Stay updated with breaking news from Standing argument. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
plants and meatpacking plants. these aren t the most powerful people and where do they turn? you have a right-wing house of representatives and a very right-wing supreme court. exactly and i think this is why so many people feel powerless and ironically some are feeling so powerless that they turn to somebody who looks like a strong man. wright, with a golden toilet. who was actually at this moment giving big tax breaks and promising more tax breaks to the biggest corporations. people need to know that the most important thing to remember is the massive trump tax cut will expire next year. he is not for the regular person. robert reich, thank you so much. that is tonight s reidout . all in with chris hayes starts now. tonight on all in a hero s welcome on capitol hill for the architect of the insurrection. we are 100% unified behind his candidacy. a lot of support. the best speech i ve ever heard. we are incredibly unified in working with presid ....
Jurisprudence before. we ve usually seen treatise between life and choice, equality and dignity. a static injury it trivializes what s going on, in a post roe america, and away haven t seen before. yeah, i cringe getting vaccine injection, that s not relevant to whether not we should have vaccines in the world. mary, you point out that this is the kind of thing we could see, whether it s the standing argument or whatever the cases. and the, and this particular case is going to go to the supreme court, and we re gonna see something happen. what s your sense of how that goes down? because when andrew cashmere came down with this ruling, most people reacted with some degree of shock. even people like you. who read about this, and studied all the time. what happens when it gets to the supreme court? well, we know the supreme court issued a stay, which means a majority of the justices are not convinced that these plaintiffs have a viable case. i don t think the fifth circuit, for all of ....
The son. i need a microphone. thank you very much. recently, your- the son. i need a microphone. thank i you very much. recently, your shadow work and you very much. recently, your shadow work and pensions secretary called the two work and pensions secretary called the two child benefits cap venus, and suggested that labour would scrap and suggested that labour would scrap it~ and suggested that labour would scrap it. can you confirm if that is labour s scrap it. can you confirm if that is labour s policy? earlier, you audience labour s policy? earlier, you audience the arrogance of groups like just audience the arrogance of groups like just oil, but in labour run wales, like just oil, but in labour run wales, they said they are cooperating with such groups, and ektension cooperating with such groups, and extension rebellion are even boasting extension rebellion are even boasting about writing marked rigorous boasting about writing marked rigorous policies. do you t ....
Ruling that might be favorable to those who want to advocate for availability of mifepristone. when the things i thought that was particularly interesting is that there is an argument that the fda is the expert here, and that we should defer to the fda, who has for 20 years, has approved this drug. and has done studies, and we should defer to that expertise. and instead, judge ho here said i don t understand all this talk about deference to the fda. i mean, that is what courts are, for is in fifth? so, they do not seem to buy that argument what forever. there s also a standing argument that this group of plaintiffs and doctors who might cite hypothetically someday, might encounter a patient who had a botched abortion because the pill did not work. the argument was made they don t have standing, they have suffered a real harm here. and the judges seemed to have no use for that argument. they seem to brush it off of the back of the hand, and move on. so, i don t think that this case is g ....
Mifepristone. when the things i thought that was particularly interesting is that there is an argument that the fda is the expert here, and that we should defer to the fda, who has for 20 years, has approved this drug. and has done studies, and we should defer to that expertise. and instead, judge ho here said i don t understand all this talk about deference to the fda. i mean, that is what courts are for, isn t it? so, they do not seem to buy that argument what forever. there s also a standing argument that this group of plaintiffs and doctors who might cite hypothetically someday, might encounter a patient who had a botched abortion because the pill did not work. the argument was made they don t have standing, they have suffered a real harm here. and the judges seemed to have no use for that argument. they seem to brush it off of the back of the hand, and move on. so, i don t think that this case is going to come out much ....