Of mine lived she got a no fault evictions and it is placed on the market 275,000 it was apple ellis act eviction in 2009 and none of us want that to happen to us thanks. My name is cal im a resident of the tenderloin and id like for you all to consider two things that disturb me last week, i overheard what the all of a sudden spectators staff laughed about their next will that was going to be and really the next point of bmrs can be filtered to the relatives for monitoring thats an odd statement also id like to ask you look at the current housing that is development on Market Street and consider the vacancies rates there are not good so i think you can look at that and why it will work thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon, supervisors im patrick shaw on personal time i understand this origin requires the developers of Group Housing projects to be subject to the requirements of building 12 to 15 percent affordable units on site or have to pay the various inclusionary housing fee so i commend you for this ordinance since the inclusionary fee legislation was first implemented over hundred and 70 million in fees have been paid by developers into several inclusionary fee Fund Accounts this Community Needs to rapidly hold a hearing on what the market values has spent the one hundred 70 million on and not spent the m h 0 codys what theyre doing and details San Francisco spell needs the board of supervisors to over and place a city chart change to on the ballot to create a connection in charge of total oversight of the entire moh cd it is not good enough on angle set forth body to the Successor Agency to the Root Development swoeshgs agency what is mou h cd doing with the housing fund theyre separate and the hundreds of millions that have been collected from the inclusionary housing fees that are collected to date so it where is the money. Thank you is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak on this item. All right. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed at this time you. Supervisor kim as a few remarks. Thank you supervisor cowen and supervisor wiener i appreciate the time spent over the last week on the amendment at committee and glad to see were going back to the original language of the Group Housing ordinance again, i want to thank all the members of the public that squat to organize for todays meeting we want to make sure that the Inclusionary Housing Program that was passed by the board in 2002 committed Group Housing and it is said that Group Housing developers will be providing Affordable Housing under this ordinance, however because of wording languages around the dwelling units and it wasnt applied because we havent seen a lot of market rate sros types of developments come before the board the market is so hot those micro units are financeable and being proud we have 3 in the district i have 1178 fulsome street and micro units at 2 hundred 90 plus square feet and one that impacts the residents leavenworth is the 2 hundred and 38 units of apartment that are roughly 2 hundred and 50 square feet were finding those units are 90 percent medium average income my mind but all developers are providing 12 percent on i take it and 50 percent of ami many of you mentioned this is far above the income of people in the tenderloin 40,000 a year for a person of one we want to insure that is provided if we want to talk about increasing the ami oversight Affordable Housing we should do that through the longer process of amending our inclusionary housing a program called the dial you may get unit by have to provide more of them youre not subsidizing those units or perhaps provide fewer constituents u units at a lower ami therefore hitting the residents that are here in the room i want to acknowledge you talked about the sro issues not just new ones the elevator issue many of the conditions our office and i heard supervisor cowen express that this she is interested in continuing on this over 50 percent of the sro buildings are in district of this is part of our housing balance on monday that conversation will happen i encourage you to come out and hear that report sorry i want to thank sro collaborative and the Filipino Association and the council and hospitality house and faith fools and mission sro can go collaborative for coming out and i know those groups came out and thought well be putting this forward to the full board im sorry we should make a motion on i believe that supervisor wiener will it do that and ill make a motion on the full ordinance. Supervisor wiener. Thank you very much madam chair and all the members of the public who coming out came out i think the representation from the tenderloin neighbors it neighborhood it is great to see when an neighborhood organs it is great when you agree or draw but it is entirely when a neighborhood comes out and represents ill be supporting as i mentioned when im finished with my remarks ill make a motion to withdraw the amendment that we adapted last week and supporting this legislation today with the positive recommendation i side, however, want to address an issue that not everyone commenter made but some commenter made if you didnt know anything about the ordinance and showed up you might get the inaccurate prospective that the amendment that i offered last week it raise the max area medium income for the group income from 50 to 90 percent that was taking the units out of the affordable category and putting them into the nonaffordable educator even taking them out the below market rate that is completely and entire inaccurate our Inclusionary Program goes from zero to one hundred 20 percent it includes low income and low income and moderate income 20 percent is at the end of moderate income if 55 and 90 percent even though some of the commenters were applying that was some way somehow moving into an luxurious category that is the lower end of moderate income and into dollar terms that is were talking about an annual salary between 45 thousand and 65 thousand dollars a year in many parts of United States youre doing fine if i make between 45 and 60 thousand you can science and raise a family that is a challenging income range in San Francisco and so many of the people i know i represent and talked who are struggling with housing and hanging open by their. Nails if their evicted their duo to struggle to stay in the city and neighborhood theyre in that range lets talk about is in the 45 to 65 thousand range the 55 percent to 90 percent of ami that some people see not in need of Affordable Housing those are teachers weve heard reference to teachers those are teachers in that category, in fact, teachers make a little bit above that this is the low ends of teacher salaries starting teachers and social workers and Lab Technicians and our medical centers fall into that paralegals fall into that category not our even but lp in these and Office Managers so i think this is very important to choose the language not so is youre going up over 55 percent in the in the morning affordable in the for rich tech workers or whatever people say this is about our teachers and social workers and Lab Technicians a llp n that are struggling to stay in this city that is who were talking about and right now we have not building hours for those people were not building enough low Income Housing ive been supporting the funding were not building enough and need more were hardly building anybody for this income range and we have to side better we have to build more for 2, 3, 4 highend of low income and the moderate income residents right now were just not doing anything for them so you know i just wanted to really put that out there because this income matters this is part theoretically part of our affordable Housing Program were able a small amateur of housing they can afford we need more moderate housing and see every time i have raised to stay on the boards 5 years the concept of moderated housing there is a lot of lip service and not a lot happens i know that some projects in process that have moderate next door housing when you add up the units it is a drop in the bucket compared to what we need more this income range i want to make sure i put that ousted there, there was a lot of carpenter over the last week over the amendment having the gale to suggest we should be building in the 50 percent of ami to 90 percent of ami range somehow meat it is not part of bmr program i understand there is political rhetoric in this building and town but it is important to look at the actual facts i also want to say that i as i mentioned in the giving up it is great that the Tenderloin Community as radical and organized around the two Group Housing projects that are being built in the tenderloin im a big believer in the community of housing getting built weve seen this in my district and the upper market area in not limited to the tenderloin but the whole city i understand that it is important to be overseeing around those projects but this legislation is not again one or two projects or one period of time this is for the whole city for the long run it is important we get it right and have tons of discussions airbnb those issues including Affordable Housing for all income levels so with that madam chair, i want to withdraw the amendment we approved last week and ill be that concludes my report supervisor jane kim will be recommended with a positive recommendation ill be supporting that recommendation thank you, supervisor wiener appreciate you for clearing up the miss commendations to withdraw the amendment and well take that without objection. Lets accept that motion well take that without objection. That motion passes. Supervisor kim. Thank you. I just wanted to say a couple of things first of all, in response to supervisor wiener we know we need to build housing at every category its not good were pit twins against the middleincome residents. Couple of things i want to remind the members of the committee a lot of the residents room are on fixed income living day to day from Social Security and that the 4 hundred to 800 a month so 40 percent of ami in 201564 thousand plus a year is hard to tell me theyre hanging by a tread thread the people if this room are hanging by a thread not to say People Living in the ami it is hard to make 45 to 65 thousand dollars but we should remain the audience were speaking to and those are the folks that are really, really hanging by a thread we prioritized this type of housing and the group hows impacting the city what all the projects are in my district and it feels like a g6 policy the second thing about micro unit that is legislation that is passed in zoned and eligible for Group Housing not in other parts of the city that are singlefamily homes and large apartment buildings so a couple of things with that said i support us building housing at every income level i know that supervisor cohen and my district 6 and 10 produced most of 60 percent were built in those districts and when you look at the piecemeal pooechl 3 hundred and 8 it out of the middleincome units are being proposed in the district i recommend i subtle building in the middleIncome Housing for example, in the giants field with the loss 7 were almost thirty percent of that housing for individuals between macro between 50 and hundred plus ami the nurses and social workers we were talking about i think there is some real struggle that people are hearing in this room thats why they focused little way they did and many people advocating for 50 percent of ami are not dwoobl for those and many are seeing the types of serves as as organizer i never made more than 40,000 this is the type of housing so i want to make a motion to move forward with a recommendation as a committee recorded for tomorrows full Board Meeting motion by supervisor kim and this is forwarded to the full Board Committee report thank you clapping. all right. Thank you ladies and gentlemen, as you transition please try to keep your voices down. Madam clerk items three and four. The praying of the agreements by the Successor Agency to, llc for a purchase of 4 hundred plus millions for a palace as transbay block 5 and item 4 a resolution approving a position for the Development Agreement for the transbay hours 71 million all right. Supervisor kim is the author thought and will make a few openly remarks. Thank you those two items are continuation of the sales of our block on transbay which helps to fund the construction of the tunnel which many of the residents have noticed that has gone from below ground and it is exist to see the skeleton of what will be the terminal for downtown caltrans and high speed rail keep our fingers crossed into the future im going to turn it over to your Successor Agency ocii is required to sell those blocks to generate the sale precedes the transbay redevelopment plan needs the board to approve the parallels with the section of the Community Redevelopment lay ocii has entered into the deposition and agreement with block 5 and 8 developments teams that were selected through the rfp process and this is the final step one of the blocks block 5 is all office space and will be transcribing to our fees program 18. 6 million that goes directly into the affordable Housing Program for the program 10 million in transit fees we have a joint venture on block 8 that a mixed use market rate housing that contributes to the 035 percent of affordability that will be required in the transbay Redevelopment Area plan 25 percent for low and moderate income and 10 percent for middleincome inflicting in case the types of neighborhoods we want to see being built throughout San Francisco i know we have a brief presentation by ocii and i believe that shawn the project manager will be speak on those two items. Thank you, supervisor kim. Supervisor cowen supervisor wiener thank you very much my name is shawn heart the transbay project manager with the office of citizen complaints i have a brief presentation im going to present both block 5 and block 8 at the same time start with block 5 at howard and beale streets this map shows the parcels that involved the larger parcel is n one and that is the parcel that will actually be sold to m a west which is the developer other two parcels are open space parcels next slide is a rendering of the average Office Building ill talk about that more in a minute Purchase Price is one hundred 72 millions the proceeds go towards the construction of the Transit Center and in 2016 the project consists of 7 hundred and 66 thousand seven hundred square feet of office space and to restore the tower there is 86 hundred square feet of ground floor retail space and about 24 thousand square feet of Public Open Space the plan to Start Construction in 2016 and required to complete the construction within 39 months of commencement as supervisor kim mentioned the developer will pay the impact fees of 6 point plus Million Dollars and 11 million plain clothes 8 is located on fulsome street between first and fremont this is a rendering of the building this one is residential and it consists of Tower Building plus two podiums located adjacent east this is a site the Purchase Price is 71 million again the funds are towards the construction and the close date is october 1st of 2016 for total units of which 4 hundred and 4 market rate that are split into the for sale and rentals there will be hundred 50 affordable units of which 70 where are inclusionary are developer funded and will be affordable to households up to 40 and 50 percent of ami and the other 80 affordable units will be funded by and affordable for households up to 50 percent of ami and 65 hundred square feet of open space they will Start Construction in december of 2016 and must complete within 42 months of commencement if you have any questions i have developer reps here. Thank you very much for your presentation. Quick and to the point. Supervisor kim i dont know if you have any rarmz remarks seeing none Public Comment for items three and four any Public Comment on this item . Please come up to the podium you have two minutes seeing none, Public Comment is closed at this time supervisor kim. So id like to make a motion to move forward items three and four i move we send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. Well take that without objection. That motion passes with a positive recommendation madam clerk please call item number 5 and 6 together. Yes. Item 5 is an ordinance amending the construction of a accessory dwelling units in district 58 and the dwelling units in district 3. And she is the author of item 57 and supervisor christensen is the author of item number 6 i first recognize supervisor wiener. Thank you very much madam chair it is a great to be here today with the legislation which is the third piece of legislation around increasing inlaw units that ive authored in the last year and which captains the work weve previously done and i want to thank supervisor christensen for xandz this concept into district 3 and it is terrific to see more parts of city be able to assess this important kind of housing so, of course colleagues as we know our housing crisis will require a number of approaches to address it and i wont glow a laundry list of a lot of things we do only one piece of the puzzle allowing people to add inlaw units and accessory inlaw units into our existing building whether a singlefamily home or space in a multi unit building not currently used for residential purposes we have a lot of unused space in believes in various parts of city not currently used for residential purposes but that could be a garage or a shortage area or a basement that is partially above ground this legislation builds on the castro in law legislation i offered last year and this board passed unanimously and the Service Legislation i offered this year that allowed the in law units with retroactively retrofit and captains the entirety to the district i represent district 8 including for the creation of must rental units if it is adams into an existing rermentd building the castro legislation we passed last year support from the castro eureka area and the bay area recordeder and the lgbt Democratic Club and spur and the legislation before us that expands to the rest of the district is endorses by the board of supervisors and the Park Association and the dined or Diamond HeightsCommunity Association we know that our city has been growing and continues to grow San Francisco is growing by 10 thousand people a year and our housing creation had a has not kept up we need to find ways to create moyers for a growing population we know that inlaw units are the most affordable kind of nonincentivized housing we according to various studies by hud and berkley and aarp they end to be smaller on the ground floor theyre not because of built into existing buildings not finished with the Construction First and foremost the infrastructure is in place and needs to be extended into the new units the units are more affordable and assessable for seniors for people with mobility challenges thereby typically on the ground floor