perhaps time has not been given, due consideration has not been given and we're just going to end up in this legal mine field over a variety of issues? >> i completely agree. this was done too hastily, it was done without consultation. it was done to satisfy a campaign promise rather than to protect the nation in a reasonable way. it could have been done more carefully, and it still can be done more carefully, and one hopes that perhaps the president will be advised and maybe will have second thoughts and decide to go back to the drawing board. we do need protection against terrorism. there is the possibility of terrorists coming through our visa programs, but we can deal with that problem without confronting problems under the protection clause, the first amendment relating to religion, and statutes. there's a statute on the books that says visa shall not be denied based on religion. so this can be done much, much more carefully in a calibrated