so you have another story wrong, never mentioned the word "israel." >> leland: there's a few ways to look at this. one, perhaps, the president is trying to put it behind him. on the other hand, he's kind of allowing this to be brought back up again when if he ignored the question and walked off everything would be fine. >> well, i think it would be an enduring issue. i'm not sure the allegation is that he used the word "israel" in that alleged meeting in the oval office. it was that he may have compromised an israeli intelligence agent or source the ground in iraq or syria. that infiltrated isis. there's probably under needs the surface, some simmering tension over that episode. if it was true. it seems like a lot of the details have been tacitly confirmed by the administration. the overwhelming goal of this trip to israel is reaffirming what he called an unbreakable or unshakeable bond between the countries. clearly a mention or reference to the previous administration