Tortious Contract Interference Is Unrecognizable In Nevada

In CMB Infrastructure Grp. IX, LP v. Cobra Energy Inv. Fin., Inc., Judge Dorsey questioned whether the plaintiffs had adequately stated a claim for aiding and abetting tortious interference with a contract. She decided no such cause exists under Nevada law.

Related Keywords

Crescent Dunes ,Nevada ,United States ,Pahrump Valley ,California ,Texas ,Tonopah ,Arc Dome ,Reno ,Spain ,Nye County ,Ione ,Nevadan ,Spanish ,Californian ,Texan ,Jennifera Dorsey ,Las Vegas ,Cobra Energy Inv ,Crescent Dunes Solar Energy ,United States Department Of Energy ,Nevada Power Company ,Fin Inc ,Us District Court ,Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project ,Court Judge ,Crescent Dunes Project ,United States Department ,Judge Dorsey ,United States Today ,Legal ,Litigation ,Energy ,Business Crimes ,Mb Infrastructure Grp Ix Lpv Cobra Energy Inv Fin Inc ,Rescent Dunes Solar Energy Project Failures ,Tortious Interference ,