obviously emotional about having taken another human being's life, what is she reckless? was it foreseeable? did she not guard against the risk that the use of the wrong we orange the firearm rather than the taser, makes it criminally culpable? culpable negligence. that's what the jury is looking at. at no point, i think the prosecutor is very smart here not to try to hone in and say a-ha, this is sub-who had it out for daunte wright. that's not what the evidence seems to show nor what her statements have been nor what the law actually requires, and we're seeing a theme here, right? a number of cases we've seen in ent times where the defendant has taken the stand in his or her own defense now, and there's been an emotional thread in terms of it. at the end of the day this, case is distinct because intent is not a calculation of the prosecution. >> let's play that moment when you talked about the taser and the gun being very different, including how they function, how
Related Keywords
Yours Taser , Firearm , Life , Risk , Human Being , Use , It Foreseeable , We , Daunte Wright , Point , Evidence , Jury , Prosecutor , Negligence , Defense , Case , Stand , Cases , Number , Terms , Law , Defendant , Thread , Statements , Ment Times , This , Theme , Prosecution , Gun , Calculation , Intent ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.