a backdrop where it all sort of -- "the washington post" has this reporting again about how donald trump views these situations. the mrntrump administration try to divert disaster relief funds to border enforcement, which of course has prompted an outcry. and then you look at "the new york times" reporting on donald trump seeing this as kind of a time to be loud, but not be accurate. mr. trump awaited landfall by assuming the role of meteorologist in chief, adding weatherman style updates to a usual weekend routine of critiquing the performance of his cable news allies. i suppose the risk is that it all becomes mixed up in one soup and tuned out, rather than people who live in alabama, and this would matter regardless, but happens to be a state that went heavily for trump, people going, wow, i really wish he didn't set off a false alarm here. that's not helpful. >> well, i would hope the people of alabama and particularly the voters of alabama would take