frustrated as she may be with mr. stone, is that both parties, not just the defendant but both parties get a fair trial. so as long as she's convinced that she can draw a fair jury and he's not influencing witnesses, it appears that she's willing to give him a little more leash. i'd be very surprised if he violated yet again another gag order that she would continue to let him remain out on bond pending trial. >> to that point, we did see two hours after her order mr. stone's wife start posting about him, photos of him and discussion about today's hearing on instagram. that's obviously from her and not him. would a judge or would a court usually expect that a defendant's immediate family members would respect the same sort of restriction that was imposed on the defendant? >> there is the spirit of the order, which they're clearly violating, and then there is the letter of the order, which she apparently did not violate. but this is not a judge to be trifled with. remember, she didn't hesitate to revoke mr. manafort's bond when he was tampering with witnesses.