And were seeing rumbling from a small but inflew nuential Group Democrats who think they should do what republicans want and hold a formal vote to help defuse gop claims of unfairness. And fraz tas for the president himself he danced around how much his people would comply even if he got the vote. A vote in the full house and the vote were to authorize, would you cooperate . We would if they give us our rights. It depends. And he said he was going to testify no matter what. Is the right thing to do or not . Its not required and there are no house rules that say that and the idea of resdant . I dont know inits there. Shes got a really rich pedigree in the it law and intelligence. She worked at the pentagon. Syria and the risks there we must address as well. But lets start with this instant issue of of whether or not to have a vote. Do you see it as a distraction or should it get traction . I mean i think its a delay tactic. But i dont think the house of representatives would have a problem passing a vote. Some of what happened in the past couple of weeks was a bunch of folks coming out that hadnt before saying they would support an impeachment inquiry because of of the it very basic idea of the president reaching out to a foreigner and can asking for information on an american citizen. I dont think a vote is a hard thing to do. But if they need have it, im not against it its time and design. As soon as you announce the it vote, now i stand up and say what about my rights . Can i call any witnesses eror oitis it just a democrat show and theyll say what about us . Cant we get involved the way clinton was in 1998 . How do you handle that . Its import oant that the process is objective. I think its important and ive expressed this to other fellowo members in the house. I think its important that we look at the facts and that we answerer to the public that wants to understand what is happening. Can it cant be a washington conversation. This is a big deal to take the country through this. So its got to be we bring the public along. And it is important that we do everything we can to demonstrate its about the fax and objective objectativity and not a political grudge. You dont have any rules except by my reading. Says impeachment will follow the ordinary course of committeeings haves. Nged the rules to box out the minority. So now theyre paying the price for their own change as you go down that road of can kmcommitt investigation. How many would want to change that to make it more fair . I dont know. Ib mean were all home in our districts so everyone is scattere havent, that i know of, had a conversation with the caucus about it. Ive had three town halls in three days and i took the feedback that they feel like its an objective process. So im open to ways to make it more objective. The issue that got to me was this idea that president , the most powerful man in the world, reached out to a foreign leader and asked him to dig up dirt on an american. You got a taste of what its like the be one of of us these days. Just for the record for people one of your constituents never said favor. This is from the white house, they gave us this. Id like you to do a favor. See the second clump of yellow. The first line from the it president president. That is thought a legitimate concern. But people arent reading the transcript. This is not about the facts. It fairness and as you know a lot of people believe youre all the same. What this president did is the Industry Standard and who has a right to judge him when you all do the same stuff. Listen, obviously theres people who see both sides of the issues and feel very strongly one way or the other. Wh interesting is in my town halls and thought as sexy for the mead you do pick up is a lot of people who were there legitimately. They probably didnt agree with me but they wanted to understand why i made this decision and they asked respectful and civil and decent questions. There was one woman who said dont do me a favor and i said thats what is in the transcript and she said okay. I stand krkted. It may not get as much need you attention but it there are people seeing what the country is going through, trying to understand why were doing this and why its important and thats those are the people im interested in having a conversation with. Even if we disdwree. Hamilton warned us this cant be just about numbers. It has to be so big, so flagrant that it draws bipartisan support others with maybe its not the right route. Lets talk about Something Else getting bipartisan upset in congress and the different agencies around the president. He said im getting out of syria. People want their boys and girls back home and we now expect a blood bath. You worked on deconfliction in the area. How big a message that the president sent . As someone at the pentagon working on the issues there are shortterm issues and longterm issues and the shortterm is whats going to happen in the fight against isis. There are still thousands run around the area. Whats going to happen with all the fighters being detained and held by forces out of syria. Are they going to be running around . Whats going to happen to all the people leaving their homes and walking away from their towns and villages. The longterm impact for me, frankly, is just as big a deal and thats the american handshake has to mean something. We went in there, four star generals, colonels, we talked to the Syrian Democratic forces, kurds and arabs and said we have a common enemy, itsize and we want to root them out larly of the caliphate and were gooing o give you advice and counsel but were going to need you on the front lune 378z and we shook their hands and they went and fought. And while americans lost their loves in syria the number is less than ten. I believe its six americans, which is tragic but comparathat to them. They lost upwards of 10,000 people. So the next time we fight somewhere and we dont want american men and women on the front lines. We want to it work with a partner force, what is that partner going to say when we reach out our hand and say fight with us. Llt lets do this together. Youre thinking twice because youv youve seen what happened in Northern Syria. Taafter the president did th, hes making calls sayinging all our boys and girls are in line. The republicans have been angrierer with him than anything ive seen him do. You can talk about whether or not it warrants it. But bad timing for him. Do you think that increases the chance this policy changes . I think its important to remember general mattis, our secretary of defense at the it time resigned over the very specific issue. When the president said im going to pull back and let the turks go to Northern Syria. He reversed his decision because of bipartisan pressure. Democrats and republicans saying no. And i think the republican voice had a huge impact on him. I was part of a group that wrote a bipartisan letterer and he reversed the decision and here we are in the same moment. I dont know whats changed but the same impact is there. I think republicans see the umpact this will have as democrats do and its a National Security issue. Its hard to see why he did this rgter than the idea that people want pop tool come ohome. Congresswoman, thank you somuch for your perspective on two very pressing matters for the American People. Be well. So if the houses does do this vote on an impeachment inquiry, not in their own rules and squishy. What would the white house want . What do they want out of this . What are the goal posts . What are the republicans wanting . Why arent we hearing more standing up for protecting the whistleblower . Isnt that what whistleblower protection is about . What is the perspective next. Upbeat musieverything was so fresh in the beginning. [sniff] dramatic music but that plug quickly faded. Upbeat music luckily theres febreze plug. It cleans away odors and freshens for 1200 hours. [deep inhale] breathe happy with febreze plug. So why not bundle them with esurance and save up to 10 . Which you can spend on things you really want to buy, like. Well, i dont know what youd wanna buy because im just a guy on your tv. Esurance. Its surprisingly painless. When you take align, you have the support of a probiotic and the gastroenterologists who developed it. Align helps to soothe your occasional digestive upsets, 24 7 with a strain of bacteria you cant get anywhere else. You could say align puts the pro in probiotic. So, where you go, the pro goes. Go with align, the pros in digestive health. And try align gummies, with prebiotics and probiotics to help support digestive health. At to cover the essentialsyou have in retirement, as well as all the things you want to do. Because when youre ready for what comes next, the only direction is forward. Ok ill admit. I didnt keep my place as clean as i would like cuz im way too busy. Whos got the time to chase around down dirt, dust and hair . So now, i use heavy duty swiffer sweeper and dusters. For hardtoreach places, duster makes it easy to clean. It captures dust in one swipe. Ha gotcha and sweeper heavy duty cloths lock away twice as much dirt and dust. It gets stuff deep in the grooves other tools can miss. Yknow what . My place. Is a lot cleaner now. Stop cleaning. Start swiffering. Do you recall, not long ago we would walk on the sidewalk all around the wind blows we would only hold on to let go blow a kiss into the sun we need someone to lean on blow a kiss into the sun we needed somebody to lean on all we need is someone to lean on asbut when your team is always dealing with device setups, app updates, and support calls. You can never seem to get anywhere. Thats why Dell Technologies created unified workspace, powered by vmware. A revolutionary solution that lets you deploy, manage, support and secure all your devices from the cloud. So you can stop going in circles, and start moving forward. Pain happens. Saturdays happen. Aleve it. Aleve is proven better on pain than tylenol. When pain happens, aleve it. All day strong. Republicans now insist that rules they wrote to force compliance are no longer fair. They want a vote, they want more changes. Good to have you, sir. So help me understand what is wanted now and why it is the fair and right thing to do. What is wanted if now is that we would have a congress that would focus on the pall as they ran on to get the majority in 2018. Instead in terms of impeachment . It they dont impeach him, trump might just win again. I think the question is lets get it started. If thats what they want to do, go down to the floor of the house of representatives just like republicans did with bill clinton and why is that vote so important that republicans took against bill clinton on the floor of the house of representatives . Because it sets up the process because the constitution tell its us this is the legal way that you can take a president and actually put them through a Legal Process of claims that they violated the law. Its not a Legal Process. The constitution does not say that. Its not a Legal Process. Its a political process. Go ahead. I believe its imbued with politics. But the it reason its in the constitution is because there has to be a remedy for a president , whos the most powerful person in the government when theres wrong doing and for impeachment for everybody, not just president s. Let me try to answer the question which is the reason you need the vote is it sets up the process by can which the person who whose claumed to have broken the law has rights and ability to call witnesses, to subpoena, to call to subpoena documents. So just like bill clinton had the ability to have that process too, cross examine those making charges, a whole Legal Process is established with that vote. What nancy pelosi lets talk it a step at a time. One, youre early. Unlike with nixon and clinton here congress has to do the investigating. Thats not right. Absolutely. With nixon you had a grand jury in place. With clinton you had the starr investigation. When those were over they both tu turned to the house. With clinton once starr was done, thats when they had their vote and then starr came unand thats the only person they were able to deal with. They didnt call witnesses. The reason this is different is you just showed a clip and Anderson Clipper just showed a clip of joe biden saying the president should be impeached. Nance nancy pelohsy has said over and over he needs be impeached. Theyre not saying we need start a process. Nancy pelosi said that for a year 1 2. Theyre all saying you should be impeached. Nobody in the Democratic Caucus is saying my mind is open. I dont know whether he should be impeached. But lets start a process to investigate him. Theyre not doing that. You have a handful of holdouts and a lot of people who say they are open and want an investigation and whats holding up the investigation is your side. They wont comply. This is true. They wont comply. Theres never been a president thats been investigated every minute of the president. Hes not complying. Hes can completely complying. They wont give people up, they claimed lewandowski had executive privilege. Lets take it step by step. The ambassador was not allowed to testify because theres been no vote on the floor of the house of representatives. That ambassador had no ability to bring counsel with him. That ambassador had no idea what the rule oz of the road would be for this investigation. Look, the democrats won the majority. They have the right to play politics. Day have the right to do this. Who gave them the right to do it this way . The amare cancon people. No. Who gave them the right . American people gave them majority. The it republicans did when they changed the rules in 2015. Thats not right. Its absolutely right. Im sorry. This is a matter of fact. Those rules can be changed by a majority of the house and so nancy pelosi so youre saying they can be changed, yes. Are you saying they were not changed by the republicans . Im taking your word for the fact. After they had to hold obamas attorney general in contempt of congress to overturn documents. S so now you have a white house that wont comply but you want the democrats to change the rules. I love to battle with you. Theyre in a position that they were with bill clinton. If the American People perceive theyre being too aggressive and toer are partisan and what ended up happening in 1998 is the republicans lost a lot of seats. If the republicans look like theyre being too partisan but they wound up winning the president ial election and some say that was payback for clinton. And the second piece is both nixon who was not impooched but would have been and clinton who was, they had just won their second terms. There was not another time for them to be on the ballot. Were in the heart with a year away from a president ial campaign and these democrats want to beat donald trump, just beat him. Youre a year away. Why would you put the country through this . The answerer is its the only way they can beat him and you have Congress People honest einf to say that over and over. What congressman . Congressman green. Id love to show you the clip. You have nancy pelosi saying shes been wanting to impeach. Shes been slowing them down. She seemed reasonable for a period of time. She seems hell bent no matter what is turned up. You say they have to go through the investigations and committees and waiting for something to turn up. Adam schiff, jerry nadler. Nancy pelosi, jim can cliburn, theyre like we must umpeach the man. I hate to use your own argument on you but the constitution doesnt say it and there is no law orprocedure that says they have to do what you want. So they dont have to do it just like the president saying i dont have to turn over my taxes and hes saying i dont have to comply with congressional investigations which may get him impeached. Ill give my answerer. The democrats were given the majority by the American People. They can handle themselves in office any way they want. My only point is if it looks like theyre being too partisan and not allowing ambassadors to be deposed having counsel is a having counsel is a good issue. The idea of due process during an investigation, no defendant gets to have a hand in their own investigation. And you do have republican ing thats not what were asking. Were not asking for the defendant to set up what the process is but the defendant needs know what the process is. The remember noal places the impeachment would go is the judiciary committee. For some reason she has issues with jerry nadler. In her latest iteration of where who would look at this process of impeachment, the Foreign Affairs committee and judiciary committee. Because they think it would be more expedishes for the committee who have already been looking to look. In pursuit of a crime. Theyre investigating. Could be a special committee a select committee. Pick one committee with a dedicated staff. That staff will have plenty of lawyers. Theyll work out these subpoenas and when information flows back and forth with the white house. That is the way it worked with bill clinton. It was nothing like this with bill clinton. You had an independent counsel. You had an independent counsel, an investigation. Not on this. Thats untrue. Mueller didnt look at this . So chris, if you say this has nothing to do with the Mueller Investigation and the russia hoax, what is the crime theyre going to write an article of impeachment on . There is no need for there is no fleed a crime. You know who tries crimes . Prosecutors and courts. You can know what impeachment is . Its not in the constitution. Its one legal opinion from the office of Legal Counsel that says a sitting president cant be indicted. Its not in the constitution. Dont confuse the two. You know who wrote that opinion but its never been tested. Impeachment is for political crimes of abuses of power. Why didnt they list murder . Why didnt they list kidnapping . The reason why our founders in their wisdom thought this was the right way to handle this was because when you are elected and donald trump was eelected just a couple years ago. I remember. So the American People are going to get to have their say. You get to write checks to his opponents. Its about not liking the foreign election. But the problem they have is even if youre right that the president could be tried in court, theres no crime. If there were a crime, it would be prosecuted in the criminal justice system. Impeachment is for removal of people in office for abuse of their power. For crimes. Read page 65 from hamilton. He says in caps, political crimes. Political crimes. What youre trying to do is give cover for the fact that the they thought the opposite. The founders said if this is just about raw numbers, its a mistake. If its just about the majority forcing it through, its a mistake. Can which is why it was smart for the republicans when they voted on the impeachment on the floor with the house of represents to have democrats along with them for the vote. Nancy pelosi said we will not do this without republicans in the house. They havent done it yet. Theyre still investigating. Theyre definitely investigating. Thats what theyre calling it. And theres no crime. Im on the phone. I dont believe you need crime. But they have to reach a high bar. Youre admitting they dont have a crime and they can impeachment anyway. I think thats what impeachment is about. I think courts are for crimes. They may be crimes, they may not. Im im going to argue more. In closing. The president said no one respects the fbi more than he does. I dont think Andrew Mccabe is going to buy that. And investigatively what is the through line for the democrats to keep in mind. cos i know what it means to walk along the lonely street of dreams here i go again on my you realize your vows are a whitesnake song . I do. If you ride, you get it. Geico motorcycle. 15 minutes could save you 15 or more. Thats what happens in golf nothiand in life. Ily. Im very fortunate i can lean on people, and that for me is what teamwork is all about. You cant do everything yourself. You need someone to guide you and help you make those tough decisions, thats Morgan Stanley. Theyre industry leaders, but the most important thing is they want to do it the right way. Im really excited to be part of the Morgan Stanley team. Im justin rose. We are Morgan Stanley. They use stamps. Com all the services of the post office only cheaper get a 4week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps. Com tv and never go to the post office again. danny s voice of course you donte because you didnt . Get a 4week trial plus postage and a digital scale your job isnt doing hard work. Its making them do hard work. And getting paid for it. vo snap and sort your expenses to save over 4,600 at tax time. Quickbooks. Backing you. Now all this talk about having a vote and resisting can come with a price. The president and his team could see more subpoenas coming. Theyre different from criminal supoppaus. The purerson who knows the difference. Its highly unlikely that anyone who refuses to comply with a congressional subpoena is going to be locked up and halled off to jail. Thats basically the difference between the two. And thats why its a better gamble for the president. However could end up being a base for an article of impeachment. They like this and its a good political tactic. But i think with time it will wither. You dont have a big enough crime, andrew. You dont have a big enough crime to advance the standard and thats the standard, high crime. I think we have a very, very serious allegation in front of the president. Hasnt changed over the course of this scandal so far. It is that president used his powers of foreign diplomacy for his own benefit by soliciting Campaign Dirt on his campaign rival. With every witness that they end up talking to, every piece of of evidence, whether its the memo from the phone call or the transcripts of the diplomats that were involved. Everything theyve seen so far supports that central allegation. Now woo have a second wh whistleblower and the further they go into the investigation, they may not uncover any new core allegations. But they will further support and shed light on that thing that weve been pursuing from the beginning and that make as a stronger case. This aint legal. This is political. I dont know why he kept saying its legal. Its an entire itly political process with legal trapings. And even if you get it to thesont the trick is if you dont have a big crime to hang it on, youre not going to get buy in with people even though this fox poll says hes over 50 with the inquiry. Youre not going to get bipartisan buy in and removal. Is impeachment the right path if youre not going to get bipartisan buy inb . They have a huge burden in terms off can convincing the American People they are on to something roou righteous and real and proven and can convincing the senate. I think the odds even if they pass articles of impeachment are incredibly long under any circumstances. But it seems theyre taking the principaled stance. They think this president has placesed our constitution under assault, hes challenged their oversight, their subpoena and theyre going to do their job and go forward with the inquiry and return articles of impeachment if they think theyre there. At that point theyve met their responsibilities and good for them. Thank you for clarity in a foggy process. Sure. Pleasure to be here. Thats the way you see it, right . Well, not andrew because hes smart ashole rr. And is it not a big enough deal . Or senator angus king is wrestling with exactly this. He would be a juror in any trial in the senate. How does he see the stakes unsyria . Hell explain. I started a tiny Investment Firm in 1986 and grew it to 36 billion dollars. In 2010, i signed the giving pledge to fund good causes. Then i left my business to combat climate change, fix our democracy, and hold President Trump accountable. Last year, we ran the largest youth Voter Mobilization in history helping double turnout and win back the house. Im tom steyer and i approve this message. Lets make change happen ayou listen to advyour clients goal ofen. Sending her daughter to the music school of her dreams. And you help her turn it into reality. Principal. We can help you plan for that. Start today at principal. Com. Unitedhealthcare Medicare Advantage plans come with a lot to take advantage of. Like free vitamins, pain relievers, sunscreen and more. I like the gummies. 0 copays on common prescriptions plus 150 in wellness products. Go ahead, take advantage. Uncase can youre wondering what President Trumps defense is for pulling troops out of syria and ignoring bipartisan out cry about abandoneding our allies. They didnt help us in the second world war, normandy. They mention names of of different battles. But theyre there to help us with their land. We like the kurds. What . Lets get to independent senator from maine, angus kung. Maybe that makes more senseb to you. I dont know what he was talking about there, our president. Weve known each other a long time. He has never had republicans come at him the way he is right now over this. Are you hearing of any putenotel change in posture . I havent heard of anything. Lindsey graham and a lot of the republicans have been very strong this week and i think can correctly so. Lindsey said he had 95 votes. Im one of those votes. The president s waffled over the last couple of days and indicated turkey does something bad hell respond. But this is one of the worst can decisions that ive seen one of of our leaders make in i cant remember when. It was procedurally sloppy, morally reprehensible and strategically dumb. This is a gift to putin, to iran, to turkey to assad. Because why he did it is hanging out as a big question mark. Why do this right now . We hear that there is an idea in the air that iran made a deal with putin and sorry. Turkey made a deal with putin and that now trump was on the phone with erdogan and maybe there was a deal there as well and thats why this is happening. Do you know anything about any of that . Nothing whatsoever and this is the second president ial phone conversation of intenses. We dont know what was said. What we do can know is that was virtually the only input the president had in this decision. I havent heard of anybody that knew this was coming. People were talking about the policy of maintaining this kind of buffer zone on saturday. The phone call came on sunday and now were in the mess were in leading, hopefully not, but quite easily to a massacre and if that happens the blood is on our hands. Who is going to answerer the call the next time we need help in the world . This isnt america first. Its america alone and the kurds died for us. They lost 11,000 people in the fight against isis. They were the point of the sphere of this coalition and to turn our backs onthem and to leave them to the tender mercies of the turks is unbelievable. But its going to have ramifications. We turned our back on people that put their lives on the line for this country in the fight against isis. You say 95 votes in the senate. What if you have a hundred votes . One thing that lindsey is talking about is imposing severe sanctions on turkey if they the deed over play their hand. They came in today with artillery and air power. Thats not exactly something thats going to discriminate between fighters and civilians. So thats not very encourage canning. Thats one possibility. Whether that would slow erdogan down i really dont know. I kind off doubt it. Hes been itching to go after the kurds in Northern Syria for years. I said that beginning sloppy process. The president , as noor near as i can tell the only person he consulted with was erdogan. Year go having to to live with the ramifications of this decision for years. And the question is what if the president refused to have them put into effect . What if he were able to play a role there . And how all of this will cascade into what youre looking at with ukrain . The republicans are much more angry at him now when he needs them most. Hes supposedly been making calls to senator mcconnell to say we have all our ducks in a line. Do you think the disgust and the outrage that decision with syria may rebound to being against hisses in the ukrain impeachment matter . I think it possibly could. I think i cant read the minds of my colleagues but i think theyll distinguish between the two. Breath about abuses of power. Thats right and i think some people may say this is a dangerous situation. Chris, the air waves have been full of this discussion. You have people talking about politics and everything. But this is a really grave situation. Ive been a conservative for two years ive been saying lets do the election. Lets not go through this thing that will divide the country. But on the ukrainian thing where you have a president of the United States using the awesome power of that office and in effect our country to enlist aer foreign country in his reelection campaign. I got to point where i said i cant blink at that. To honorer my own oath to the constitution i cant say that doesnt justify at least being investigated. And theres a lot of confusion. The impeachment in the house, you mngzed earlier. Its like an indictment by the grand jury. Its not the due process. The trial is in the senate. Thats where you have combatting witnesses or dep zigszs. They use depositions in the clinton case. But the idea now is for the house to gather the information and the president basically is taking, as far as im concerned, a novel legal position. On the one hand saying a president cant be induted and tried and now theyre saying but he also cant be impeached because we dont like the process. If you go to the constitution it says the house has the sole power of impeachment. Period. Doesnt say anything about witnesses or how its supposed to work and later in article one says the senate shall try impeachments. The chief justice is the chief judge of the impeachment trial in thesont. And impeachment is for any federal official who is who misuses, abuses their power, their office. And the framers were obsess would the idea, the concern of foreign interference unour afaurs. Madis madison notes to the constitution. You cant have a title. All about trying to be sure foreign interests werent engaged unour campaign and now we have the president on the record he produced asking the president of ukrain to do his bidding on an investigation of what, at the time, he thought was his principal opponent. You cant youve got to say youve got to have somebodys got to investigate that. Weve got to ghoet to the botto of it. In your lap that will be a true moment in history. The senator has an oped about it right now with a reminder from obruham lincoln that these are the time its that will light our way to a new generation. Thank you for being on the show. Its great to have you. Thank you. Senator gave us a great idea. Its so confusion. Lel lets clarify the things that matter in a factual basis. What do you say . Next. At fidelity, we help you prepare for the unexpected with Retirement Planning and advice for what you need today and tomorrow. Because when youre with fidelity, theres nothing to stop you from moving forward. Because when youre with fidelity, just between us, you know whats better than mopping . Anything at the end of a long day, its the last thing i want to do. Well i switched to swiffer wet jet and its awesome. Its an allinone so its ready to go when i am. The cleaning solution actually breaks down dirt and grime. And the pad absorbs it deep inside. So, it prevents streaks and haze better than my old mop. Plus, its safe to use on all my floors, even wood. Glad i got that off my chest and the day off my floor. Try wet jet with a moneyback guarantee heres the thing about managing for your business. S when youve got public clouds, and private clouds, and hybrid clouds things can get a bit cloudy for you. But now, theres the Dell Technologies cloud, powered by vmware. A single hub for a consistent operating experience across all your clouds. That should clear things up. This melting pot of impacted species. Everywhere is going to get touched by climate change. I have moderate to severe pnow, theres skyrizi. Things are getting clearer, yeah i feel free to bare my skin yeah thats all me. Nothing and me go hand in hand nothing on my skin thats my new plan. Nothing is everything. Keep your skin clearer with skyrizi. 3 out of 4 people achieved 90 clearer skin at 4 months. Of those, nearly 9 out of 10 sustained it through 1 year. And skyrizi is 4 doses a year, after 2 starter doses. I see nothing in a different way and its my moment so i just gotta say nothing is everything skyrizi may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. Before treatment your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis. Tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms such as fevers, sweats, chills, muscle aches or coughs, or if you plan to or recently received a vaccine. Nothing is everything ask your dermatologist about skyrizi. Outdated. The paperwork. The calling for everything. The searching for id cards. Its like youre stuck in the 90s. Thats why esurance makes it simple with an app that has everything you need because thats how we live nowadays. Rad. Your id card is on a bodacious tiny future tv. Wow youre really committed to this whole 90s thing, arent ya . No, im just saying whats in the script. Thats true. Everything were sayings in the script. When insurance is simple, its surprisingly painless. Pain happens. Saturdays happen. Aleve it. Aleve is proven better on pain than tylenol. When pain happens, aleve it. All day strong. Do you recall, not long ago we would walk on the sidewalk all around the wind blows we would only hold on to let go blow a kiss into the sun we need someone to lean on blow a kiss into the sun we needed somebody to lean on all we need is someone to lean on we now know thisss argument for bucking almost every request from congress. The current proceedings are nothing more than an unconstitutional exercise in political theater. Article one, section two, the house of representatives shall have the sole power of impeachment. Tats arer it. Congress can do it in the house and they do the way they want. And then theres this. Your contrived process is unprecedented in the history of the nation and lacks the necessary authorization. We just told you the constitution is the source and there is no requirement in the house rules and really is no past precedent. Why . The other cases were very different. There were investigations ongoing. There was a grand jury in nixon. The starr investigation in clinton. So that went on before the house took over and had their vote. Here the house is doing the investigating. So what defendant gets rights to be part of that investigation . What about confronting your accuseer . That would come at trial and that comes in the senate, not before. As for the republicans, their real enemy is them. The it only relevant mention of how to impeach in house rules says that the ordinary rules of Committee Investigation apply. The reason the minority oin congress doesnt have subpoena power as they would like is because the republicans changed the rules when they were in power in 2015. Schlapp dudden know or didntb want to respond but its true. And where is the big crime you fleunfounded in the constitution. Article two, section four. The civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment conviction of treason, bribery, other high crimes and misdemeanorers. Hamiltons told us in federalist papers 65 this is about political crimes for those in positions of trust. Its to punish political offenses that abuse power to such a degree that removal is unavoidable and that is the smart part of the president s attack. It makes it look like the democrats arent being fair and that should be a concern to democrats. Hamilton warned impeachment must be based on abuses so flagrant that it inspires bipartisan appeal. Its a high bar and democrats should think about how they proceed because the senate trial is not the only place where fairness matters. This ideaia dont have to do something so you wont do it. Thats the same disposition that democrats oppose in this president when it comes to transparency on his taxes and can compliance with theirings haves. So for them they should have a guide of being better than what they oppose. And lucky for them the bar has been made decidedly low. Thats it had argument. The u. N. Is facing the worst cash crisis unnear in nearly a. Guess who owe as lot of money . Be on the lookout for a fresh round of hypocrisy next. These are real people, not actors, whove got their eczema under control. With less eczema, you can show more skin. So roll up those sleeves. And help heal your skin from within with dupixent. Dupixent is the first treatment of its kind that continuously treats moderatetosevere eczema, or atopic dermatitis, even between flare ups. Dupixent is a biologic, and not a cream or steroid. Many people taking dupixent saw clear or almost clear skin. And, had significantly less itch. Thats a difference you can feel. Dont use if youre allergic to dupixent. Serious allergic reactions can occur, including anaphylaxis, which is severe. Tell your doctor about new or worsening eye problems, such as eye pain or vision changes, or a parasitic infection. If you take asthma medicines, dont change or stop them without talking to your doctor. So help heal your skin from within, and talk to your eczema specialist about dupixent. Thats what happens in golf nothiand in life. Ily. Im very fortunate i can lean on people, and that for me is what teamwork is all about. You cant do everything yourself. You need someone to guide you and help you make those tough decisions, thats Morgan Stanley. Theyre industry leaders, but the most important thing is they want to do it the right way. Im really excited to be part of the Morgan Stanley team. Im justin rose. We are Morgan Stanley. Theyre americas bpursuing lifechanging cures. In a country that fosters innovation here, they find breakthroughs. Like a way to fight cancer by arming a patients own tcells. Because its not just about the next breakthrough. Its all the ones after that. Here, hello starts with hi mple. How can i help . A data plan for everyone. Everyone . Everyone. Lets send to everyone [ camera clicking ] wifi up there . Ahhh. Sure, why not . Howd he get out . a camera might figure it out. That was easy glad i could help. At xfinity, were here to make life simple. Easy. Awesome. So come ask, shop, discover at your xfinity store today. Be on the lookout President Trump loves to take digs at other countries for not paying their fair share. U. N. Is in a lot of trouble and guess who owes the most . Us. Thing its are so bad the u. N. Nearly ran out of money to open the General Assembly debate last month. Be on the lookout to see if this president leads by example and pays up. Thank you for watching. Cnn tonight with d. Lemon starts now. You expect him to pay up . Arent you a new yorker . I am a new yorker. Youre expecting him to pay up . Im expecting him to pay up. Thats the problem. He is not country. He doesnt get to hold aid back because they dont do what he wants. Doesnt work like that. I have before me the thing i think is the most interesting of the day. Theres lots going on including your interview with matt schlapp. Thats for another time