A newscast reviewing and analyzing top stories of the day as they happen. Said yes. We expect more detail. Shepard its my understanding there was testimony about a time when Paul Manafort essentially ran out of money. He did. Theyre saying in 2014, when his former top client, who the mueller team described as manaforts golden goose, ukrainian president victor yanukovych. Gates testified when he left it decreased the Income Stream. Heres how much the Income Stream was down. Gates testified that in 2016, manafort paid between 200,000 and 225,000 for yankees season tickets. But then, manafort asked gates to write a letter to the yankees saying that gates actually just borrowed manaforts credit card to make that huge purchase. This case that started with a lot of testimony and a lot of exhibits and ed showing that manafort lived a lavish lifestyle for several years has now evolved into a case about a former lobbyist and campaign
and whether there was collusion between the Trump Campaign an
something bordering on comical. i know. shepard: i guess they do it for liability purposes? we reached out to the automakers that i mentioned, they had no comment, nobody got back to me about the specific report. shepard: be careful while you drive. it was just hey, these features are there to help you, they can save your life but you need to be attentive. shepard: you mentioned tesla, they suspended their stock? . their stock has been suspended because the founder and the ceo, elon musk who has since last spring had a kind of interesting way of interacting with the public on twitter, own earnings calls, basically implied that analyst questions about their cashflow and productivity were dry or boring. he was razzing the analysts calling in. he kind of tweeted out something, we had to verify it was him and not a prank, that he is taking tesla private. he s a 21% owner of tesla. there are 10 large institutional
passed about people having to buy gun insurance. the latest have been in connecticut, maryland, massachusetts, pennsylvania, new york and now california. this particular bill would force people who own guns to also buy insurance, and they draw the analogy to the fact that when you drive a car, you have to have insurance for liability purposes. in this case it would cover damages or injuries caused by the weapons that you own. of course the other side of the fence on this is that it would encourage it would encourage people not to buy guns because there would be this added cost of having to carry insurance. brian: the executive director of the gun owners of california said if something happens with my gun, whether i do it or somebody else, i m getting sued anybody. why am i getting insurance? if i m willing to take that risk, i should be willing to take that risk. steve: would something like this be constitutional? the government would mandate that you have to buy something to exerc
a peacock. it is going viral . he is a mail carriier obviously and one point stands on top of his car. it is peacock. uh-huh. and there is it a neighbor out in kansas who had a peacock and it was nasty. if you are a mail man you try to figure out if a peacock is following you. but for liability purposes. you can t touch the peacock. if it is a pet. if it snaps at them. it can defend himself. no one owns him and he chose to fly there. he s got no owner. why do they have wings then. they fly. do you know,io? they can fly. stewart varney knows. yes. you go to india, peacocks are all over india.