>> well, yes, that's the standing argument. as to why they get to go into court and ask the judge for injunctive relief. what the president is doing is violating the emoluments clause of the constitution, and it's really a very simple concept, because the founders were aware of this problem. emolument means profit or benefit. and the founders did not want, they specifically prohibited any person who holds a position of trust in the united states government from receiving profits or benefits from foreign governments. so that's what's going on when foreign governments patronize these hotels. it's unconstitutional, it's a form of influence over the united states government official by the foreign government. the founders didn't want it. they put it in the constitution. and that's exactly what that language means. and we're going to expect the judge to rule on that and interpret the emoluments clause, explain it to the president what the law is. not just with respect to that hotel, but the law is the same