Supervisor farrell absent supervisor kim absent supervisor mar absent supervisor tang supervisor yee supervisor yee we have quorum. Okay. Thank you very much item 2. Item 2 chairs report an informational item. Colleagues earlier this month i was happy to join with supervisor mark farrell and supervisor christensen with direction tilly chang. The staff from the Mayors Office and members of the community to celebrate of the openly of the new doyle drive on july 12th the presidio parkway was opened marking a major milestone for the 4 lane undivided highway built 77 yooshgsz along with the Golden Gate Bridge to a beautiful parkway that serves the gateway serve city over the contractor g lc undertook a complex demolition of the structure and constructed new structures to handle the hundred of thousands of people that use the roadway everyday safely and ahead of schedule with the new doyle drive the access to the presidio and the new connections to the presidio for pedestrians and transit users and motorists alike we should be proud as cosponsors of the project along with caltrans we took the mediate in lead in the earlier stages of the planning review and invested 65 million of the salesforce fund and finalized the funding plan for the private dollars as our director noted it is a celebration not easy to get to this many partnerships and boundary from creating new parkway standards to having sustainable methods to becoming the first and only p3 or publicprivate pales in comparison on the highway i want to congratulate caltrain and the presidio parkway with the Transportation Authority for this wonderful chauvinism i want to acknowledge our former executive director jose that demonstrated the ability to get this built and our recently retired deputy who had the skill and tenacious it we celebrate the openly of doyle drive all the projects in the program as well as are underway with the Strong Demand were seeing on all the Transit Services the needs for pedestrian and Bicycle Safety to achieve vision zero and the desire r desire for more reduction measures time to plan for the next major investment with the interests in the powell on bart and transportation conducted by the Bay Area Council covering San Francisco alameda and contra costa the public concerns about the congestion and the publics willingness to invest there was strong support for a bart bond to invest in the implementations or replacement of this aging system the poll identified the demand for better transit including more and fast serves as a result of that poll Contra Costa County is moving forward with the measures in 2017 Alameda County approved the saks and theyve adopted the goals for potential measures next year as well it is important for San Francisco to be well positions and to know our funding and Investment Decisions with the neighboring community and especially important to have local matching fund to move our priorities forward when federal and state a eventually materialized if that funding didnt materialize were appreciative to the voters for purchasing prop a and prop b with the 1040 Transportation Plan and the Mayors Office 2030 plan both plans envision the need to invest to meet our maintenance and capability r capacity and expansion as noted in director chang chronicle and ed reiskin mta this increases the capacity in all 3 of the major muni bart and caltrans with the traffic on the freeways to make our streets safer and more visiting is great need for road improvement for this reason i want to ask the Transportation Authority staff to collect a poll of the san franciscans to get a better sense for the investment for the Transportation System and how to pay for them this will help to shape our nation that the Mayors Office regarding the 2016 bart as well as local measures i look forward to the poll results and with that, colleagues, i want to wish everyone a great august recess once we adjourn this meeting is there any Public Comment on item 2 seeing none, Public Comment is closed item 3. Item 3 executive orders this is an informational item. Thank you chair Wiener Tilly Chang in light of todays heavy presentation id like to skip quickly to congratulatey remark about the sfmta receiving a 41 million cap trade grant for the light rail vehicles and otherwise still bleak federal and state transportation picture of the sfmta will be using the 41 million for the cap trade for 64 vehicles and this is part of the long Term Investment program we put in place last fall what the largest sales tax allocation bart transbay explorers are coming people to avoid that corridor and use the Ferry Service and others bus Transit Services on august 1st and it through the Labor Day Weekend to please be aware of the closure of the transit four maintenance projects locally the geary Rapid Transit is moving forward were pleased to put that on the agenda for the next Engineering Design for near term and the improvements later in my report we notice the van ness project has has preconstruction workshop on the delivery method a wonderful milestone for the project were in the Implementation Phase for the bart project so congratulations to sfmta on that milestone at the neighborhood level the neighborhood Transportation Plans moving forward sfmta will be conducting Public Outreach for the district 2 for in conjunction with supervisor farrells office and district 5 the western edition for the Transportation Plan study with supervisor breed office under is dates in my reports tuesday august 18th for the meeting at the high school and i was in the morning at the 10 00 a. M. We encourage the public to come out there will be a lot of staff to take our input and shape the Planning Efforts well continue to work in district 3 with sxhooifshgz and sfmta for the kearny street for the transportation and anticipate any maps for the boards for adoption and it is on the agenda for todays approval for the followup effort to improve the safety on that corridor prop double a approved in 2010 an attachment to the vehicle registration and Progress Report the program is moving along nicely the board approved it in envelope and since then weve allocated 21 million to 17 projects throughout the city and some are featured many in my report the hunters view with the Housing Support as well as the Service Center bike station which is underway in double a funds in addition to the presidio parkway the milestone for the partners we celebrated the full name offramp Ribbon Cutting had a small ceremony essential this is the first to approach the city if the bay bridge the fulsome fremont ramp to help with the safety Pedestrian Crossing and providing the ability to have a better parcel led by the project manager and i want to congratulate it is our first implementation project led from beginning to end and on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency known as the average office of Community Investment ike so the completed project for safety is again, i want to thank our partners for their help including caltrans and the ike the yerba buena ramp is moving and progressing the construction of the rams to and from the east side of the island hopefully, well see the Ribbon Cutting on schedule next summer august 2016 that project is being led by our project manager eric who im pleased and excited to announce as our deputy for the project so eric has been a veteran of this transportation work and project gliefr having worked for 31 years first in caltrain and really advising multiple agencies like ours he bring a wealth of the expertise and caltrain and the caltrans process and deliver the ramps and a host of other ways hes been assisting the city as we move the projects through the caltrans process and excited to deliver projects were fortunate to have eric finally ill note we were able to have joint training with sfmta i want to thank eric he spearheaded that working with the Deputy Director for finance and administration both sfmta and ta staff were able to take 21 folks were able excuse me. Hundred and 50 folks with a joint delivery and Management Training that benefits the city wells fargo with that, i want to wish you and our staff a relaxing summer recess. Thank you, ms. Changing colleagues, any questions or comments regarding the executive director report seeing none, e seeing none, any Public Comment on item number 3 seeing none, Public Comment is closed this is an informational item item 4. Item 4 approval of the minutes of the june 23rd meeting an action item. Okay. Colleagues any changes to the minutes or any other questions or comments seeing none, is there any Public Comment on item number 4 seeing none, Public Comment is closed can you please call the roll on item 4. Supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos absent supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell absent supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang Supervisor Scott Wiener supervisor yee that motion passes. Okay item number 5 ash item 5 adopt the positions on state legislation an action item. Okay. Any questions or comments on item 5 seeing none, is there any Public Comment on item 5 seeing none, Public Comment is closed and colleagues, can we take item 5 same house, same call . Well take that without objection. That will be the order item 6 and item 67 award a 2 Year Contract to the services not to exceed 4 hundred thousands for the planning and jerry for the to San Francisco corridor 30 years the contractor for the conditions and terms this is an action item. Colleagues, any questions or comments seeing none, any Public Comment on item 6 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed and colleagues, can we take item 6 same house, same call . Well take that without objection. That will be the order item no. 7 item 678 authorize the executive director to execute a Transportation Authority authority for the quit claim on Howard Street particles to be sold as part of particle f by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority this is an action item. Ill ask our supervisor cohen to proceed over this item. Good morning okay supervisor wiener. Thank you, very much. Maam, vice chair colleagues like many of ive been a strong supporter of transbay transit project i want to thank supervisor kim for her work as the Transbay Joint Powers Authority this is the first of a twophase project that includes the downtown extension of caltrans that is led by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority bus terminal is scheduled to open late 2017 and eventually the train will be constructed below the terminal will house the transbay serve enacting los angeles to San Francisco for the reason i cant overstate the importance of delivering those promotions in a timely and Cost Effective marijuana the Transbay Joint Powers Authority was a strong supporter and early funder having set aside 270 million in the prop k plan and allocating over 70 million to the project to date the reason has contributed hundred and 50 million to the project unfortunately after approving a 310 million increase to the budget in 2013, the tjpa board is asked to rise it as the tjpa staff right to left 260 million gap in just like this brings the total to twice its original budget this brings us today to the need to sell this parallel from tjpa to sell this particle when is the quit claim action that had been intended to pay for in terms of the property will be sold and used to pay for the downtown extension and instead not even to help complete the funding for phase one every time that funds are taken away if phase two the downtown extension and moved to phase one it makes is it harder for us to complete the funding to get the trains downtown last week the tjpa came to the me up Transportation Commission i serve asking for a similar quit claim in order to sell the parcel the mtc commissioner were quite unhappy to put it mildly with the staffs presentation requesting that quit claim we felt the Management Team had not been an adequate job of estimating and keeping the Decision Makers informed of the projects but there are contributing factors like martin outside of the control like costs we have gas by the overly optimistic estimate the mtc was not confident in the increase finger and waguespack was skeptical to bring the project on time and on budget and, in fact, tjpa staff indicated there were only thirty percent confidence with the upward revision of the last of the Cost Increases the mtc voted to approve the quit claim but it was approved as part of the motion to approve the witness claim the mtc included an amendment mandating the agency to do the Cost Committee comprised of the city and county of San Francisco through the Controllers Office and the Transportation Authority to review the costs of both phase one and two and to make recommendations regarding management of costs Going Forward now with this action on our agenda i want to echo that condition that the mtc impose last week and to add two more conditions first is that the tjpa willfully cooperate in a 90 day cost plan for the phase one and two and, of course, the Transportation Authority will be involved in the cost review it is expected to come up with recommendations for both project phases for phase one on what can be done to increase the confidence this is the last cost increase and seconds in different to the cost review that i mentioned the tjpa shall agree to only all the time the phase one cost plan finishing to have the parcels day that will be awkward in september and any other costs identified by the time the tjpa Board Meeting so the budget changes will be limited to those known increases in funding for the agency and this will be the case until the 90 day cost review is completed and present to the mtc until we do the deep dive into the costs the agency should not be making Budget Adjustments beyond the sale of this parcel and others concrete Funding Sources that becomes aware of tjpa low agree to continue to work with the mtc with the city and the ta and other funding participates to develop a full plan for phase one that includes specific recommendations for any additional financing needed beyond the existing interim bridge with the golden saks and gotten secures colleagues, we what you wish so jeopardy this and it is stealing important we address the lack of confidence with the tjpa management of this critical project i want to note point tjpa the directors i think have stepped up and asking a lot of hard questions i appreciate their leadership and really pushing their staff on this but i want to join in that push to make sure that we are getting very, very clear costs and transparent information from tjpa staff i believe that we will conclude the cost review well on time for the tjpa to meet the goal of showing up to fund the project to draw down the a plan so i want to offer those plans and conditions to the approval of item 7 thank you. Thats a motion. Okay. Supervisor wiener made another motion is there a second seconded by supervisor christensen the motion lets do roll call vote. On the amendment. Yes. On the amendment excuse me. Supervisor kim. I wasnt sure if there was a response from tjpa they have staff here i was hoping you could talk about those amendments and your conversation i want to say i support the amendments before us and the staff knows that we had multiple conversations in the last two years about the cost overruns driven by increasing the Construction Costs over the last two years but i know the board tjpa has expressed plans how we can you know mitigate as many of the trade packages coming in and kind of our failure to bid early on many of the packages that were much more affordable that weve done in the city i want to give the opportunity for the tjpa staff to respond. Good morning, commissioners im mark the project manager with the Transbay Joint Powers Authority weve had did the has supervisor kim mentioned last year in bidding the trade packages the Market Conditions in San Francisco have been difficult with the Building Construction our project is unique and complicated it is 4 city blocks and this is in the middle of downtown so its hard for the contractors to reach the project site and as as you can see from the south of market area a lot of construction going on with the team the buildings keep going up and theres another possible 9 or 10 coming up which has limited the availability to the contractor to bid on the project so the bidding has been low and increased the margins quite a bit for the bids so well see them above our estimates and have implemented the measures in order to reduce the costs and down scoping well done alternative control costs but that unfortunately was not sufficient so our request in front of the board well augment our budget by 2 hundred plus Million Dollars in order to bid the remaining packages by the september Board Meeting in order to keep your construction on schedule if were not able well only be bidding on the trade packages and enormity in the meantime, their critical for the packages and bid them out in september with the Available Fund to proceed and delay the packages until funding becomes available one is the rooftop parks and the society elements and our discussions with the general contractor he identified the trade packages most critical and less critical and he identified the park as one of the packages we can defer and then continue to constrict that rooftop park will not allow us to build the trade center with the openly of the trade center well open the Transit Center while the construction of rooftop park is ongoing it is not ideal but doable so i would like to emphasize by asking the Vice PresidentSteve Humphreys that is managing the project if you dont mind. Good morning Steve Humphreys e frees what mark said is absolutely true we actually bid out the rooftop park at the end of the june it is good for 90 days and if not awarded at the end of september the bid expires and well have to rebid that scope that extends the completion date of rooftop park beyond many months and just able to present challenges with presenting that work around an operating facility for the driving up the costs as well. So im sorry to interrupt im a little bit surprised to hear about this delay of the park construction because . A a conversation we had last year the tjpa board was clear along with the Mayors Office we wanted to see the park opened being this is one of the commitments to the neighborhood many of the residents are living in a high density area, of course, for the workers im not sure i port that as a way to manage the cost over renewals we simply should have bid for Central Hospital keeping those budgets irs on time and on schedule we cant go back and cry over spilled milk those bids are going out but legitimate concerns about i think the option your offering to the Transportation Authority in terms of how to control the costs i know the tjpa board questioned the immense costs overruns were seeing more the skin of the terminal and many of us are requesting you know whether this is the best pathway moving forward some go that the exterior and needs to have but we need to consider that as one of the lemons that we really think versus the park that is actually concept all that will be offended to the community and the neighborhood that has has outcome i dont think so in the time to have the dialog i want to know if the staff that chair wiener is offering as we vote on the matter. Were happy to see this in order to do the full competitive cost review we meet point tjpa and the construction meeting on the Construction Contractor meetings wire aware were definitely more than happy to continue the negotiations for item 2 if were not able to secure the money well not be able to award the rooftop park if were able to do that well be able to do that and item b the will delay cause delays. I understand that i dont think there is any indication that authority wanted to delay the rooftop parks said it is important to keep it on time again my question was specifically on the amendments proposed by chair wiener. Weve been weve been supporting item b will mean that construction is is impacted and rooftop park is not awarded to the Transit Center it allows us to use the proceeds for to do an interim budget of a hundred and 69 million thats not sufficient for the critical package we need this in order to keep the construction going. May i interject the executive director has something to add. On the revolt park and the ability of the tjpa to be awarded mom and dads chair weiners proposal for the interim budget it should be limited to the sale of the parcel faelz deals search warrants security by the funding or grant i believe that are in negotiations with the city so whatever those funding precedes you can secure by september there is nothing in the condition to preclude the continues of the rooftop park. With all due respect we need 200,469,000,000 in addition to the september tjpa Board Meeting otherwise the construction burglary be impacted i agree we remember able to come up with the level of funding by september construction about keep on going with no impacts but 246. 9 is not available by september it impacts construction and so forth. Chair wiener did you have an opportunity to brief our amendments with the tjpa staff. Ms. Chang spoke. You want to speak are she was not aware of the amendments. We spoke before the meeting. So theres support with the staff. We received the written so. So theres support for the amendments. Supervisor kim the support for the amendments. The amendments restrict the ability to award that effects construction. So you dont support the amendments. No. Perhaps if we could have a little bit more time i actually support but want to better understand the disagreement before we vote on that item. Before we go further i want to give the chair the floor. Thank you, commissioner vice chair and for your comments getting clarity i have to say i continued this to be disappeared by the way those items move forward and first of all, that was a heated conversation the tjpa staff they put parcel out to bid knowing they needed quit claim in the Transportation Authority and the mtc they put it out the bid and come to us and say you better grant the witness claim if you dont it will holed up our sale why not get etiquette claim before you advertise the bid and it puts us as policymakers in a terrible prologis ccig Oakland Global position with the tjpa staff continually conforms you better do what were asking you to do and if you dont it will have xyz ramifications instead of coming to us ahead of time i know that ms. Chang spoke to the lady ill ask her to describe the conversation but Eric A Kaplan is not here today so ill ask ms. Chang to talk about that. Further clarification my understanding from the tjpa budgeted numbers as well as the constitution with director kaplan part of 246 million is needed for the awards for the september as well as the revolt park but the facility didnt have to be addressed at this point for the reaccomplishment of the project as well as additional 48 million in Construction Management costs and oversight costs that are budgeted for the next couple of years or 3 years i believe about hundred Million Dollars didnt voluntary e have to be secured by september in order to award the remaining bid package for rooftop park. There is some soft costs and oversight and other costs that can also be deferred for a few more months as we conduct a cost review. It you critical we replenish our resources part of the reason we need to have the resources we utilized 82 million reserves to that came a lot of budget thats how we were able to do that about you but it is critical we need need 246. 9 to ward the packages and hundred and 60 million it will not be sufficient to ward the remaining 3 packages. My understanding is there are only a couple of bid packages you need to award that is sufficient and that on for 3 months well come back after the cost review and see about the plan to see about the desirability of the budget. Let me ask steve from web core to respond to that theyre managing the trade packages. Okay. Can you there are 3 trade packages coming before us in september are; is that correct. Thats correct a concrete slab topping package are the rooftop park, and i forgot the third yeah, the metal seems like and the glass Floor Assembly yes. And a column of covers. Supervisor kim. Im not clear. Let me clarify we have. Why you dont support the amendments. We dont think that the hundred 60 is sufficient to ward the packages and the contingency can move forward. With your ability to pull the public auction on september 2nd. No, but it well not be able to award the packages in september this delays construction or rooftop park. All we need is 246 that allows us to award the most critical trade packages and month are completed and the funding valuable for the trade packages and thats what we communicated to the ta staff. My understanding that is no different than where we are today, the rooftop park is not fund for the ability to shift more means to afford those the two trade packages are hundred and 39 million the mini minimum is hundred and 69 million we hope the auction will provide more than that and help to solve the problem of it does were in no different position in the future as today, we still need tjpa to secure the funding for that rooftop park and is under negotiations with the city to handle that with the balance of the 246 million. And to work with the city to fully fund the project but the september Board Meeting to award the remaining 3 packages the hundred 39 excludes includes the bonding fees so again, if were limited or restricted to only parks left well not be able to award the remaining trade packages. Sir for example, if 9 auction yields more than a hundred and 60 million the minimum bid that takes care of of matters, however, were not in a different position we still need to find the Additional Fund for the rooftop park if we were to award that and maybe want to award that in september nothing precludes tjpa staff to secure the financing from the city what were dir what we are defering is 79 million for couple of months and some oversight costs and management costs but a couple of funds didnt. Were going in a loop we must ask for the reserves for the construction so apologizes we cant support. Chair wiener. I want to reiterate the last portion of ms. Changs remarks this motion explicit restrict the expenditures to the precedes of the sale it includes many outlets Funding Sources that are identified whether from the city or otherwise this funding will exist or not exist and it will not impede for the contract for it so i stand by the motion. Supervisor kim. I think that when is the next Transbay Joint Powers Authority meeting. September late september . 22nd; is that right im wondering if there is time if something is holding up the auction although i mean this is the minimum bids which we assume were going to get at least the minimum bid so im going to support the amendments Going Forward i wish this could have been worked out prior to the meeting and not at the full board it is a battle in terms of what is the staff moving forward and hopefully between july and september 10th well clarify the best way moving forward the tjpa board is also concerned about the cost overrun we want to look at a number of things through the shell that came up at the july 4th meeting that is something that director Mohammed Nuru and others brought up we have to reevaluate it far more important than the terminal we need caltrans to the terminal in order for the terminal to be what we promised the city much more than a bus terminal i think it is important for the oversight to occur i dont think it necessarily has to be the two bodies but to create leverage to insure there is more work on accident trade packages moving forward ill support that i wish we have worked out you know an agreement on the amendments prior to coming to the Board Meeting i dont want to work against the tjpa in supporting those amendments that is not you know this position i was hoping to be in when i came to the Transportation Authority. I have a couple of questions to ask staff what instructions did maria give you in coming to the chamber today. To provide the status of where we are at and hold this stem where it impacts in order for the trade packages again, we worked well with the ta staff, however, only received in writing the conditions this morning we have a conversation yes afternoon about the conditions we only had an opportunity to side or so them this morning. How much time this morning did you have to review. I want to say 9 30 or 945 we didnt have a conversation on the phone yesterday afternoon but seeing something in writing. Whats your name. Mark. This is the position i dont know if the other commissioners feel this this is not a subject matter i know b a lot about im a little bit uncomfortable im in the cross because i trust my colleague supervisor wiener generally does thoughtful and Due Diligence im uncomfortable staff is saying we dont support those amendments and the executive director is saying she had a conversation with the director of tjpa who by the way, is not here and unable to offer comments on what is happening im curious to the other commissioners, if there is any other concerns or thoughts or ideas out there it is comforting to know that supervisor kim is supportive of the amendment i imagine between supervisor wiener and supervisor kim to be the two most knowledgeable persons on this particular project just looking for some direction supervisor kim. I dont completely understand the sdaurmentd im not going to say i do i support a level of oversight im finding confusing whether there is agreement on the amendment the way i read the amendment it doesnt seem to impact or have the outcome that the staff is saying it will around the trade packages that that being said construction is not my expertise like ed reiskin and have staff now say those amendments impact the project is concerting but it recent hard to evaluate right now what gives me comfort two months to work out the pieces and holy hoping that you know if there is a way that the amendments are negatively impacting the trade packages that well have that prior to september 10th im looking at director chang that is shaking her head this dynamic is disconcerting it is. I hope not a telephone tail sign of what is happening supervisor christensen. Did the director want to interject. I apologize were more unison the 8 million plus needs to be found exists today and hopefully, will get closed between now and september or other forms but the budget gap exceeds the excepted value of the parcel the parcel will be more than a hundred and 60 hopefully a lot more but the minimum bid even with that parcel an hundred and 87 million gap to get to the cost that the tjpa approval of so hundred and 87 million gap the decision explicit effect that the condition as a in the future no september the tjpa should not adapt a budget that exceeds the known funding that will be parcel f and could be more the hundred and 87 million exists today youre making a recommendation to accept the amendment. Absolutely the amendment is reasonable and calls for support. Chair wiener. You know in the discussions of the mtc last week and also in talking with director reiskin from the tjpa yesterday and others their focus was please grant the witness claim we have the option of delaying the witness claim and on september 2nd they could auction it to the lease in september the closing period and ms. Kaplan asserted that will cause the construction blow up i dont believe that is the case but the request has been please dont delay the quiet claim we are putting reasonable conditions and the tjpa will or will not have the funding for the additional contract in september and none of the conditions will impact whether or not they have the funding chair wiener who made the request not to delay the acquit claims. Well ms. Kaplan was one and we had the discussion thank you mtc i spoke to ed reiskin who felt we should move forward with the witnequit claim the people d with our staff many chang and others to put together those reasonable conditions. One last question to the through the chair for can reap was the amendment provides to the tjpa at 9 30 that morning and not the day before or a week before. I think a lot of this came up as part mtc so a lot of this played out at the mtc meeting we didnt we requested that she personally attended the mtc because the mtc today theres a lot of he said she said we thought it was important to have all principles there thats not the case today to ms. Chaplain and things have moefld quickly over the last few days. Supervisor christensen. This is in response to that madam chair it is apparently this is all a great deal discomfortable on not only the cost overruns but you i the way in which theyve been compiled and managed today it seems unlikely we approve the witness claims i ask the quit claim that is likely to put us in a better position and moving forward with the caveat has its merits. Okay. Why dont we chair wiener youre the maker of that motion sounds there needs to be more discussion what would do you want to do. I wish we voted on the amendments and ill be voting to support the quit claim release subject to this. Supervisor kim. Did you want to speak. So i wanted to request a couple of more minutes director chang has emailed the information to director reiskin and theyre going to respond pretty quickly and they the see the amendments prior just to insure that the amendments proposed by chair wiener is exactly what we previewed and read. Any others discussions with any on the commissioners. Since supervisor kim is requesting time ill suggest we go on to item 8 and come back to item 7 once the other items are completed on the agenda and thats an excellent suggestion item 8 a appoint Jacqueline Saks and peter saks to the Citizens Advisory Committee this is an action item. On technical 8 colleagues, any questions or comments seeing none, is there any Public Comment on item number 8 seeing none, Public Comment is closed colleagues i dont has the house changed can we please call the roll. Commissioner avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos absent supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee item passes. Okay item number 9. Item 9 appoint kevin stole to the bus Rapid Transit committee. Colleagues comments or questions on item 9 pie Public Comment on item 9 seeing none, Public Comment is closed colleagues, can we take item 9 same house, same call . Without objection that will be the order item 10. Item 10 allocate 38 million plus in prop k fund with conditions and appropriate 6 hundred plus in prop k subject to the fiscal year decision schedules an action item colleagues, any comments or questions on item 10 any Public Comment on item 10 seeing none, Public Comment is closed colleagues, can we take item 10 same house, same call . Without objection that will be the order item 11. Adopt the chinese town action report. Colleagues, any questions or comments on item 11 seeing none, any Public Comment on item 11 seeing none, Public Comment is closed and colleagues can we take item 11 same house, same call . Without objection that will be the order oh, well without objection that will be the order. Item 12. Adopt the geneva Feasibility Study final report. Colleagues is couple of different comments about the study that is incredibly important that brings connections between geneva corridor the bayshore boulevard and shipyard to get to bart station and the t line for caltrans station i appreciate the responsiveness of the concerns from the community by including an analysis of the avenue as an alternative route and acknowledge the ta staff especially david and the Citizens Advisory Committee the ta adams 3 meetings in english and chinese which is critical to the area and its important to move forward for the study and work towards implementation to continue this sort of outreach to the community by proactively reaching out to residents in the neighborhood to keep them informed on the process as well as the project every step of the way i also want to thank our colleague in daily city for theyre discrepancy. Thank you very much supervisor cowen no outlet questions or comments well move to Public Comment any Public Comment on item 12 seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And colleagues, can we take item 12 same house, same call . Without objection that will be the order item he 13 13 transportation stunt update this is an informational item. Staff has a presentation for us; is that correct ms. Chang . Just a quick way of introduction were pleased to present this to the multiple agency team weve worked on this back in early 2000 with the l o s with the larger comprehensive management for the Development Review and ceqa analysis and id like to acknowledge the hard leadership the sfmta and the Mayors Office in developing the program the first part is the Transportation Sustainability fee that was introduced by the supervisor wiener and the focus of todays presentation to reach our transportation performance in the city including the reduction of the vehicles travel and looking forward to the presentation with that, im going to turn it over to michael with the Transportation Authority assisted by folks from the Planning Department and from the sfmta thank you. Thank you director i will make it brief i know were running behind were excited to be floovent of you reaching this great mile the whole purpose behind this project is addressing a good thing that San Francisco is a very popular place to work live and visit it is straining our Transportation Network anybody out there knows the road at the transit vehicles are nearing capacity in some areas and this great lifestyle people facing less than good conditions this is only going to get worse those problems more challenging by 2040 new households and jobs this is something for a long time we struggled are were going to grow and i think that the subject of an early item today, we know there is not a lot of housing being built but 40 percent are in the pipeline it is coming something we need to address in comprehensive so the city is bringing forward the transcript Capital Investment and the bike infrastructure and the this is really what can we do to parish with the developing community to make sure their contributing their fair share but limit the strain on the network so that is where we come to 9 transportation assailant it is a comprehensive approach in 3 parts a moderntion of the transportation with the alternatives to level of Service Analysis and the second what can veerpz do onsite to limit the single occupancy vehicles and feinstein an investment to make sure that the developers are making pair fair share for the strain on the transit position with that, im going to turn it over to my colleagues with an will be talking about the first two and listing i cant chang will be talking about the second thank you. Thank you, michael chair wiener and members of the board im the senior planner with the Planning Department as michael and director chang mentioned ill talk about the first component that is the level of the Service Reform the levy level of services is a standard to measure the transportation impacts for projects subject to the California Environmental quality act reforms is happening at the state level as a result of state bill the senate bill says its a metric under ceqa cant be used and an alternative metric should be established the level of service is how many seconds a driver waits at an intersection the Service Analysis is the inconsistent where other federal, state, and local laws it is bias and typically doesnt result in better ordinances for the transportation including the safety outcomes so the state is proposing removing the level of services and replacing that with the vehicles traveled metric by making this change at the state lovely improves the local transportation for land use projects the state is proposing the vehicle miles traveled to the region of average i mean, ill come back to this in a minute what that means for San Francisco for transportation projects the state is proposing that projects in the net decrease will not help with the significant environmental impacts many of the transportation projects that come before you meets this criteria it is critical that the city can deliver projects to accommodate the growth that michael mentioned in the level of Reform Service should effect that sooner so this slide simply illustrates what the miles traveled means and it is murrays the miles and Zoning Districts that a person my drive typically a development from another uses located in poor access to nonaudible modes of travel that generates a substantial amount of driving the medics provides the Environmental Performance then level of services as it relates to Green House Gas and energy so as mentions for land use projects the state is proposing comparing the vehicle 3450i8z traveled to the regional average in San Francisco the regional average is the bay area so this table compares San Francisco with the regional average with the vehicle mile traveled per capita per day as you can see is San Francisco is doing well, this is expected given the citys diversity of uses and other factors that effect the travel behavior this is a good indication that most land use projects will generate a lower vehicle miles traveled ratio than the regional average in the city we want to do better than the status quo given the challenges that michael mentions ill scott wiener discuss it threw our second component of the ta shift through shift were proposing implementing the onsite amenities we do driving alone above and beyond what is required in the planning code like car sharing and bus parking the goal to encourage the sustainable behavior while providing predictability so the city is working on a t d m with a menu of the options for the effectiveness of those measures at different locations in San Francisco which is a form based Research Done in the state and city and like all good policy efforts morntdz so the mornts insures that the developers are implementing the measures theyre committed to and the program is effective this next slide is an example of the t d m measures that the developers will select from many are familiar with the components of t d m and implemented for or implemented voluntarily by the developers because of the market demand for those types of measures but if were going to have developers to implement the project we need to be able to fund that shift in our Transportation System so colleagues listing i cant chin with the Planning Department says theres a way to do that in the component of the program. Michael mentioned we have a robust policy in improving our transportation to make sure that people can travel safeties mentee would what mode the Mayors OfficeTask Force Found we need 10 million for the existing task force to have potential funds for a posh license fee and sales tax this to address some of the needs the proposal to create a Transportation Sustainability fee that was introduced by supervisor wiener at the boards hearing lecture last week it was to pay for the design shares on the Transportation System most of the Funding Sources identified through the task force are really focused on maintaining the Capital Improvements to the system efficiency the p. S. F to serve the demands on growth of course, we do have an existing transportation fee the Transit Impact Development Fee that goes to the nonrestricted projects it has excuse me. The pablt for the Residential Development and large institutions smaller nonprofits will continue to be exempt under the charitable process the prototype draft ordinances introduced at the board of supervisors but weve made refinement and moved to have the Feasibility Study both available on the project website the nexus study identified the justified amount we can ask the city to provide new services for growth and he did feasibility stooped will insure were maximizing our results from this work we established the residential growth of 7. 74 will help to support a fee of 15 or roughly 4 more than theyre paying the pdrs uses pay under 8 a square feet i should note that Residential Projects in some area plans receive a offset in costs that is where the city is accounting heres more detail who the fees covered by the t d f of 21 units or more and major hospitals and universities for the master plans to the City Hospitals will not be subject to the fee until the seismic requirements are met subject to the board there would be a number of exemptions in the proposal for Affordable Housing this includes the my mind and affordable projects and includes exemptions for businesses and nonprofits and units 21 units or fewer the process will provide the projects that have received the entitlements will continue to pay the existing ti f and any impact fees that did apply to the residential project in the pipeline that have not received their entitlements will receive 50 percent if the existing t d f for existing projects what will this mean once adapt it raise billion dollars over thirty years over 4 million in new transportation revenue or 14 million annual the fund goes towards the transportation improvements for the expanding of muni reliability and reduces driver times and going towards projects like muni forward the expenditure plan is for bart and caltrans and helps with this biking and making walking safer here are the relative amounts for the fees ive mentioned the bulk of the fee supports the transit reliability looking forward weve been working for the last several years to refine the outreach and working to support the adaptation process with facts implemented we anticipate the two components will come forward independently this year the timing of the ceqa changes is do not the state changes well happy this winter in conclusion we well our proposal thank you. Thank you very much that presentation this is a really important step forward in terms of introducing the legislation and updating our approach to transit impact fees and development so thank you colleagues, any questions or comments regarding the presentation . Seeing none, any Public Comment on item 13 seeing none, Public Comment is closed and this was an information item item 14 item 14 introduction of new items an informational item colleagues, any introductions there okay. Any Public Comment on item 14 seeing none, Public Comment is closed item 15 then item 15 Public Comment. New general Public Comment please come forward. Supervisors im francisco you heard a lengthy presentation given by one of the employees and none of you all asked her any questions during this Public Comment i dont know if you have easy to see but the congestion on our roads in San Francisco is dispermissible not too long ago i was on the 38 geary and a bus stalled for over one hour because of congestion because of an incident so presentations like this given like a conceptual plan what is a conceptual plan like a dream you can wake up from this dream and it would be the Worst Nightmare you know several people are looking at me ive been here and jose and others who i dont see over here a lot of new describe and the new buzz theyll have no sense of history no sense of cultural competency no sense of a real Traffic Management for the computer day weve selected before we keep collecting the data but not have the ability to utilize it i is that because one time i ran the procedure one thousand plus acres i know what it means to run a city im just making this comments because i can see that people dont ask questions. Thank you very much is there any additional Public Comment seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Okay. Colleagues id like to recall item no. 7 this has already been called ms. Chang any updates . Was able to send them to the directors director reiskin and have been in communication with director reiskin he understand that i believe and well convey that to the feedback to 9 commissioners. Okay. Thank you tjpa staff wants to make a comment. Im sarah the cfo and he hope i can clarify some i hope i dont confuse things weve worked with tjpa staff and we appreciate our quit claim support but want to point out the plan has been and weve been working with the city to come up with a full signing plan to award all our packages in september so weve been working with the city for most now the focus over the last month has 80 has been to identify the projects with the infrastructure and otherwise streetscape that will be complete when the Transit Center is implemented and what projects can be pushed out to evaluate the city can evaluate what other fund can be shifted to totally fund the parks our understanding as the staff mark and i this may be an incorrect understanding but the city will participated in the cost overview up to 90 displays the whole plan will not be in place by september 10th so mark has been flagging is not we dont support the conditions were more than happy to cooperate but without a full funding plan by september 10th well not be able to award everything but only award Construction Management oversight contracts, etc. We have in place for we understand the sentiment we could award everything with a minimum of contingency for a few months perhaps but at a staff level we have some concerns that not replenishing the contingency with awarding the packages puts us in a difficult positions some construction arises what we propose to do if it is limited if the only if i understand identified the parcel precedes well identify the critical packages and award or increase the budget for Construction Management only to the extent we dont need the full 9 and a half Million Dollars for the increase over the life of the project size that down to the next 6 months or next year but trying to flag that with the commissioners without a few funding in place we cant do everything. Just to clarify having the other identified source of funding beyond the sale of the parcel. Correct. Today, were not voting on other source of funding youll either find those if in or not. Everyone understands the reality well find that with the city and sfmta so if findings those sources is put onion hold or comes at the end of 90 days for the costs rectify theres not a full plan in place. So, of course, Everyone Wants to mock the funding it existing in terms of the 90 days set by the mtc the language about the amendment i offered was simply referring to the mtc 90 days weve discussed the 60 days and mtc staff are requested 90 days, of course, if you can complete it before that that is great there is nothing in the mtc action or our action that in must way prevents things from moving forward within the 90 days if the costs are completed we hope that will be completed sooner or later. It could take up to 90 days and if the parcel is 246 million on september 2nd well in a great position and we recognize that as well. Thank you very much okay. Colleagues any so right now with respect to item 7 a motion that was been seconded by supervisor christensen on the table any additional discussion okay. Seeing none mr. Clerk, call the roll oh, youre right before we vote on this thats correct any Public Comment on item no. 7 seeing none, Public Comment is closed mr. Clerk the house has changed call the roll on the amendment to item 7. Yes. The amendment. On the amendment commissioner avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos absent supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell absent supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee amendment passes. The amendment is adapted and for the underlying items item 7 as amended colleagues, can we take that item same house, same call . Without objection that will be the order item 16. Item 16 adjournment. We are adjourned thank you. Good morning welcome to the finance county Transportation Authority im commissioner avalos the president of the committee and supervisor kim and supervisor cowen and joined by supervisor campos and supervisor mar our clerk is steve mr. Clerk your announcements. No announcements. Okay. Lets go on to to our first item. Number one roll call arrest commissioner avalos supervisor campos absent supervisor cohen supervisor kim supervisor mar absent we have quorum. Very good let go on to item 2. Item 2 approval of the minutes of the june 9th meeting an action item. Colleagues, any changes at all 0 our minutes no comments open up for Public Comment members of the public on our minutes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Peoples politics not system politics a system politics it could be really immediately replied by a machine the Political Science of humanity inside and out meaning and loyalty and matt haney of matters. Thank you. Okay seeing Public Comment is end well close Public Comment and colleagues a motion to approve the minutes. Second. Sect by supervisor kim with a roll call vote. On item 2. Commissioner avalos supervisor campos supervisor cohen supervisor kim supervisor mar absent that motion passes. Very good item number 3 please. Item 3 federal and state action item. Good morning mark sends his regrets a busy time in sacramento and many things to do so hopefully, ill cover the bills in the ethics matrix a just want on a special session the governor declared a session for transportation and infrastructure to data number of informational background hearings basically outlines the need for transportation and infrastructure for the solutions for new revenues that could be pursued so, however, most of the funding and discussions have been around the need for highways and roads not so much transit a push from the vehicles local government to bring that into conversation theres been a modest number of bills introduced in the special session ill go over in a second first of all, were proposing two new recommendations for the legislation from the first is the ab 744 which would relates to eliminating the minimum parking requirements around the in fill areas around the stations and the Planning Department is supporting this and the section regular bill is ab 902 basically currently for minors a dwefks program they receive a ticket for a vehicle code things like bikes infractions they countys encourage get education rather than a ticket and the proposal to extend that to everyone for diversion for bikes running stop signs the first is a b x one one that mandates the loans in prior years of Transportation Fund to general fund the second is ab x one, two is expansion of the authorization for the building in the regular session and finally constitutional amendment x one one protects for transportation revenues if they have passed in the current session were recommending a new cigarette time Senate Package of transportation revenue increases revenue bill 16 and similar x bs one one by senator bell the increase in the new gas tax and a vehicle fee along with other packages this would be a 5 year program again mostly for local highways we are also reading the spot bills in the extraordinary bills session and waiting to get controls hopefully more details. What is the probability revenue for sb 16412 r x one one. The estimate is one billion dollars two to 3 billion a year ramping up over the 5 years were working to support the Second Amendment for the massive needs for the streets and road but also trends has significant repair needs and hopefully making that permanent not to come back and mark wants to gnaw well move forward this summer for the first time. Thank you. Were optimistic and finally recommending two bills sb x one 2 that redirected the cap trade funds as important to keep it if transit sb puc has the light rail vehicles were hoping to seek the funding for the sfmta. Where is it proposed from. Excuse me. And who is proposing. Senator hearing officer. From. I dont know where thank you. North bay. We think and finally were recommending a positions on sb x one weve seen a lot of those bills basically kill the high speed rail by pretending bonds and at the federal level weve been operating under a number of continuing resolution the federal transportation bill weve seen more likely so see them towards the end of the year the senate has introduced a long term 6 year reauthorization bill called redeveloping the vision for the economy or drive as the means it is focused on highways and roads with some new restrictions on percentage of funding for transit good news it does increase the funding for transportation and increases the flexibility that the local jurisdictions have to address its own concerns there is a recent development theyre proposing to eliminate the Tiger Program that is a competitive funding for San Francisco and the region and it will be sad to see that program go away with that, ill be happy to answer any questions. Thank you. Good morning tilly chang bart has announced recently the general manager theyll propose to their vote to take a bond to the bay area were tracking that the bay council did a poll of the arts alameda and contracosta alameda to see how voters feel about a bond measure to primarily be for maintenance needs but to address operational and other sort future expansion it is our opportunity to weigh in our staff work with these with the Mayors Office and bart itself to better understand what the options are important composing that program now there is a decision to move forward at least a proposal from the general manager in proposing that to her board. Thank you. Well check in for your guidance on that. Supervisor kim. Thank you. I just had a question on that if theres a 3 county bond measure inch not seen 0 one in my time a 2 3rds plus one vote. Im not sure if we 2 3rds yeah, im told twittered the first thing and cross the 3 counties. The county below and santa fe San Francisco was super high the average of the 3 and also how many county wasnt participate in that bond. I think by agreement san mateo will not and santa clara has contributed on a different basis so the 3 county for this bond as i understand. I understand on a more curious question in general how many counties can participate in a bond measure like that. The bart is formed as the 3 sdriblthsd could be as many as the bart district but maybe another regional measure for the bridge tolls all the county in the area. And were trying to get to a press conference downstairs so if we can do a quick response. We need the state legislation like the gas tax theyll put it up on the smaller sunset. Ill ask enjoy realize were on a time issue. Thank you very much we can open up for Public Comment any member of the public seeing none, Public Comment is closed. This will be same house, same call . Colleagues. Yes. That motion passes. Next item, please. Item 4 recommended an award of a two Year Contract to the services in the amount of 4 hundred thousands for the San Francisco freeway Corridor Management study for the executive director to negotiate the contract terms and conditions this is an action item. Good morning with the Transportation Authority theyve seeking the cms for manage the increase of the liability on the freeway corridors in San Francisco from phase one and two of the cms study are from the caltrain grandparent and appropriated for cal grant this subject is the phase two and the Transportation Authority board approved the cms phase the report set the foundation for the took analysis in phase two by developing an evaluation frame goals moving more people and increasing the triple liability and increasing the neighborhoods adjacent to the freeway corridors this contract was waterway for a procurement process on may 8th for a request for the scope is in our packet the preproposal conference was held and 4 proposals by the dew date met the dba goal and the sfmta and caltrain interviewed the banks on june 3rd and unanimously recommended the firm the team has been experience in planning in the region in east bay and south bay and the objectives and the limits of the environment in San Francisco and the development and screening of a analysis of like scenarios the a team that is here today will address the additional questions the c h s team and the solutions this is an action stem were seeking to award this contract im available to answer any questions. Supervisor kim. I have a particular interest this is ann has an interest in the downtown area im interested in some of the difference Management Concepts and curious it in the background and work im not sure how many containments have been working im not familiar beyond la what other adjudicators have taken on the program and maybe there isnt a lot of persistence. A lot in the persistence in the la area and the alameda couldnt and currently seeking a plan for the entire region but the point to be aware of many of the efforts so for in the region either new h o v or a conversion in San Francisco it is a bit of a challenge in that the constraint maybe to alternatives that dont necessarily relate to the capacity. Supervisor kim we can absolutely have another meeting the state of california has been sort of a forer of the state weve seen a lot more implementation of those things and there is substantial experience in south bay as mentioned and east bay and lomdz has in place a grade of 5 corridors 101 is currently under study in san mateo and wanted to continue to look at San Francisco the conversion and potential others Management Studies for 101 and 280. Their exercise. They have exercise locally and mta form m t c staff around the other h o v. Thank you for your presentation and well open up for Public Comment any member of the public want to comment none well close Public Comment and colleagues, same house, same call . It passes next item, please. Item 5 introduction of new items this is an informational item. Colleagues, any new items for introduction seeing none, well go to Public Comment on this item Public Comment is now open no increments well close Public Comment. Item 6 Public Comment. General Public Comment is open and seeing none, e seeing no member of the public well close Public Comment and before we adjourn id like to thank sophisticating staff jim and others mr. Clerk. Item 78 adjournment. Colleagues, were adjourned clapping celebrating the wow. Turnout this is our third annual to celebrate pride we notice we didnt have Community Event for pride. We actual had 19 we had godzilla and are you ball weird names i think its unique were able to have special event were all women that relax and have fun you know everything is friendly and kind wer all equal im happy that clapping. good morning celebrate brants on behalf of bearings the director of health for San Francisco and dr. Ed chow president of the health care ill delighted to welcome you and celebrate the 50 anniversary of the grand experiment that touches millions of americans since their launch 50 years medicare and medicaid are a resolution in our nations history few programs have had to many impact of the lives of the people in the city in San Francisco there are over hundred and 20 thousand people goibt for medicare that is over 60 percent of the population and over 2 hundred and 6 thousand san franciscans enrolled in medicaid thats one quarter of our citizens population today, were proud and delighted to host this event here in the City HospitalSan Francisco general and fromme Trauma Center where over 50 percent of our population is commodity of medicaid and medicare enroll easy at this time please allow me to welcome partners we have with us today first Katherine Dodd clapping kathy is director of San Francisco health san franciscans and form regional director of Historic Preservation commission we welcome you back home we have dr. Sue carlyle our partner San Francisco general clapping. and we have Katherine Duke the director of the Health Care District will you please announces clapping and finally we have tracey trustees of Alameda Health district and alameda. clapping. we want to thank you all for joining us at this visionary Public Policy and celebration now my great pleasure to introduce the mayor of our great city mayor mayor edwin lee clapping . Good morning, everybody. Good morning. I just wanted i to make sure you saw my ignites tie laughter thank you for the introduction and for all the good work in our Health Network great to see so many people here faces have famous everybody in the room here that be celebrating our 50 accounting anniversary of medicare and medicaid i cant think of a better place in the San FranciscoGeneral Hospital it has been a centerpiece i know that all of you have been associated with our hospital know that is our signature were excited this year but ill say i will speak all today along about baseball and other things what weve been able to do in health care is like winner the world series like our Community Partners our friends here at San Francisco general and the whole system has benefited from a really programs but the people that were committed in the programs not only to fulfill the goals weve stated but once those goals are stated to make sure that the mantra that everybody gets assess and that we will figure out eventually; right . Im a great fan oracle to figure out a lot more things and interested on the topic that will be presented by dr. Is both a challenge but we all know we must do better at the City Government has an important goal to play in making the lives of all People Better and the first time in a decade yesterday, i got to sign the historic biggest baddest budget in the city of San Francisco clapping. two year budget no budget cuts people came in and honestly told us what we needed to get done were fulfilling the promises and making sure were taking care of the gaps as well its a balanced budget with increased revenues allows us to do in the past years weve not done it is smart strategy investments and make sure we are thinking about sustainability and sustain this for the long term those are good Economic Times for the state but also the greatest opportunity to make sure that the prosperity is shared by more people if not by everyone we need to touch everybodys lives a great advantage weve been able to do with the creation of the handsomelying bird place some of us focused on the Behavorial Health issues our example that we can do something here we can replicate it in many parts of city to exceed far too many examples of whats his name we were not able to Pay Attention to this incredibly important issue later this year ill be excited to join all of you and more in openly up our new sf General Hospital yeah clapping. it is a great thing for the city and so many ways again but the ignites are going to be there its a worldclass institution and surviving the institution and the number one Trauma Center in the entire Northern California with the reputation of just being really great responders but emanates the education aspects a level of care the level of intention and the multi cultural approach to serving everyone in the city and i think this is why i know this is why the voters overwhelmingly passed the largest revenue general Obligation Bond we honor that by making sure that on time and open and alive and everybody works within this is happy they get the machinery that is needed thats why friends of the Sf Foundation is so for this is the giants thing pam and others and all the friends that led that effort clapping. and be able to say this is also a name of priscilla and Mark Zuckerberg along with thousand of others donations to make that work that will have the state of the art machinery the things that the bond cant do but accomplishes what we need to get done to fill all the gaps ultimately on that day ill praise everybody that works there thats why people go yes, its the building yes. The machinery about it you dont have the people that number one thing to care for your health and have the attitude that is why request have a worldclass center for the confidence for the people for uncontrollable circumstances caused to be going there we want to preventive people from having to go there as many people as possible this is why celebrating that that milestone of 50 years but understanding the world series games weve won since that that time is so important laughter that was a world series win when we got the San Francisco health plan kraeth katherine and everyone figure out we were not going to be satisfied well get to universal be health care when the government gets there no, we wanted to be the t could be done that president obama didnt have to be alone on this we can be the for or against examples and guess what 54 percent dropped in uninsured persons since health care was incorporated 50 percent drop in San Francisco thats incredible part of this history and we couldnt have gotten it down without the obama legislation but gave his the foundation to live the dream and prepare and plan and implement to do all the things with a lot of partners and marries like my predecessor building in it to get it done working with the director of the Public Health and barbara working with the Health Commission yes keeping a good dialog with City Government that were all partners in this we created one of the first medical managed care plans and built sf and none is left out in the partners and help to reform everybody has assess well find more ways to make that footage now mayor u make sure that people use it before they come to the Emergency Care and educate ourselves thats why i have to be a better example of health myself i want to say that youll have you are here not only to celebrate the milestones but to really re1rib9 what were trying to do in making sure that access and people take advantage of the system it doesnt work if people dont take advantage and not thinking how to be healthy in 20 years or my kids more healthy and do all the things whether preventing obesities such things im very willing to do spend money on experiment with make some mistakes along the way in an effort to get to the right answer and making sure that we have partners in entire bay area to work with us to make sure they do it right. I want to say to the fellows partners anothers hfa o and others initiatives those partnerships that allows us to be experimenting but affordable i look forward to working with you on those big challenges with the staff and the entire region to make sure that your tireless efforts dont get wraurtdz unduly and also very much happy to not only listen careful to sandys word to transforming the health care into making sure were doing all the right things ill interested in her leadership, of course, and roshlts leadership to make sure were doing youll see right things Kathy Heinecke republican has us on a right beat to make sure were doing all the right things in the city to prevent the costs from over comping use it is more than a celebration but a confirmation were heading in the right direction to invite people to take care of their health and our systems are assessable and culturally assessable dealing with the issues of the time that allows me to say im not just building more housing but service and communities i want to make sure People Health and Public SafetyJob Opportunities and the family investment are all taken care of and ill say coming back from the invitation of pope france to talk about climatic change to Human Trafficking around the world were very, very lucky to be in San Francisco where minds of people are saying we can do better we can be a city for everybody and build infrastructure and build confidence in people that want to come here well take care of you where it is health or housing or criminal backgrounds the dedication for again, we had the chance to talk about transforming lives were in the business cities are in the busy business of transforming lives and this is what we always want to in do in our Health Care Business whether it is preventive or responsive or the aftercare were going to do all those things were the greatest city in all the world thank you [gavel] i guess we are ready. Okay. Good morning. The meeting will come to order. This is the meeting of the government audit and Oversight Committee for july 16, 2015. I named his supervisor yee and chaired a committee to my right is supervisor christiansen, vice chair. And on my left will be supervisor read. The committee clerk