0 size in a star studded match up, lionel messi leads juggernaut argentina against reigning champions france and the sensational karine jean-pierre scored. it all comes down to a magic. the world cup final coverage begins sunday at 9:00 a.m. eastern live on fox on the fox sports . d evenintog and welcome to tucker carlson. tonight, so not long after jack ruby shot lee harvey oswald,amer on camera in the basement ofce dallas police headquarters, a lot of americans startedeopl to have some questions about the kennedy assassination. it was you'dd have to admit, a pretty extraordinary sequence of events. a lone gunman murders the president of the united states and then less thanat forty two hours later, that lone gunman is himself murdered by another lone gunman. i what are the odds of that? it's one thing if you get struck by lightning, rare but possible. >> but if ever tning, ry member of your family also gets struckf yr by lightning all on different days, you might begin to suspect these are not entirely natural events. suspec these are not naturants. suspec but, oh, replied the u.s. government, they are this bizarre chain of killings was all entirely natural. >> so less than a year after the jfk assassination, the johnson white house released something called the warrenk assassinatio commis. >> and the report concluded that while their motives remainedncar, both lee ac alone. no one helped them. there was no conspiracy of any kind. casesed. closed. time to move on . and many, many americans didat e move on .ea >> at the time. they had no idea how shoddy and corrupt the warren commission was. it would be nearly 50 years before the cia admitted under duress that in fact it withheld information from investigators about its relationship with lee harvey oswald. inve even then, at the time ex the government's explanation didn'tpln didn't seem entirely . some'tpln didn't seem entirely . and some people started asking obvious question s about it. >> it was at that point, as americans started to doubt the officialstarted to story, tt the term conspiracy theory entered our lexicon. as professor lance david smith points out in his book on the subject, the term conspiracy theory did not exist as a phrase in everyday americanpiracy conversation befe nineteen sixty four inbefore 19. year warreixty four inbefore 19. nineteen sixty for the year, the warren commission issued its report. the new york times issued publi five stories in which conspiracy theory appeared. now, today, of course, the termp conspiracy theory appears in pretty much every s "new york times" story about american politics. it's wielded an now as then as a weapon against anyone who asks questions.ks the government doesn't feel like answering. >> but despite sixty years oswef name calling, those questions o have not disappeared. >> in fact, they have multiplied with time and one of them, in april of nineteen sixty four, a psychiatrist called lewis george allen west visited jack ruby in his isolation cell in a dallas jail. >> according to west's written w assessment, he found that jack ruby was, quote, technically insane. and in immediate psychiatricd of hospitalization. >> those are conclusions that puzzlingly, no one who had spoken to jack ruby previously had reached ruby had seemed perfectly sane to the people who knew him.. d hi >> lewis dailan w pronounced him crazy. but what what w did not say was that he was working for the cia at the time. louis storyland w was a contract psychiatrist for the spy agency . t ony agency he was also an expert on mind control and a prominent player in the now infamouontrol as mk a program in which the cia gave powerful psychiatric drugsinent to americans without their knowledge. so of all the psychiatrists innh the world, what in the worldd wa was this guy doing jack ruby's prison cell? >> p the media didriso not seemt interested in finding out.edn in fact, the new york times, inu an extensive 1999 obituary of w never mentioned the fact that mn he had worked for the cia, much less his time in jack ruby cell ,which seems relevant. >> so you can see why non crazy people would wonder about what really happened.k and of course, many have wondered in nineteen seventy six long forgotten the house of representatives impaneled a special committee to reinvestigate the jfk tiveassassin. t th their bipartisan conclusion, jack kennedy was almost certainly murdered as the result of a conspiracy. >> but the question is as cons conspiracy. by whom? well, the obvious suspeccyy t wd be the cia. >> why else would the agency withhold critical evidence for investigators? is there a benign explanation for that, for maintaining this level of secrecy for this many years? >> level o not that we're aware. and it is illegal. s pa >> in 1992, congress passed the president, john f. kennedy assassination recordsk pres collection act. that act mandated full disclosure of all documents by twenty, seventeen, fifty four years after jfk was killed, the last administration promised to comply fully with that law. but under intense pressure from cia director mike pompeo, withheld in the end thousands of pages opof cimpeoa documents. today. today. administrationdae bide did exacy the same thing. that would be thousands off do pages of documents after nearly. 60 years after the death of i every single person involved. but we still can't see them clearly not to protect any person. they're all dead.ct it's to protec at an institution . but why? well, today, we decided to find out. >> we spoke to someone who had access to these still hidden cia documents. a person was deeply familiarfamr with what they contain. >> we asked this person directly, did the cia have hav a hand in the murder of john f. kennedy, an american president ? and here's the reply wenswe received verbatim. quote, the answer is yes, i believe they were involved. it's a whole different country. from what we thought it was. it's all fake. response then it's hard to imagine a mores no jarring response than that. again, this is not a quote, . conspiracy theorist that we spoke to , not even close. this is someone with direct knowledge of the information that once again is being withheld from the american public. and the answer we receivednswe s unequivocal. yes, the cia was involved inve the assassination of p the president. >> now, some people will notnt.e be surprised to hear that s they suspected it all along. >> but no matter how you feel about what you thought about the kennedy assassination, pause to consider what this means. it means that within the u.s. government, there are forces wholly beyond democratic control. these forces are more powerful than the elected officials that supposedly oversee them.versee . they canly oversee them.versee . these forces can affect election outcomes. they can even hidelicity o their complicity in the murder of an american president . in other words, they can der oot apretty much anything they wan. they constitute a government within a government mocking by their very existence the idea of democracy. >> as cynical as we have become after 30 years of watching government officials ignore, we the voters who employ them, we were shocked to learn this. it's not acceptable. americans have trusted e their government less with every passing year sinc eith every passing year sinc the killing of john f. kennedy. maybe this is why and people a have known this for a long time. the people who kneme.w would include every director of the cia since november o ifnc nineteen sixty three . 196 and that list would include obama's cia director , john brennan. one of the most sinister and dishonest figures in american life. s that list would also include y are sad to say, our friendan mike pompeo, who ran the cia in the last administration, mike pompeo, knew this. weo asked pompeya to join we h asked pompeya to join turns down a televised interview. he refused to come. we hope you will reconsider. >> in the meantime, we are happy to be joined tonight by new york post columnist frano devine. >> miranda, thank you so much for coming on . i don't think we'vi don'e pauseo enough to consider what thisr means. w after sixty years, when every person involved is dead, we can't see classified information about it. mayb e the pivotal event in modern american history. and noe pivotaw we know why. te well, tuckerr,, look, you laid t used, tuckerr,, look, you laid t and , you know, it used to be that conservative like me dismissed theories from the left about jfk assassination as just left wing conspiracy theories. but over time, i think that the left looks as if they were quite justified in not trusting the intelligence services. and i think the wmd pretext for the iraq war was a red pill is slowly dawning. red pill for m re. n and so now you just have fad so now you just have basic level. you just look at the fact that thirty years ago, congress, inus a unanimous bipartisan and unequivocal, unambiguous uivocal,decision, said that thel the jfk files have to be made public. absolutely no reason to keep them back . ever back . 60 years ago. everybody involved is dead. d you're not worried aboutea sullying reputations or unmasking a spy overseas. no. they can they can only be to reasons forg it. t one is that you're tryingo to protect the cia against allegations or revelations thati it knew more than it made out about. lee harvey oswald had huge file on him. they were investigating him or in in contact with him beforeh i the assassination. and they didn't dom be enougforh to save jfk or protectt th the president. ise president. enough to really keep this secret going for sixty years? i mean, a terrible dawning daw recognition is that really thisn recognition is that really thisn protecting the institution. ifif the cia was involved in tht assassination, that is the reason that you would wante. to keep that from the american becae the fury thathe american would erupt and this is a bipartisan fury would be the one thing that would unite absot americans is an absolute rage at this unaccountable spy agency that is has decided that it is going to get involved, murdering, assassinating the duly elected american president . for what reason? you know, there would be suc hn a clean of the cia. the i don't know if it would evenin survive. and so the trust inbottom our institutions is already at rock bottom. think i think it's a mistake fot mike pompeo not to come on youro show because all this does fue is fuel more conspiracyis theories. the truth is the best disinfectant. and if the ciat did do this, ws involved 60 years ago, then it needs to come clean. >> we need to have a reckoning. and just to be clear , that was the assessment of someone weas spoke to who was directlsessmeys and personally familiar with the contents of these documents, not someone who read it on the internet. this is someone who had access to the documents. >> and i have to say, i don'tage understand and i agree with secrecy, abets evil. and the more secrecy you have, the more evil you're likelyd mii to have. so wmie should minimizemount the amount of secrecy as a general matter. but i don't understand how johnj brennan can go on nbohc newsna every day. he was on today and no one pauses and asked, like, what is this exactly 60 years ti s,really? >> don't give me the sources and methods best, by the way,yer son , like we're adults here.ea? what's the real reason? n why is no one ask him that? cter well, the more we see characters from the cia like john brennan, like those fifty one former intelligence officials who sign that scurrilous letter about hunter biden being russiathnabou disinformation, the more the less impressive they look. h these people are in the shadows for a reason, because if yourean actually saw who they were, look at john brennan, would you, knowing what we know now about him, would you really entrust him to run the country's premier spy agency? spto have such power to run around the world, intervene in other countries elections?s elen no. sos? i , i , i just don't know what good it does us to have those kind of malevolent people having so much power i and using it in our name and causing us all great harm. because we don't know whatt they're doing. >> that's right. transparency can fix it. >>ri the only thing they can. and i appreciate. your assessment team. miranda devine of the new york post. thank yoranda neu. you. >> thanks. so the same people who aree peoe withholding this information lying to us about the pivot point in modern american history, sitting on the fact thatca the u.s. agency is complicit in the murder ofnt an american president , thosee same peoplsamee are now overseeg us involvement in the war in ukraine. americans fighting russia, and that involvement is escalating significantly. according to multiple reports tonight, the bush administration is preparing to sen pretod patriot missile ds systems to ukraine. now, these are not surface to air missiles. >> these are long range missile defense systems. long-rs that can shoot down bote missiles and aircraft. they are more advanced than any weapon this country has sent so far to ukraine. >> that's saying a lot. >> as recently as march, the pentagon denied that it would ever do anythingarch like this. a senior u.s. defense officialo said in march that, quote, e there is no discussion aboutt putting a patriot battery in ukraine. have t in order to do that, you would have to put us troops with it to operate it. americante it. in other words, you would have american troops directly fighting russia. congress does not authorize that. the american public is not ireso ofe american public is not ireso there's no justification for that. and of course, the risk of doing doing that are profound. >> but now we are positioningno troops in ukraine is no longer a problem. it's no longer a theoreticaldemt problem. it's reality. c and democrats in congress arong encouraging watch. >> we can provide them aire ai defense systems, specifically pt patriot missiles, and we've gotn to accelerate delivery of d those. i have called on the unitedery. states to really prioritize ukraine. i've suggested that we should take patriot missiles, but also another system called the amram system. how worried are you thatri otsupplying these patriot systes could lead to a very serious escalation in this war that would involve the u.s. and russia now directlyt that fighting? >> i'm not that worried, erin. i'm not that worried. tha he's not that worried because it's already happening. ening. so u.s. military military personnel are fighting russia right now. that'shting ru right a fact. >> but what's russia's response? how close are we to somethingnst awful? most americans don't know because news from russia has been cut off completely here. you're not allowed to know.s as it's been censored as it is in north korea. ibut you should know that the russian foreign ministry is warned that they'll be , quote, consequenceforeign indusf the biden administration puts patriot missiles and u.s. personneu.s.l in ukraine.n prop is that russian propaganda? no, it's just what they said. >> so in order to underscore the point, the russian government has just released footage of the ja's nuclear imissile. that missile is capable off hitn hitting both the united states and the uk. you're seeing footage of it right now. it shows a russian soyuz rocket being installed into a silotold south of moscow. >> a russian general told stateo media that the plan is to hit t london, quote, you don't haveinn to hit washington first. to hit washington first. firs farlondon is next door. london is the main hotbed of all nastiness. r an >> so however you feel about ukraine, you oppose the russian invasion of ukraine. >> most people do. we do. >> this is very serious. and you think that lawmakers in congress would notice it was happening, but they don't seem e to care. >> as adam schiff said the other day, armageddon is a small price to pay because we wneed to defend democracy in ukraine. >> do yocracy inu think the risf direct conflict is growing? >> i think it is growing. i i think it is manageable.ma and i think urbanization has done a remarkable job in managing that and not letting itbide get out of hand . but you see putin continue to rattle the nuclear saber, which is extremely dangerous. >> it it can't deter us , though, from giving our full and complete support to ukraine . so how do we get to a place where adam schiff, who is demonstrably dishonest and reckless, almost dementedis in the way he behaves, is playing a significant role in us foreign policy? >> scary. about >> pretty much everything they have told us about this war since the very beginning has been a lie.t kn >> and again, most people don'ts know because our news is sohe controlled by the u.s. government. >> one of the things we've learned from the twitter filesen ,but very quickly is run through some of the things they told us . they told us that sanctions were going the russian economy. joe biden said that in a speecha to the country did it well this summer, the russian ruble hit its strongest level in seven years. and just a few months ago, russian postedrsrussia a massive surplus. russian propaganda, no economic facts. facts our policy isn't working. in fact, it's counterfei it. from january to september of this year, russia's trade surplus wa12s one hundred and $20 billion higher than it was in the same period last year.. it is doubleperiod last year.. it's double russia's previous record , set in two thousandcord eight . that's where sanctions have done. remember when we were told that putin would be crippled by sanctions? liars? >> rebel news reporter called s jeremy loffredo just went to moscow to see what is happening there. >> turns out they're doing okay. doingwhat we're doing isn't hug them. only us grocery stores ines moscow are not empty. they're not running out ofn mo d and their food prices aren't bad either. watch this. upon walking. >> and i was surprised. i it seemed like not only a normal grocery store, but it was absolutely full of food.ood. barilla pasta, which you can get at any grocery store in the states with stacked so tall that i would need a ladder to reach the linguine. but i remain skeptical because surely the new york times and the washington post wouldn'tcked s be lying. n stors how expensive is everything? russian stores could have food, bu.t with inflatione so and shortages, items could be so expensive that no one canx afford it. pensfirst, i went to the milk aisle. kiffer 1% 10% three percent and even four percent. a milk, yogurtnds and fig dairyir alternatives. they had a lot of options.ar i got a liter of regular milk. it was eighty nine rubles or a dollar forty one . then i made my way to the meat section. they had beef, chicken , turkey , pork and even rabbit. i settled for a pound of ground beef, which was one hundred and seventy five rubles orground two dollars and seventy eight cents. the total for milk, eggs, beef,8 bread, and mushrooms was four hundred and ninety nine rubles or seven dollars. and ninety two cents. surprisingly, it seems the mainstream media is not being entirely truthful inn strm regards to the effect sanctions are having on the prices of essential goods in russia. >> so there's no question thatoi we will be accused of russian propaganda for playing that clip. not that we care, but it gives us the chance to make a very obvious point. . >> that's news. those are facts. we are bringing you informationa you do with it what you will .ul >> that's not propaganda. propaganda is when you withhold information from the population in order to affect a policy they don't actually support. tha that's what north korea does. that's what the soviet union did. and that's what we're doing here. and that's why we're grateful that you're actually went to find out what was happening. that is wht what was happening. >> here's the news. je here's the news. thanks so much for coming on . n i'm certain you will be attacked as a tool of putin, w but let's ignore that and get to what you saw there. what look from the grocerye no store that sanctions are not hurting moscow, too badly. >> yeah, i was on my way to russia and i saw the new york times that the soviet era" shortages "the washington post" said something along the lines e of that there's essential goods scarcityss of foreign policy. they put out a report that said that the economy in russia is in a black hole that's out of proportion. that's never been seen before. . and so i was a little nervous going there. and you i went to rural areas outside of moscow and i wenty to grocery stores like you just saw. and , you know, things weree cheap and they had more things than the whole foods, the whole foods here in new york city. and , you know, what is the goal? what is the goal of thesetions? sanctions? the goal is obviously to cause unrest, shortages, make people unhappy with the government. hopefully, people will take wi governm. thee will take and at the end of the day, wee a want regime change in russia. we want a different government. but as you can tell, you know,p. that's not happening. i spoke to hundreds of people in russia and they fit into how theya and they fit into about three different categories of how they feel about the sanction feel:s. t cae the first category ogof people they consider themselves russian patriots, and theyif usssian patriots, and theyif netflix, they don't care. spotify. they don't care if they can't g. send money overseas. they believe in the causer grou and they support their government. and then another group of people, maybe,e would consideram them liberals. we have them everywhere every and they oppose the sanctionssai only becauseon they can't go ony vacations. they can't, you know, watch netflix. and they oppose the war because. they oppose the sanctions. they just want to livehe how thy normally live, which is a relatively comfortable lifestyle. and then live. the other group o people, they don't even noticegu anything is happening. >> maybe they just buy food at. the store.fo the gas is cheap. they drive arounod at the d. they're not affected at all by these sanctions. y right.nctions. >> well, i mean, the point undergirding all of this is we are affected by the sanctions>>c and so is western europe and they're crushing our economy. so let me ask you very quickly, just for the record, will you yu accompany by a putin government minder, as was your reporting, dictated or driven or steeredn by anyone from the putin government? no one from the government? , anyy goom the government? government was with me. i was by myself walking aroundas documenting what i was seeing and grateful that you did, because more information, the free flow of information is essential in democracy. jeremy le figaro, thank you so much. so no president in americande history has evernt turned hisn guns on his own population inpoa the way biden and his staff ditd on the unvaccinated. they told you the unvaccinated. we're going to kill you. remember that?you. what opened up? though thed up? well, they haven't given that up, even though, of course, the science proves that's insane.s now, they're telling you that the unvaccinated are dangerous drivers, not making that nexate the ministry of changed the world forever. it's one thing to read about the life of , but to make the story of truly come alive. i knew i had to see for myself what better place than a star in bethlehem as we go on this journey, we're joined by experts along the way. really know this land in a crypt is a very specific spot. marking the very spot where he was born. god loved us so much that he gave his only begotten son . it's here in these waters of the jordan river where jesus christ is baptized and his ministry begins. this is my beloved son in whom i am with at least the greatest story ever told. starts right here. the life of , god . with us streaming now only on fox nation. sign up now and at 50% off all yearly plans this holiday season to give your special someone the gift of naturally new pajamas exclusively from pajama graham, a luxury is a way to relax. >> naturally, new pajamas caress your skin and compliment her every color. >> plus accentuate her beauty. naturally, new pajamas are available in sizes from extra small to three eggs and come with a love guarantee. and now in this special tv offer, when you order pajama rams, naturally no pajamas today they'll ship tomorrow. >> but that's not all you'll also receive. absolutely. free and naturally nightie. even better when you order today, pajama graham will include free gift packaging order. now, through this special tv offer, you'll save seventy five and get a free boneless nightie. plus pajama gramble. wrap it for absolutely free. make her feel cherished this holiday season. >> order now shifts tomorrow. hello, i'm mike lindell and i'm excited to bring you my biggest betting cell ever. just in time for christmas, get my giza dream bedsheets for as little as twenty nine . ninety eight . a set of pillowcases only nine ninety eight . rejuvenate your bed with my pillow mattress topper for as low as ninety nine ninety nine . we also have blankets, a variety of sizes, colors and styles. >> we even have blankets for your pets. get duvets quilts down, comforters, body pillows, boaster pillows and so much more . oh the biggest discounts ever. i know my bedding products are perfect for you and i'm extending my money back guarantee for christmas until march 1st. 2020 three . making them the perfect gifts for your friends, your family and every one you know. so go to mypillow .com or call the number on your screen. use your promo code and you'll get huge discounts on all mypillow bedding products, including my keys, adream bedsheets for as low as twenty nine . >> ninety eight . get all your shopping done now while quantities last psychiatric drug use skyrockets. see what's driving the dramatic increase, includindo little.