once again dredging up lies about the 2020 election, just six weeks before the iowa caucuses. this afternoon, trump accused president biden of, quote, waging an all-out war on american democracy, and his chain hand campaign handed out these signs, you can see it on the screen, "joe biden attacks democracy." the former president told supporters at another rally today that he hopes judges will let him prosecute the 2020 election, and encouraged them to go into ballot tabulating facile at this times in 2024 to, quote, guard the votes. kristen holmes has been following the trump campaign today. she's in cedar rapids, iowa, for us. kristen, what's the latest? >> reporter: yeah, jim, essentially, this is the most forcible rebuttal we've seen from former president trump to the argument that president biden has routinely made, that a second trump term would be a threat to democracy. he even vaguely referenced a speech that biden gave in september when he talked about maga republicans to be a threat to democracy and american institutions. listen to some of what trump had to say. >> so, if joe biden wants to make this race a question of which candidate will defend our democracy and protect our freedoms and i say to crooked joe and he is crooked, the most corrupt president we've ever had, we will win that fight, and we're going to win it very big, very big. >> reporter: so, jim, what exactly is he saying is a threat to democracy? he's touched on a number of things. he said it's about try ing toll control vehicles you drive, but most of what he has been focused on, unsurprisingly, is the allegations against him, the multiple indictments that he has faced, and this argument that he has continued to make donald trump, that this is election interference. saying that biden is interfering with democracy, he's been charged because of these subpoenas, indictments, arrests. that is the core of why he is saying that joe biden is having an assault on democracy. i also want to read to you one thing he said directly. he said his campaign is a, quote, righteous crusade to liberate our republican. clearly, here, a forceful rebuttal to what president biden has been arguing over and over again, that former president trump is a threat to democracy. we're going to be keep listening here, he's obviously still going, he seems to be going a little bit off-track, but we'll have ears open to listen to his messaging. a clear pivot to the general election, as he is leading in most polls here in iowa, just six weeks ahead of that caucus. >> yeah, sounds like a lot of classic trump projection there. he was the one that tried to overturn the 2020 election results, it was his supporters who tried to overturn the election results by storming the capitol, and so on on january 6th. and just to ask you a followup question, kristen, you had some new reporting this week, not everybody in the republican party is onboard with trump's renewed focus on obamacare. i think trump said earlier this week, something along the lines of, quote, obamacare sucks, but that's not what the polls show. >> well, jim, that is exactly what he said, he said that he wanted to come up with an alternative. first, he said he wanted to replace obamacare, then he wanted to come up with an alternative, which, a lot of republicans were alarmed by, given the fact that even when he was in the white house and they had a full control of republican po power in washington, they were unable to return obamacare. and another thing to mention here is that trump said he was going to come up with a health care plan, but never did present a plan there. but democrats are seizing on that, not surprising. obamacare is more popular, and it's not something that republicans really want to go after again unless there is a clear path. now, we'll show you, i think we have some of it cut here, but the biden campaign actually launched an ad in response to this, slamming trump, saying that he wants to take away health care. this has given them a new sense of ammunition in this potential general election match-up in 2024. >> yeah, the biden campaign will welcome that fight on obamacare. okay, kristen, thank you very much, reporting from iowa for us. we know we have many of these events coming up for you, so, we appreciate it. come very tough rulings in the trials of former president donald trump this week. a federal judge ruling the former president is not immune from criminal prosecution, just hours after a separate appeals court had a similar ruling on civil liability. let's discuss w. judge chatutkan did not mince words, writing, in part, trump's four-year service as commander in chief did not bestow on him the devivine right of kings. judge chutkan almost seems to relish, a little bit, soft of getting up in trump's grill, if i can use nonlegal parlance. >> she's a good writer. she's a tough writer. she's a very sharp judge. and in this case, a lot of these cases, turn, they win or they lose, on what happens before the trial. what the judges do on these big legal questions. donald trump was making a very big bid here to get this case tossed, saying that because he had been the president at the time that this had happened, he had some protections, he wanted there to be an immunity because of the constitution, because of the presidency, and judge chutkan said, this just isn't in the constitution. it's not what the people who wrote the constitution wanted to allow for presidents. and that if former presidents didn't have the ability to be prosecuted for things that they did in office, then that would not be part of what the constitution wants us to have as equal justice under law. she says it's essential to be able to bring cases like this to have justice work in this country you and so, she denied these claims from donald trump, these arguments he was making, that this is a really big issue that has to get settled, and now we have the judge ruling on this and saying, let's go, we're going to move to trial. there are a couple other things she has to look at and say whether she will, you know, toss certain charges in this case, and some other things, he's argued that this was the big one. >> yeah, sounds like the trump defense strategy is to say immunity then, immunity now, immunity forever. he wants immunity from everything. what's your analysis of what came down from the judge yesterday? >> i think it's a very good analysis, very sound, just like in the civil matter, the court of appeals recently was very sound, too. i do think from my legal analyst perspective, it's a little bit of much ado about nothing about the constitutionality issue. it's so fact-specific to this particular president, i mean, yeah, it will arise again the next time we have a former president running for re-election that's charged with 91 counts. so, he's trying to yield the first amendment as his defense here. it's all pretty much a red herring, because common sense, non-lawyers would say, of course a former president can't have a permanent get out of jail free card. it makes perfect sense not to do that. but our legal system tries to be so far that no matter how off the argument is, you have to wind through the system. and of course this will cause more delay, but on a legal grounding, it's very, very solid. >> i want to ask you about that in just a moment. we saw a similar ruling from an appeals court on the issue of these civil lawsuits, sounds like similar outcome. >> yeah, a lot of people, including judge chutkan, were waiting to see what the d.c. circuit would do on these civil lawsuits. a bunch of people filed lawsuits against donald trump, trying to hold him accountable for january 6th, that attack on the capitol. my count, eight lawsuits, at the very least, were all on hold, including a lawsuit before judge chul chutkan. he sai she said, this decision come out from the d.c. circuit, it say, there's no ability to have immunity broadly for what donald trump was saying and doing before he was president. there's a different between presidential speech and campaign speech, even if you are stitting president running for re-election. there is going to be an opportunity for donald trump in these lawsuits to go and argue the facts, whether or not what he said on january 6th was part of his campaign or whether it was part of his governance, but that decision is another really big one that judge chutkan even cited in her criminal case decision. we have an appeals court weighing in now on this question of immunity, and those cases, too, are going to be able to go forward, at least a little bit, for now. >> yeah. and shan, do you think we're going to see this issue of presidential immunity end up at the supreme court? and to that end, it goes back to the point you were saying earlier, if they keep throwing these things out in front of these judges, various challenges on all sorts of different grounds, i mean, one would think, at some point, they're going to be successful in delaying some of these trials, and maybe the federal election interference trial that has been scheduled for march may not happen in march if they're success successful. what do you think? >> i think there's plate good chance they'll succeed. the one in florida, about the classified documents issue, it's complicated, just on the logistics, because there's classified material. in d.c., no question jack smith tried to really streamline this, maximize the chances of doing it fast. chat chutkan's moving very fast. i think the supreme court will probably take the case, just because it screams constitutional issue, i wish they wouldn't take it. >> yeah. and the immunity question in the criminal case in d.c. with judge chutkan january 6th, that has to be settled before trump goes to trial. it has to be as a right for a criminal defendant. >> yeah, they could decline to take it to the court of appeals, but i don't think they will. >> do you think the supreme court could say, yes, you have immunity in that case? >> i think it's legally very unlikely. they haven't been fans of his arguments and this seems like a no brainer. >> allll right, very good. thank you, guys, really appreciate it. coming up, we're following some breaking news. a news conference in los angeles under way right now. we're going to show it to you -- there it is -- about a possible serial killer targeting the homeless. we'll break that down for you in just a few moments. you're live in the "cnn newsroom." breaking news. police in los angeles have just made a major announcement in a manhunt for a possible serial kill whole allegedly murdered a number of homeless people in recent days. camila bernal is with us from l.a. what are we learning? >> reporter: hey, jim. so, now we know that a man has been arrested, not just for three killings, but authorities now saying they believe this man is responsible for four different killings. killing three people that were unhoused here in los angeles, and then also following someone home, robbing them, and killing them, as well. and so, police now saying this is a man they hope to prosecute after this arrest. that is the current focus. i want you to listen to what the police chief just said as this press conference is ongoing. >> this afternoon, it is with tremendous pride that i announce their collective work, in concert with the work of los angeles sheriff's department, beverly hills police department, has resulted in the identification and arrest of the individual we believe is responsible for these vicious crimes. tragically, that same individual is also believed responsible for the murder that occurred during a follow-home robbery, making this suspect responsible, we believe, based on our investigation, for the murder of four individuals over the course of four days. >> and this is a los angeles resident, 33 years old. authorities announcing that arrest just moments ago. and saying that this has been the work of the task force of everybody coming together, trying to identify this person. they were also able to identify a vehicle, and that's really what led them to that arrest. they say that vehicle was spotted in the different areas where they believe the unhoused people were murdered. and say that during this past week, what this man essentially did was walk up to homeless individuals, shot them, and left. these were people who were sleeping on the streets, who were alone, and who were in open areas, whether that was a sidewalk or an alley, and that's how authorities dwan sort of connecting the dots, by seeing these killings. they say the first one happened on sunday at around 3:00 in the morning. the second, on monday just after 5:00 in the morning, and wednesday, 2:30 p.m. they said that the victims were two hispanic men and one black man. now, we do not know the identity of that fourth person that authorities now say was killed, as well. we're obviously getting all of that information right now as that press conference is ongoing, but this, of course, had taken los angeles over the last 24 hours, because this is a city that houses so many unhoused individuals, and so, authorities just asking people to be careful, to contact family members that they knew lived on the streets, to really try to warn them and to make sure they had a safe place to sleep at night, because so many people were worried about what could happen over the next couple of days. now, authorities saying they have the person they believe is responsible. they'll now focus on that prosecution and what comes next. they still say they do not have a motive, they do know that he was targeting unhoused individuals, but in terms of why he was doing it, they say that's obviously part of that ongoing investigation, and eventual prosecution, jim. >> all right, very disturbing case. camila bernal, thank you very much for that report. we appreciate it. israel says it has hit more than 400 targets in the 24 hours since the truce ended. can they forge another agreement to stop the fighting? a live report from tel aviv is next. now to the latest in the middle east. intense fighting has picked back up in gaza after a nearly week-long truce ended between israel and hamas. the israeli military says it carried out more than 400 strikes in ga saza since the tr expired yesterday. israel's recalled its team of negotiators from qatar, saying talks are at a dead end over the remaining hostages held in gaza. matthew chance is live in tel aviv with more on all this. matthew, any sense as to how israelis are reacting to this collapse in hostage negotiations? >> reporter: well, i think israelis are divided about it. obviously it's disappointment there haven't been more handovers of hostages, that truce, that pause in the fighting to allow for those hostage releases, it's been very successful for seven consecutive days. and, you know, and then it basically fell apart. and for the past two days, there's been a return to the kind of intensive violence that we saw in the period before the truce was declared. and so, there's been a lot of impact on palestinians on the ground. there have been up to 400, according to the israeli military, strikes on separate targets inside the gaza strip. and, of course, the impact that has on the hostages is something that many israelis are profoundly concerned about. there was a vigil earlier today in the center of tel aviv here, where thousands of people turned out to show their support for the 130 or so hostages that are still inside the gaza strip. some of them chanting, you know, kind of messages, such as, "everyone out now, everyone now, everyone now." that's what everyone was chanting. and a lot of criticism that we heard from people inside that crowd of thousands of people that the government is not doing enough to prioritize the release of those hostages. that's what they want. of course, the country is divided on that. united in the sense that everybody wants the hostages released. but they're divided in how the best way to do that is. there are some in the government that believes the current run of hostage releases has run its course and now is the time to apply as much military pressure as possible to hamas in order to force them back to the negotiating table and to get more hostages set free, but you know, regardless, it's a very political, emotional issue in this country right now, as you can imagine, jim. >> absolutely. and any sense as to how the hostage talks might get restarted? is it just a matter of time, at this point, matthew? what do you think? >> well, i think ultimately, it is, and i think ultimately, there will have to be further negotiate for more hostages to be let out, i mean, that's what the israeli government says they're doing. they're saying they've restarted this military campaign. with the express purpose of putting as much military pressure as possible on hamas, because they say that's the best chance that the hostages inside the gaza strip have of being set free. and so, you know, at some point, it's going to have to be a meeting again of the various mediators and various sides to try and hammer out some kind of deal. the sticking point, as far as the israeli sources that i've been speaking to are concerned, is the ratio, or one of the sticking points, the ratios of palestinian prisoners released for every hostage. it's 3 to 1 at the moment. so, ten hostages released, 30 palestinians released from israeli jails. when it comes to the men, many of them who are serving in the israeli military who are held hostage, hamas are going to want a much higher ratio. they're going to want more prisoners released than they get for the women and children. so, that is just one of the obstacles facing the mediators in this current period. >> all right, matthew chance, thank you for that reporting, as always. we appreciate it. nearly two months after hamas' brutal assault on israel, new details are emerging on the massive failure of israeli intelligence. security experts have wondered how israel, with such a strong reputation for its intelligence community, could have missed a massive terrorist attack that killed some 1,200 people. this week, "the new york times" reported that israeli officials knew of hamas' plan more than a year before the attack. israeli authorities obtained a blueprint, but dismissed the plans as aspirational. joining me now to talk about this is former defense secretary william cohen. secretary cohen, great to see you, as always. what is your sense of all of this, the israeli government, intelligence community, you know this all too well. very strong reputation globally for the intelligence apparatus in israel. how did they miss this? how did they get it wrong? >> i think it's a combination of arrogance and ignorance. arrogance that they had very little regard for hamas, thinking that it was all aspirational, they didn't have any particularly talent or capability. and so, it was sort of -- we can handle it under any circumstances, they're not really a threat. the ignorance comes about in terms of, they didn't have sufficient evidence for them, at least, except for one woman in the -- woman analyst who said, this is something, it's very close to what we know they've been planninging and yet she was disregarded. so, they just assumed that they were superior, that hamas were inferior, incapability, and you had one woman who had the intelligence, she had it, others had it, but she believed that her assessment was the accurate one, and she was dismissed. a woman has to prove herself much more capable than a man in order to be called successful. >> and i -- this is another key question in all of this. when it comes to accountability, israeli officials have said they will investigate the intelligence failures when the war is over. isn't that a bit of a copout, considering how long that could potentially take? the israelis said they're going to continue on with this for months. they haven't set a timetable for when this might be over. it's going to be over, they say, when hamas is wiped out. what if this goes on for a long time? what is your sense of that, when you hear that? >> well, the difficulty is that the israeli people are divided. they want the hostages back, they're not happy with netanyahu, but they have a governing consensus right now, netanyahu and others in his -- in his group. if that were to split, then the israelis are looking at a divided government, they don't want that, they want a way forward, so, i think bibi netanyahu is counting on the israeli people to stand behind him for the time, but the handwriting is very clear on the wall. a failure of this magnitude, i don't think any leader could possibly stay in power beyond the time, if this is ever settled, if there's ever an end to this war, i don't think any leader who presided over the failure of intelligence can survive. but bibi netanyahu has been there for some 16 years. anything is possible. he's just holding out, hoping that he'll remain after the war, if there is an end to it. >> right. and i did want to move to the next stage of what the israelis hope to do in gaza. as you know, the bide administration has been stepping up some pressure on israel to minimize civilian casualties in gaza. i know you've probably seen some of these reports that leaflets are being dropped, they're trying to send out text messages and other messages to smartphones so people in harm's way can get out of harm's way. does all of that sound realistic to you? after all, palestinians were moved to move out of the northern part of gaza to get out of harm's way, down to the southern part of gaza, and now, the israelis plan to go into the southern part of gaza to some extent. what is -- what do you make of all that? >> well, i cited golda before, the israelis have a secret weapon, they have no place to go. well, gaza has no place to goal, and israel will keep pulverizing what they believe to be military targets. and hamas has wrapped themselves inside the innocent civilians, saying, you can kill as many as you want, we're winning the public relations war. and i thought tom friedman had a very interesting piece over the weekend where he said israel should make a proposal to hamas, saying, we'll have a cease-fire, and you just turn over all of the hostages you have, and put the burden on hamas to say, no, you keep killing us, you keep killing all of our innocent civilians, and so, you shift the burden to hamas, rather than on israel now, which is bearing the burden of public relations, seeing them no longer as a victim, but more of a villain, so, i think tom's proposal, interesting, i think it has some merit, and looking, what is success? if israel is to succeed in dismantling hamas, who takes over gaza at that point? is it going to be the israelis? is it going to be an international group? is it going to include any of the arab nations? all of those questions need to be asked now, rather than later. so, i think listening to tom friedman, i think he had an interesting proposal to shift the burden, at least, to hamas, where all the killing is taking place, because they could solve the problem right now, just by releasing the hostages they have. >> absolutely. and at this point, that does not appear to be anywhere in sight. secretary cohen, as always, really appreciate the insights, great questions you raise this evening. thank you again so much for your time. appreciate it. >> appreciate it. >> all right, good to talk to you, sir. in the meantime, george santos has been expelled from congress, and now there is a rush to fill his open seat. his former opponent joins us live next. we'll talk to him in just a few moments. you're live in the "cnn newsroom." there he is. voters will soon get the chance to decide who will replace former congressman george santos. santos was expelled from the house on friday, in an historic vote, after an ethics committee report found evidence that he broke federal laws and stole from his campaign. santos is also facing nearly two dozen federal charges related to identity theft, wire and credit car fraud. the locks to his office are not the only thing changing the republicans' razor thin majority in the house. new york gove no kathy hochul now has to declare a special election to replace santos, which should be right around the corner. joining us to discuss, robert zimmerman, the democratic candidate that lost to george santos in last year's elections. i'm sorry to say that, bob, i know every time it comes up -- >> great reception, jim. >> probably stings a little bit every time it's said. >> good to be with you. >> are you going to take another crack at this? >> i told the political leadership, because -- in new york state, when we have a special election, it's the political leaders who choose the nominee, and for the democrats, it will be, of course, jake jay could bes, the nassau county chairman, congressman greg meeks, the queens chairman. they'llcon susulting with the governor and with hakeem jeffries. this is so much more than me, j jim. it's critical for queens and nassau county th, and so, i madt clear, i'm there to help. >> and what is your reaction to santos being expelled? and i have to ask, maybe you've been asked this before, but were there any rumblings at the time that there was all this wacky stuff in his background that -- one would think, if you knew all that, you would have used that against him at that time. >> we certainly tried. >> okay. >> we certainly did. i mean, frankly, there's an enormous sense of relief to see him out of congress. not a moment of celebration, because he should have been removed much earlier, and too many republicans were basically accomplices to his crimes by protecting him and keeping him in congress. let me point out to you, when i ran, george santos has been running for congress for four years. during those four years, the local republicans never did opposition research or investigated him, though they nominated him. the person who ran before me against him never did opposition research into him, either, but won that race. and when i ran, the democratic congressional campaign committee prepared an 87-page book and they nailed a lot of issues, they missed a lot of issues, too. and i've got through a lot of pints of haagen-dazs discussing that. but we took what we could prove and we focused on it in our campaign. many of the issues -- many of the red flags we turned to the media on. and as many of your cnn contributors have pointed out who work in the media, the press focuses on the marquee races and oftentimes, because of a lack of resources, they don't have the ability to do the investigative work that's needed. that's a real problem. but we did have local media on long island, like north shore leader, lang slate media, to try to sound the alarm. >> right. and they were on top of this, they were the ones that broke a lot of this. let me ask you this. some republican lawmakers say the reason they voted against expelling santos is because he had not been convicted of a crime as of yet. what do you make of those claims? >> let me tell you, it's so offensive and such a deciisgracl comment. they had access to all sorts of secret information that campaigns don't have, the media doesn't have, as does the department of justice. they proved that he committed an identity theft, he stole money, he stole credit cards, they documented not just the lies, but the crimes he committed. and the idea that republicans would use that as an excuse to say that, because he wasn't found guilty in a court of law -- being a convicted felon should not be the standard to being dismissed from congress. when the ethics committee points out crimes committed, that should concern everyone and mobilize everyone. i heard one lawmaker say, all of us have sin in us. this is not about sin. this is about criminal behavior. and it took a year, but it happened. >> and what are the prospects, you know this district well. what are the prospects for democrats flipping this seat back to the democratic column? as you know, the republican majority in the house is so razor thin at this point. and what does it say about some of these other -- because one of the linchpins of the house republicans taking over the house the last time around were these other new york seats, the seats that may be more favorable to joe biden, may have been more favorable in joe biden in 2020 and might be favorable to him in 2024. how critical are those seats that are currently held by new york republicans, and democrats getting the house back? and what are the prospects for getting your district back? >> you know, jim, the path to the majority runs through new york. and it's always a mistake in political analysis to look at a presidential election where the turnout has a maximum high level for democrats and republicans and compare that to a gubernatorial year. it turns out to be 75% amongst democrats in a presidential year. when i ran, the turnout was 51% amongst democrats and 64% amongst republicans. so, the point i'm making is, when you analyze what we're facing in our district, this special election, you have to understand, it's going to be a very close race, a very tough race. this is not the old third congressional district that steve israel and tom swazzy represented. it's significantly more republican. we had a republican landslide that lost us five districts. in my district, the entire democratic ticket lost to the republicans. i proudly ran ahead by five points of most of them, but even chuck schumer, the most popular public official in new york state, lost our district. that's how republican the districts have become. we have to work very hard at reaching sw ing swing voters. and quite frankly, we have the issues to run on to get that done. i feel like we're going to win, but it's going to be a tough fight. >> let me ask you to listen to how some of the voters in your district feel about george santos and get your response. >> i don't like him. because he's a crook, because he's a liar. because i just don't like him. >> i think the people on long island made a mistake. at the beginning. >> yeah, what's it going to take to restore faith for voters who feel burned by this? they're going to think, oh, every politician who comes along is just another george santos. >> trust me, i feel burned, too. i feel their pain, in a very real personal way. it's more than just my congressional district. it's my home. i've lived here since i was 9 years old. built my business here, went to school here. and the worst part of santos' crimes is how he destroyed people's confidence in our democratic system and frankly, for a year, we've not had representation. i get more calls from people, constituents in the district looking for help for passport assistance, senior cadre, becaue his office doesn't function. it's going to take, frankly, both parties and i think democrats will do it the best, making it clear that we're here for them, we're meeting the voters where they are, we're speaking to their issues, addressing affordability, addressing protecting or democracy, speaking up for public safety, gun safety, we have to be able to do that in our campaign, i'm sure we will. i believe we can. i believe we can restore confidence for people in your district, but trust me, it is a real -- our district was betrayed by george santos and i don't care what he does with his life, if he's on "dancing with the stars" or runs as donald trump's running mate. he may not be qualified. we have to get back to representing our district and now we can turn the page and do that. >> all right, robert zimmerman, thank you very much for your time. appreciate it. >> always good to be with you, jim. >> good to talk to you, thank you so much. in the meantime, we are introducing you to this year's top ten cnn heroes. you can vote for your favorite hero, we're only about a week away from announcing the 2023 cnn hero of the year. meet alvin irby and his barbershop books. >> what's up, man? how are you doing? we install a child-friendly reading space in the barbershop. we literally ask little black boys, what do you like to read? and then those are the books that we distribute to our national network of barbers. use the opportunity, when they're sitting in the chair to just talk to them about books. many black boys are raised by single mothers. so, there's this opportunity to support barbers in becoming -- how is the book going so far? -- black male reading role models. i'm just excited that we get to create a safe space for boys to do something that is really life-changing. that's what i really believe reading is. it unlocks potential. >> go to cnn heroes.com right now to vote for alvin as cnn's hero of the year or any of your favorite top ten heroes. voting ends on december 5th. asking that question every morning. so, what is the answer? is this about building machines and humans -- >> that is the far-off fear. he says he's carrying on with this research because the cat's out of the bag, and also, the benefits to mankind, to human kind could be so great. he said there's a possibility in 20 years we could cure every disease known to man. we could also find a source of endless cheap, clean fuel that could save us from a fossil fuel fate, but the risks, and we dive into them deeply, you know, the military risks, will there be a robot that will select a without a human making a decision? the tech is already there. i chatted to a dutch military commander and he told me stuff that made my hair stand on end. i had to make sure i was hearing him right and i had to make sure there wasn't a language barrier. the dutch have good english and it freaks me out. >> yeah, it freaks me out too. i watch all of those terminator movies and it feels funny that we are even having this conversation but there are real implications the need to be talked about, no doubt about it. >> i am not a tech reporter, which i think is a benefit here. this is not a tech story, it is a story about humankind, philosophy, economics, history, geography, sociology, i mean, this is everything. this tech is in our lives whether we realize it or not. that is only going to increase and we all have to face up to this. you can't bury your head in the sand and say oh, a.i., whatever. for me, this was one of the greatest privileges i've ever had as a reporter, getting access to these people to figure out what is coming down the pipe, what will hit me and everybody. >> sounds like an amazing assignment. nick, thank you very much. we will be watching. be sure to tune in. an all new episode with a whole new story with anderson cooper, one whole story, one whole hour. nick watt talking about a.i. and the future of humanity. catch it 8:00 p.m. eaststern and we are back in a moment. tomorrow morning, , join us to discuss israel's military tactics. amid the starts and stops, what is next in the wara live tomomorrow momorning at 10 first time i connected with kim, she told me that her husband had passed. and that he took care of all of the internet connected devices in the home. i told her, “i'm here to take care of you.” connecting with kim... made me reconnect with my mom. it's very important to keep loved ones close. we know that creating memories with loved ones brings so much joy to your life. a family trip to the team usa training facility. i don't know how to thank you. i'm here to thank you.