comparemela.com

passed about people having to buy gun insurance. the latest have been in connecticut, maryland, massachusetts, pennsylvania, new york and now california. this particular bill would force people who own guns to also buy insurance, and they draw the analogy to the fact that when you drive a car, you have to have insurance for liability purposes. in this case it would cover damages or injuries caused by the weapons that you own. of course the other side of the fence on this is that it would encourage -- it would encourage people not to buy guns because there would be this added cost of having to carry insurance. >>brian: the executive director of the gun owners of california said if something happens with my gun, whether i do it or somebody else, i'm getting sued anybody. why am i getting insurance? if i'm willing to take that risk, i should be willing to take that risk. >>steve: would something like this be constitutional? the government would mandate that you have to buy something to exercise a constitutionally guaranteed right. >>brian: would gang members go out and get this

Related Keywords

People ,New York ,California ,Insurance ,Gun Insurance ,Guns ,Bill ,Latest ,Massachusetts ,Connecticut ,Maryland ,Pennsylvania ,Car ,Case ,Families Aren T ,Side ,Course ,Weapons ,Fence ,Analogy ,Injuries ,Liability Purposes ,Damages ,Brian ,Something ,Anybody ,Cost ,Gun ,Somebody ,Executive Director ,Gun Owners ,My Steve ,Government ,Risk ,Members ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.