question. the question is not about need, it's about the right, and then reference the second amendment, as a point of reference. why i think that so important, leads me to think about that, is because that is the debate. people are talk about, well, why do you need this? is it really for hunting or otherwise? that's one conversation that is happening. then there is the second amendment consideration, this one court, whether talking, not the need, the right for preference, and what you're able to do. and at its core, i think to unpack that even further is probably one of the reasons why he did not have the answers, because you're looking ahead to the supreme court, looking about what questions are being asked, and whether suicidally we are going to balance this need versus right, and in fact the right question. >> go ahead. >> i think when things are trying to do is bring a three dimensional aspect to it. where you stand on the issues, where you are going to act as a leader when the white house. it's almost the opposite approach of someone like ron desantis. ron desantis and his campaign are saying i want to be most concerned of guy on every issue. doesn't matter what it is, what