people raise issues. i am limited with what i can say about them. i'm aware there are cases -- >> i'm not asking you to decide a case or predict how you would decide to, i'm just asking isn't it apparent that when the supreme court decides that something that is not even in the constitution is a fundamental right, and no state can pass any law that conflicts with the supreme court's edict, particularly in an area where people have so sincerely held religious beliefs, doesn't that create a conflict between what people may believe as a matter of their religious doctrine or faith in what the federal government says is the law of the land? >> well, son of dirt that is of our right. when there is a right, it means