a great role to play, - and we find that often it falls far short of the kind ofjournalisticl standards that it actually uses - when it comes to other communities. so, i think we got a sense from that of how you define what's a negative story, what's a positive story. where does more neutral coverage sit? for example, you know, if there's a muslim contributor, but they're not speaking about islam, is that positive or negative, or do you discount it? is that not something that comes into this report? i mean, we have 50 key words which, in one form or another, _ kind of give us all the articles - or television clips that contain one or more of those words. now, if somebody is on and they're not identified as being muslim, - or the word islam or any other kind of word isn't identified, _ that wouldn't appear on our radar. but if it does, even if it's a passing mention, - then we do analyse it. and obviously there are lots of articles that we kind -