Transcripts For CSPAN U.S. House Of Representatives U.S. House Of Representatives 20240713

217. A h. R. 182. A bill to extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National seashore Advisory Commission. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman, and the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, each will control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman. Mr. Huffman thank you, madam speaker. I ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on the measure under consideration. The speaker pro tempore without objection, so ordered. Mr. Huffman madam speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Huffman thank you. H. R. 182, introduced by representative bill keating of massachusetts, would reauthorize the Cape Cod National seashore Advisory Commission, which expired under current law in september of 2018. This bill would reauthorize and extend it until 2028. Since the National Seashore was originally created in 1961, it was actually the first National Seashore, its the second most beautiful National Seashore, but it was the first National Seashore created, the Advisory Commission has served as a main forum for consultation and coordination between local communities and the National Park service. Comprised of representatives from the six towns within the park, the commonwealth of massachusetts and the secretary of interior, this Advisory Commission gives surrounding communities a voice in the management of the seashore. So id like to thank representative keating for his leadership in introducing this important legislation, and i urge my colleagues to support h. R. 182. I reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves the balance of his time. The gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock thank you, madam speaker. I yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock madam speaker, i rise in support of h. R. 182, which extends the authorization of the Cape Cod National seashore Advisory Commission until 2028. It was established in 1961. It comprises more than 40,000 acres on came cod, massachusetts. The enabling legislation also provided for an Advisory Commission comprised of six cape cod communities located within the seashore and the county to consult with the secretary of the interior about the development of the seashore. This is as it should be. The federal government must be a Good Neighbor to the communities that its lands impact and consulting them as partners is a fundamental point of this principle. One of the unique aspects of this Advisory Commission is that the secretary of interior cannot issue commercial, industrial, or recreational permits without the advice of the commission as long as action is taken in a timely manner. In addition, the Commission Meets regularly with the park superintendent to discuss specific seashore issues and to advise him about seashore programs, facilities, and activities providing valuable local feedback to the National Seashore. This feedback helps to promote sound Park Management and improve Public Access and it ensures that the National Park service is a Good Neighbor to its surrounding communities. This is a model of how the federal governments land managers should be governed. My only regret is its provisions dont apply to every community affected by federal landholdings. Can i not help but note that the federal government owns just 1. 2 of massachusetts while giving great deference to its local communities. It owns 46 of my state of california and off gives local communities impacted by its lands a dismissive brush off which is typical of the experience of our western states. In fact, i take this opportunity to ask my colleagues from massachusetts to consider what would happen to their communities if the federal government took over half of the land in their state, removed it from the tax rolls, severely restricted any productive use of that land, and then thumbed its nose at the concerns and complaints of local communities . Thankfully this administration is taking a cooperative and supportive position in recent years and improved conditions greatly. But that doesnt guarantee that future administrations wont revert to the washington knows best approach thats produced no end of problems for the people of our western states. Id urge adoption of the measure and i reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves. The gentleman from california is ecognized. Madam speaker, i would like to yield to the representative from massachusetts who is honored to represent the second most beautiful National Seashore in america, mr. Keating for as much times may consume. The speaker pro tempore gentleman from massachusetts is recognized. Mr. Ing i rise in support of my mr. Keating i rise in support of my bill. Want to thank the chair from Natural Resources for yielding and i want to thank both of my colleagues from california for supporting this bill. Cape Cod National Seashore was created by president kennedy in 1961. His vision was to preserve the unique landscape of the outer cape for recreation and enjoyment for all americans. Forever. Today more than four million people, both americans and those from around the world, travel to cape cod every year to experience the National Beauty and recreation that the Cape Cod National seashore provides. However, when the national when the Cape Cod National seashore was proposed, it presented challenges to residents of cape cod. Unique to locating a National Park on a peninsula with a limited area and with very small communities within that area. Many of the communities in the outer cape the National Seashore was designed to occupy as much as 80 of the available land effectively foreclosing other Economic Development options after the park was established. And while the promise of president kennedys vision, the outer cape was realized with the National Seashore drawing millions of people from around the world to the cape, the importance of the Advisory Commission to the National Seashore and its Host Communities is still important today, as important as it was almost 60 years ago. The Advisory Commission was at the heart of president kennedys vision for the National Seashore. As he recognized that the Host Communities would need a voice, a voice in the National Seashore affairs after the park was formed. To this end it was important that the Host Communities retain a formal structure to advise seashore leadership and the park service about how actions taken within the park would affect them and their communities. And the reason for the powers granted the Advisory Commission in its enabling legislation are just as perfect swaysive perfect saysive today as it was. It affects the lives of thousands of my constituents in the Host Communities, those decisions should be made with the input of those communities. Some have suggested that the Authority Regarding the commercial activity granted to the seashore Advisory Commission and enabling legislation is no longer necessary. This is simply not the case. Suggestions that the value of having a regulatory unity among the National Park lands and various Advisory Commissions are unperfect saysive when one considers the unique nature of cape cod. Such a bureaucratic consideration could possibly outweigh the important benefits that the seashore Advisory Commission provides to my constituents is just laughable. Today just as in the 1960s, the unique nature of the outer cape represents the same challenges to those that live there with respect to the National Seashore. The most effective way to address the concerns of the outer Cape Community is to ensure that a functioning Advisory Commission is sitting and can continue to play its Important Role in the community. Long ago president kennedy envisioned what responsible selfgovernance looks like on the outer cape. A balance between the seashore, the towns, and a place where all parties could come together again in the spirit of sustaining the community as a whole. Thats the vision of the Advisory Commission. Over the past few years, the outer cape region has faced some of the toughest challenges with climate change, coastal erosion, ocean acidfication, and new concerns about sharks in the waters off cape cod. Cape codders are grapeling with. So most difficult issues to face the communities have seen in years. Under these circumstances, the commissions absence is felt every day. Thats why i ask my colleagues to support this straightforward piece of legislation. A bill thats been passed by this house in the last congress that will reactivate and effective tool thats provided an Important Role for the cape cod community, my community. For nearly 60 years. Thank you. I yield back. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from massachusetts yields back. The gentleman from california reserves. Le the gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock is my friend ready to close . Madam speaker, i ask for adoption of this measure and yield back the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields. The gentleman from california is recognized. Respectfully request an aye vote and i yield the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the question is, will the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h. R. 182. Those in favor say aye. Hose opposed say no. In the opinion of the chair, 2 3 of those voting having responded in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed, and without objection the motion to reconsider is laid pon the table. For what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition . I move that the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h. R. 255 as amended. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the bill. The clerk h. R. 255, a bill to provide for an exchange of lands with the San Bernardino county, california, to enhance management of lands within the San Bernardino National Forest, and for other purposes. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman, and the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, each will control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman. Mr. Huffman thank you, madam speaker. I ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days to revise and and include remarks extraneous material on the measure under consideration. The speaker pro tempore without objection, so ordered. Mr. Huffman madam speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Huffman h. R. 255 introduced by representative cook would authorize an equal Value Exchange between the u. S. Forest service in San Bernardino county. This exchange would enable the county to build a resource consequence tation and recovery facility. This will increase efficiency and safety of timber processing and recycling in that area. In return, the Forest Service would receive an undeveloped end holding in the San Bernardino National Forest. The bill is a perfect example of house, through a collaborative process, we can meet the needs of local stakeholders while continuing to protect our environment and public lands. So i would like to congratulate and thank my colleague, representative cook, for introducing this legislation. And urge my colleagues to support the bill. I reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock. Mr. Mcclintock thank you, mr. Speaker. I yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock mr. Speaker, h. R. 255, introduced by congressman cook of california, authorizes a locally supported equal value Land Exchange between the Forest Service and San Bernardino county. The countys proposed to convey an inland parcel within the San Bernardino National Forest to the Forest Service in exchange for land further north to be conveyed by the county. The land conveyed by the county will allow needed Forest Management infrastructure to be located closer to the forest and promote road safety by reducing the need to drive Forest Products down narrow, winding roads. H. R. 255 also authorizes cooperation between the county and the Forest Service to relocate a portion of the Pacific Crest National Scenic trail if needed and requires that the trail relocation be completed before the exchange is consummated. This legislation is the result of a congressman who has listened to the voices of his community and administration sympathetic to the plight of our polite of plight of our forest communities and representatives forward a reasonable and workable plan. I urge adoption of the measure and i reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california reserves. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. At this time i recognize for as much time as he may consume the gentleman from southern california, mr. Aguilar. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Aguilar thank you, mr. Speaker. I appreciate the gentleman from california offering me some time. And i want to thank representative cook as well for his efforts. I rise in support of the big bear Land Exchange act. My community in San Bernardino county experiences some of the highest levels of air pollution anywhere in the country. And in order to combat this pollution, we must find ways to reduce emissions in our region. And this bill will help us do just that. This Land Exchange between the county and the federal government will allow the establishment of a recycling and Recovery Center in my neighboring district, and this facility would decrease the long distances that trucks have to travel to dispose of waste and will allow us to divert this waste by repurposing recyclable materials. This legislation is good for our communities and is a smart way to help mitigate pollution and combat climate change. Id like to thank my colleague, representative cook, for his work in championing this bill, and for his bipartisan collaboration. Ive worked with mr. Cook on a number of issues representing San Bernardino county. Nobody is more thoughtful when it comes to what our future direction holds, and i know his heart is in San Bernardino county as well. And no one will ever doubt that about his intent. Just because he doesnt want to hang out here with us in this facility oftentimes doesnt mean that he isnt publicly driven and publicly minded in order to deliver for his constituents. This bill is one of those examples and i look forward to working with my colleague the remainder of the next 12 months and in the years ahead and i thank him for his efforts in this regard. Thank you, mr. Speaker. Mr. Huffman i reserve. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves the balance of his time. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california. Mr. Mcclintock i share my colleagues high words of praise and warmth for our colleague, mr. Cook, the author of this measure. And i am also somewhat annoyed with him for his decision to leave the congress at the end of this session, for the county board of supervisors. With that, im pleased to yield to him such time as he may consume. The speaker pro tempore the chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Cook. Mr. Cook thank you, mr. Speaker. Thank you, mr. Mcclintock, for yielding your time. You know, i had my speech all prepared, but im not sure whether its a San Bernardino lovefest or a beatup on paul cook because hes leaving this institution. This is an example, Everybody Knows that you can Work Together , you can put your differences aside and get things done. I pride myself on that. Im very, very passionate about certain things. This bill, it sounds simple, but the pollution going up and down that hill, but more so, anyone thats lived in a Mountain Community knows how dangerous it is. Particularly in the winter. More so with a truck with timber on it. The number of accidents that we have on those roads up there and just deaths every year the deaths every year. Weve always had problems and its something im very, very concerned about. I do want to commend working with the Pacific Crest trail association, to Work Together so we could iron out some of these things. The relocation as i think already mentioned will include Environmental Review and will take care before the exchange takes place. And weve got a lot of people on this. In the city of big bear lake, the friends of big bear valley, big bear fire department. By the way, theres big bears up there. If you havent met one there, stay off the highways. Anyway, the Big Bear City Community Services department, the water district, the Community Health care, the chamber of commerce, and the local big bear chapter of the c. R. Club sierra club, and theyve been great on this. Passed out of the House Resources Committee on a unanimous bipartisan vote last december, nearly identical language. Passed out of the house as h. R. 5513, with overwhelming bipartisan support. And i appreciate the comments, even the sarcastic comments of my colleagues, and i truly am going to miss this institution. Thank you. The speaker pro tempore does the gentleman yield . Mr. Mcclintock mr. Speaker, i assure my friend, theyre not sarcastic. He will be sorely missed in this house. With that, i wonder if my friend is prepared to close. Mr. Huffman i am. Mr. Mcclintock then i yield back the balance of my time and urge adoption of this measure. And urge my colleague to to change his mind and come back next session. Mr. Cook talk to my wife. The speaker pro tempore the chair recognizes the gentleman from california. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I want to associate myself with the other comments about how much we are going to miss colonel cook. We respect him, we admire him, were amused by him. Let the record show he just called the sierra club great. I want that to be noted. And although hes found a way through this bill to create an equal Value Exchange, something tells me that in the exchange of colonel cook, because were losing him, the county of San Bernardino is making out a lot better than this institution. So i wish him well. Urge a yes vote on his good bill. And i will yield back the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. The question is, will the house suspend the rules and pass h. R. 255, as amended. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, 2 3 of those voting having responded in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed and, without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid n the table. For what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition . Rough rough mr. Speaker, i move that the rough rough mr. Huffman mr. Speaker, i move that the house suspend the rules and pass the bill, h. R. 263, as amended. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title. Does the gentleman claim to pass the text at the desk . Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I ask unanimous consent that all members have five legislative days the speaker pro tempore the entleman will suspend. The text at the desk is not amendment. Does the gentleman plan to pass the text at the desk . Mr. Huffman then, of course. Mr. Speaker, i move that the house suspend the ruse and pass the bill, as written the rules and pass the bill as written. The clerk house calendar 45. H. R. 263. A bill to rename the Oyster Bay National Wildlife refuge as the congressman lester wolff Oyster Bay National Wildlife refuge. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman, and the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, each will control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I ask unanimous consent that all members have five legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include ex trainious material on the measure extraneous material on the measure under consideration. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Huffman mr. Speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. This bill would rename the Oyster Bay National Wildlife refuge in new york as the congressman lester wolff Oyster Bay National Wildlife refuge. A longtime congressman from long island, congressman wolff was instrumental in creating this refuge and protecting it from unnecessary development. Thanks to his hard work and vision, the oyster bay refuge is an important stopover for wintering water fowl and its also a popular destination for Outdoor Recreation enthusiasts. At 100 years old, congressman wolff is the oldest living member of congress. This bill is a fitting tribute to him for his years of conservation leadership, and i urge its adoption and i reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves the balance of his time. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock. Mr. Mcclintock thank you, mr. Speaker. I yield sufficient time as i may consume sufficient time as i may consume such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock this bill renames the oyster bay wildlife refuge in honor of congressman lester wolff. A form long island north shore congressman. It is certainly appropriate to recognize and honor congressman wolffs distinguished eightterm career representing the people of new york by adding his name to the wildlife refuge that he fought so hard to create. This refuge has become a popular destination for Many Americans to enjoy the wildlife and beauty of our outdoor spaces, and add 100 years of age at 100 years of age, congressman wolff has the distinction of being the oldest living member of congress. Its fitting we honor man so dedicated and who has put so much of his life to fighting and protect and serve this place and fighting for his constituency. Id urge adoption of the measure and i reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves the balance of his time. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Chair. Id like to yield 2005 minutes to my colleague, the gentleman from new york, mr. Swawsy. Suozzi. The speaker pro tempore the chair recognizes the gentleman from new york. Mr. Souzzi thank you, mr. Speaker. And thank you, mr. Huffman, for allowing me this time. I rise today in support of this bill that ive sponsored, a bipartisan bill, h. R. 263, which has been mentioned, would rename the Oyster Bay National Wildlife refuge as the congressman lester wolff Oyster Bay National Wildlife refuge. I want to thank chairman grijalva and congressman huffman and my colleagues on the Natural Resources committee for their work on this bill, as well as the mens of the new york delegation, all of whom are cosponsors of and support this legislation. Congressman lester wolff, who represented my district for 16 years, is our nations oldest living former congressman, and in january he will turn 101 years old. The renaming of the Oyster Bay National Wildlife ref new jersey his honor is in recognition of his monumental contributions to the preservation and protection of our environment. These precious wetlands that congressman lester wolffs urging were protected in 1968. It was 1967 that the new York State Legislature at the insistence of thengovernor nelson rockefeller, and the master planner, robert mow serks authorized a bridge moses, authorized a bridge across the Long Island Sound. Lester immediately saw the bridge would spoil this pristine and Precious Resource of the Long Island Sound and soon found himself at the center of an enormous political fight. Lester eventually won this fight and the oyster bay wildlife refuge was born. Today it covers over 3,200 acres of one of the most important areas for natural refuge anywhere on the north shore of long island and is home to many endangered species. Not only was lester a champion for our environment, he also served our nation honorably in our military. He served in the Civil Air Patrol during world war ii and commanded the congressional squadron of the Civil Air Patrol, rising to the rank of colonel. In 2014 wolff received the congressional gold medal, the highest civilian award. I urge my colleagues to also support this legislation so we may honor this great congressman whose efforts were an important part of our nations environmental history. And i yield back our time. Thank you. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california reserve . Mr. Huffman i do. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california reserves. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock. Tick tick is my friend ready to close mr. Mcclintock is my friend ready to close . Mr. Huffman ready to close. Mr. Mcclintock then i yield back the balance of my time and ask for adoption of the measure. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Chairman. I will just close by commending representative suozzi for his Bipartisan Initiative to horn the legacy of congressman lester wolff. I urge a yes vote on this bill and i yield back the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the question is, will the house suspend the rules and pass the bill, h. R. 263. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, 2 3 of those voting having responded in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed and, without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. For what purpose does the gentleman rise . Mr. Huffman i move that the house suspend the rules and pass h. R. 737, as amended. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the bill. The clerk h. R. 737, a bill to prohibit the sale of shark fins, and for other purposes. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman, and the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, each will control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I also ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days to revise and includeheir remarks and extraneous material on the measure under consideration. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Huffman thank you. I yield myself such time as i may consume. Mr. Speaker, this bill would make it illegal to possess, buy, or sell shark fins in the United States. Now, everyone knows sharks are in trouble. Around the globe, one quarter of sharks and their relatives are threatened with extinction. They are being caught and killed on average 30 faster than they can reproduce. In large part due to the demand for their fins to fuel the global shark fin trade. The fin from as many as 73 million sharks entered the shark fin trade every single year. As top predators in the oceans, they play a Critical Role in ecosystems, impacting our fisheries, coral reefs, and tourism economies. The concern for declining shark populations and the impact of their loss and impact that loss has on ecosystems and tourism alike has led to increased efforts to conserve sharks globally. Including no take marine reserves. Species specific fishing bans, and shark fin trade bans. While the United States has banned the practice of shark fining, we have not banned the buying and selling of shark fins, which means that we are still part of the problem. States and the private sector are catching on. Already 12 states, three territories, 48 airlines, and 20 Major International shipping companies and other corporations such as amazon, disney, hilton, and grubhub have all refused to partake in that trade that devastates shark populations around the world. Just this year, canada passed a similar bill. In large part thanks to our efforts here. That is the intention of this bill. When the United States steps up to lead, others will follow. H. R. 737 would build on the leadership of these states, territories, and companies by eliminating shark fin sales and possession in the United States. In addition to its 287 bipartisan cosponsors, this bill enjoys the support of Recreational Fishing interests, aquariums, over 150 scientists, 150 chefs, over 300 dive businesses, and over 130 nonprofits. With this overwhelming support and at a time when so many shark populations are depleted, its of utmost importance that we pass this legislation. So i want to commend congressman sablan for his leadership and also congressman mccall for his leadership on this bill. And i urge my colleagues to support it. With that i reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california reserves. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock. Mr. Mcclintock thank you, mr. Speaker. I yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Mcclintock mr. Speaker, this legislation is a Bumper Sticker bill purports to save the sharks but in reality would damage shark fisheries, destroy american jobs, and increase the threats to endangered species. Lets first define what we agree on. Killing a shark solely to take its fins is contemptible. It is immoral. Herman melville called such wanton waste blasphemous. This practice is already illegal under federal law. Its been that way since 1993. American fishermen are not the villains in this story, they are heroes who are add hearing to rigorous regular lace that is require them to account for the full use of their catches. So what does this bill do . It does exactly what it purports to you abhor. Proponents rightly denounce taking the fins, and then throwingway the carcass, so they have come up with bail that would take the carcass but throwway the fins. This bill makes it illegal to possess or purchase a shark fin. The fins are 50 of the value of the catch. If you force shark fishermen to waste literally 50 of the value of their catch, you remove their margin and destroy their enterprise. This does little to stop the illegal trade of shark fin since almost all of the demand is in east and southeast asia, and that market will simply apply upward pressure on the illegal taking of shark fins. The responsible management of our u. S. Fisheries and the exemplary conduct of u. S. Fishermen has resulted in a Great Success story. Since 2,000 the domestic shark population has been growing. The indecks shark abundance in 2015 was the highest in its 29year history. If you force fishermen to throw away 50 of the value of each shark they catch, one of two things is going to happen. Stay in business theyll have to take more and more sharks to make up for their loss, or more likely for american fishermen, theyll simply go out of usiness. If its the latter we can expect outofcontrol explosion in shark populations with devastating consequences for endangered marine species like the right whale. In either case american fishermen will suffer to the advantage of the unregulated, illegal foreign fishing fleets. This is an example of two developments that we have had to watch on the Natural Resources committee since the democrats took control. The first is their tendency to cater to emotional pressure groups who have been successful at raising large sums of money by tugging at the heartstrings of gullable donors, but whose bromides end up doing enormous harm to the population they purport to protect. The Wildlife Conservation society recently submitted a letter warning of this signed by 60 of our nations leading scientific experts in shark, science, and fisheries. The second is the tendency to blame Americans First for the excesses and predayses of bad foreign actors. Time and again american fishermen, american growers, and American Consumers have proven to be the lawabiding conservation minded responsible practitioners of sustainable practice. But the democrats continue to impose punitive and destructive measures on this to atone for the irresponsible actions of foreign nations. I urge rejection of the measure and i reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california reserves. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I would just note in california where i authored a very similar ban on the possession, sale, and trade of shark fins, the sky has not fallen. The world has not ended. All of the calamities my friend predicted have not taken place. And guess what . There continues to be a sustainable shark fishery for the meat without contributing to the global shark fin trade that is driving the decimation of shark populations around the world. With that i would yield five minutes to the gentleman, mr. Sablan, the author of this bill. The speaker pro tempore the chair recognizes mr. Sablan. Mr. Sablan thank you very much, mr. Speaker. I rise in support of my bill, h. R. 737, the shark fin sales elimination act. The act bans the buying and selling of shark fins in the United States. And this wildly supported bipartisan bill has gathered 287 hasponsors a companion bill been introduced in the senate as well. This is the largest number of cosponsors for any Ocean Conservation bill so far in this congress. I want to thank my good friend and the distinguished member from texas, the honorable michael mccaul, who has worked tirelessly with me on the bill and brings with him the support of 68 members from his side of the aisle. This bill has such strong support because it represents an effective way to remove the United States from the devastation devastating global trade in shark fins. At zero cost. And because it does so without stopping those who want to fish for sharks and use them for their meat. Mr. Speaker, sharks are absolutely critical to life in the ocean. As apex predators, they help maintain balance by keeping prey populations in check. They are also critical to the economy of our coastal communities. In florida alone, tourists go diving to see sharks generate more than 200 times the value of the trade in shark fins for our entire country. 200 times the value. Despite their importance economically sharks are in serious trouble. Each year fins from up to 73 million sharks are sliced off and sold in the Global Marketplace. Le and largely due to this command and largely due to this demand for fin, some shark species population have declined by more than 90 . Our nation has widely banned the inhumane practice of fining sharks and throwing them back into the ocean to drown and die. Yet we still allow fins to be bought and sold here. And many of the fins we are buying and selling comes from countries that simply do not have the same level of protection the United States gives sharks. Now is the time for us to take the next step. Only by banning the shark fin trade once and for all within our borders can we ensure we are no longer supporting an unsustainable use of ocean resources. Recognizing this unsustainability, the northern Mariana Islands, my home, was the very first insular area to ban the trade of shark fins in 2011. As an island culture, 3,000plus years old, the people understand and respect the Important Role that sharks play in maintaining our life the life of our oceans. And we are not alone. 12 u. S. States and two territories have also passed their own shark fin bans. But this can be challenging to enforce. And this is so this is why we need a federal ban on the shark fin trade in the United States. And that is why im asking for your support today. A ban on the shark fin trade is supported by 45 domestic and international airlines, by 21 shipping companies. Seven major corporations, and more than 645 u. S. Businesses and organizations. A 2016 National Poll found four of five americans support a national ban on the buying and selling of shark fins. Hundreds of scientist, chefs, fishers, and surf businesses have written to congress requesting passage of the National Shark fin ban. It is time for this house to act. Please join me by voting yes on this critical bill. Vote yes conserve our oceans and the all important sharks that live in those waters. Thank you. I yield back my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california reserves. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock. Mr. Mcclintock thank you. Mr. Speaker, my friend from california says, well, californias ban hasnt resulted in any calamities. What he foregoats goetz is virtually all shark fisheries in the United States are found in florida, louisiana, and north carolina. Banning shark finning in california is like banning buffalo hunting inryry. There just isnt any. My friend from the marianas tells us that there are 73 million shark fins in the Global Market annually. Thats a very misleading statement. Comes from a report published by shelly clark. That report gives a range between 26 million and 73 million and makes no differentiation between legal and illegally obtained fins. Which unfortunately is a defect in this bill itself. For a different opinion, however, id now like to yield two minutes to my friend from texas, mr. Mccaul. The speaker pro tempore the chair recognizes the gentleman from texas, mr. Mccaul. Mr. Mccaul thank you, mr. Speaker. I thank the gentleman from california for yielding. I rise in support of this bill to help end the inhumane practice of shark fining. After shark fins are removed, these majestic creatures are thrown into the ocean to die. And multiple species face extinction. I want to thank my friend, congressman sablan, for his courageous leadership to introduce this bill, which i strongly support. The United States banned shark fining. Now we must end the shark fin trade. Major retarlse, airliners, and shipping companies refuse to ship or sell shark fin products. And 12 states including my home state of texas, have banned on shark fining trading. Its time for a federal ban, mr. Speaker. The United States led in ending the trade of trafficking ivory and rhino horns. Now we must lead to end the shark fin trade itself. I want to end and close with a personal thanks to my wife, linda, who is an oceanography, who spent many years serving our country in Naval Intelligence tracking soviet submarines, and now she tracks sharks by tagging sharks and following them around the world as they exist. As she told me when she returns from gaut lieu pay island, guadeloupe island, on the very same boat that beater benchly went out on as he saw the majestic great white shark, he said the greatest regret of his life was writing the book, jaws. I want to thank congressman sablan. I want to thank my wife, linda, and also thank her for her great testimony before this committee. I stand . Strong support. I hope my colleagues on both sides of the aisle will join us on this momentous day. I yield back the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yield. The gentleman from california reserves. The gentleman from california, mr. Huffman. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. Just another shout out to congressman mccaul and his wife, who was fantastic witness at the hearing we had on this bill at the Natural Resources committee. And also the leadership of the state of texas and so many other states, territories, and leaders in the private sector who understand we have to end this terribly wasteful and cruel global shark fin trade. With thade like to recognize the gentleman from south carolina, mr. Cunningham, for two minutes. The speaker pro tempore the chair recognizes the gentleman from south carolina, mr. Cunningham. Mr. Cunningham down in south country, we all understand the importance of a healthy ocean, healthy sharks are part of that story. Unfortunately, many populations sharks have severely declined due to the demand for their fin. In south carolina, we have not imported or exported any shark in recent years, and a large number of constituents ave contacted me in support of this legislation. Support for this ban is growing country. E 12 u. S. States already have shark fin bans. Companies are also refusing to ship or sell shark products. Just earlier this year, canada became the first g20 country to fin trade. Rk the United States has already banned the act of shark finning, continue to import fins from countries who dont have bans. Own finning and disturbingly, in the United States, our own Government Data that less than 20 of our are being stocks sustainably managed. So its time for the united its role in the shark fin trade and stop contributing to the decline of populations. Im grateful that congressman grijalva chairman from the Natural Resources committee and their leadership to his issue and also want thank the Foreign Affairs Committee Ranking member mccaul leadership. Ending the shark fin trade will a thousand ath by cuts, and we have the opportunity to make a big cut right now. Pass the shark fin sales reserveion act, and id the balance of my time. Mr. Huffman i reserve. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california reserves. The chair recognizes the california, mr. Mcclintock. Mr. Mcclintock thank you, mr. Speaker. My friend from texas compared fins to banning ivory. The difference is the u. S. Was a ivory. Onsumer of its 1 of the entire global shark fin market. Three w pleased to yield minutes to the gentleman from louisiana, mr. Graves. Tempore the o chair recognizes the gentleman from louisiana, mr. Graves. Mr. Graves thank you, mr. Speaker. To thank the gentleman from california for yielding. I want to be upfront. Ive caught dozens of sharks in my life. I have released every single one of them intact. Ive never gone shark fishing. It was an unintentional catch. Soup. Never had shark fin nor do i have any intention or those. To have any of but i do represent a state that shark industry that those. Ably harvests mr. Speaker, i think that its to actually go to scientists, to go to fisheries to get their opinion on what it is that we ought to be doing here. Ask o mr. Speaker, i unanimous consent to include in the record a letter from our administrationor where they talk about this bill and they say as long as in onsible management is place, which is currently the case for the sharks in the gulf need for there is no this legislation. The practice of shark finning is lready illegal in the United States and louisiana and it has been since 2000. Waste of would have legally harvested shark parts by fishermen to not not effect bill will global shark fin markets or further l encourage development of unregulated harvests to replace the landings. U. S. Ask peaker, i go on to unanimous consent to include in the record a National Geographic article from this year that has from the moet Marine Laboratory in florida. Shark , the director of research for that institute where he says, the folks that for the fin ban Campaign Want to simplify it to the simple message. The trade in the United States we save sharks all around the world. Simplistic and so wrong. It would cost fishermen would ave to throw fins in the dumpsters and goes against the octrine of full utilization projects when we harvest fish from the sea, we want to use everything we can. A Marine Conservation biologist frazier Simon University talks, also, about how this is a flawed approach actually lays out an alternative, which my friend from florida, congressman advocated for, as laboratory marine director of the science at the Shark Institute there has for as well. Mr. Speaker, no one here this body thatin supports the concept of shark finning. Be clear on that. No one here supports this concept of finning a shark and letting the rest of it drop to the bottom and die. No one does. Got to understand that our entire Fisheries Management practice, the state of louisiana having one of the largest commercial fisheries in the part of this is the speaker pro tempore the gentlemans time has expired. Mr. Mcclintock i yield the gentleman 30 seconds. Part of the this is overall consideration. Yet, this bill attempts to gut harvesting, legally sustainable shark harvesting, hats part of the overall Fisheries Management practice and doesnt take into conversation what that impact what will have. This bill is not the right approach. I agree with the objective. All were doing here is pushing illegally harvested species to as opposed to truly stopping the problem. There are successful efforts hat are out there that are demonstrated to work, whereas this is simply, again, going to harvesting. Gal i yield back. Mr. Mcclintock i reserve the balance. Withoutker pro tempore objection, the letter will be entered into the record. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman, is recognized. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. F this is a question that requires us to listen to the experts and the scientists about shark fin the global trade, then its not much a debate. 150 scientists are on record supporting this bill, and consensus exists among eaders at aquariums, academic institutions, and other places. With that, mr. Speaker, id like to recognize the gentleman from minutes. Or four the speaker pro tempore the gentleman from oregon is recognized. Mr. Blumenauer i appreciate the gentlemans courtesy, his our friend in the moving this legislation forward. This is leadership in terms of practice. Global my colleague from louisiana understates the power that the has in terms of right. Our policies yes, we have outlawed shark in 2010, but the International Traffic continues, next need to take this step. This is a progression of efforts animal nd deal with welfare. This is one of the first whether its ear, illegal poaching, ivory trade, species. Gered we have been able to set the on a global stage to be able to change the die am in aics, to dynamics, to change the perception. Sharks are declining globally. There may be a species or two overall, this but apex predator species, so mportant for the health of the ecosystem, is imperilled, and imperiled, and the practice of shark finning is part of this. About defining while theyre still alive, discarding in the water, which is a very common practice. My state states of oregon is one where people tepped up and ended this barbaric practice. E have mobilized voting initiatives where we deal with problems of trafficking with species. Ts proven that our action in 2010 prohibiting the taking of was not enough as long as his global trade continues unchecked. There still is a market for the fins in the United States and world, and its fueled by imports sourced from ll over the world, including locations with no ban. Were one of the top 15 shark importing nations. Who knew . Likely ult, its highly that shark fins sold in the United States came from sharks finned. E been brutally i am pleased that were taking action to do the right thing and trade of shark fins. And i hope the senate takes this passes it soly and we can get it enacted into law. One of the things we could with. Ly agree you heard the bipartisan support evidenced here today. I hope that we can continue forward with an Animal Welfare agenda. Series of bills on a thesan basis that are prepared act, to help Animals National disaster. The wildlife antitrafficking combat wildlife trafficking. The anti the safe act, to slaughter. Se we have these bipartisan pieces f legislation with major sources of cosponsors. Go. re teed up, ready to i hope this passes today with overwhelming support, and it is more step as we implement an Animal Welfare agenda thats one of the areas where we can Work Together on a bipartisan basis o make the world a little better. Thank you and i yield back. Mr. Huffman i thank the gentleman, and i reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves the balance his time. The gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock thank you, mr. Speaker. We hear a lot about the letters signed by 150 scientists in bill. T of this we ought to point out that only scientists 0 actually are scientists with expertise in shark fisheries, one of the scientists who signed the Wildlife Conservation Society Letter in are ition to this bill recognized in active professional shark researchers professionals in the field. With that im pleased to yield four minutes to my colleague from florida, mr. Webster. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from florida is recognized. Mr. Ebster thank you, mcclintock, for yielding. Thank you, mr. Speaker. To se today in opposition. R. 737, the shark fin sales elimination act. As a floridian, a member of the ouse Natural Resources committee, promoting shark conservation has long been a priority of mine. I am glad to see sharks receiving national attention. Crucial role in our oceans ecosystem and, yet, face a grave threat. Ofrk finning, cruel practice capturing sharks, clipping the fins, and casting the rest of it in the ocean. H his practice is cruel and inhumane. Florida was one of the first states i was a member of the egislature 30 years almost 30 years ago when we banned as one of the first states to finning. Since then, finning has become completely illegal in the United States. Unfortunately, finning still occurs in unregulated waters globe. Round our h. R. 737 will do nothing to being finneds from in those areas. Would require american fishermen who legally and responsibly land sharks to or discard the fins leading to a terrible waste. Any scientists, conservationists and commercial opposed have vocally this bill and has said it is not it will not advance shark restoration or stop the practice of finning. His bill would have a devastating effect on responsible american fishermen, many in our my own district in florida who have and sacrifices to conserve rebuild our shark populations. A separate bill, an lternative, h. R. 788, one that has been sponsored and supported by senator rubio in the senate is probably the key bill there for this particular issue. Sale of f banning the humane sourced shark fins, my encourage bad actors in the shark fin market to sciencebased Management Systems for shark conservation. My bill requires any nation shark, ray xport steak to be to the united by es to first be certified noaa that it is conservation in as conservation policies place that rise to the standards f u. S. Fishermen and that forbid nations practice of shark finning. The u. S. Plays an Important Role on the world stage in fishing management and conservation. Would remove the u. S. From the shark fin market. Leading silence the voice in shark fin shark conservation. My bill would amplify it and fins enter into the United States. I urge my colleagues to make the for sustaining shark populations long term and oppose bill before lawed us today. I yield back. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california, mr. Houghman, is recognized. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I want to thank mr. Webster for his engagement on this issue. I think his intentions are noble. I think he wants to help end the global shark fin trade. Unfortunately, though, his bill just wont work. We did incorporate some of that bill. The part, frankly, that would not cost a lot of money. By doing so we added skates and rays to the sea forward import monitoring program. Thats a good suggestion. Because skates and rays are also not doing well globally and they deserve our attention. But the rest of the bill is extensionive, cumbersome, and frankly its just extensive, cumbersome, and frankly its not going to work. It would require a complicated certification scheme that might sound good on paper but we know the real world that we live in. In marine Fisheries Management in the United States right now, we are years, sometimes decades behind having the resources we need for adequate and timely stock assessments, even for the fisheries that we are already trying to manage right now. So the idea we would somehow be able to do this, be able to afford it, and also do it in a way that we could comply within this country so we could hold other countries around the world to that standard. If we are unable to do all of that stuff, then requiring other countries to meet that standard would trigger a w. T. O. Violation and we would do nothing to help end the global shark fin trade. I appreciate the gentlemans interest in this issue. I know that florida has been said to be the heart of the opposition to this bill, but we should note that 19 members of the florida delegation support this bill, including six republicans in the florida delegation. With that i reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves. The gentleman from california. Mr. Mcclintock is my friend ready to close . Mr. Huffman yes, i am. Mr. Mcclintock mr. Speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock lets be very clear killing a shark for a fin while throwing away the rest of the carcass is contemptible, immoral, wrong, and it has been illegal and banned in the United States since 1993. American fish american dont do this. American fishermen do do this. It this bill does something very different. It requires american fishermen to throw away the fins when they kill a shark. That is just as wasteful and despicable and its not going to stop foreign bad actors. It will kill american fishing. It will destroy the livelihoods of americans who have followed the law and who are responsibly accounting for their entire catch. It is not going to help our domestic shark populations. They are doing quite fine. Noaa currently manages 42 shark species along with the commercial and recreational shark fisheries. None of these 42 species in the atlantic are listed as endangered under the endangered species act. The most recent results of the noaa fisheries longest running shark survey showed our domestic populations increasing with scientists capturing and tagging more than ever before. Its a shame that we are here to blame american fishermen who are following all of the laws and doing everything right. And remember this. Under h. R. 737 sharks can still be legally caught in u. S. Waters. However, there will be they will be forced to cut off the fins and throw them into the garbage. Ask yourself is this right . Congress has long supported the full utilization of landed sea foord in order to obtain the maximum economic value of our limited marine resources, all consistent with the magnusonstevenson act. This would result in little more than wasted resource. The administration opposes this legislation, it writes, we cannot support the shark fin sale elimination act of the bills negative impact on u. S. Fishermen that would outweigh its minimal benefit to shark conservation. This would hurt u. S. Fishermen who currently harvest and sell sharks and shark fins in a sustainable manner under strict federal management. Industry opposes this legislation. They write, h. R. 737 would effectively put an end to all shark fishing. The revenue realized from fin sales can comprise up to 50 of a large coastal sharks value requiring the discarded or destruction of the shark fins is also wasteful, both as a Food Resource and Economic Resource that helps sustain rural coastal fishing communities here in america. It has long been the policy of congress to encourage full utilization of landed catch in order to obtain the maximum economic value of our limited marine resources. Finally, scientists oppose this legislation. Two of the leading scientists in the field write, if the shark fin trade in the United States were completely eliminated, the direct impact on reducing global shark mortality would likely be insignificant. The elimination of United States supplied fins in World Markets would opet door to increased market share for illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing nations not practicing sustainable shark fishing, including those that have not yet prohibited fining. This fining. This legislation follows a familiar theme we hear from the other side. Blame Americans First for the worlds problems. This legislation is the definition of the solution in search of a problem. Sorry some of my republican colleagues have been convinced to support this legislation, but i hope that todays debate has shined a bit of truth on the issue. Let me just quote from the Humane Society quickly. Their reasoning for this legislation is that the United States is a robust market for shark fins, many of which likely were obtained through fining, thats the end of their quote. Let me state again, likely were obtained . This is the science and data we are using to support this legislation, likely were obtained . Mind you we make up less than 1 of the Global Market. Shark fining will continue across the rest of the global and will continue to focus on the market in south and southeast asia. And we will have lost our ability to manage our resources and support our local fishing industries. Id ask my colleagues to oppose this misguided and misconceived legislation and yield back the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. The gentleman from california. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. Again i agree with my friend, we should listen to the scientists. Not the two that my friend cited in his closing arguments, but how about the over 150 that are on record in support of this bill . We should listen to them. We should listen to the many states and territories and other nations, including recently canada, our neighbor to the north. We should listen to the many Corporate Leaders around the world, all of whom have reached the inevitable conclusion if you are serious about ending this wasteful and inhumane and horrific practice of shark fining, then you have to tackle the shark fin trade. You have to ban the possession and sale of shark fins. Because if you dont, we know here in the United States we have banned the practice of shark fining for years, and yet we have continued to be part of and contribute to the global shark fin trade because we dont ban the possession and trade and sale of the fin itself. Thats what this bill does. In terms of u. S. Fishermen who are, as my friend says, following the laws and doing everything right, well, the good news is, they are going to be just fine under this law. We know that because in states like california and oregon and texas and other places folks who want to continue fishing for shark meat have been able to do so even though those states have passed bans just like this on the possession, trade, and sale of shark fins. This is a good bill. Its an overwhelmingly bipartisan bill. Its a bill that includes support from 19 members of the florida delegation, including six republicans from that delegation. I urge my colleagues to vote yes. I yield the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. All time has expired. The question is, will the house suspend the rules and pass h. R. 737, as amended. So many as are in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. Mr. Mcclintock i ask for the yeas and nays. The speaker pro tempore being in the affirmative. In the opinion of the chair the rules are suspended the bill is passed. The gentleman from california is requesting a recorded vote. The yeas and nays are requested. Those in favor of taking this vote by the yeas and nays will rise and remain standing until counted. A sufficient number having arisen, the yeas and nays are ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, further proceedings on this uestion will be postponed. For what purpose does the gentleman from marianas seek recognition 1234 mr. Sablan mr. Speaker, i move that the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h. R. 925 as amended. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the bill. Clerk it the speaker pro tempore does the gentleman wish to call the bill introduced . Mr. Sablan as introduced. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the bill. The clerk Union Calendar number 229, h. R. 925, a bill to extend the operation authorization of appropriations for allocation to carry out approved Wetlands Conservation projects under the north american Wetlands Conservation act through fiscal year 2024. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from california, the marianas, mr. Sablan, and the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, will each ontrol 20 minutes. The gentleman recognizes the gentleman from marianas. Mr. Sablan i ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on the measure under consideration. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Sablan mr. Speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Sablan thank you, mr. Speaker. This bill would reauthorize the north american Wetlands Conservation act. A Partnership Based program delivers demon federal funds to protect and restore wetland and associated habitat. Nawca has enjoyed bipartisan support in the past and this bill is no exception. The bill authorizes nawca for five years at 600 million per year. Nawca is considered one of the most costeffective conservation programs. Its federal invested in nawca is typically matched by more than 3 from nonfederal partners. At the local and state level, including corporations, private landowners, and nonprofits. 2929. 8 nawca, almost million acres of habitat have been protected. I reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves. The gentleman from california. Mr. Mcclintock mr. Speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock thank you, mr. Speaker. H. R. 925 reauthorizes conservation projects under the north american Wetlands Conservation act through fiscal year 2024. It i readily concede this is a popular program. Even without an authorization, the appropriators put 42 million into this last year. The sponsors of the bill obviously want more, authorizing 60 million a year. Thats higher than any appropriation to date. I am concerned that in a time when we are running record and perilous deficits, that we ought to consider the level which some of these programs should be funded. Much of the money nawca is used for conservation easements and wetlands to benefit Migratory Birds and fish. According to the fish and wildlife service, the program has within fitted almost 30 million acres of wetland habitat in north america since its inception po years ago. Its a very good thing. Heres the problem. The federal government has already landlord to 640 million acres of the country and is doing a poor job of maintaining what we already have. For example, the National Park service is facial nearly 12 billion deferred maintenance backlog and the question i would raise today is whether we really need to authorize increased funding to buy even more land. It would be one thing if congress had taken strong action to address this backlog by moving h. R. 1225, by congressman rob bishop, the former chairman and currently Ranking Member of Natural Resources, that was a favorably reported bill. It has an overwhelming 329 bipartisan cosponsors. That bill would take excess funds from new Energy Development and target these deteriorating lands so that people as well as Migratory Birds and fish can enjoy them. I recognize that h. R. 925 simply authorizes an existing program, but its imperative to take into account the realities that our current federal lands are facing. Acquiring more land when we cant take care of the land we already control is not a wise use of our resources. And i reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from the northern mariana. Mr. Sablan id like to yield four minutes to my colleague from california, mr. Thompson, sponsor of the bill. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california is recognized for four minutes. Mr. Thompson i thank the for yielding. Mr. Speaker, i rise in strong upport of my bill, h. R. 925, the north american Wetlands Conservation extension act. My colleague, congressm congressman wittman of virginia, cosponsoring this measure with me and for his leadership on this issue, not just on this bill, but on this issue. A stalwart and he works extremely hard on making sure our wetlands and our protected. S are so thank you. As members. Mying are a as members of the myratory Bird Conservation help fund nawca. Share a ommission, we responsibility to ensure that veryone in america can use and can enjoy the Natural Resources that belong to all of us. 1989, north american grantss conservation act have funded close to 3,000 more ts carried out by than 6,000 partners. Every year, restoration and projects, funded by nik with a, support nawca, jobs across our country, from fisheries, to ogists, engineers, construction teams and supply retailers. Grants require a 11 nonfederal match, and over past federal years, 1. 6 billion in federal funding has matched more than 3 1 with contributed by nonfederal partners. Been sults so far has 29. 8 million achers acres, an area of the size of rehabilitated f and restored wetlands. Bidiversity biodiversity while allowing hunt, to fish, to hike, to bird watch, to farm and to ranch. Activity ing economic exceeds 5 billion every year. Dont use these lands directly benefit. Natural provide processes that allow us to have supplies. Ntiful water wetlands protect the lands absorbing by floodwaters and storm surges. Nawca so eauthorizes we can continue the critical work on north americas wetlands that offer tremendous ecological and economic benefits to each of us. Ry one i ask that you support nawca continue ake sure we to conserve our public land. Lets Work Together today on americans now and for future generations. I speaker, thank you and yield back the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back. Marianas man from the reserve. The gentleman from california. Mr. Mcclintock mr. Speaker, im pleased to yield such time to the y consume gentleman from virginia, mr. Wittman. The speaker pro tempore the entleman from virginia is recognized for such time as he may consume. Mr. Wittman thank you, mr. Speaker. Want to rise, also, in strong support of h. R. 925, the north american Wetlands Conservation act, and also like to thank mr. Thompson for his thisordinary leadership on legislation and for his service n the migratory Bird Conservation commission. As he spoke about, he has a passion to make sure we are habitat we all value, the wildlife that lives the Migratory Birds but the other life it supports. Its important we continue this program. True success e stories in conservation in our nation and, again, i want to his mr. Thompson for leadership. This bill works to reduce disappearance and to conserve Migratory Bird habitat. We in d part of it is setting aside this land now redominantly use conservation ease elements easements as a mechanism to do so. Chairmans the concern about more acres of land in the federal inventory and the takes to maintain that land. We absolutely have to address that. But the good news here is many these acres are in conservation easements which stay in private ownership. They have an easement from the federal government to maintain habitat. Ical thats really the best of both worlds as well as leveraging private dollars with this. What a great example of how to leverage public dollars with private dollars. Ago the duck said, in mass came and listen, we want to have the the sary dollars to match federal dollars that go into this program. Ombra ordinarily successful extraordinarily successful. People from birdwatchers to hunters said, listen, we want to more of our dollars into it. Again, we are using their tax dollars to leverage those this e dollars for critical habitat. Our wetlands across the united natures e mother filters for the water that comes off the land and also mother nurseries for all the critical wildlife that lives there. Birds and other critters that are critical to these environments. Disappearing at an alarming rate. This bill helps us stem the loss wetlands. As i said, the leveraging of private resources is critical. I think congress should be doing more to identify these types of nawca, programs, like that have proven to be successful. A lot atches funding by of contributors in the Conservation Community to continue these successes. Do more of that. Protecting and restoring and habitats is and critically important. I would argue of all the habitat out there, this on the scale of value has the the value across not just United States but across the planet. We have to do more to make sure were preserving that. Critical we invest efficiently to conserve these efficiently ing means lefrmging that one leveraging that one public dollar to three private dollars we want to make sure were preserving these areas for use, generations. Unfortunately, wetlands continue to disappear at an alarming rate. His helps stem the disappearance of those wetlands, so id ask my colleagues to support this legislation and, i yield er, with that ack the back my time to the chairman. Mr. Mcclintock and i reserve. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves. Mr. Speaker. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from the northern Mariana Islands is recognized. Mr. Sablan thank you, mr. Speaker. Id like to commend epresentatives thompson and represent representative thompson and representative wittman for their work on this bill. No further requests for time and i would inquire whether remaining e has any speakers on his side. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california is recognized. R. Mcclintock thank you, mr. Speaker. I yield myself the balance of the time. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Mcclintock mr. Speaker, popular ndoubtedly a program. It does well serve public and use, the very purpose of our public lands, and i certainly dont oppose it. To close about this warning. We are continuing to acquire land while we are failing to take care of the already estates that we hold. Louie gohmert, my colleague on the Natural Resources committee, compared our federal lands policy to the old miser in town mansion is delapidated, yard overgrown with weeds his time spends all and money plotting how he would take his neighbors property. I would hope that the bipartisan for this bill will be accompanied soon with bipartisan mr. Bishops bill, h. R. 1225, that would actually resources that we are generating from the public lands to assure that we are taking of our public lands back. Th that i yield the speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back. He gentleman from the northern Mariana Islands is recognized. Mr. Sablan mr. Speaker, i urge this bill and yield back the remainder of my time as well. The speaker pro tempore the yields back. The question is will the house uspend the rules and pass the 925. H. R. Those as amended. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. Chair, 2 3ion of the having responded in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed, and without objection the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. For what purpose does the california seek recognition . Mr. Huffman mr. Speaker, i move the house suspend the rules bill h. R. 1088. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of bill. Does the gentleman wish to call amended . Ll as mr. Huffman i dont believe there are amendments to this speaker. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the in huffman as amended committee. I stand corrected, mr. Speaker. As speaker pro tempore amended in committee. The clerk will report the title of the bill. The clerk Union Calendar 220, h. R. 1088, a bill to offer the society of the first make ry division to modifications to the First Division monument located on in president ial park in the district of columbia and for other purposes. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the california, mr. Huffman, and the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, will each control 20 minutes. The gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I ask unanimous consent that five legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on the matter under consideration. The speaker pro tempore without objection. I huffman mr. Speaker, yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Huffman thank you. This bill, introduced by marshall, would honor the heroism of the armys s of the u. S. First Infantry Division by authorizing the installation of at the first ques Division Monument located in the National Park services park, just south of the white house. These additions would include 600 first of over Division Soldiers who paid the ultimate sacrifice in it Service Nation during Operation Enduringorm, operation freedom, Operation Iraqi freedom, and operation new dawn, ensuring that these Fallen Soldiers are not forgotten. For over 100 years now, soldiers armys first Infantry Division have embodied mission too no difficult, no sacrifice too great, duty first. To rise in strong support of this bill and the brave soldiers of the first ivision, and i want to thank representative marshall for tampaing championing this important legislation. I urge my colleagues to support and reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves the balance of his time. The gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock mr. Speaker, i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Speaker, h. R. 1088, offered by our colleague from kansas, dr. Roger marshall, authorizes the society of the first Infantry Division modify the First Division monument here in washington, d. C. The society seeks to honor its who died during combat in operation desert storm, iraqi freedom, operation new dawn, and freedom. Enduring first Infantry Division of the United States army has served faithfully, with distinction and honor for well now. A century 12,949 heroes of the big red one defense of our constitution and the freedoms it guarantees and our grateful nation remembers their by inscribing them here in our nations capital. Motto, no ith of the mission too difficult, no sacrifice too great, duty first. Time to update and add names to the monument to honor an e heroes and to serve as inspiration and example of the generation whose freedom and security they gave their lives protect. I urge adoption of the measure and reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves. Is gentleman from california recognized. Mr. Huffman mr. Speaker, i reserve. Im prepared to close. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california reserves. The gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock mr. Speaker, ill yield the balance of our to the author of this measure, dr. Roger marshall of kansas. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Marshall i thank my colleague from california, mr. Mcclintock, for yielding. Rise today humbled, a bit emotional in support of the infantry recognition of sacrifice in theater act, also known as the first act. The first act modifies the first infantry Division Monument to the names of nor 60 brave soldiers who paid the ultimate sacrifice for our country during Operation Iraqi operation new dawn, and Operation Enduring freedom. Division monument, located in president s park, was of the white house, first conceived by the society of the first Infantry Division of ommemorate the lives soldiers killed serving our country during world war i. Total of ears, a soldiers es of fallen have been inscribed and commemorated on this monument. Will now take an act much congress to honor the sacrifice act of congress to sacrifices of those 660 recently Fallen Soldiers and ive their families a hallowed place for remembrance. Throughout history, when the president has decided to send harms way to protect american lives and uphold american values, hes always called upon the first Infantry Division. Ndeed, the first Infantry Division, more commonly known as the big red one, has a heroic and storied past. They celebrated their 100th anniversary this year. Over the years they have fought in world war i, world war ii, the cold war, vietnam war, operations Desert Shield and desert storm, the war on terror and as of today multiple operations around the globe. Always first into battle the division fired the very First American shots of world war i, providing the United States its first victory in the war to end all wars. At a battle in france. Despite suffering more than 1,000 casualty the First Division bravely captured the village from jermap force, defended against repeated counterattacks and bolstered the morale of the allies. They returned home in september of 1919 with five medal of honors. Next in world war ii, the first Infantry Division led the way in the allied division of north after character leading to the defeat of the axis africa corps and capturing over 250,000 soldiers. They departed for the invasion of sicily after a specific request from Lieutenant General george old blood and guts patton. There they faced fierce mountain combat and suffered heavy casualties with some units losing over half their fighting strength. Theyd then return to england in preparation for the invasion of norman d. On dday, soldiers from the big red one would once again lead against German Forces at omaha beach, and continue an offensive across france, into germany, suffering 120,000 casualties throughout the war. After the war they provided protection for occupied germany and maintained security at the nuremberg war trials. They played a pivot ol role in world war ii and would return home with 16 members being awarded the medal of honor. The first Infantry Division has been active all over the world, assisting in combat and humanitarian missions for over 100 years. Since their establishment, more than 13,000 soldiers of the division have lost their life in bat. Today soldiers from the division stand at the ready in 15 countries. We sleep peaceful here at home because they stand at the ready abroad. It is our duty in congress to make sure theyre not forgotten by passing the first act and allowing the inclusion of these 660 Fallen Soldiers who paid the ultimate sacrifice. Im proud to represent them as ey continue to continue their continue to con live their model, no duty to difficult. I yield back. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Huffman i want to commend congressman marshall for that moving presentation and the impressive history he recounted of the First Division. This is a great bill, an important bill, i know were all very proud to support it. I aurge yes vote and yield back the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back. The questionis, is, will the house suspend the rules and pass pass the bill h. R. 1088 as amended. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, 2 3 being in the affirmative, the rules are suspended this bill is passed and without objection the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. Without objection, the title amended. For what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition . I move that the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h. R. 1446 as amended. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the bill. The clerk h. R. 1446, a bill to require the United States Postal Service to continue selling a Multinational Species Conservation Fund semipostal stamp until all remaining stamps are sold and for other purposes. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman, and the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, each will control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I ask unanimous consent that all members have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on the measure under consideration. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Huffman i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Huffman i rise in support of h. R. 1446 that requires the United States Postal Service to continue selling the Multinational Species Conservation Funds semipostal stamp and require those sales until the remaining stamps are sold. Since 2010, these stamps have been sold by the Postal Service to support International Conservation efforts but the authorization for these sale has expired, leaving 49 million stamps unsold. Printed, but unsold. Americans care deeply about wildlife and by purchasing these stamp they can support the multinational conservation Species Conservation fund which includes five Grant Programs that support the conservation of african and asian elephants, great apes, marine turtles, rhinos and tigers. Between 2011 and 2017, the stamp sales from this program generated 3. 9 million. That money went to conservation projects related to antipoaching, capacity building, Community Engagement and outreach, habitat restoration, and raising Public Awareness of wildlife trafficking. 49 million stamps have already been printed. They are sitting and waiting to be sold. This bill doesnt authorize the printing of any new stamps. But it does direct the Postal Service to continue selling the is stamps it has printed until they are exhausted. At a time when so many species are threatened with extinction due to climate change, habitat loss and exploitation, we must do more to protect wildlife. Id like to yield five minutes with that, mr. Speaker, i do not have another speaker at this point, ill restemb me ill reserve the balance of my tile. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california is recognized mr. Mcclintock i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Pr mcclintock i thank mr. Clay for his legislation and his being amenable to changes that made this bill one every member can support. This legislation raises money through voluntary purchase of a special stamp that funds valuable conservation efforts of iconic species like tigers, rhino, great apes and marine animals and their habitats. Anyone who wants to support these efforts can do so by purchasing these stamps, and a small amount is deposited into funds used for conservation work around the world. While the authority to sell these popular stamps is expired, a stockpile of 49 million stamps still exists. Mr. Clay accepted amendments to allow the stockpile to be depleted before new stamps are printed that prevents wastage and protects taxpayers. International conservation of these important species is a shared goal of both democrats and republicans and this bill is a very good example of that seemingly rare opportunity for all of us to come together for the benefit of wildlife, their habitat, and of course the American People who enjoy both for generations to come. I urge adoption of the measure and yield back the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back. The gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I thank the gentleman from california. Its good to have bipartisan support for this bill. I am prepared to close, so ill reserve the balance of my time. Mr. Mcclintock i yield back the plans of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back. The question is will the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h. R. 1446 as amended. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, 2 3 being in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed and without objection the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. For what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition . Mr. Huffman i move that the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h. R. 1472. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the bill. The clerk h. R. 1472, a bill to rename the Homestead National monument of america near bee tricks, nebraska, as a homestead historic park. The speaker pro tempore purr uent to the rule, the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman, and the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, each will control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Huff map. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I can unanimous consent that members have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on the measure under consideration. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Huffman i yield myself such time as i may consume. H. R. 1472, introduced by my friend representative smith of nebraska would rename the Homestead National monument of america near beatriz, nebraska, im going to ask him to clarify the pronunciation beatriz. I want full credit for the proper pronunciation, near beatriz nebraska be renamed as the Homestead National historic park. In 1862, president lincoln signed the homestead act and this enabled citizens to own a portion of the vast public lands across the western United States. To commemorate the first claim under the homestead act, congress established the Homestead National monument of america in 1936. Serving as a lasting memorial to the over 1. 6 million claims that built the american west. Today the Homestead National monument of america consists of the first site successfully claimed thunder ehomestead act, the freeman school, a heritage museum, hiking trails, and 100 acres of restored tall Grass Prairie resm designating this important monument as a National Historic park would provide a more accurate and appropriate description of the sites scope and resources and confirm the parks designation to the park service standard. I want to thank my colleague, representative smith, for introducing this bill and urge my colleagues to support h. R. 1472. With that, i reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california reserves. The gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Mcclintock h. R. 1472, offered by our colleague, congressman smith of nebraska, would redesignate the Homestead National monument of america simply as the Homestead National historic park. Congress authorized this in 1936 after acquiring the site of the Daniel Freeman homestead. It was set aside as a lasting memorial to settlers who built the american west. In total, 270 million acres, 10 of all land in the United States, was settled under the homestead act. The name of the monument with the redundant qualifier of america has made it an anomaly within the National Park system. This bill removes that redundancy and conforms more clearly with the naming customs of the National Park service. Redesignating the unit as a National Historic park would further clarify it in keeping with the designations the park service maintains. I urge adoption of the measure and reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves. The gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Huffman i reserve. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman reserves. The gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock thank you, mr. Speaker. Im pleased to yield five minutes to the gentleman from nebraska, mr. Smith, the author of the measure who brings it to the floor today. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Smith thank you. I appreciate my colleagues and their support of our efforts to change the name from Homestead National monument of america to the Homestead National historical park. Obviously some of the reasons have been jut lined, i appreciate the chairman and Ranking Member for bringing this legislation to the floor. Its supported by the entire nebraska delegation and even more importantly, by local stake holders. And as was mentioned, the homestead act of 1862 was signed by president clinton tissue lincoln and it helped shape the american west. It allowed u. S. Citizens to earn ownership of a portion of the vast public lands owned by the federal government across the western u. S. Ultimately the federal government granted title to 10 of the land in the u. S. Through this program. It gave millions a chance to build a new life for themselves, their families, and for future generations. In order to claim a 160acre parcel of land under the homestead act, homesteader was required to be at least 21 years of age or head of a household, build home on the land, improve and farm the land for five years, and pay an 18 filing fee. Homestead act remained in place until 1976 with provisions allowing for homesteading in alaska through 1986. President reagan said the homestead act, quote, ensured that the Great Western prairies of america would be the realm of independent, propertyowning citizens. A mightier guarantee of freedom is difficult to imagine. We are very proud the very first claim under the hem sted act was made by a man named Daniel Freeman near beatriz, nebraska. To commemorate this milestone and millions of other claim, eHomestead National monument was established, also near beatriz. Unfortunately, referring to this as a monument brings images of a single status monument such as a statue or obelisk or a natural feature, not of an extensive park that celebrates the pioneering homesteaders of many years ago. Homestead National Monument consists of a heritage museum, freeman school, and tall Grass Prairie hiking area, farming demonstrations and much more. Referring to this as a historical park would far more clearly describe the site. 9 of firsttime visitors were confused by the name. On bhoof the people of nebraska and particularly the citizens of beatriz and gauge county, nebraska, i appreciate the opportunity to advocate in support of this proposal today. Thank you and i yield back. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back. The gentleman from california is recognized. Reserve, mr. I speaker. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock is my friend ready to close . Yes, i am. N mr. Mcclintock id yield the balance of my time to the mr. Eman from nebraska, fortenberry. The speaker pro tempore without objection. The gentleman from nebraska is recognized. Mr. Fortenberry thank you, speaker. First, let me thank two of my good friends, Ranking Member mcclintock, and chairman huffman, for the cordial and levated discussion today about something that might appear small in the big scheme of things, particularly whats oing on in congress, but nonetheless is a good working part of functioning government on the house floor. This is important to us in and its important to the rest of america and im pleased that my good friend, has essman adrian smith, been working on this effort to rename the Homestead National the ent of america to Homestead National historical park to clear up some confusion. Important change will more accurately reflect the ature and mission of this unique National Service park unit. The homestead act, as we have heard, of 1862, it really did forever change the direction of our nation. Few facts through a that have already been mentioned but i think theyre worthwhile emphasizing. Exchange for the 18 filing fee, and just this, a commitment to improve the land, new u. S. 160 acres and farm wn it outright after five years. Almost inconceivable to us today, but this is how this began. Park service l unit dedicated to telling the of these ary story incredible pioneers is located nebraska. Ce, thank you, chairman huffman, for clarifying how its pronounced, beatrice, nebraska. Area. To represent this its only about 50 minutes from my home in lincoln, so its part of the broad neighborhood of the and third congressional districts. Homestead is located on the site homestead he first claims in the United States, and it commemorates the lives and of these early homesteaders. Harty celebrates those individuals hearty ndividuals who through harsh torms and brutal wind and isolation help grow this country. So this minor name change will clear up any confusion about site because the word monument generally applies a a single individual or uniq unique topographical feature and homestead is so much more. Its a unique piece of open prairie, as we heard, and it the Historical Records of so much many settlers, and so visitors come to learn a little bit more about their ancestors. O, mr. Speaker, id like to particularly recognize one ingler, a mr. Mark friend of the nebraska a egation, who sees us quite ot, and many in the Beatrice Community has made this a gem of treasure to nd a americans. Thank you and i yield back. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back. He gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, yields back. The gentleman from california, mr. Huffman, is recognized. Mr. Huffman mr. Speaker, in closing, this is a good bill. Community of beatrice i just had to say it one more time like that pronunciation is fortunate to be home what will hopefully soon to americas newest historical park, also fortunate represented over the years by these two fine gentlemen from nebraska. This an aye vote on bipartisan and yield the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back. Question is will the house suspend the rules and pass the 1472. R. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, 2 3 having responded in the ffirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed, and without objection the motion to reconsider is laid on the tab table. For what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition . Mr. Uffman thanks, speaker. I move that the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h. R. 1487, as amended. The speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of bill. The clerk h. R. 1487, a bill to direct the secretary of the conduct a special resource study of portions frt los angeles of the los coastal area in the state of california to evaluate alternatives for protecting the resources of the coastal area and for other purposes. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the california, mr. Huffman, and the gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, will control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from california, mr. Huffman. Mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. I ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days to revise and and include remarks extraneo extraneous materials on the measure under consideration. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Huffman i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the recognized. S mr. Huffman thank you, mr. Speaker. My 1478, introduced by colleague, ted lieu of california, would direct the National Park service to conduct resource study to determine the suitability and designating a new Recreation Area along the santa bay coastline or ncorporating the area into the existing Santa Monica Mountains national Recreation Area. Expanding the National Park include this area would significantly enhance and public lands access in one of our nations polluted and , park poor regions, los angeles county. Although our public lands belong many simply ans, dont have the opportunity or the resources to visit these places. Le h. R. 1487 would help us take an ensuring step toward that public lands access exists for all americans, and id like thank my colleague, congressman lieu, forei proposal. G this i strongly urge my colleagues to support this bill and reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the the balance erves of his time. The gentleman from california, mr. Mcclintock, is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock thank you, mr. Speaker. I yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore without objection. R. Mcclintock mr. Speaker, h. R. 1487 authorizes a special resource study for portions of coastal area in california to evaluate lternatives for land management, including designating the coastal area as a unit of the National Park system. I do not oppose authorizing a special resource hope that is area, i congress will complr caution exercise caution before adding amounts of coastline to the existing santa monica recreational onal area which is already struggling to manage its current resources increasingly beginning to resemble lincolns story of a farmer who said, i aint greedy land, i just want what joins mine. Of bad land use management, the vast majority of he same area burned in the massive woolsey fire. 21,000 of the 23,587 of the National Park service acres were burned. Paramount ed the ranch, the 1927 peter straws most most strauss home, of the Ucla Research center, two and an esidences, attached archives building. Urther, the National Park service is already stretched and has a y thin deferred maintenance backlog hat we already discussed in this bill. Although, i recognize this measure authorizes a study and oesnt transfer any land or jurisdiction, its imperative that we take into account the are ties that our parks facing and the devastating management Justice Policy that be described as benign neglect. Weary discovering the discovering, consequences are anything but behind. I urge adoption and i reserve the balance of my time. Tempore the o gentleman reserves. The gentleman from california, mr. Huffman, is recognized. R. Huffman mr. Speaker, i yield to the gentleman from los angeles, mr. Lieu, for as much time as he may consume. The speaker pro tempore the is leman from california recognized. Mr. Lieu thank you, mr. Speaker. Huffman,u, congressman, for your leadership and for supporting this legislation and thank you, congressman for supporting this legislation. I rise in support of h. R. 1487, mountains onica National Recreation ail recreational boundary study act. Ongress preserved national and Historic Sites and to provide educational, cientific area to los angeles community. It includes part of the Santa Monica Bay watershed in my congressional district. Much of the Santa Monica Bay watershed, however, remains outside of the national area. Tion this includes several miles of beaches and acres of wetlands greatly from federal resources. My bill would commission the service to k determine whether to expand the boundary of the existing santa Recreation Area or create a new area altogether. Cover the entire Santa Monica Bay coastline from torrance venus beach to torrance coastline. The conducting the study, National Park service will consult with state and local government groups, community roups, nonprofits and residents. The study would become a basis or future congressional action to modify the borders. Expanding the area would allow benefit from to infrastructure resources, enabling better conservation and recreational use. It would also help federal agencies to enter into cooperative agreements to manage carry out projects, Building Wildlife corridors, and more. This will be ll accomplished without affecting private Property Rights or creating Unfunded Mandates on or local government. The los angeles Coastal Region preserve benefit to open space for conservation, recreation. Have the roud to support of my colleagues in the los angeles delegation. Vote in colleagues to favor of h. R. 1847, and i h. R. 1487, and i yield back the time. Ce of my the speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back. California, from mr. Mcclintock, is recognized. Mr. Mcclintock is my friend ready to close . Mr. Huffman i am. Mr. Mcclintock i yield back caveats i discussed. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from california. I huffman mr. Speaker, urge an aye vote with no caveats nd urge the gentleman and i yield back the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. The question is will the house uspend the rules and pass the bill h. R. 1487, as amended. Those in favor say aye. Those opposed, no. In the opinion of the chair, 2 3 having responded in the affirmative, the rules are suspended, the bill is passed, and without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. Mr. Engel the hong kong human of 2019. Rights the speaker pro tempore the clerk will report the title of the bill. The clerk senate 1838, an amend the Hong Kong Policy act and for other purposes. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from new york, mr. Engel, and the gentleman from smith, will each control 20 minutes. The chair recognizes the gentleman from new york, mr. Engel. Mr. Engel thank you. I ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days to revise and and include remarks 1838. Eous material on s. The speaker pro tempore without objection. Mr. Engel i yield myself such time as i may consume. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Engel thank you, mr. Speaker. The passage of the hong kong and democracy act today will once again demonstrate our support for the people of hong kong. The house passed our version several weeks ago and this version passed the senate as lootrk last night as well, showing that the people of the United States stand with the people of hong kong even during a troubling time. We are seeing violence in unprecedented ways, indiscriminate use of force against students and Chinese Forces manipulating the Security Forces in hong kong. However, as joshua wong said when he was last here with us on capitol hill, just a few weeks ago, the people of hong kong will never walk alone. Thats a quote. Never has this been truer than today. While the of all the abuses and injustices endured by the people of hong kong, holcy challenge that this presents for the United States is far more nuanced. It is my expectation that when implementing this legislation, secretary of state will understand congressional intent that this legislation is designed to help u. S. Government and the u. S. Congress better evaluate the erosion of hong kongs autonomy and ultimately stem the tide of chinas aggressive behavior toward the people hong kong. Our objective is not to punish hong kong but help preserve and protect hong kongs autonomy in the face of beijings flay grant disregard for flagrant disregard for one country, two systems which they promised. We believe its in the National Security interest of the United States to protect the autonomy of hong kong. It is with that intent that this entire legislative exercise has been undertaken. I hope that in evaluating how to apply the mandates in this bill, this administration and any future administration will give the best interests of the people of hong kong the highest consideration. I reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from new york reserves the balance of his time. The gentleman from new jersey is recognized. Thank you very much, mr. Speaker. First of all, i want to thank the distinguished chairman and Ranking Member, mr. Mccall, for their strong support for thevert, both bills that are up today. I would like to thank the speaker for her leadership as well. Madam speaker, mr. Speaker, since the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre 30 years ago, ive had the privilege of working with colleagues on both sides of the aisle, including especially speaker pelosi, jim mcgovern, my good friend and chairman of the china commission, congressman frank wolf, a former member who was tenacious in his fight for human rights and the rule of law and democracy for the people of china. We have always believed that every person deserves better than the brew tlity so many endure in the systematic violation of their universally recognized human rights. Chinas ruthless dictators do not agree and they are driven, they are obsessed, to tighten their control. Today, mr. Speaker, hong kong is burning. The status quo is no longer. The brutal government crackdown on democracy activists has escalated. Tragically, under president xi, human rights abuse throughout china has significantly worsened including the pervasive use of torture, religious persecution, Human Trafficking and genocide against muslim uighurs. Last month, president