government this week? i'll explain. first, here's my take. if you are trying to understand the recent protests against the putin regime in russia, one of the best guides is an outspoken columnist that's been writing essays in the nation's leading newspapers over the past month. political competition is the heart beat of democracy. this author writes "noting the absence of such competition in contemporary russia." he describes the frustrations of the russian middle class, demanding political rights. today the quality of our state does not match civil society's readiness to participate in it. on corruption, perhaps the issue that most riles the public, the problem is scathing. it's from the lack of transparency and accountability of government, he says. now, what makes this all deeply strange is that the author of these essays is vladimir putin, the architect, builder, and chief enforcer of the system that he is critiquing. putin seems to understand russia's problems better than your average dictator. he doesn't seem to understand that he is the source of those problems in many people's lives. in putin's world view, he is the savior of modern russia. the man who stopped its descent into chaos and poverty in the 1990s. his opponents see him as a warmed over kgb operative over a new and improved soviet state. neither view is entirely accurate. the real hero of russia's rescue was oil. the dramatic rise in the average russian's income has been a consequence not of putin's policies but of oil prices. the price of oil when putin came to office was $27 a barrel. from that point it began an almost unbroken rise and is now at $116 a barrel. oil is the lifeblood of the economy that provides two-thirds of its exports, half of the federal government's revenues. they used these revenues to dole out patronage across the country. it is widely believed in the west that putin stays in power through repression. he does so in larger measure through bribery. in the short run putin will be able to win the march election and consolidate power through a mixture of repression and patronage. his problems are more long-term. his government has ramped up its revenues to the point that it now needs oil to approach $125 a barrel simply to balance the budget. russia's demographics are terrible. it has a population that's age and shrinking, which means pension and health care costs will rise as people retire, labor productivity in russia is a biz mal, the caucuses region is almost turning into a separate country, and russia's ethnic diversity is straining its sense of nationalism, but like saudi arabia, like venezuela, all somewhat dysfunctional regimes, the russian regime will survive these challenges until and unless oil prices come down. for more on this, you can read my column in this week's "time magazine." let's get started. the violence in syria escalated this week. hundreds and hundreds of civilians have been killed. the question is in light of russia and china's veto of a u.n. security council resolution to condemn and try to stem the violence, what options are left for the international community community to act on. to talk about this, three great guests joins me from london. he is the director of the middle east study center of the london school of economics. elliott abrams was the deputy national security advisor for president george w. bush. he lives in d.c. and in beirut romney runs the international affairs program at the american university bay. let me begin with you. how would you describe what is going on in syria because it appears to be more than just a few protests. there seems to be a kind of insippent civil war. >> well, i think syria has already descended into a prolonged conflict. political violence has gone to many parts of syria. many syrians, i have just returned from many syrians are arming themselves. the syrian government appears to be losing control of is some neighborhoods and some streets and even towns. you have now a potent arnled ininsurgency. the last week or so knee launched an all-out offensive to crush the ininsurgency. the security council has been neutralized as a result of the double veto. the syrian crisis has been caught in the unfolding cold war between the saudi-led alliance and the iranian coalition. this is a very, very prolonged conflict. even though i don't see how assad can survive from the long-term, it will take a miracle to rescue his sinking ship. in the short-term and medium term, assad is not as desperate as some of us or most of us would portrait him to be. >> rthere's a cold war where syria is, in a sense, the battleground. from in the region does it appear to you that way that you have on the one hand the syrian regime backed by iran, really its sole major ally, but then is there a lot of money and arms flowing in from saudi arabia? >> there are three things happening simultaneously. you do have the saudi and raunian-led cold wear in the region that's been going on for some years and has played itself out in lebanon and palestine and iraq. sometimes in somalia and yemen and now in syria, and you have the second thing which is this arab series of uprisings all across the region where citizens are trying to reclaim their dignity, their sovereignty, and their citizenship, and their rights, and the third thing now, which is the most recent with the veto at the united nations you have the russians, the chinese, as two world powers that are reclaiming a role in the region as the americans and the europeans slowly lower their foot print in the region and simultaneously the rise of regional powers like turkey, iran, saudi arabia, and the arab league. the egyptians are on their way. you have three things happening simultaneously, and all of them are converging on syria. >> elliott, if you were in the national security council right now trying to figure out whether this regime could survive, wouldn't one of the key metrics be whether there are defections in the army, whether the regime itself is cracking, and what i'm struck by is for all this, all the turmoil, you don't see much in the way of defecks of the army or the intelligence. >> i think that's right. i would say that that's because people have not yet become convinced, people in the army, that assad is going to lose and going to lose reasonably soon. i would say we with the turks and we with the saudis need to do more to help the side that is being killed by the assad regime and its supporters. iran, china, russia wra. >> would you agree with the intelligence and army is -- that's why they're clinging. that it would be possible to pry them away? >> we talked six months ago when i was in syria. i don't know if you remember. i made the point that it's not just about the security. the reason why i think this particular regime has a lot of staying power for several reasons. social support. millions of syrians, sadly to say, not just otherwise -- the christians i talked to fareed, they're more fanatical assad than the otherwise. you have the militant class that has benefitted from the neo-liberal policies of the assad regime. a critical base of support. you have the security apparatus that has remained solidly behind him. when i say a solid security base, i am talking about 300,000 troops and soldiers. as yad can mobilize up to 500,000 special forces and has been doing so. not only that, of course, he has the support of iran. iran -- i mean, what we need to understand, fareed, is that the iraq road now has become the lifeline of the assad regime in terms of money, in terms of arms, so he has the veto two double vetoes in the last ten months, and that's why i think we have some humility, and we have to be blunt with your position. yes, assad might not survive. not survive on the long-term. this is going to be a very deeply entrenched, very bloody, very costly, very prolonged conflict, indeed. >> we're going to have to take a break. i'm going to ask elliott abrams what he would do about the russian and chinese vetoes, and we're also going to talk about iran with syria's main sponsor when we come back. >> we shut not watch that happen and sit by. we should give them help, concrete help. >> would that expand this insippent civil war? >> it's terrible advice, fareed. zero-to-sixty in less time than a porsche panamera s. the 429 horsepower genesis r-spec. from hyundai. imagine if you could always see life [music] in the best light. every time of day. outdoors, or in. transitions® lenses automatically filter just the right amount of light. so you see everything the way it is meant to be seen. maybe even a little better. experience life well lit, ask for transitions adaptive lenses. diarrhea, gas or bloating? get ahead of it! one phillips' colon health probiotic cap a day helps defend against digestive issues with three strains of good bacteria. hit me! [ female announcer ] live the regular life. phillips'. in your breakfast cereal, what is? now, in every box of general mills big g cereal, there's more whole grain than any other ingredient. that's why it's listed first. get more whole grain than any other ingredient... just look for the white check. ...we inspected his brakes for free. free is good. free is very good. my money. my choice. my meineke. we are back with our panel discussing syria and all the turmoil going on there. elliott, when you confront a double veto from the russians and chinese, which effecttively means the u.n. security council is not going to be able to authorize these actions, which we all understand provide legitimatety and provide a lot of regional players to get involved what you do you do? do you think the united states should be moving down a unilateral path here? >> well, it wouldn't be unilateral. we would be consulting with the ash league, with the turks, with the gcc, the countries because, in fact, there is a very large amount of support against the assad regime. it doesn't happen to include iran, russia, and chooun. the question now really is who is going to win? the russian, chinese, iranian side backing hezbollah, backing assad, or the other side, which includes the saudis, the turks, the europeans, the arab league, the gcc, and us. now, assad is willing to kill to prevent himself from being ousted from power, and the question really is are we going to back the other side along with the arabs, or are we going to back them with words, or are we going to back them with something a little bit more tangible? >> what would that more tangible thing about? >> more tangible thing would be the kind of support that was given initially in libya. that is, i would give them money, and i would give them arms. that's both of the two things they need right now. they don't need american airplanes. they do need what would from our point of view be covert support. i would hope that it would come from arab countries rather than directly from the united states. they're being slaughtered, however, and they have rifles. we should not watch that happen and sit by. we should giver them help, concrete help. >> would that expand this incipient civil war? >> that's a terrible advice, fareed, because the worst thing that can happen to the uprising, the awakening, is the militaryization of the intifada, because that would play into the assad's basically world view, and the united states has been correct saying that the most effective means to basically this awes odd is to have a dipping point. what we need to understand, fareed, in the last ten months, there has been a war being waged against the assad regime by others. you have a financial war, customer war, psychological war, and it's amazing, and i just mentioned i just came back how much -- i mean, the -- it's being hurt. if we do arm the opposition, if we try to go that particular road, syria will descend into all-out civil war, or syria is on the verge, on the brink. we should struggle very hard to convince the opposition to remain a political and healthy opposition because the dipping point, fareed, i believe the social balance of forces inside syria. once the middle passes, fully joins the uprising. assad is a goner, i believe. >> if i could just -- here is the problem with that, i think. the longer this fighting goes on and this is a war of the regime against the people. the longer this regime fights the people, kills the people, and kills a sunni majority population, the harder it is going to be at the end to pull the pieces back together to avoid revenge and to get reconciliation. if this goes on for another nine or 12 months, there will be too much blood will have been shed. that's why it's important, i think, to bring it to an end sooner. >> let me ask you a final point, which is about iran. iran is really the main sponsor of this regime. this doesn't look very good for them as syria gets employeesed, as this descend intuz turmoil. how do you think this is being seen in iran and how is it seen in the region? >> iran is emerging as one of the great losers all across the region, and the iranians probably have to look at home because they're not impervious to these kinds of uprisings themselves either. there are tennings within iran, but this is going to be played out in syria. this is a battle between the rulers of syria and the many of the people of syria. there is strong support for the regime, as there was for other leaders who are overthrown, finally. the security, mft minorities, and the middle class in damascus, and all of this is happening to a very slight extent, but it's been increasing over the last eight, ten months. the trend is very clear, and i think foreign military intervention would probably be catastrophic, and to hear americans suggest this is to think back what they did in iraq and what an extraordinary catastrophe that has been. that's still playing itself out today. i think we need to feel the pain of the syrian people. it's a terrible thing to watch them as we do here, and you see the refugees coming into lebanon and the businessmen and the civil activists telling us what's going on, and in the end this has to be played out in syria and i think it will be. >> thank you all very much. fascinating discussion of a very important issue. we will check back with you shortly, i'm sure. we'll be back. okay, team! after age 40, we can start losing muscle -- 8% every 10 years. wow. wow. but you can help fight muscle loss with exercise and ensure muscle health. i've got revigor. what's revigor? it's the amino acid metabolite, hmb to help rebuild muscle and strength naturally lost over time. [ female announcer ] ensure muscle health has revigor and protein to help protect, preserve, and promote muscle health. keeps you from getting soft. [ major nutrition ] ensure. nutrition in charge! but my nose is still runny. [ male announcer ] truth is, dayquil doesn't treat that. really? [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus fights your worst cold symptoms, plus it relieves your runny nose. [ deep breath ] awesome. [ male announcer ] yes, it is. that's the cold truth! now for our what in the world segment. remember mitt romney's infamous poor comment? >> i'm not concerned about the very poor. we have a safety net there. if it needs repair, i'll pictures it. i'm not concerned about the very rich. they're doing just fine. i'm concerned about the very heart of america, the 90%, 95% of americans that are struggling. >> it got me thinking. romney was actually being honest about americans in general. we don't -- none of us spent e spend much time thinking about the very poor. we should because we have a real problem in this area. an economic political and moral problem. now by romney's calculations, if 95% of americans fall in the middle class, how that can be used is another question. then there must be 5% of americans who qualify as poor. well, no. the number from the eocd, the association of the world's developed economies, is actually 17. 3% of americans who are poor. how do we compare with other rich countries? we rank 31st of the 34 countries that make up the oecd. of the 34 member states, only mexico, chile and israel are worse off than we are. the u.k. has a port rate of 11%. germany, 8.9%. france, 7.2%. they're all much lower. the oecd average is 11%. well lower than ours. let's look at another chart. this one is even more worrying for americans. the percentage of children living in poverty, we come in at 20.6% of our children. again, far worse than other rich countries. japan, australia, the u.k., germany, and frances all have much better numbers. mitt romney spoke about how he would fix the safety net for the poor if it needs repair. well, let me suggest one place it desperately needs repair, and that is in the area of child poverty. now, whatever the causes of poverty, when children grow up in desperate circumstances, circumstances that they had no role in creating, studies show that they will be more likely to drop out of high school, be unemployed, use drugs, have children out of wed lock, and get sick. in other words, they will be unproductive members of society and they will cost taxpayers huge amounts of money over the course of their lives. children in extreme poverty do badly even when they're smart. a recent u.s. study tracked a group of eighth graders in 1988 and found that students who did very well on a standardized test but were poor were less likely to get through college than their peers who tested poorly but were well off. now look at health care. the key indicator of the level of health in the country is its infant mortality rate. that's when a child dies within the first year of his or her life. let's compare again. we're at about six deaths for every 1,000 live birthed. again, the u.k., australia, germany, france, all fair much better. japan's rate is less than half ours. this is simply because many mothers in america don't have access to prenatal air care. malnutrition and poor childhood health care set in motion a lifetime of poor health, which, of course, means huge costs to the system and to taxpayers. on indicator after indicator the u.s. compares badly with other rich nations on not only how impoverished it is, but also how facilities and opportunities it is giving the very poor. that's why social mobility has stalled in america. compared to other rich countries, poor americans are more likely to stay poor. this shows how more than 40% of american men whose fathers had earnings in the bottom fifth end up in the same bracket. britain, denmark, finland, norway all performed much better. the sad part is these statistics are reversible. i'll show you one last chart. compare child poverty rates in america and the u.k. over time. you'll see that the u.k.'s rates were haved within a decade from the mid 1990s on. the u.s., on the other hand, has actually had a rise in its child poverty rates since then. now, there's no secret source here. tony blair's labor government simply made reducing child poverty a priority through various programs. so mitt romney, yes, the media took your comments out of context, but you do need to be concerned about the very poor. actually, we all do. we'll be right back. >> what is your prognosis of the american economy right now? >> it definitely shows some signs of revival. a new belt. some nylons. and what girl wouldn't need new shoes? we talked about getting a diamond. but with all the thank you points i've been earning... ♪ ...i flew us to the rock i really had in mind. ♪ [ male announcer ] the citi thank you card. earn points you can use for travel on any airline, with no blackout dates. earn points you can use for travel on any airline, today is gonna be an important day for us. you ready? we wanna be our brother's keeper. what's number two we wanna do? bring it up to 90 decatherms. how bout ya, joe? let's go ahead and bring it online. attention on site, attention on site. now starting unit nine. some of the world's cleanest gas turbines are now powering some of america's biggest cities. siemens. answers. one golden crown. come on frank how long have we known each other? go to e-trade. they got killer tools man. they'll help you nail a retirement plan that's fierce. two golden crowns. you realize the odds of winning are the same as being mauled by a polar bear and a regular bear in the same day? frank! oh wow, you didn't win? i wanna show you something... it's my shocked face. [ gasps ] ♪ [ male announcer ] get a retirement plan that works at e-trade. >> i'm candy crowley in washington. fareed zakaria will be back in 0 senkdz, but, first, "showbiz tonight" correspondent on the death of whitney houston. michelle, i know you were at the hotel last night. tell us a little bit about the clive davis party where houston was supposed to attend and sing, i understand. there was talk would they go on with the party or would they not? clive said after speaking with whitney's family, he decided to continue with the party lan. in part, to honor her and her music memory. some things that people were saying on the red carpet last night, is they will miss that voice. that she was the gold standard in the music business that every singer out there aspired to be. you know, we spoke with some of the people that were closest to her, speaking of gladys knight and david foster, and they told us just how shocked they were to hear this news. >> i have known her since she was a little girl and her family, of course, and i'm venturing out to say this, and it may get some flack, but there will never be another voice like that. >> i got the rare privilege to be front and center when whitney houston, the race horse, and it's just shocking. it's beyond. >> david fothser, most notably, candy, worked with whitney houston on both "the preacher's wife" sonned track and "the bodyguard" soundtrack, that was so amaze and so big for her. back to you. >> michelle turner, of course, out in l.a. that's your top story. reliable sources is at the top of the hour. now back to fareed zakaria "gps." joining me now the billionaire businessman george soros, one of the world's best known financiers and philanthropists. welcome back to the program. george, what is your prognosis of the american economy right now? it does seem to be better than the euro zone -- >> it definitely shows some sounds of revival. shale gas, shale oil as a cheap source of energy which has made manufacturing more competitive. also, the fact that you now had several years of no wage growth, so wage disparities have been reduced, and so all this is bringing a very welcome relief. i'm worried that the politics of the election are going to interfere and put a lid on this because the republicans don't want to face elections with obama to seed the economy and recover. they will continue to push for austerity, no new tack taxes, and, therefore, cutting of services which will depress economic activity and employment, so it will be a break on the politics. it will be a break on the recovery this year. after the elections if the republicans win, actually, they'll undergo miraculous transformation where they discover that actually it wouldn't be so bad. therefore, we can afford to have some stimulus. >> you think mitt romney, if elected, would pursue a similar progress? >> i'm pretty sure that would happen. >> when you -- >> i mean, of course, obama would like to as well. he may find it more difficult if the republicans continue to obstruct him. >> do you think -- so in a sense you feel that some part of this republican opposition to an additional stimulus is just cynical. they want the economy to stay weak in an election year. >> unfortunately, our political system is now not functioning the way it used to in the sense that the political parties are more determined to destroy each other. then to reach a policy step that would benefit the country. >> you are still in favor of more stimulus. >> you have to be a little bit more selective because you really have to spend money in ways that would eventually pay for the interest, repay the investment. i think we should distinguish between investments that bring a return, whether it is investment in human resources like education or infrastructure like broadband or high speed rail or whatever, which i think would be very beneficial and tunnel under the hudson would -- this would be the time to build it. however, the idea -- the government -- it should not be the case. i think this is a politically inspired campaign which is self-fulfilling because if you believe the government is bad, then you can do a lot to make sure that the deposit is bad, so this is what the political process, i think, has led the country into a dead end, and that is what we need to somehow get out of. >> well, a lot of businessmen say that the obama administration has placed a huge burden of regulation, taxes, health care, energy, financial services. your own fund decided to reclassify itself as a family office to escape some of these regulations. is it true? do you feel that there is too much of a burden? >> no. i think there's a real quandry here. take, for instance, the financial markets. the crisis we are in was created in the private sector. it's by deregulation and globalization that the financial system was left on its own and it grew like cancer, and it became far too big and extracted far too much of the profits being produced by the economy for its own purposes. it was up to 30% of the total earnings -- profits in the u.s. economy were in the financial sector. that was unsound. the financial services clearly don't contribute 30% to the well being of the country. it also created imbalances led to excesses, leverage, excesses indebtedness that led to the financial collapse which they suffer from. that is -- that came from the private sector, so the -- it means that the private sector and financial sector, in particular, does immediate to be regulated. that stability needs to be an objective of public policy because markets don't connect their own. this is where the quandry comes in. regulation is also imperfect. in many ways more imperfect than the markets because it tends to be a very bureaucratic, so it's always lagging behind, so you have two very imperfect systems that need to be reconciled with each other. >> what about tacks? you think -- you support president obama's proposal to increase taxes on the wealthy? >> i very much do so because it's -- the big boom, the super bubble really resulted in the great increase in inequality. now we have the after effect where have you slower growth. the average american would be better off as a result, but that is totally politically unacceptable. i haven't heard president obama particularly pushing it either, so that's where i think the country could really benefit. >> people were surprised to see that mitt romney was paying only 13.5%, 13.9% in taxes. would it be fair to say if we were to look at your returns since most of it comes from investments, you would probably pay something in the same range? >> yes. well, actually, i would probably be the biggest loser if you had a minimum, which is what's being proposed, because i give all my effectively the maximum amount i can to my philanthropy, and, therefore, i don't pay taxes on it. my tax bill would go up a lot if you had a minimum tax, but i'm willing to pay that because i think if everybody gave as much money as i do, i wouldn't advocate it, but i think the free riders should also pay. >> and we will be right back after this break with more with george soros. we're going to talk about europe and whether there is going to be a european crisis. and about president obama's handling of the american economy. when we come back. giant frozen vegetables.en over twenty delicious varieties have sixty calories or less per serving and are now weight watchers-endorsed. try green giant frozen vegetables with sauce. imagine if you could always see life [music] in the best light. every time of day. outdoors, or in. transitions® lenses automatically filter just the right amount of light. so you see everything the way it is meant to be seen. maybe even a little better. experience life well lit, ask for transitions adaptive lenses. the world needs more energy. where's it going to come from? ♪ that's why right here, in australia, chevron is building one of the biggest natural gas projects in the world. enough power for a city the size of singapore for 50 years. what's it going to do to the planet? natural gas is the cleanest conventional fuel there is. we've got to be smart about this. it's a smart way to go. ♪ we have to thank you for the advice on phillips' caplets. magnesium, right? you bet! phillips' caplets use magnesium. works more naturally than stimulant laxatives... for gentle relief of occasional constipation. can i get an autograph? [ female announcer ] live the regular life. phillips'. [ roger ] tell me you have good insurance. yup, i've got... [ kyle with voice of dennis ] ...allstate. really? i was afraid you'd have some cut-rate policy. [ kyle ] nope, i've got... [ kyle with voice of dennis ] ...the allstate value plan. it's their most affordable car insurance -- and you still get an allstate agent. i too have...[ roger with voice of dennis ]...allstate. [ roger ] same agent and everything. [ kyle ] it's like we're connected. no we're not. yeah, we are. no...we're not. ♪ the allstate value plan. dollar for dollar, nobody protects you like allstate. we are wack with george soros, one of the world's most successful investors and also one of its most genres philanthropists. do you think president obama has done a good job, all things considered? >> he is on a kind of micked job. i think that the problems that he inherited because he came in immediately after the financial crisis, were bigger than any president could have immediat y immediately -- you know, hoover was elected in 1928. he was actually a very capable president, but this name is mud. roosevelt came in 1932, and he actually was -- he made some mistakes at the beginning, but nevertheless, things have recovered, so whoever gets elected now has a much better chance of being successful than obama had. >> will you create a super pac to help president obama? >> i haven't decided, but i think it's a big, big issue that the citizens united has really unleashed private money for political purposes that can be used anonymously, and this would create an unequal playing field which would further destroy the political system. i have given minimum money for on principle not for pursuit of my private interests, and i have always done it very openly saying what i'm doing. i will state what i'm deciding, but i'm distressed by the problem that the citizens united has created. >> will you vote for president obama? >> definitely. >> you are very worried about europe. you think that it is moving in the wrong drenkz. >> i think a catastrophe will be avoided. greece is a sick situation. it has been mishandled. they charge a premium on the rescue package, and it's basically politically the dynamics that are very bad, and that is a general problem in europe. the european union has a desirable sort of being created. it was a desirable objective. people like me and people in europe were very excited about it. as a reality, it's more of an imposition than it is something desirable. >> if you were still running your $25 billion, would you bet against the euro right now? >> no. that's a separate issue. i think the euro can go either way. it's a 50-50 pron proposition. the problems of europe don't translate into a bet against the euro. if anything, would say that the euro is more likely to appreciate than not. >> the european central bank is moving towards being like the federal reserve and basically creating a lot of credit and all too weak in the your wroe. >> would it be fair to say that your prognosis for europe is probably no crisis, no dramatic collapse of the euro euro zone, but very, very slow growth as a result of the system wide austerity program. >> you see, what has happened is that the deter countries within the euro zone have found themselves in the position of third world countries that have become heavily indebted in a foreign currency. so they are relegated to inferior status. this is what happened to latin america in the 1980s when you had a similar, very similar, situation and in the lost decade for latin america. and so right now the european union and particularly the heavily indebted countries face a lost decade. it might actually be longer than a decade because japan had a similar situation with a real estate boom and the crisis has had now 25 years of no growth, and that will create tensions within the european union which could destroy the european union, and that's a real danger. >> george soros, thank you very much. >> pleasure. >> we will be right back. i'm a marathon runner, in absolute perfect physical condition and i had a heart attack right out of the clear blue... i'm on an aspirin regimen... and i take bayer chewables. [ male announcer ] be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. he's my success story. [ laughs ] in your breakfast cereal, what is? now, in every box of general mills big g cereal, there's more whole grain than any other ingredient. that's why it's listed first. get more whole grain than any other ingredient... just look for the white check. 8% every 10 years.age 40, we can start losing muscle -- wow. wow. but you can help fight muscle loss with exercise and ensure muscle health. i've got revigor. what's revigor? it's the amino acid metabolite, hmb to help rebuild muscle and strength naturally lost over time. [ female announcer ] ensure muscle health has revigor and protein to help protect, preserve, and promote muscle health. keeps you from getting soft. [ major nutrition ] ensure. nutrition in charge! are you still sleeping? just wanted to check and make sure that we were on schedule. the first technology of its kind... mom and dad, i have great news. is now providing answers families need. siemens. answers. lead paint poisoning affects one million children today. if you're pregnant or have young children and your home was built before 1978, you could be at risk. learn how to protect your family. to find your home's danger zones, the health effects, or just to find help, log on to leadfreekids.org. this week queen elizabeth ii marked the 60th anniversary of asinges day, the day her father, the king, died in 1952 and she became queen. her coronation came the following year. she marked the anniversary by visiting schoolchildren, but my question of the week is where was elizabeth on that day in 1952 when she suddenly became queen? was she, a, sailing on a in hong kong harbor, swimming at the hotel bell err in beverly hills, c, cutting a ribbon in new zealand celebrating its independence day, or d, sitting in a tree house in kenya. stay tuned, and we'll tell you the correct answer. make sure gu to cnn.com/fareed for ten more questions while you're there, check out the rest of our offeringings on our global public square website, and don't forget you can follow us on twitter and facebook. and you can now find full video episodes of gps for sale at the itunes tv store. go directly dr. tl by typing itunes.com/fareed into your browser. this week's book of the week was written 2,000 years ago, but it is remarkably current. the great orator, marcus sits row, was running for roman council, the top job in the republic. his brother, qntus gave him a note on how to win an election. there's a new translation that has been published. he advises promise everything to everyone. when you don't dmrifr, some will forget, others will have moved on. if you don't promise them now, the younger cicero suggests everyone will be upset. read this book to see how some basics and politics really never change. now for the last look. all of the members of the british cabinet got birthday presents. not for their birthdays, but for the 200th birthday of charles dickens, and the gifts presented by the culture minister were works by the great victorian novelist that seemed relevant to the recipients. for example, prime minister cameron got great expectations to any incoming leader, but also hard times, which is an attack on doctrines of -- foreign secretary william hague was criticized last year for using private planes instead of commercial airlines. his gift? the book "the uncommercial traveller." business secretary vince cable was dubbed scrooge last year after he said he was sending no christmas cards to members of parliament. so he got, obviously, a christmas carol. the leader of the antique house of lords with its ark action news procedures got bleak house, which is a book about a neverending court case, and what was the book from nick clegg, the deputy prime minister from the liberal democrat party who is always wanting a bigger role and more power? oliver twist, of course about the boy who says -- >> please, sir, i want some more. >> more? >> what do you say, mr. cameron? the correct answer to our gps challenge question was, d, elizabeth windsor was in a tree house hotel in kenya when s