issues here in georgia law. the first is citizen's arrest. the defendants will try to claim and have claimed that they were carrying out a citizen's arrest. the problem with that and what the judge is going to charge the jury with later today is saying that a citizen's arrest can only be carried out if you witness the felony taking place. if the felony is taking place in your presence. she's very clear to lay out the facts of the case do not lend themselves to that citizen's arrest. the only thing she's starting to lay out is the term, in the presence of. that is, the other defendants, whether or not they pulled the trigger. whether or not they actually shot ahmaud arbery, they were in the presence of the crime. that they were then a part of that crime. she actually compared it to super bowl rings. that everybody gets a super bowl ring, whether you're a trainer, whether you play or not. she's trying to convey to the jury that when they are given these instructions, there is no choice, as she would say, but to find the defendants guilty. we'll see how the defense plays out their case, but you can bet, it is going to be both that self-defense defense as well as that citizen's arrest defense.