank jesse larson and phil jackson our friends at sfgovtv assisting us and clerk is john carol as well as who will be vauvent linda wong and mr. Clerk, any announcements . Devices. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate that. Could you you, please call item one. Item no. 1 department of Public Health for fys 20172018 and 20182019, and requesting the department of Public Health to report. Thank you the sponsor of this hearing supervisor cable cars good to see you thank you for being here. Would you like to begin the presentation. Great, thank you. Thank you are Barbara Garcia director of health and as a staff speaker i hope i can get through the slides a highlevel review of our structure and also have budget and just to make sure you all understand your mission to protect and promote the health of all san franciscans we have a population component and with Delivery System and quite frankly not many departments have those anymore we have one or the other and lucky we can move our system and improve Health Overall our division of department of health as you may know is health comical disease promotion and july 1st bringing over Emergency Medical Services the Core Functions are heartache assessment and assurance San Francisco Health Network we developed for respondents to the Affordable Health care act and provides well continue on the Healthcare Services with many of the services youre well aware of San Francisco zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital laguna over 20 primary care clinics and Behavorial Health clinics and jail health as you may know health San Francisco so to show numbers several hundred thousand of primary care invites speciality care invites stair part of what we have with our Network Partner uc and 200 thousand plus days at the laguna our budget is a 2. 1 billion with 26 percent of our city budgeted it is has 711 million in general funds with almost 7 thousand budgeted positions as weve provided you can see the pie chart in terms of of where the things go to San Francisco General Hospital is 900 million of our target budget and Public Health is next that is administration and Public Safety and Mental Health is very large as well and the other areas you see one of the more important things we do try to do in this Health Department to leverage our revenue we have great opportunities with medical so as you can see for every general fund dollars we get we maximize there the general fund and try to get our revenues as you can see that has grown from last year to this year and last couple of years with the ac a we have being able to increase our revenue many more people are insured we drop down the revenues our priorities for the next two years a revenue maxtion the last couple of meetings around the scheduled budget issues we can there is confrontations about medicare and insurance we believe that until we get notification and direction that will it takes time for the federal government to change the direction felt Affordable Health care act we really want to focus on generating a much revenue as much as possible so a 59. 2 million in 20172018 and nonrevenue are 59 percent to 25 percent of our budget is depend on general fund were doing to electronic charters to improve the capture and continue to be an advocate of state and federal 0 changes that may have negative impact on us so were hard working to make sure that were 0 fighting the potential cuts our other priorities for the stabilization of infrastructure in the last couple of years with the opening of zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital we are putting in the . 7 million operation to for, if any, the hospitals operations one of the areas that we have found that really needs the support is our Human Services help to hire and provided oversight to the employees and also to assure we get office of Economic Workforce Development one the strategies we reality worked on not bringing in more ftes we really repurpose this vacancies to meet new needs for the coming years. And so for this particular development we did for Human Resources repurposed 13 positions we can utilities utilizes weve been in the process of a new qualities progress called lean that looked at not wasting dollars time and particularly Patient First and how to go good morning o become reduce the wait time for people in the intrment and so were acting asking for one . 4 million to do that and be looking at that throughout the improvement of our quality and reducing waste and providing better care to our patients. Have you been with us for a couple of years weve been developing many enterprise and electronic records has to do with with how we improve revenue and how we can improve the care we have 60 systems and we are now trying to really bring alls r of those together and enterprise the Health Records particularly several one in primary care and one this is hospital and that is a 10 year costs of 373 million our current proposal is 15 million in spending for 20182019 and these integrated systems will replace the Building Systems will go away weve incorporated those saiftsz into the cost and personally in an rfp currently issued for those to have are a hopefully through 2017 through the negotiations and our final contract by january 2018 and were supporting citywide initiatives on Mental Health with the Substance Abuse a disorders and opening up a hump bird a 15 bed and Transit Program whole person care provided federal government match to really were working closely with the department of homelessness helping them set up theyre it system and to share we have a segregated model looking at the most afford individuals in the city to get care but were using that opportunity to also really focus on whole person care 5 hundred and 70 people that are in the you get care in ogunmans going to the hospitals we received almost 5 million for Law Enforcement assisted diversion and working right now in the station at the 16th street bart as well as city center we have part of that were working with the Police Department average sighting not just that but more hands off on the site and a transport individuals to programs for example, the Probation Department will open up their Community Center twentyfour hours a day helps those in jail when they get out at two or three in the more than and helping with the delores street with the health and safety and that will be adding to twentyfour hour program involved with our Police Department District Attorney and public defender theyre all involved just to show our over time zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital as a 4. Million this is due to new work flows of a new building and utilization for the hospital represents 3 percent of the sailor budget forever zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and a 23 percent spending of overtime. Laguna honda expects 7 had hundred and 50 thousand for 67 million in addition over time requesting 24 7 services and working with laguna honda as you may know the laguna honda is not a place for people to stay forever it is a field nursing and rehab to get People Better because were focused on more vulnerable populations some require a 24 7 siter in addition to the regular nursing staffing model that represents 5 percent of laguna Salary Budget and plus over time. Thats the end of my presentation look forward to any questions and also have our cfo who can answer detailed questions. I see supervisor sheehy has a few questions. First thank you for your presentation and i also want to thank you for your long term commitment to hiv aids and we have historically back filled hiv aids cuts running white. Were in conversation with the Mayors Office regarding some of those i believe that were in negotiations with those Mayors Office. Regarding those with our budget staff are here, too. And then i want to ask you know scott Supervisor Scott Wiener passed legislation requiring health and Human Services to have Sexual Orientation on july 1st. So was that on track well, were really proud of that because we helped him with the legislation we had a head start to looking other policies a year before Supervisor Scott Wiener started that particularly we were doing reassignment surgery for transgender and hard to do a Business Plan we cant identify the number of people but because of our hiv work identifying people with a specific population were well on the way as we develop our electronic Health Records do the implementations with all of the assistance we have as time times put in the collections of data we are doing that. Great, thank you. Because trump is just the administration has stopped the collection of data. That means at the local level will be more important. Exactly finally you know Behavorial Health is a you talk a little bit about that but i want to thank you for establishing the hump bird Navigation Center that is the substitute is that right. But can you talk about that about the behavorial expansion especially for young people in the age of 24. One of the things i think that weve done really well, in the department to continue to do better is we have a Funding Source that allows us to bill for Mental Health services our el cap dollars we can leverage for every 0. 10 bring in 90 credence from the federal government and once they get to the adult level 50 percent on that manage the expansion request the dollars and trying to get ahead of 24yearold individual with foster care those individuals leaving the foster you care are in the arresting cardiac population we adding one middle to our original apps and working with our Homeless Department looking that with housing and Supportive Services it is a population that we continue to have to work on in our lead project r program an tell us every new Funding Sources we look at the case population that is such an important population we really want them to get that theyre at a specific Development Stage in their own lives many times put in with 50 years old over the years specific programs and continue to get better in the future. Great, thank you. All right thank you. Colleagues any other questioning questions. Supervisor yee. Just looking at the the fourth slide i think i understand this the 2. 1 million budget is is 21 percent of the citys budget meaning i guess city budget is 10 million isnt; is that correct. Okay. Then he understand better never mind. The pie chart you have two pieces of pie one from the Mental Health and one for jail health. Uhhuh. Is there any overlap between that i think you this applies to the Mental Health jail and thats a great question. Jail health is 30 Million Program 33 million we have a behavorial component to that i think it is about 8 million and the rest is really nursing and medical services that includes twentyfour hour nurses and assessments of people that come in and remember that 65 percent of the people coming in into jails dont stay very long so a large resources on the back end to help people get back to the system of care the opportunity for us when people come to jail to get them prepared for medical and manage any of their Behavorial Health issues by maintaining their care when necessary came in if we were in a Behavorial Health system for example, on medication to make sure they have the medication and when they get discharged to get a warm hand off to the care one thing during the ac a development before people come into the jail and their medical will be disconnected now with h s a they get put on hold and as individuals leave that is put off and people get back on, on medical if they dont hsa is getting people on medical so that would be a repetition not part of health and safety an area that we focus on. So i think you mentioned 18 million. Did you mention 18 millions for Mental Health in the jails. How much is the 34 million. I believe it is almost 10 millions ill get details. So your answer is that that 10 millions is not include in the 306 million. I dont believe ill get that confirmed. When anyone goes to tailing jail were not allowed to draw down revenue as i look at this across the country so many instances of Jail Services system because entities have to put in general fund we cant draw down medical quality is different and some go to private providers so that is hard to work cross the state on jail Health Services were considered one of the best and one of the most funded Jail Services ill say in the country. Can you clarify the over time amounts again, this is just the budget amount is not an increase or nothing is that. Ill let my colleague talk about the details. Supervisors greg wagner cfo for the department of wanting on the slide that is a previous as you may know under the we need to return for appropriation of over time above what was in the budget is within the current budget we have a need to participate in that over time supplemental that will be coming before you so there is 4. 5 million over time spending on behalf of budget and that hundred and 50 thousand at laguna honda, however, those are funded from within the existing budget so well be reappropriately dollars from salary and fringe within our own budget to fund that over time your offer times hours are higher than budget but funded from within other line items a lot of the reason for that ask particularly at the sf g as we move into the hospital and the proclamations are adopting with a new level of services and ramping up the hiring a theres been a need to backfill the hours until we get permanent staffing in place we have relatively modest level of overall over time we work hard to control that to the best of our ability and my last question in regards to the zuckerberg fund the amount that i will is stabilizing the delivery other sponsors 9. 7 million is that it says ongoing support i thought that was a one time a big amount for one time only. It is ongoing what the weasel talk about the new building didnt know what the staffing pattern will be needed we have the new facility and greg you have any additional . Yes. That is exactly correct we had a staffing model that was developed prior to moving into the new hospital as we had experience with the staffing and the number of opted out beds were experiencing as well as some of the work flows that are required to operate in the new building there are areas where we are above what we anticipated when we went into the opening of new hospital we had a fund that was allocated f and particularly for the purpose of judgements as we got used to the new hospital and identify the actual staffing pattern one time funding and now making a correction based on the 3 4ths of our staffing level well monitor and adjust that as we go forward and get more experience with the actual staffing patterns. So as stated in the handout ongoing support and so i guess my question interpretation is ongoing for like many, many years or is that ongoing for yeah. A fair question so the proposed budget includes that for the twoyear budget so we budgeted it for 20172018 and 20182019 at those levels well hover as we go into 20172018 be evaluating that and then adjusting it as needed as we get into the twoyear budget so we have a rolling that twoyear budget were making a forecast for the second year if we can bring that down well do so in next years budget process for the 20182019 so it is an estimate of what we believe the ongoing staffing cost will be for the hospital based on the lovely of consensus and the operations. You think that youll have the analysis when again. Well that is a constant process were constantly evaluating those figures are for the first 9 months we have taken our actual payroll and prorjd that forward we are monitoring our salary spending and staffing patterns literally months and months so it is a controlled process that we have and do it every year and doing it even more comprehensively given the fact in a new building and still learning about that were evaluating it and making adjustment i spent by the Time Next Year we have new information and salary data and fringe data we can look to adjust this as we do every budget practice. Thank you very much. To add it it i just wanted to reassure the board of supervisors we do is really good data a staffing requirement that for the ever bed we have had to have for every patient a solid number and track our expenses and like overtime and project that building a new facility and growing in that facility were seeing the adjustment now. I appreciate. Thank you very much director garcia and appreciate the thoughtfulness in your presentation and work youre doing colleagues no further questions go to Public Comment. Lamenting time for Public Comment youll have two minutes a thirty second chime indicating a soft chime thirty seconds remaining seeing none, Public Comment is closed. All right. So may i if no further discussion entertain a motion to file that motion to file that item. Second. There we go. Without objection that item passes. Could you call the next item. 20172018 and 20182019, and requesting the department of homelessness and Supportive Housing to report. Great the main event thank you for being here mr. Jeff all right. Appreciate the presentation all right. Are you ready. Yes. Were ready too take it away. Thank you, supervisors jeff with the department of homelessness and supportive of housing want to walk you through where the our new department is at in terms of the progress in addressing homelessness in San Francisco and the talk about an overall the budget as you may know the department of homelessness is the meeting of programming staff and funding from the multiple departments with the hsa and the department of health our mission to make homelessness in San Francisco a rare breed and nonreoccurring thing for as many people and reduce the number of people that become homeless and reduce homelessness on our streets as you may know san franciscans have identity homelessness as the number one, issue facing the community in our 2015, 7 thousand individuals homeless and 52 percent were 14er8d versus 48 unsheltered making us one the highest citys in terms of the homeless that are unshe recalled and three percent of the survey respondents were kohn homeless homeless for a year or longer and some for the o form of disability key strategies with first of all, the creation of the new department addressed implementing the coordinated entry system working with other city departments most notably the police and public works to address the homelessness on the streets as well as working towards are long term state funding into the department and with the philanthropy and he strengthening coordination this map youll see this is how the system works and the result of funding in multiple departments fractured system and individuals that are homeless trying to navigate it is inefficient we are working towards the coordinated entry will look like that. Back to the last slide you said this is a picture illustration of what youre. Current system looks like. Okay. Yep. It is essentially each one the arrows represents a path someone needs to take to assess the services at the need. Their defendant agencies or departments that are initially those arrows. Multiple agencies and multiple departments. How many. 70 organization that are currently providing services. Okay continue. And also this is a very much waiting list system you get into one line and get into awaiting list and your turn to get assess to the services were hoping to change it through a system called coordinated entry that is used across the country and the state of connecticut organized their services more efficiently manner and essentially the way it works when an individual is homeless theyll come into our system and triage if there was an emergency situation Domestic Violence everyone is assessed once every line when a person gets to the end of the line their assessed and asked questions about their status and how the became homeless this is one assessment that will be assessable by all provider and rather than people being put on waiting lists assigned to the appropriate resource rather than people that have other paths getting assess to the very valuable and limited permanent and supportive of Housing Stock there be determined who gets both that housing this will also having all of that managed by one daylight system have a better system of accountable weeping well be able to track the individuals through the system and be able to track nonprofit organizations how theyre performing and track interventions to built more accountability into the system and then the resources that we will have available under coordinator entry been naektsd and temporary you housing like stabilization unit and individuals will is short time subsidies to Supportive Housing we will be focusing on trying to divert people out of the system inspiring this is something that San Francisco masz has not done as well, however, homeward bound is an attempt to get them out of the system towards loved one and well be experience with ways to divert pole people out of system and working at the back end of the system when people are living in the supportive of housing that can be costly one thing theyll no longer need the services we have a service call moving on for people to move on using the house of choice or is section 8 voucher and started that with the Housing Authority and going well, we have currently access to three hundred and 50 section 8 vouchers were using and that means we will place an additional three hundred and 50 people into the Housing Stock this year some the progress well, the city during the 5 year period if january 2011 to december 2015 facilitated 20 thousand people some have permanent and supportive of housing a similar to the Homeward Bound Program and rapid housing that is a subsidies one time intervention we were hoping to expand not only didnt rely on the costly and time consuming process of building where you see more housing provides people are an one time intervention to exit homelessness im sorry director. Absolutely. Just one question on the slide the progress to debate and how many numbers of fascinate homeless from january to i guess 2011 to december 2, 0160, do you have a breakdown of an average year by year im wondering in terms of how much or how much weve have found and able to help with the exit. We have that information i dont know those numbers off the top of my head but get those to your office. Okay some of the other progress since weve opened opened up 4 hundred 50 units and a 93 bed Navigation Center on 12 and Market Street the residents found permanent exits in homelessness and encampments weve get a team that resolved 9 encampments of 7 that are resolved footing people have not returned to camp in the location and 72 percent of people went to a temporary shelter or program some of the milestones were expecting during the next year there are well be opening up 4 new naefktsz humbling bird by the department of health and two new housing building the national and auburn hotel for single adults we will begin rolling out the data migration spots entry system well be managing the process i spoke about and deploying fund for Youth Homelessness we received a 2 housing unit 8 million grant from the federal government and actually got a meeting were working with providers and aged youth how to deploy that funding and have additional funding to help address chronic homelessness through the be car act a medical waiver were working with the district weve received a first round of funding and applied for the second we are in the process of completely redesigning the family Services System that will begin well have that implemented starting in july which will lead the goal to reduce the average length of homelessness from 15 months that is the time families are homeless trying to reduce that to 90 days in the years and lastly the moving on initiative ive spoken about as far as our budget our basis level is 200 and 9 million that is 20 million as part of mayors rebalancing plan ti percent of the funding from the general fund the majority from the federal government we have one and 20 employees youll see the vast majority 82 is grant to Nonprofit Service providers the withhold 10 percent of the budget to the department of health be primarily for Health Services and 8 first for staff and administrative costs how this is broektd into the Program Investments on the following slides that is important to remember that were better late than never the button and the number of people the vast majority 71 percent used for housing and subsidies not to serve 8 hundred thousand people on the streets but house were providing subsidies to approximately 9 thousand people who are maintaining in permanent supportive of housing if the private market and 18 percent of the budget is on temporary nates or beds a small podium is spent on Resource Centers and outreach and transitional housing and as far as you know we have Robust Service system here in San Francisco i think wereable we will be able to do better with what we have i think, however, gaps in the system that exist that are not currently budgeted for i think that some of the needs we pointed out are the need for a twentyfour hour hot center for people to bring people to assess and hygiene facilitates get a sandwich a place a break from the students we obviously need more temporary shelter beds one thousand people to shelter on any given night were running at a 4 percent go vacant due to no shows a need for temporary beds i think there is a lot promise in a flexible housing shortterm subsidies to give poem one time assistance sometimes helping to pay a Security Deposit but have a go Global Warming policy of funding to help people exit homelessness without assess or waiting for access to permanent supportive of housing in this model people can use that money to go where they want to they dont have to find housing in San Francisco and we help subsidy that that is an eminent opportunity to experiment with that model thats been successful in other communities and probably the biggest gap in our encouragement system and need more permanent supportive of housing especially for chronically homeless deputies a transition age youth and Family Housing in the pipeline, however, we are currently working with the Mayors Office of housing and, of course, with the Budget Office on bringing new units of supportive of housing in the pipeline no one is in our current budget but hopefully adding unit for single adults we have not built open for chronically run by a nonprofit in 2011 and 12 but a program called no place lie home well be investing capital to help to build now housing be happy to answer any questions you may have. Supervisor tang go ahead. Sorry. Oh, my goodness. Sorry about that on your last point i didnt realize in the peter cohen, San Francisco council of Community Housing organizations. For chronically homeless single adult and not built singles 2011 in the population the families or single adults or the population in terms of where the need is. So were actually finally seeing a reduction in the number of families and think well see a slight reduction in the Youth Homeless that is he trending upwards ill existed about the fact we are in the right direction the fact it is unshe recalled adults in the city and again, i think that is some of that has to do with with the fact weve opened up master lease housing for single adults not opened up the high quality housing that serves the disabled and single difficulties for quite a few of the but no place like home well restart the pipeline and want to add that is in part due to the fact that most of housing that is about the in the past was built with redevelopment funding the redevelopment went away theres a last state bond prop 47 i believe most of funding has gone away but no place like home will kickoff that and glad for the new program and seeing now housing opening up. How much money. That is roughly 95 million. Over the course of over the course however long that takes us to spend it well be politically to the state to rather than apply on a Housing Units by housing unit building basis politically for an allocation of the fund and the city will distribute those and well be working with the Mayors Office of housing. Last question in terms of increase in the homeless single adults want to get a sense of the level of increase especially in comparison for the decrease in the youth and families. We dont have the finally numbers at this point, i dont want to guess we should have those numbers in a month or so. Okay. Thank you. Supervisor sheehy. Yes, thank you for your presentation he really want to ask specifically about young people in my district especially in the castro the situation is getting worse and a probably the single Biggest Issue of the constituents that young people in the castro the population is growing and not much you success you and i have talked thank you. I know you have the federal grant but i feel that might barely make a dent. It is a significant investment 2 housing unit 8 million for 3 years that is growing and getting becoming permanent if our continuing care from the federal government so i think that is actually has a Significant Impact i dont want to say i think that is important we hear from young people and youth providers i dont want to stand here and say this is how the money will be used but some of the things we should think about being more aggressive to have families reunite with families overtime you have left the family former whatever reason the family is part of a problem not part of solution and need to find ways maybe not returning to a parent but another Family Member and great models around coop housing a Great Program we are looking at that has been successful in france for the age youth to seniors that require assistance clearly selecting people not suffering from Mental Health issues but a lot of i think avenues we can explore in addition, were opening up 80 beds for youth and we discussed with Barbara Garcia were going to work with our current providers were doing outreach in your district to try to get folks connected better to some of the services that are available some of the drop in Centers Available in the haight and in the tenderloin and also working to coordinate better through my staff and Public Health getting access to Treatment Services so i believe this new funding will make a significant difference as well as the new units of permanent supportive of housing coming online for the transitioning youth. The last at this time 16 hundred young people on the streets so 80 beds and i also note that will half of them 48 are lgbtq theyve come and refuges i hope were mindful of that and the health needs are drama 13 percent in that count is hiv positive for that age it is it is staggering it feels like a Public Safety crisis i hope we get the aids those are kids from al tun that harry brought in years ago i want to ask the same question i asked Barbara Garcia about other collection of peoples Sexual Orientation we actually can name a team in the absence of the federal government doing anything. Well be collecting data on the people were providing services and know who is in the system but who needs help and who are the services were providing serving qualifying based on gender Sexual Orientation and race, etc. To make sure we have to 40 percent of the population our people of color we certainly make sure that 40 percent of people that are assessing our services are people of color right now that is difficult to engage that 014 databases that are attracting Homeless Services within the next 18 months well be able to report on a daily basis whose in the system and you can see. Thank you. Commissioner yee. Thank you chair. You mentioned that the families that were homeless and i think you said the population that the homelessness is theyre getting the services they need or their i guess theyre doing be better than in the past. Yep. So can you kind of highlight whats his name contributing to this i guess trending towards success. Since mayor ed lee is in office a 44 percent increase in spending on homelessness in the units to supportive of housing for are formally homeless families and rapid housing is a temporary subsidy to scale up the approaches family homelessness for for example, in the Unified School District in 2007 we saw a really large spike in family homelessness going from 8 hundred kids in the San Francisco Unified School District in 2007 who are experiencing homelessness to over 23 hundred children by 2013 or 14 those numbers are down were at 19 hundred students in the San Francisco Unified School District that still far too in one in every 3 students were heading in the right direction and been between the School Integrity and philanthropies we are in the process of raising public funding for the programs that is really along with the redesign of the system were working on we think once in a while well drive the numbers we want to reduce the number of times the families become homeless we wont prevent 100 percent of the homeless there will be dons donors we are making sure that no family is unshe recalled we have enough beds so families should not be sleeping on the streets and religiously the amount of time to 90 days or less when children exercise trauma they suffer from permanent slow down in their development and want to prevent that obviously will really im excited about the trend were heading in and feels like we have a Clear Pathway on that issue. Do we have estimation in the last 3 years how many units are available he made available new ones for families and same question for jake and i dont have those numbers off the top of my head but provide those to you easily today. First, i know some of the develops in the books before the mayor so i dont count those as even though every mayor takes credit for everything it is more of the last 3 years probably would be troibltd to his effort and what is in the books in regards to the next few years. Well get you that information. I guess on the flip side of creating the units do you know look at data in regards to evictions and, yes. And whether or not that has slowed down i mean this is probably in correlation through addiction and homelessness. In terms of our supportive of housing our eviction is less than 2 percent we should be proud of that the department of health and hsa that are primarily managing this to the department and provider done an excellent jab force the corelation between eviction and single adult homelessness there is not a lot of data didnt mean it didnt exit but doesnt show theyve contributed to the adult homelessness im sure that is not the case but given the there in rent compared to the increase in homelessness and the there in evictions there is not a strong correlation, however, we know that given the case it of housing it is hard for for the purpose get into the Housing Market once homeless thats why we see a significant number of people that choose to move outside of San Francisco to find housing that is affordable a number of units that are available 28 person you know they dont become available very often. Thank you thank you. All right. Thank you very much jeff thank you for your presentation a very how level but this is budget as you may know well get into the meat in the early part of june but something i want you to think about is evaluating what the county of los angeles they passed a bond measure 3. 6 billion if im not mistaken that will be a steady stream of income for the next years i want you to analyze that and we can did you this in San Francisco so possibly we can begin do find a dedicated stream of income to help us begin to attack that based on the numbers youre doing a great job and spend a lot of money i believe we need a lot of money in order to move the needle and providing the much noted services that our Homeless Population needs correct me if i am wrong i found disposition in conversation with you living and breathing in San Francisco and watching what is going on but la might be onto something i want to have a thoughtful conversation not at that hearing but in the future in a thoughtful way bringing out. Thank you so they passed two measures the bond make sure m pursue was replicating the Housing Trust capital to build for supportive of housing i want to point out that San Francisco has supported housing for than any other city i am paying attention they have generated the sales tax im going to los angeles to speak to the county supervisor and the staff in the organization be happy to report back. Im glad to hear that i reached out to the president of the board of directors and had that be a team player i dont want to be only criticizing without coming with xhuveng well be able to take away the key principles and agreed only 47 priorities before they brought it to the voters the county board of supervisors agreed on 47 principles are priorities where the money will be spent that is incredibly important when youre talking with voters they want to know how and where the money will be spent we should be prepared to answer i also got my hands on powell data so id like to compare and share notes tactfully attack the challenges and with that said, gap and services a bulletin point on the last point with the Navigation Center ive been accurately anticipating with the Navigation Center in the dog patch is the 25 and it was no easy task to find that location we were scheduled to open in march of this year and then i was told april 15th and here we are it is still closed i know there are challenges and effects their back in the saddle and moving in the direction you im trying to get a feeling when we can expect this Navigation Center to be open. Well be open by the end of may. Okay by the end of may we heard that. On the roared record and i want to hear the place between San Francisco district 10 and 9 are shouldering some of the responsibility in housing and opening Navigation Centers i think supervisor yee wants one and mark wants two, how do we make this happen. Were happy to speak with you know any supervisor or Community Group interested sea communities clearly to identify the funding but overtime if you imply the challenges finding the location and making that happen needs 15 thousand temporary beds and whether we call them Navigation Centers or shelters we feed to increase the number of temporary beds that takes the burden that is shared by district 10, 9 and 6 and happy to share with you specific breakdowns of where those services are by districts and but i have gotten you, you know positive feedback if every supervisor we have multiple sites were looking at. Are you looking at multiple sites. Across the city and correct me if i am wrong im making an summation but homeless in every nook and cranny in San Francisco. There are homeless yes. Is there not to my knowledge we need to know. So many things but i look forward to sharing with you our Strategic Plan that is almost done that will answer some of the questions in terms of specifically the gaps in the system and how many units of housing do we need and specifically how many shelter beds and think about where we want to invest additional funding should we be able to identify a dedicated revenue stream. Amazing you have a hard job we recognize that and here to support all right. Thank you for your presentation can i sorry Public Comment on this item. Any Public Comment on this item . Come on up to the podium and hear a soft chime no Public Comment is closed. All right. Please item 3 oh, wait i need a motion i need a motion. To file the hearing. Motion and seconded by supervisor yee and well take that without objection. Thank you very much next item, please. Item no. 3 hearing to receive a budget update from the Human Services agency for fys 20172018 and 20182019, and. All right. The second work is the harder workingman in San Francisco jeff topped you a little bit but in terms incredibly important work you and your team are doing so welcome back to the Budget Finance Committee committee. Nice to see you all as well im fairly familiar with the work that jeff is doing. I know you are. Members of the board executive director. Sfgovtv were ready for you on the laptop. Not quite weve still got
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.