obviously emotional about having taken another human being s life, what is she reckless? was it foreseeable? did she not guard against the risk that the use of the wrong we orange the firearm rather than the taser, makes it criminally culpable? culpable negligence. that s what the jury is looking at. at no point, i think the prosecutor is very smart here not to try to hone in and say a-ha, this is sub-who had it out for daunte wright. that s not what the evidence seems to show nor what her statements have been nor what the law actually requires, and we re seeing a theme here, right? a number of cases we ve seen in ent times where the defendant has taken the stand in his or her own defense now, and there s been an emotional thread in terms of it. at the end of the day this, case is distinct because intent is not a calculation of the prosecution. let s play that moment when you talked about the taser and the gun being very different, including how they function, how
highly popular among the press. cnn wrote this glowing story of her and pelosi sitting behind the presidential address and said she s become one of biden s closest advisers, she was the last person in the room on the afghanistan decision now you have a cnn reporter saying she s supposed to be in charge of the border where is she? los angeles times had a whole beat dedicated to harris. and now:ment times calls her - - now l.a. times calls her ineffective. the last person in the room on the afghanistan stan decision and the first person to leave the room on the crisis at the border. you ve got thinking polling numbers for both of these people. kamala harris and joe biden. him for his policies mainly and what he s doing. and her for not doing anything. i can t, i can t even get my mind around how different it would be if she leaned in. would love to find out. just attack any of the 7 or eight jobs the president has