then we were divided in 2020. so, the way i would go about it is very direct and very simple. that there is no bad opinion. you want to express your opinion in this country, express it i want to hear. and then everybody gets a round table and resolve our issues. one of the time. the same way we used to do at dinner parties for the last eight or ten years. it wasn t like there weren t political differences to discuss. it s just that people did not start throwing their cutlery and it was a little more civilized. and it was not as if our democracy was at stake. see, in the end if you make everything a crisis, and it will be. and i heard the president today, joe biden earlier today talking about how he was concerned about democracy of donald trump getting elected again. and then i heard donald trump yelling and screaming about how badly he s been treated, these two guys need to stop worrying so much about themselves and start worrying about you. my approach to being president wou
to this that is not constructive in our country. joe biden looked all of us in the eye in 2020 and said, elect me and i ll bring us together. and then he ran far left and abandoned most of the country philosophically. so, how could he be the uniter in a second term? a second term all he ll do is keep doing what he s doing, which is dividing the country even more than we were divided in 2020. so, the way i would go about it is very direct and very simple, that there is no bad opinion. you want to express your opinion in this country, express it. i want to hear it. and then everybody gets around the table and resolves our issues one at a time. the same way we used to do at dinner parties before the last eight or ten years. wasn t like there weren t political differences discussed. it s just people didn t start throwing the cutlery. it was a little more civilized. and it wasn t as if our democracy was at stake. see, in the end, if you make everything a crisis, then it will be. a
Then there is the second amendment consideration, this one court, whether talking, not the need, the right for preference, and what you re able to do. and at its core, i think to unpack that even further is probably one of the reasons why he did not have the answers, because you re looking ahead to the supreme court, looking about what questions are being asked, and whether suicidally we are going to balance this need versus right, and in fact the right question. go ahead. i think when things are trying to do is bring a three dimensional aspect to it. where you stand on the issues, where you are going to act as a leader when the white house. it s almost the opposite approach of someone like ron desantis. ron desantis and his campaign are saying i want to be most concerned of guy on every issue. doesn t matter what it is, what donald trump says, i m the most conservative guy. but don t worry about personality.
Question. the question is not about need, it s about the right, and then reference the second amendment, as a point of reference. why i think that so important, leads me to think about that, is because that is the debate. people are talk about, well, why do you need this? is it really for hunting or otherwise? that s one conversation that is happening. then there is the second amendment consideration, this one court, whether talking, not the need, the right for preference, and what you re able to do. and at its core, i think to unpack that even further is probably one of the reasons why he did not have the answers, because you re looking ahead to the supreme court, looking about what questions are being asked, and whether suicidally we are going to balance this need versus right, and in fact the right question. go ahead. i think when things are trying to do is bring a three dimensional aspect to it. where you stand on the issues, where you are going to act as a leader when the whit